Re: [VOTE] Configure IDE plugins to download sources by default within Maven projects

2007-07-04 Thread Edwin Punzalan
+1 Its in my settings.xml too. On 7/3/07, Mark Hobson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Following the recent thread Maven POM plugin config, this is a vote to add downloadSources=true to both the eclipse and idea plugin configurations in the maven-parent POM: [ ] +1: I like Javadoc and easy

Please review maven-eclipse-plugin

2006-07-17 Thread Edwin Punzalan
Ooopps! I sent the other one to the user list... :( Here are the changes I've made: - created three sample usages: - attaching library sources - preventing module references - providing project natures and build commands - added three FAQ entries - some fixes to improve site

Re: Trying to understand the POM inheritance chain for plugins

2006-07-17 Thread Edwin Punzalan
Sounds odd, bec both the eclipse and idea plugins are generating 10 of the project reports in my machine. I even ran it on javadoc and found the same 10 reports. I do agree about the checkstyle plugin being placed inside the pom but not configured... since its there, we might as well fix

Re: Maven 2.x Resource Plugin Documentation needs Reviewing

2006-07-18 Thread Edwin Punzalan
Hi, --- index.html This, thus, allows the separation ... should be Thus, this allows the separation... --- encoding.html encodingUTF-8/aggregate should be encodingUTF-8/encoding ^_^ FA Valencia See wrote: Good day, I would like to ask for some help reviewing M2's

Re: Please review maven-eclipse-plugin

2006-07-18 Thread Edwin Punzalan
On 7/18/06, Edwin Punzalan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ooopps! I sent the other one to the user list... :( Here are the changes I've made: - created three sample usages: - attaching library sources - preventing module references - providing project natures and build commands - added three

Please review maven-compiler-plugin

2006-07-18 Thread Edwin Punzalan
Hi, I've just created the staging site for this plugin: http://people.apache.org/~epunzalan/maven-compiler-plugin/ and would appreciate your feedback/comments. Thanks in advance. ^_^ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL

Re: Please review maven-compiler-plugin

2006-07-19 Thread Edwin Punzalan
Done, thanks. Staging site updated. Dennis Lundberg wrote: Edwin Punzalan wrote: Hi, I've just created the staging site for this plugin: http://people.apache.org/~epunzalan/maven-compiler-plugin/ and would appreciate your feedback/comments. Thanks in advance. Here's my review

Re: Please review maven-eclipse-plugin

2006-07-19 Thread Edwin Punzalan
Updates applied. Staging site, updated. Thanks. ^_^ Dennis Lundberg wrote: Edwin Punzalan wrote: Ooopps! I sent the other one to the user list... :( Here are the changes I've made: - created three sample usages: - attaching library sources - preventing module references

Re: Review surefire plugin documentation

2006-07-25 Thread Edwin Punzalan
Allan, Here are the things I found that may need improvement: index.html - Examples section, usecases should be use-cases. usage.html - All of the providers support the following configuration., where are the configurations? Allan Ramirez wrote: Hi everyone, Just updated the

Please review maven-assembly-plugin site documentation

2006-07-26 Thread Edwin Punzalan
Hi, I've made some changes to the documentation of the Assembly plugin and would like to hear your inputs about it. - made the plugin docck-compliant - edited the descriptions inside the modello files - edited some of the parameter descriptions - added an faq page - added some single

Re: Please review maven-assembly-plugin site documentation

2006-07-26 Thread Edwin Punzalan
Assembly Plugin on page headings - added the Usage section in index.html Again, thanks to the reviewers. NOTE: The link to the javadoc plugin will fail bec the javadoc plugin isn't in there. :P ^_^ Edwin Punzalan wrote: Hi, I've made some changes to the documentation of the Assembly plugin

Re: Please review maven-assembly-plugin site documentation

2006-07-30 Thread Edwin Punzalan
Hi, Thanks for the review. Please see my inline comments below... Dennis Lundberg wrote: Hi Edwin I have committed a fix for a few typos. Here are some additional comments om the assembly plugin documentation: assembly-mojo.html - archiverManager, artifactResolver and repositoryAssembler

Re: [discuss] A new name for the repository manager?

2006-07-31 Thread Edwin Punzalan
I agree. Although its name is not bad, I think we can still think of a better name than just plain Repository Manager. Although I do not object to naming the list as [EMAIL PROTECTED], I am also willing to wait for better names that may come out. Brett Porter wrote: Hi, I was

Re: Please review maven-assembly-plugin site documentation

2006-07-31 Thread Edwin Punzalan
staging site updated with a patch from MASSEMBLY-130 applied. Again, thanks for the reviewers. ^_^ Edwin Punzalan wrote: Hi, I've made some changes to the documentation of the Assembly plugin and would like to hear your inputs about it. - made the plugin docck-compliant - edited

Please review maven-ear-plugin site documentation

2006-07-31 Thread Edwin Punzalan
Hi, I've made some changes to the documentation of the EAR plugin and would like to hear your inputs about it. - made the plugin docck-compliant - separated the usage examples into separate example pages - added an faq page - added some single project examples A staging site is currently

Re: Please review Changelog plugin documentation

2006-08-01 Thread Edwin Punzalan
Hi, Here are my comments: * usage.html - replace the word m2 with Maven - explain the default configuration values used (when running the plugin without any configuration) - A user would like to see a sample report generated by this plugin. Can you provide one like what Allan did for the

Re: Please review maven-ear-plugin site documentation

2006-08-01 Thread Edwin Punzalan
/ /artifactTypeMappings /configuration http://docs.jboss.org/jbossas/jboss4guide/r2/html/ch13.html Otherwise, this is really really good!! Thanks, Stéphane On 7/31/06, Edwin Punzalan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I've made some changes to the documentation of the EAR plugin and would like

Re: Please review maven-ear-plugin site documentation

2006-08-01 Thread Edwin Punzalan
Staging site updated with the following modifications: - modules should start with lower case letters - proper way of handling faq entry #2 - added mini-guide for the solution to faq entry #2 - fixed copy/paste errors in modules configuration page Edwin Punzalan wrote: Hi, I've made some

Re: [discuss] A new name for the repository manager?

2006-08-03 Thread Edwin Punzalan
+1 for Curator ^_^ nhb wrote: Hi, Brett invited me to post an idea or two I had to the list: Maven Curator # The person responsible for developing and maintaining collections. http://www.lib.unc.edu/instruct/manuscripts/glossary/ # A person who catalogs and cares for artifacts after

Re: maven-resources-plugin Checkstyle

2006-08-03 Thread Edwin Punzalan
If IDEA is correct, it can be declared final bec it didn't find any other classes setting its value. Also, the naming would suggest that author meant it to be final. The tests also passed if after I changed it to final. So I'd declare them as final. Franz Allan Valencia See wrote: Good

Re: is everyone subscribed to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

2006-08-03 Thread Edwin Punzalan
With regards to this, I tried fixing the Maven Assembly Plugin test failures... but I need a SNAPSHOT of file-management in maven-shared which is not deployed yet. I then deployed a snapshot of maven-shared-io which is required to build the file-management project. Then I get to build the

Re: applying patches

2006-08-09 Thread Edwin Punzalan
I'll look into some of them... ^_^ Brett Porter wrote: Does anyone have time to apply an occasional patch? I keep track of them and I now count 223 outstanding. I know many are sometimes a bit off base, but there's two problems with this: - we have potential fixes for issues already - we

Re: svn commit: r430355 - /maven/plugins/trunk/maven-one-plugin/pom.xml

2006-08-10 Thread Edwin Punzalan
Hi, my bad. I'll revert asap. I had my settings.xml configured for snapshots repositories, both for codehaus and apache. Apparently when I tried building this plugin, maven didn't find any 2.0.5-SNAPSHOT so I thought the dep was wrong and changed it to 2.1-SNAPSHOT since the trunk is

Re: Progress update Re: [VOTE] Rename repository manager

2006-08-14 Thread Edwin Punzalan
expressed a preference for a single one other than proposing it): Brian Fox, Allan Ramirez, Maria Odea Ching, Edwin Punzalan, Brett Porter, Wendell Beckwith We will create mailing lists: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Then, SVN will be renamed and I'll put together a beta

Re: continuum project release white site

2006-08-29 Thread Edwin Punzalan
at the bottom? Cheers, Brett On 29/08/2006, at 2:07 PM, Edwin Punzalan wrote: Hi, After consulting with Brett, we've come up with the white site for releasing projects using continuum. Brett, if I missed something, please do remind me. I've deployed here for your viewing: http

Re: svn commit: r441469 - in /maven/continuum/branches/release-integration/maven/maven-release-plugin/src: main/java/org/apache/maven/plugins/release/ main/resources/META-INF/plexus/ test/resources/or

2006-09-18 Thread Edwin Punzalan
I'll fix this asap. Thanks. Brett Porter wrote: On 08/09/2006, at 8:50 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: epunzalan Date: Fri Sep 8 03:50:09 2006 New Revision: 441469 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=441469 Log: PR: CONTINUUM-727 +private final int phaseSkip = 0,

Re: Building continuum

2006-10-25 Thread Edwin Punzalan
CONTINUUM-970 has been created for this... you can apply the patch there in your local copy if you want. Hope that helps. ^_^ Martin van den Bemt wrote: Hi everyone, Building continuum is kind of a pain and is not working out for me. The problem may be due to the apache snapshot repo

Re: Test failure in continuum-release

2006-10-27 Thread Edwin Punzalan
Did that failure just return? I tried building it and I didn't get the failure. I remember evenisse fixed something like this. Again, was probably caused by the outdated snapshot repo, this time for the maven-scm. Installing maven-scm locally should do the trick. And again, someone should

Re: Maven on Nabble

2006-10-30 Thread Edwin Punzalan
This is good. Great work. ^_^ Eric Redmond wrote: Interesting. I'll do it. On 10/29/06, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Anyone interested in this? Begin forwarded message: From: Will Lin [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 26 October 2006 2:10:53 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL

Re: maven-release-manager: Request for all snapshot releases to be deployed with attached sources

2006-11-01 Thread Edwin Punzalan
release manager can be found here: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/shared/trunk/maven-release-manager Barrie Treloar wrote: Can any snapshot releases also have the source attached as part of the deployment? There is an error filed at http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/CONTINUUM-968 which

Re: maven-release-manager: Request for all snapshot releases to be deployed with attached sources

2006-11-01 Thread Edwin Punzalan
The trunk for maven-release-manager fails bec somehow, the exception thrown has been changed in the latest snapshot of maven-scm. I'll fix the failure in a while. Barrie Treloar wrote: Can any snapshot releases also have the source attached as part of the deployment? There is an error

Re: maven-release-manager: Request for all snapshot releases to be deployed with attached sources

2006-11-01 Thread Edwin Punzalan
Trunk is now fixed in svn. Edwin Punzalan wrote: The trunk for maven-release-manager fails bec somehow, the exception thrown has been changed in the latest snapshot of maven-scm. I'll fix the failure in a while. Barrie Treloar wrote: Can any snapshot releases also have the source

Re: [VOTE] Release Checkstyle Plugin

2006-11-06 Thread Edwin Punzalan
+1 ^_^ Joakim Erdfelt wrote: Hi, It has been 5 months since the last release of the maven-checkstyle-plugin, Since then, there have been numerous fixes to correct various site generation failures, updated maven ruleset, some cleanup of the report layout, header refactoring, revised

Re: svn commit: r473592 - /maven/shared/trunk/maven-web-ui-tests/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/shared/web/test/AbstractSeleniumTestCase.java

2006-11-18 Thread Edwin Punzalan
hmm... didn't know such a plugin exists is it in codehaus ? Jason van Zyl wrote: Just curious but any reason why this is not in a Selenium plugin? Jason. On 10 Nov 06, at 7:29 PM 10 Nov 06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: epunzalan Date: Fri Nov 10 16:29:18 2006 New Revision: 473592

Re: Is this still an issue?

2006-12-03 Thread Edwin Punzalan
Fix version is 2.0.5... so you'll have to wait for the next release or use the latest snapshot to use the fixed version David Whitehurst wrote: Is this still an issue? I don't understand the comments. http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-2261;jsessionid=atZK5r5j2N8bRm0-m5 I want to use an

Re: [VOTE] Release MWAR Plugin

2006-12-03 Thread Edwin Punzalan
+1 John Tolentino wrote: Hi Everyone, The latest version (2.0.2-SNAPSHOT) of the maven-war-plugin is now deployed to the snapshot repo. We'll also have the license stuff resolved before doing any release. For your reference of features included in this release:

Re: svn commit: r485552 - in /maven/archiva/trunk: archiva-core/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/archiva/scheduler/executors/ archiva-webapp/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/archiva/web/action/admin/ arch

2006-12-13 Thread Edwin Punzalan
oh, yeah. Sorry about that, wasn't intentional... i'll edit my comment in there, thanks Brett Porter wrote: Edwin, You should list who submitted the fix in the comment. - Brett On 11/12/2006, at 7:30 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: epunzalan Date: Mon Dec 11 00:30:32 2006 New

Re: problem with separation of java and resources

2006-12-19 Thread Edwin Punzalan
I'm not sure if eclipse supports it, but with IDEA, the package view keep the resources and the java sources together. Joerg Hohwiller wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi there everybody, from the separation of concerns view of the maven plugins I can see the point in

Re: Can't launch jetty on TRUNK

2006-12-20 Thread Edwin Punzalan
you can set it in cli, -Dappserver.base=C:\EclipsePack\continuum\trunk\continuum-webapp\target ^_^ Christophe LECHENNE wrote: Hi all, After a successful build, when I try to start continuum as it's written in README.txt, I've got : java.io.FileNotFoundException:

Re: Surefire sources missing?

2006-12-26 Thread Edwin Punzalan
try here: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/surefire/trunk ^_^ TslH wrote: Hello, I wanted to have a look to Surefire plugin, in order to see why TestNG 5.xdon't work with it. But when I browsing SVN, I can't find surefire sources. I'm trying to get them through:

Re: Surefire sources missing?

2006-12-26 Thread Edwin Punzalan
/source-repository.html, since it's awfully outdated. Have a nice day. 2006/12/26, Edwin Punzalan [EMAIL PROTECTED]: try here: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/surefire/trunk ^_^ TslH wrote: Hello, I wanted to have a look to Surefire plugin, in order to see why TestNG 5.xdon't work

Re: Surefire sources missing?

2006-12-26 Thread Edwin Punzalan
that's ok. Merry christmas! ^_^ TslH wrote: Awfully was not the right word, I apologize. Another trick played by my bad english ;) 2006/12/26, Edwin Punzalan [EMAIL PROTECTED]: The site was last published Nov 7... and the source repository was moved Dec 20. Its just a bit outdated

Re: [vote] Barrie Treloar as a Maven Plugins committer

2007-01-03 Thread Edwin Punzalan
+1 Brett Porter wrote: I'd like to propose we make Barrie a committer. He has contributed a lot of small patches, and recently seems to be the does it work on Windows? watchdog. He in particular has done a lot with the assembly plugin and has also dug into some of the components in Plexus to

Re: [vote] Establish a list of emeritus committers

2007-01-05 Thread Edwin Punzalan
+1 Brett Porter wrote: Hi, Vote to operate as - requiring 2/3rds of the PMC to vote (13), with a majority within those votes for it to pass (ie, add them all and if the result is 0). Other votes would be welcome with reasons as advisory, but not binding. - Votes can be changed at any time

Re: svn commit: r502089 - /maven/release/trunk/maven-release-plugin/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/plugins/release/PrepareReleaseMojo.java

2007-01-31 Thread Edwin Punzalan
Brett, Its failing in phase check-dependency-snapshot phase... the phase uses project.getArtifacts() which is not populated when its missing Brett Porter wrote: Edwin - can we double check the requirement here. I recently removed this to prevent the problem of it failing if you haven't

Re: svn commit: r502089 - /maven/release/trunk/maven-release-plugin/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/plugins/release/PrepareReleaseMojo.java

2007-01-31 Thread Edwin Punzalan
getArtifacts() be changed to getDependencies() without changing the meaning? (Sorry, I haven't looked, I just know the dep resolution was problematic) - Brett On 01/02/2007, at 2:54 PM, Edwin Punzalan wrote: Brett, Its failing in phase check-dependency-snapshot phase... the phase uses

Re: svn commit: r502089 - /maven/release/trunk/maven-release-plugin/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/plugins/release/PrepareReleaseMojo.java

2007-01-31 Thread Edwin Punzalan
in the repository already, as it was working for me... Can the code using getArtifacts() be changed to getDependencies() without changing the meaning? (Sorry, I haven't looked, I just know the dep resolution was problematic) - Brett On 01/02/2007, at 2:54 PM, Edwin Punzalan wrote: Brett

problem releasing artifacts using expressions as versions

2007-02-01 Thread Edwin Punzalan
Please see: http://mirrors.ibiblio.org/pub/mirrors/maven2/org/codehaus/plexus/security/plexus-security/1.0-alpha-8/plexus-security-1.0-alpha-8.pom Its clear that the release manager failed to update the expression definition of the dependency versions. Fixing this bug will be easy if only

**/pom.xml is part of the ignore list during the check-for-local-modifications phase within the release process

2007-02-08 Thread Edwin Punzalan
Hi, I've seen that **/pom.xml is being ignored for local modifications during a release... Although that doesn't seem right because when the release is committed, the changes will become part of the release process, I have found a use for it when dryRun=true... that is, to test a release of

Re: **/pom.xml is part of the ignore list during the check-for-local-modifications phase within the release process

2007-02-08 Thread Edwin Punzalan
Kenney Westerhof wrote: Edwin Punzalan wrote: Hi, I've seen that **/pom.xml is being ignored for local modifications during a release... Although that doesn't seem right because when the release is committed, the changes will become part of the release process, I have found a use

Re: **/pom.xml is part of the ignore list during the check-for-local-modifications phase within the release process

2007-02-08 Thread Edwin Punzalan
Brett Porter wrote: On 09/02/2007, at 6:44 AM, Edwin Punzalan wrote: AFAIK the reason the poms are excluded is because they're modified by the release process; if the check for local modifications is run after the pom is modified, it's impossible to do a release. So this could probably

Re: about Maven release-plugin

2007-02-11 Thread Edwin Punzalan
What is it that you want the release-plugin to do? If you just want to specify a different version than what is recommended by the plugin when it prompts them, then it should be safe to do without any problems. ^_^ Guijie (Maggie) Ma wrote: Hi, I'm a user of Maven and Maven is very

Re: about Maven release-plugin

2007-02-11 Thread Edwin Punzalan
If we want the release-plugin deal with this automatically, what problem dose it have? Can the developers give us some suggestion or help? Thank you! Maggie Ma Edwin Punzalan [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2/11/2007 4:21 AM What is it that you want the release-plugin to do? If you just want

Re: about Maven release-plugin

2007-02-11 Thread Edwin Punzalan
automatically? I have attached the snapshot of the release-prepare. Thanks! Maggie Edwin Punzalan [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2/11/2007 8:05 PM I don't think there will be any problems if you put in the configuration all the versions you will want to use. Continuum have a similar process too

Re: about Maven release-plugin

2007-02-11 Thread Edwin Punzalan
unfortunately, you can't. If in continuum, the user is prompted for all the versions. What the plugin does however is suggest a default, which is what it currently does. Of course, the default isn't always appropriate for all cases, but generally it should suffice. If you want a new

Re: about Maven release-plugin

2007-02-11 Thread Edwin Punzalan
well although this about Maven and modules *may* be true, the release plugin can release the modules with a different versions than what is declared in the parent. That's why the release plugin prompts for the release/dev versions even though the project will inherit them. If you specified

Re: svn commit: r507397 - in /maven/continuum/trunk: continuum-core/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/continuum/scm/ continuum-model/src/main/mdo/ continuum-webapp/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/continuu

2007-02-13 Thread Edwin Punzalan
hahaha! nice catch... I guess I'm depending too much with my IDE. I'll do it, thanks. ^_^ Brett Porter wrote: On 14/02/2007, at 4:49 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -ScmRepository repository = getScmRepositorty( project ); +ScmRepository repository =

Re: State of the Archiva (Feb 2007)

2007-02-21 Thread Edwin Punzalan
I like this... good thing archiva have people like you ;) ^_^ Joakim Erdfelt wrote: I hope to have this 'State of the Archiva' be a fairly regular report here in the archiva-dev@maven.apache.org mailing list. Here, the Past, Present, and Future of Archiva will be outlined. :: PAST ::

Re: build loop feature 4 continuum?

2007-02-22 Thread Edwin Punzalan
That's odd. Mine doesn't build a project if there are no SCM changes. The projects in my Continuum instance are from an SVN repo. Maybe its an SCM-related problem. What's your SCM provider? Are you sure there aren't any changes? [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: can I configure that a clean

Re: build loop feature 4 continuum?

2007-02-23 Thread Edwin Punzalan
Message- From: Edwin Punzalan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 23, 2007 6:42 AM To: continuum-dev@maven.apache.org Subject: Re: build loop feature 4 continuum? That's odd. Mine doesn't build a project if there are no SCM changes. The projects in my Continuum instance

Re: build loop feature 4 continuum?

2007-02-27 Thread Edwin Punzalan
org.apache.maven.continuum.buildcontroller.DefaultBuildController). so no starteam provider problem here, thanx -Original Message- From: Edwin Punzalan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 23, 2007 6:42 AM To: continuum-dev@maven.apache.org Subject: Re: build loop feature 4 continuum? That's odd. Mine doesn't build

Maven Repository Manager - Proxy

2006-01-20 Thread Edwin Punzalan
I've been looking at both proximity and maven-proxy features for reuse with the MRM proxy. I would like to ask you guys what you think on these features: - browsable repositories - maven-proxy browsability is on a per-repository browsing - proximity browsability is a view of

Re: svn commit: r369655 - in /maven/repository-manager/trunk/maven-repository-indexer/src/test: java/org/apache/maven/repository/indexing/MetadataRepositoryIndexingTest.java repository/test/maven-meta

2006-01-26 Thread Edwin Punzalan
Sorry... I'll get those fixed soon... thanks. ^_^ Brett Porter wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +public void testExceptions() + throws Exception +{ +//test when the object passed in the index(..) method is not a RepositoryMetadat instance +

Re: svn commit: r371476 - in /maven/repository-manager/trunk/maven-repository-indexer

2006-01-26 Thread Edwin Punzalan
About the FLD_ID, the delete method for a document cannot have more than one Term object for groupId, artifactId, and version so an ID is used. i apologize about the others, I'll fix them right away... Brett Porter wrote: I think this is a possible NPE... [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +

Re: svn commit: r374306 - in /maven/repository-manager/trunk/maven-repository-utils: pom.xml src/main/java/org/apache/maven/repository/ArtifactUtils.java src/test/java/org/apache/maven/repository/Arti

2006-02-08 Thread Edwin Punzalan
I think one of the commits after this fixed it. ^_^ Brett Porter wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Modified: maven/repository-manager/trunk/maven-repository-utils/pom.xml URL:

Re: MRM Patches

2006-02-15 Thread Edwin Punzalan
great! Patch applied... thanks. Odea Ching wrote: maven-repository-application.patch file: - fix error in IndexSearcherCli - changed ArtifactRepositoryIndexSearcher searcher = indexFactory.createArtifactRepositoryIndexSearcher( index ) to DefaultRepositoryIndexSearcher searcher =

Re: svn commit: r382337 - in /maven/repository-manager/trunk/maven-repository-webapp: ./ src/main/java/org/apache/maven/repository/manager/web/action/ src/main/java/org/apache/maven/repository/manager

2006-03-08 Thread Edwin Punzalan
sorry, just got to read this now... will change it now. Thanks. Emmanuel Venisse wrote: I think it will be better to use a logger instead of System.out.println in DiscoverJob. Emmanuel [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit : Author: epunzalan Date: Thu Mar 2 01:53:40 2006 New Revision: 382337 URL:

Re: [vote] Fabrice Bellingard as a plugins committer

2006-03-10 Thread Edwin Punzalan
+1 ^_^ Brett Porter wrote: Hi, Fabrice worked on the JXR plugin, fixed a number of bugs in the original library and improved the mojo. Active on the users list, with a particular interest in the site plugin, I believe would be a good addition to the project. Please vote: [ ] +1 [ ] +0

Re: [vote] Brian Fox as a plugins committer

2006-03-10 Thread Edwin Punzalan
+1 ^_^ Brett Porter wrote: Hi, Brian has done a great job in keeping the mojo project in order and has developed the dependency plugin there, which we previously indicated we'd like to have as a part of the Maven plugin artillery. He has also actively helped on the users list and

Re: [vote] Release Maven 2.0.3 (third RC)

2006-03-10 Thread Edwin Punzalan
+1 (what's non-binding?) ^_^ John Casey wrote: Hi again, I wanted to let everyone know that we've got the latest round of regressions fixed, including: * Fabrizio's lingering path problems from MNG-2006 * MNG-2136 * MNG-2124 * MNG-2130 These fixes also took care of some other

Re: Migration complete: changes, changelog, jxr and surefire report plugins

2006-03-22 Thread Edwin Punzalan
fyi, I've seen changelog and it already uses maven-scm Brett Porter wrote: I've been in favour of this since day 1. JXR, for example, is almost entirely shared. For changelog, this will happen by refactoring to Maven SCM. For changes/jira/announcement, it will be by refactoring around

Re: [vote] John Tolentino as a Maven Plugins and Repository Manager committer

2006-03-27 Thread Edwin Punzalan
+1 ^_^ Brett Porter wrote: Hi, John has been helping out on the users list, plugins and the repository manager for some time. I'd like to propose we give him commit access. [ ] +1 [ ] +0 [ ] -1 Cheers, Brett - To

Re: [vote] Maria Odea (Deng) Ching as a Maven Plugins and Repository Manager committer

2006-03-27 Thread Edwin Punzalan
+1 ^_^ Brett Porter wrote: Hi, Like John, Deng has been helping out on the users list, plugins and the repository manager for some time. I'd like to propose we give her commit access. [ ] +1 [ ] +0 [ ] -1 Cheers, Brett

Re: [vote] Jesse McConnell as a Maven Plugins committer

2006-03-27 Thread Edwin Punzalan
+1 ^_^ Brett Porter wrote: Hi, I think we all agree we need more keen people helping out with plugins! Jesse has been contributing on the users list and mojo project for some time, and has recently contributed several patches to the Apache Maven plugins, tests for the clean, compiler and

Re: svn commit: r406865 - /maven/plugins/trunk/maven-assembly-plugin/src/test/resources/assemblies/plexus-components.xml

2006-05-16 Thread Edwin Punzalan
hmmm... you're right. Seems like assembly is excluding all META-INF/plexus/components.xml and creating/adding the temp file for it even if the file is NOT in include and/or is excluded. This IS a bug. I'll create a jira issue for this Brett Porter wrote: META-INT? [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: What is filtered in assembly's FileItem

2006-05-16 Thread Edwin Punzalan
when filtered is true, it means expressions like ${project.build.directory} inside the file is replaced with the actual value when used in your pom.xml dan tran wrote: Hello, I am trying to fix http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MASSEMBLY-100 and having trouble understanding the purpose of

Re: svn commit: r408479 - /maven/sandbox/issue/rissue/README.apt

2006-05-21 Thread Edwin Punzalan
hi. sorry, but i can't update my windows svn copy of this bec there's already readme.apt. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: jvanzyl Date: Sun May 21 13:13:00 2006 New Revision: 408479 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=408479view=rev Log: (empty) Added:

Re: Cannon generate maven-checkstyle-plugin site

2006-05-21 Thread Edwin Punzalan
Fixed in svn. Thanks. Grzegorz Słowikowski wrote: Hello Checkstyle plugin site checkstyle mojo has no content: http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-checkstyle-plugin/checkstyle-mojo.html I tried to generate it myself from sources. It fails with an error during xml parsing for trunk and

Re: checkstyle plugin and propertyExpansion

2006-05-21 Thread Edwin Punzalan
${basedir} has backslashes... and is parsed wrongly by: p.load( new StringInputStream( propertyExpansion ) ); Carsten Karkola wrote: We have our own checkstyle config with some file references. I tried to use them with plugin groupIdorg.apache.maven.plugins/groupId

Re: Configure plugins through settings.xml

2006-06-07 Thread Edwin Punzalan
Although not a real solution, but I have a workaround for some of the use cases. Some parameters of the plugins similar to ${parameter} can be configured inside settings.xml... just use properties. ^_^ Tomasz Pik wrote: Hello, It's currently not possible but generally I think it would

Re: svn commit: r413818 - in /maven/repository-manager/trunk: maven-repository-discovery/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/repository/discovery/ maven-repository-discovery/src/test/java/org/apache/maven/

2006-06-13 Thread Edwin Punzalan
is distributed on an AS IS BASIS, + * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. + * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and + * limitations under the License. + */ + +/** + * @author Edwin Punzalan + */ +public interface Discoverer

Re: [Proposal] Documenting Maven

2006-06-15 Thread Edwin Punzalan
Definitely deserves +1 However, I'm still torn between using apt and a wiki site but whichever wins I think the obvious casualty will be the site-plugin. If we continue on using the pages generated by the site plugin, and based from John Casey's Core Documentation point #2, it will be a

Re: source:jar-with-dependencies?

2006-06-16 Thread Edwin Punzalan
Have you tried using the assembly plugin for this? The assembly plugin can work on project sources and/or binaries. Ovidio Mallo wrote: Hi, a few days ago I have posted a request on the Maven user list for some way to create a source bundle for an artifact which not only includes the

Re: Snapshot of maven-changes-plugin?

2006-06-16 Thread Edwin Punzalan
2.0-beta-2-SNAPSHOT can be found here: http://snapshots.maven.codehaus.org/maven2/org/codehaus/mojo/changes-maven-plugin/ Jochen Wiedmann wrote: Hi, is there a snapshot of the maven-changes-plugin available somewhere? I would like to do a release Apache XML-RPC, where I am using this

Re: Snapshot of maven-changes-plugin?

2006-06-16 Thread Edwin Punzalan
The url I gave have the snapshot timestamped on Jan 13... The latest is already in apache and no snapshots have been deployed yet. Jochen Wiedmann wrote: Hi, is there a snapshot of the maven-changes-plugin available somewhere? I would like to do a release Apache XML-RPC, where I am using

Re: source:jar-with-dependencies?

2006-06-17 Thread Edwin Punzalan
do not have any work-around in mind for your problem. Ovidio Mallo wrote: Edwin Punzalan wrote: Have you tried using the assembly plugin for this? The assembly plugin can work on project sources and/or binaries. I have already looked at the assembly plugin as it would be the most intuitive

Re: svn commit: r415252 - in /maven/sandbox/plugins/maven-docck-plugin/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/plugin/docck: AbstractCheckDocumentationMojo.java CheckPluginDocumentationMojo.java

2006-06-19 Thread Edwin Punzalan
Heheh, I didn't notice that... I just copied that from the other class. ^_^ btw, is that supposed to be 2006 only or 2001-2006 ? I remember Carlos said I'd change only the latter part Brett Porter wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: + * Copyright 2001-2005 The Apache Software Foundation.

Re: [jira] Closed: (MSITE-149) version tag is ignored for plugins in the reporting section of the POM

2006-06-21 Thread Edwin Punzalan
This issue was re-opened for the docs... and i've updated the docs so I closed it. Brett Porter wrote: Was this actually fixed, or Cannot reproduce? - Brett On 19/06/2006 7:46 PM, Edwin Punzalan (JIRA) wrote: [ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MSITE-149?page=all ] Edwin Punzalan

Re: Plugin documentation standard

2006-06-22 Thread Edwin Punzalan
May I add, based from the currently deployed site, the first page you get after clicking the plugin name, is Project Info - About which is a replica of the page Project Reports - Plugin documentation just fyi Pete Marvin King wrote: I think it's a good idea to be able to pull

Re: Reference to plugin's pom.xml during build.

2006-06-26 Thread Edwin Punzalan
You can put any artifact as a dependency (whether it contains classes or just plain text files doesn't matter ) and then you can get files from it using the classloader Resource. Marcin Maciukiewicz wrote: Hello! I'm working on Maven plugin for building project using 3rd party tools.

Re: Questions about the docck plugin

2006-06-26 Thread Edwin Punzalan
Regarding the scm tag, only warnings are produced from them, as what brett stated in his doc standard email. Brett Porter wrote: On 27/06/2006 8:48 AM, Dennis Lundberg wrote: Hi all I've had a look at the docck plugin and I like what I see so far! A couple of questions that popped up

Re: jdeveloper plugin donation

2006-06-27 Thread Edwin Punzalan
There are classes inside maven-eclipse-plugin which are meant to be extended/used by IDE plugins. Is it not worthwhile to extract it into a separate artifact first, before working on another IDE plugin? After that, the idea plugin should also be updated to use it. Just my two cents. ^_^

Re: generated plugin documentation: opinions?

2006-06-28 Thread Edwin Punzalan
+1 I see no generated pages showing these anywhere... ( or am I blind? ^_^ ) Jesse McConnell wrote: could it show the class lvl phase and goal settings and perhaps if it requiresDependencyResolution and that sort of thing? nice improvement though :) jesse On 6/28/06, Brett Porter [EMAIL

Re: generated plugin documentation: opinions?

2006-06-28 Thread Edwin Punzalan
+1 for moving the default value. A lot of the other comments want the default value at the top of the page. Showing the default value in a sentence is nice too. It just somehow becomes complicated because expressions functions somewhat like a default value, too. Any suggestions on how to

Re: generated plugin documentation: opinions?

2006-06-28 Thread Edwin Punzalan
Should the page below suffice for a cheat sheet? http://maven.apache.org/developers/mojo-api-specification.html I think its too much info for a beginner since its meant for a plugin developer... maybe someone here knows of a similar page meant for a user? Mike Perham wrote: For

add prerequisites in plugin parent pom

2006-06-28 Thread Edwin Punzalan
Now that we're starting to *properly* document plugins and prerequisites is now a required pom element, I think that it a default should be placed in the plugin-parent pom.xml. However, prerequisites is not an inherited pom element so I'd like to ask if allowing prerequisites to be

Re: generated plugin documentation: opinions?

2006-06-29 Thread Edwin Punzalan
There's a guide for configuring plugins and it mentions lists and maps... http://maven.apache.org/guides/mini/guide-configuring-plugins.html Brett Porter wrote: On 29/06/2006 4:14 PM, Wendy Smoak wrote: On 6/28/06, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sorry, but I don't really

Re: [RANT] This Maven thing is killing us....

2006-07-01 Thread Edwin Punzalan
May I add, that when maven already downloaded a poor/invalid pom, even after fixing the pom in the repository, maven won't know that it's changed (unless the version changed) and it will not download it. So you end up still using your local repo copy. To re-download a pom, you have to

Re: List of components/parameters that a plugin can ask for?

2006-07-05 Thread Edwin Punzalan
Have you checked these out: http://maven.apache.org/developers/mojo-api-specification.html http://maven.apache.org/guides/plugin/guide-java-plugin-development.html Russell, Mark wrote: Actually I was thinking more of the list that a custom plugin could get. IE If I'm writing a plugin, what's

Re: svn commit: r419367 - /maven/plugins/trunk/maven-jar-plugin/pom.xml

2006-07-05 Thread Edwin Punzalan
except for the changelog plugin... its not in the parent bec I'd prefer that the changelog should be configured such that it should show the changes since the last release of the plugin. Brett Porter wrote: Hi Dennis, These should be inherited from the parent if you set the parent to

  1   2   3   4   5   6   >