Hi,
I updated the plugin-testing tools to work with Maven 3.1.0 to help Manfred get
the Android Maven Plugin's test harness working with 3.1.0. A couple things:
1. There is an @Override for a method implemented for an interface which you
can only start doing in Java 1.6 and the compiler was
1) No opinion.
2) No opinion.
3) HUGE +1
Thanks for your efforts! :-)
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 1:54 PM, Jason van Zyl ja...@tesla.io wrote:
Hi,
I updated the plugin-testing tools to work with Maven 3.1.0 to help Manfred
get the Android Maven Plugin's test harness working with 3.1.0. A couple
+1 (binding)
On 23 July 2013 14:59, Stephen Connolly stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.comwrote:
This vote is to cover the minimum required version of Java for Maven Core.
Maven Plugins produced by the Apache Maven Project that are flagged as
compatible with older versions of Maven Core as their
This vote is to cover the minimum required version of Java for Maven Core.
Maven Plugins produced by the Apache Maven Project that are flagged as
compatible with older versions of Maven Core as their baseline will still
require to stick to the minimum Java requirements of that Maven Core
version.
On Tue, 23 Jul 2013 14:59:49 +0100
Stephen Connolly stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 (non binding)
tony.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
+1, unsure if you could have muddied the essentially simple question
much more, but OK. :-p
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 4:00 PM, Stephen Connolly
stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 (binding)
On 23 July 2013 14:59, Stephen Connolly
stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.comwrote:
This vote is to
+1000 which is a rather odd number for a vote; blame Stephen instead
of me. :)
I think we can skip the 1.6 release of the JDK as a Maven basis; JDK 1.6 is
at or near EOL and the step from one
minimum JDK version to another (i.e. JDK 1.7) would be just as painful as
the step to JDK 1.6 -
On 23 July 2013 15:29, Lennart Jörelid lennart.jore...@gmail.com wrote:
+1000 which is a rather odd number for a vote; blame Stephen instead
of me. :)
I think we can skip the 1.6 release of the JDK as a Maven basis; JDK 1.6 is
at or near EOL and the step from one
minimum JDK version
Hi all,
First of all STFB.
My name is Gilles Seghaier, I'm a 25 years old french computer engineer
working for TIBCO Sofware Inc. at Paris (France).
I have developed with Maven since 2012, implementing some custom plugins to
integrate my company solutions into Maven's ecosystem, helping
Sure, go for it. Create a patch and attach it to the jira ticket.
/Anders (mobile)
Den 23 jul 2013 16:58 skrev Gilles Seghaier gilles.segha...@gmail.com:
Hi all,
First of all STFB.
My name is Gilles Seghaier, I'm a 25 years old french computer engineer
working for TIBCO Sofware Inc. at
+1 (non-binding)
/Anders (mobile)
Den 23 jul 2013 16:00 skrev Stephen Connolly
stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com:
This vote is to cover the minimum required version of Java for Maven Core.
Maven Plugins produced by the Apache Maven Project that are flagged as
compatible with older versions of
+1 (non-binding)
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 8:59 AM, Stephen Connolly
stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com wrote:
This vote is to cover the minimum required version of Java for Maven Core.
Maven Plugins produced by the Apache Maven Project that are flagged as
compatible with older versions of Maven
+1 non binding.
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 10:33 AM, Jeff Jensen
jeffjen...@upstairstechnology.com wrote:
+1 (non-binding)
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 8:59 AM, Stephen Connolly
stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com wrote:
This vote is to cover the minimum required version of Java for Maven
Core.
First of all STFB.
I just have to ask... what is STFB? :) I can think of a few things
that might work but none seem appropriate.
Wayne
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
+1 from me as well.
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 7:01 PM, Dennis Lundberg denn...@apache.org wrote:
Hi
It has been almost five years since I made the last release of
maven-idea-plugin. The features in IDEA to integrate Maven has been greatly
improved since then, making our own plugin obsolete. I
Hi,
The vote has passed with the following result:
+1 (binding): Arnaud Héritier, Robert Scholte, Stéphane Nicoll, Ralph
Goers, Stephen Connolly, Olivier Lamy, Kristian Rosenvold, Wayne Fay,
Brett Porter, Dennis Lundberg
+1 (non binding): Lennart Jörelid, Anders Hammar, Baptiste Mathus, Chris
+1
Le 23 juil. 2013 16:30, Lennart Jörelid lennart.jore...@gmail.com a
écrit :
+1000 which is a rather odd number for a vote; blame Stephen instead
of me. :)
I think we can skip the 1.6 release of the JDK as a Maven basis; JDK 1.6 is
at or near EOL and the step from one
minimum JDK
Hi,
This is the final release of this plugin. After this release it will
be retired, see separate vote thread for more info on that.
We solved 1 issue:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11135styleName=Htmlversion=14478
There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
+1 from me.
On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 11:13 AM, Dennis Lundberg denn...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
Now that we have Maven 1 at End-Of-Life, I think it's time to retire
Maven One Plugin as well. It has been almost six years since the last
release. I therefor propose that we retire maven-one-plugin.
+1 from me.
On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 7:26 PM, Dennis Lundberg denn...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
The only consumer of Maven Model Converter we have left at the Apache
Maven project is Maven One Plugin. If the vote for the retirement of
Maven One Plugin succeeds we should also retire Maven Model
Hi,
The vote has passed with the following result:
+1 (binding): Arnaud Héritier, Hervé Boutemy, Wayne Fay, Stephen
Connolly, Ralph Goers, Brett Porter, Dennis Lundberg
+1 (non binding): Lennart Jörelid, Baptiste Mathus
I will continue with the steps required to retire this shared component.
Hi,
The vote has passed with the following result:
+1 (binding): Olivier Lamy, Robert Scholte, Arnaud Héritier, Hervé
Boutemy, Wayne Fay, Stephen Connolly, Ralph Goers, Brett Porter,
Stephane Nicoll, Dennis Lundberg
+1 (non binding): Anders Hammar, Lennart Jörelid, Baptiste Mathus
I will
+1 from me.
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 8:23 PM, Dennis Lundberg
dennisl.apa...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
This is the final release of this plugin. After this release it will
be retired, see separate vote thread for more info on that.
We solved 1 issue:
Just realized that this might have got stuck in moderation since I
used the wrong From address...
On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 4:01 PM, Dennis Lundberg
dennisl.apa...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I had a look at, and fixed https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MRRESOURCES-69
When I first saw the issue I
+1
Arnaud
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 8:17 PM, Baptiste MATHUS m...@batmat.net wrote:
+1
Le 23 juil. 2013 16:30, Lennart Jörelid lennart.jore...@gmail.com a
écrit :
+1000 which is a rather odd number for a vote; blame Stephen
instead
of me. :)
I think we can skip the 1.6
+1 nb
On Jul 23, 2013 4:00 PM, Stephen Connolly stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com
wrote:
This vote is to cover the minimum required version of Java for Maven Core.
Maven Plugins produced by the Apache Maven Project that are flagged as
compatible with older versions of Maven Core as their
Am 2013-07-23 15:59, schrieb Stephen Connolly:
This vote is to cover the minimum required version of Java for Maven Core.
Given than most companies/folks react only when something has been
discontinued, I would move to Java 6 as a baseline not before Christman
2013. First release in 2014
+1
Jeff
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 9:40 PM, Michael-O 1983-01...@gmx.net wrote:
Am 2013-07-23 15:59, schrieb Stephen Connolly:
This vote is to cover the minimum required version of Java for Maven Core.
Given than most companies/folks react only when something has been
discontinued, I
Hi,
This will be the final release of this shared component. After this
release it will retire from the Apache Maven project and move to the
Apache Archiva project. See separate vote thread about that.
We solved 6 issues:
On Tuesday, 23 July 2013, Michael-O 1983-01...@gmx.net wrote:
Am 2013-07-23 15:59, schrieb Stephen Connolly:
This vote is to cover the minimum required version of Java for Maven Core.
Given than most companies/folks react only when something has been
discontinued, I would move to Java 6 as
BIG +1 for 6, and small -1 for 7 for my own selfish reasons. The old
versions will always be available, and are forkable for anyone that needs a
fix, hence small -1 and not crying and moaning.
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 4:51 PM, Stephen Connolly
stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com wrote:
On 23 July
+1
On Tuesday, 23 July 2013, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
Hi,
This is the final release of this plugin. After this release it will
be retired, see separate vote thread for more info on that.
We solved 1 issue:
+1 (binding)
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 3:59 PM, Stephen Connolly
stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com wrote:
This vote is to cover the minimum required version of Java for Maven Core.
Maven Plugins produced by the Apache Maven Project that are flagged as
compatible with older versions of Maven Core
+1 (non-binding)
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 10:59 PM, Dennis Lundberg denn...@apache.orgwrote:
+1 (binding)
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 3:59 PM, Stephen Connolly
stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com wrote:
This vote is to cover the minimum required version of Java for Maven
Core.
Maven Plugins
+1 binding
Wayne
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 8:59 AM, Stephen Connolly
stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com wrote:
This vote is to cover the minimum required version of Java for Maven Core.
Maven Plugins produced by the Apache Maven Project that are flagged as
compatible with older versions of Maven
+1 binding
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
+1
2013/7/23 Stephen Connolly stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com:
This vote is to cover the minimum required version of Java for Maven Core.
Maven Plugins produced by the Apache Maven Project that are flagged as
compatible with older versions of Maven Core as their baseline will still
require
+1
2013/7/23 Stephen Connolly stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com:
This vote is to cover the minimum required version of Java for Maven Core.
Maven Plugins produced by the Apache Maven Project that are flagged as
compatible with older versions of Maven Core as their baseline will still
require
I'm cool with that.
+1
PS: The EOL date for Java 1.5 was not just for zOS, it applied to all
platforms for the IBM JDK, AIX and Linux included.
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 8:42 AM, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote:
+1
2013/7/23 Stephen Connolly stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com:
This vote
Hey All.
In the RTC/Jazz forum, a request came up for the ability to associate a
Work Item with the commits that the SCM plugin does.
On the Jazz side, I think that I've worked things out.
However, I am unsure as to how to best do this on the maven and scm
provider side.
The generic question
Why Java 6 ? Seriously. It does not add any value to Maven compared to
Java 5. Java 7 is what provides new APIs Maven could benefit from. Why
give up on Java 5 in favour of Java 6 ?
--
Christian
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Greetings,
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 8:59 PM, Christian Schulte c...@schulte.it wrote:
Why Java 6 ? Seriously. It does not add any value to Maven compared to
Java 5. Java 7 is what provides new APIs Maven could benefit from. Why
give up on Java 5 in favour of Java 6 ?
Politics is a strong and
Am 07/24/13 03:10, schrieb jieryn:
Greetings,
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 8:59 PM, Christian Schulte c...@schulte.it wrote:
Why Java 6 ? Seriously. It does not add any value to Maven compared to
Java 5. Java 7 is what provides new APIs Maven could benefit from. Why
give up on Java 5 in favour
Greetings,
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 9:52 PM, Christian Schulte c...@schulte.it wrote:
Why change '-target 1.5' to '-target 1.6' without any requirement to do
so ? Either stay with '-target 1.5' or introduce something which
requires '-target 1.6' as a justification. Don't get me wrong. I don't
Am 07/24/13 04:00, schrieb jieryn:
Move forward or die. If you are stuck on 1.5, you can continue to use
a full stack that is already supported. I am so sick of hearing people
complain that they will be broken if a JDK migration to a newer
version is undertaken. No, you are not broken, you
+1
2013/7/24 Dennis Lundberg denn...@apache.org:
Hi,
This will be the final release of this shared component. After this
release it will retire from the Apache Maven project and move to the
Apache Archiva project. See separate vote thread about that.
We solved 6 issues:
+1
2013/7/24 Dennis Lundberg dennisl.apa...@gmail.com:
Hi,
This is the final release of this plugin. After this release it will
be retired, see separate vote thread for more info on that.
We solved 1 issue:
47 matches
Mail list logo
