RE: ConcurrentModificationException in maven 1.x - any ideas ?

2007-04-17 Thread Jeff Jensen
someone have an idea... I wonder what would happen if we used PathFinder to run Maven/the build; perhaps it would find the issue? -Original Message- From: Arnaud HERITIER [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, April 15, 2007 8:10 PM To: Maven Developers List Subject:

RE: [vote] Release maven-developer-activity-plugin and maven-file-activity-plugin 1.6.1 for maven 1.X

2007-04-17 Thread Jeff Jensen
+1 -Original Message- From: Arnaud HERITIER [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, April 15, 2007 7:41 PM To: Maven Developers List Subject: [vote] Release maven-developer-activity-plugin and maven-file-activity-plugin 1.6.1 for maven 1.X Hi, Those two plugins have a similar fix and

RE: [vote] Release maven-announcement-plugin 1.4.1 for maven 1.X

2007-04-17 Thread Jeff Jensen
+1 -Original Message- From: Arnaud HERITIER [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, April 15, 2007 7:42 PM To: Maven Developers List Subject: Re: [vote] Release maven-announcement-plugin 1.4.1 for maven 1.X On 16/04/07, Arnaud HERITIER [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, In the logic to

RE: [vote] Release maven-site-plugin 1.7.2 for maven 1.X

2007-04-17 Thread Jeff Jensen
+1 -Original Message- From: Arnaud HERITIER [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, April 15, 2007 6:32 PM To: Maven Developers List Subject: [vote] Release maven-site-plugin 1.7.2 for maven 1.X Hi, I encountered some problems with the site plugin and its rsync deployment feature.

RE: ConcurrentModificationException in maven 1.x - any ideas ?

2007-04-17 Thread Jeff Jensen
On 17/04/07, Jeff Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: someone have an idea... I wonder what would happen if we used PathFinder to run Maven/the build; perhaps it would find the issue? -Original Message- From: Arnaud HERITIER [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, April 15, 2007 8:10 PM

RE: [m1] review of plugins to release

2007-04-21 Thread Jeff Jensen
-Original Message- From: Arnaud HERITIER [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, April 21, 2007 7:23 PM To: Maven Developers List Subject: Re: [m1] review of plugins to release On 22/04/07, Jeff Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thus I have some doubts about some others

RE: [vote] maven-model 3.0.2 for maven 1.1

2007-04-22 Thread Jeff Jensen
+1 Generated docs look good. -Original Message- From: Arnaud HERITIER [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, April 20, 2007 5:49 PM To: Maven Developers List Subject: [vote] maven-model 3.0.2 for maven 1.1 Hi team, We finalized the new version of maven-model 3.0.2 for maven

RE: [m1] review of plugins to release

2007-04-23 Thread Jeff Jensen
Agreed. Putting the release management hat on, betas, RCs, etc. are not much of a beta/RC when they keep adding new functionalitythey are continued development releases. :-) -Original Message- From: Arnaud HERITIER [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, April 23, 2007 5:43 AM To:

RE: [M1][vote] release plugins : idea 1.7, jalopy 1.5.1, jar 1.8.1, javadoc 1.9, multichanges 1.3, plugin 1.7.1

2007-04-24 Thread Jeff Jensen
+1 -Original Message- From: Arnaud HERITIER [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, April 23, 2007 10:49 AM To: Maven Developers List Subject: [M1][vote] release plugins : idea 1.7, jalopy 1.5.1, jar 1.8.1, javadoc 1.9, multichanges 1.3, plugin 1.7.1 Here is a new list of plugins to

RE: [vote] [m1] couple of plugins for rc1

2007-05-04 Thread Jeff Jensen
+1 for all -Original Message- From: Arnaud HERITIER [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 04, 2007 4:41 PM To: Maven Developers List Subject: Re: [vote] [m1] couple of plugins for rc1 +1 for all Arnaud On 02/05/07, Stephane Nicoll [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +1 Stéphane On

RE: [vote] Release maven 1.1 RC1

2007-05-09 Thread Jeff Jensen
+1 -Original Message- From: Lukas Theussl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2007 8:20 AM To: Maven Developers List Subject: Re: [vote] Release maven 1.1 RC1 +1 -Lukas Arnaud HERITIER wrote: Hi folks, The time has come to release maven 1.1 RC1. Since the beta

RE: [proposal] Change project names for M1 plugins in JIRA

2007-05-30 Thread Jeff Jensen
+1 -Original Message- From: Dennis Lundberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2007 10:27 AM To: dev@maven.apache.org Subject: [proposal] Change project names for M1 plugins in JIRA Hi We get some JIRA issues for the M1 plugins that really belongs to the M2 plugins.

RE: [vote] Release Maven 1.1 Final

2007-06-22 Thread Jeff Jensen
An emphatic +1 :-) -Original Message- From: Arnaud HERITIER [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2007 12:46 PM To: Maven Developers List Subject: [vote] Release Maven 1.1 Final Hi team, It's with pleasure that I want to launch the vote to release the final version of

RE: [poll] Requiring users to specify plugin versions in Maven 2.1 or later

2007-09-02 Thread Jeff Jensen
I think this might be the most practical solution. Yes, perhaps the functionality belongs with some type of pom/release/build/CM topic'd plugin, but that is a secondary issue! Tools like the archetypes can create them/have them created in the pom too, e.g. if genAllDeps=true. -Original

RE: [vote] Nicolas de Loof as a committer

2007-11-21 Thread Jeff Jensen
+1 Great work on the JS plugin too! -Original Message- From: Brett Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2007 3:08 AM To: Maven Developers List Subject: [vote] Nicolas de Loof as a committer I'd like to call a vote for Nicolas de Loof as a committer,

[m1] PMD plugin dependencies

2007-11-29 Thread Jeff Jensen
Hi Arnaud, PMD 4.1 has updated its deps (e.g. asm and jaxen), and I am concerned on upgrading the plugin. I know you (and possibly others) spent considerable time aligning the dependencies amongst core and many other plugins. I know Jaxen was one of them. Do you have concerns/suggestions on

RE: [m1] PMD plugin dependencies

2007-11-30 Thread Jeff Jensen
not the case you'll have to try to upgrade jaxen everywhere... Arnaud On Nov 30, 2007 2:05 AM, Jeff Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Arnaud, PMD 4.1 has updated its deps (e.g. asm and jaxen), and I am concerned on upgrading the plugin. I know you (and possibly others) spent

RE: [m1] PMD plugin dependencies

2007-11-30 Thread Jeff Jensen
not the case you'll have to try to upgrade jaxen everywhere... Arnaud On Nov 30, 2007 2:05 AM, Jeff Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Arnaud, PMD 4.1 has updated its deps (e.g. asm and jaxen), and I am concerned on upgrading the plugin. I know you (and possibly others) spent

RE: [m1] PMD plugin dependencies

2007-12-01 Thread Jeff Jensen
Ugh!! :-( Thanks for the help Arnaud, Xavier, and Lukas... -Original Message- From: Arnaud HERITIER [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, December 01, 2007 4:33 PM To: Maven Developers List Subject: Re: [m1] PMD plugin dependencies Hi Xavier, Thanks a lot for your

RE: JIRA for Maven 1.x?

2008-02-17 Thread Jeff Jensen
Possibly there are some to close (won't fix/won't do the enhancement), but what is the reasoning for a bulk close of all of them? If consolidating all to one JIRA is of some benefit, then why not just bulk move those not closed to the new one (after processing them per the above)? And

RE: maven 1.1 release (probably stupid questions)

2006-07-18 Thread Jeff Jensen
Arnaud publishes 1.1 beta 3 snapshots here: http://people.apache.org/~aheritier/maven/1.X/snapshots/ The 1.1b3 snapshots are very stable and usable versions. I regularly upgrade our team to the latest that Arnaud publishes. It slowly but surely makes continual progress to a 1.1 final release

RE: [vote] Release Maven 1.1 beta 3

2006-07-29 Thread Jeff Jensen
+1, non-binding. -Original Message- From: Arnaud HERITIER [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, July 29, 2006 3:37 PM To: Maven Developers List Subject: [vote] Release Maven 1.1 beta 3 Hi folks, Please vote on releasing Maven 1.1 Beta 3. Since the beta 2 we upgraded almost all

RE: [result] [vote] Jeff Jensen as Maven Plugins committer

2006-08-03 Thread Jeff Jensen
Thank you! I am honored by this privilege. -Original Message- From: Lukas Theussl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2006 9:38 AM To: Maven Developers List Cc: Maven Project Management Committee List Subject: [result] [vote] Jeff Jensen as Maven Plugins

RE: [m1] unable to run jar:deploy using maven-1.1-beta3

2006-08-10 Thread Jeff Jensen
Hi Stephane, Lukas, Arnaud, and I have had some emails and IRCs on it over the past couple of weeks (I experienced the problem but they did not, so wasn't sure if it just something with my local config or other). We've been doing some research with it, but nothing conclusive yet. I found that I

RE: Welcome to new committers!

2006-08-30 Thread Jeff Jensen
, not German. ;-) - Joakim Erdfelt Jason van Zyl wrote: Hi, We would like to welcome Joakime Erdfeldt, Shinobu Kawai, and Jeff Jensen to the Maven Team! Joakime will be working on Continuum and Maven 2.x plugins, Shinobu and Jeff will be working in Maven 1.x land. Thanks

RE: [RANT] Maven is both heaven and hell

2006-09-04 Thread Jeff Jensen
(Since you didn't mention it) CruiseControl works really well for us, if you need something now. -Original Message- From: Wendell Beckwith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 04, 2006 11:41 AM To: Maven Developers List Subject: Re: [RANT] Maven is both heaven and hell

RE: [vote] [m1] release changes, genapp, pom, clover, java, jira, simian plugins

2006-10-21 Thread Jeff Jensen
+1 Particularly we have been using the changes, java, and simian plugin snapshots with no problems. Thanks Lukas! -Original Message- From: Lukas Theussl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2006 5:22 PM To: Maven Developers List Subject: [vote] [m1] release changes,

Re: maven-changes-plugin questions

2006-12-27 Thread Jeff Jensen
I like the changes page as a simplified, user-friendly list of notable changes made for each release. The defect/RFE tracking system has the details for the initiated users when desired. Quoting Stephane Nicoll [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On 12/27/06, Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I never

RE: svn commit: r491675 - /maven/maven-1/plugins/trunk/pmd/project.xml

2007-01-01 Thread Jeff Jensen
Asm 3.0 is not on Ibiblio yet, which I knew, but Lukas told me that committing these changes already would break the bootstrap, and asked me to revert them. I can't answer your other questions: I did not receive an email from continuum. I did not bootstrap after the change. -Original

RE: svn commit: r491630 - in /maven/maven-1/plugins/trunk/pmd: project.xml xdocs/changes.xml

2007-01-01 Thread Jeff Jensen
Thanks Arnaud. I will commit the change and update close the JIRA when things are complete. -Original Message- From: Arnaud HERITIER [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 01, 2007 5:06 PM To: dev@maven.apache.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r491630 - in

RE: svn commit: r491675 - /maven/maven-1/plugins/trunk/pmd/project.xml

2007-01-01 Thread Jeff Jensen
/trunk/pmd/project.xml On 1/2/07, Jeff Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Asm 3.0 is not on Ibiblio yet, which I knew, but Lukas told me that committing these changes already would break the bootstrap, and asked me to revert them. Ok, he's right. It will be a real problem. Is there an upload

RE: [M1] Status for modello / maven-model / m1-core

2007-01-11 Thread Jeff Jensen
For a quick opinion ASAP, I did a quick review of the pages, and they look pretty good. When I can review more in-depth, I may suggest some additional info/clarifications and writing changes on the site docs. My initial suggestion on the Overview page is that I would like a link to an

RE: Lifecycle issues with Cobertura plugin and custom plugin

2007-02-08 Thread Jeff Jensen
I think it is clear now - Ralph, you jumped into a thread about the Maven 2 Cobertura plugin, and began asking about the Maven 1 plugin. This confused subsequent replies! If you have Cobertura questions or issues, please start a new thread as Lukas suggested. -Original Message- From:

RE: [vote] [m1] plugin releases

2007-03-22 Thread Jeff Jensen
+1 for all but clover (never used it!). -Original Message- From: Lukas Theussl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2007 7:38 AM To: Maven Developers List Subject: [vote] [m1] plugin releases Hi, These are the plugins that do not need the updated maven-model, so I'd

M2 FAQ has ibiblio ref

2007-03-24 Thread Jeff Jensen
The M2 FAQ has a ref to ibiblio. Does this need to change to the new Maven Central ref? http://maven.apache.org/general.html#available-plugins - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail:

RE: M2 FAQ has ibiblio ref

2007-03-24 Thread Jeff Jensen
has ibiblio ref tha info is not even applicable anymore On 3/24/07, Jeff Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The M2 FAQ has a ref to ibiblio. Does this need to change to the new Maven Central ref? http://maven.apache.org/general.html#available-plugins

M2 FAQ has ibiblio ref

2007-03-25 Thread Jeff Jensen
The M2 FAQ has a ref to ibiblio. Does this need to change to the new Maven Central ref? http://maven.apache.org/general.html#available-plugins - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail:

RE: confluence (was: We're near the release of 1.0 final)

2007-03-29 Thread Jeff Jensen
I wish it was all in one place - Maven site. Too many don't know or don't go. If it must reside elsewhere, the link to external site docs must be very prominent. -Original Message- From: Brett Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2007 4:26 PM To: Maven Developers

RE: confluence (was: We're near the release of 1.0 final)

2007-03-29 Thread Jeff Jensen
sense as an integrated subsite. Take a look at these examples: http://incubator.apache.org/openejb/ http://incubator.apache.org/openjpa/ http://geronimo.apache.org/ - Brett On 30/03/2007, at 10:27 AM, Jeff Jensen wrote: I wish it was all in one place - Maven site. Too many don't know or don't go

RE: Creating a schedule for releases

2007-04-02 Thread Jeff Jensen
That sounds like a great idea...and one less place to visit. -Original Message- From: Brian E. Fox [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, April 02, 2007 3:23 PM To: Maven Developers List Subject: RE: Creating a schedule for releases I know the calendar is already out there so this

RE: Could anyone give me some idea what is the difference bwteen ant and maven?

2008-10-26 Thread Jeff Jensen
I like your analogy Brian. Additionally, I think the Sonatype Maven book has a nice comparison: http://www.sonatype.com/book/reference/introduction.html#sect-compare-ant-maven (and I think this is a User-list question, not a Developer-list one?) -Original Message- From: Brian E. Fox

RE: automation question

2008-11-21 Thread Jeff Jensen
Perhaps setup CI (Hudson/CruiseControl/Continuum) locally and manually invoke builds when desired. Using build dependencies, you can have subsequent builds kick off from you manually invoking the first. Then manually commit or automate? -Original Message- From: Oleg Gusakov

Re: Question about Clearcase, Starteam and Perforce

2006-03-03 Thread Jeff Jensen
Perforce does not use local disk for storage of info like CVS and svn. Quoting Emmanuel Venisse [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi, I added a new method in SCMProvider (String getScmSpecificFilename()) This method returns the name of reserved filename/directory use by scm like CVS or .svn Do we have

RE: [vote] [m1] release xdoc-plugin-1.10

2006-06-07 Thread Jeff Jensen
FYI We have been running this snapshot for weeks/months without problem (and it fixes a couple of problems we experienced). -Original Message- From: Lukas Theussl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2006 12:45 PM To: Maven Developers List Subject: [vote] [m1] release

RE: Commit MJAR-38

2006-06-10 Thread Jeff Jensen
-Original Message- From: Kenney Westerhof [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, June 10, 2006 1:27 PM To: Maven Developers List Subject: Re: Commit MJAR-38 On Sat, 10 Jun 2006, Mike Perham wrote: Side note: I don't use Subversion daily - what's the command(s) to

RE: Commit MJAR-38

2006-06-10 Thread Jeff Jensen
-Original Message- From: Mike Perham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, June 10, 2006 1:37 PM To: Maven Developers List Subject: RE: Commit MJAR-38 Side note: is there a way to get Outlook 2003 to quote like below (with indents) rather than pushing the original

RE: [Result] [vote] [m1] release xdoc-plugin-1.10

2006-06-13 Thread Jeff Jensen
-1.10 We had a bit of noise on this thread so I hope I quote the result accurately, please correct me if something's wrong. There are 3 binding +1's (Stephane, Arnaud, Lukas) and two people (Jeff Jensen and Dennis Lundberg) who expressed positive opinions, but without casting an explicit vote

RE: [Proposal] Documenting Maven

2006-06-19 Thread Jeff Jensen
Contrarian, one thing that is useful about the current approach is the browser search feature. It works pretty well to find the topics on a doc page with lots of entries and common search words. Hopefully the reorg solution doesn't lose a search-ability/adds a better search. -Original

RE: generated plugin documentation: opinions?

2006-06-28 Thread Jeff Jensen
I think default values should be in their own column so it is easier to see/read/find. I find other plugins that have done this much nicer to use. I very much dislike pages that have buried the defaults somewhere in the description (front, middle, end - doesn't matter). I also found that when

RE: Common API for issue tracking systems

2006-07-07 Thread Jeff Jensen
An issue hosting artifacts not on ibiblio is the Maven group has tried to centralize on ibiblio so we all don't have to have dozens of different repos in our config. -Original Message- From: Mik Kersten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 07, 2006 9:38 AM To: 'Tomasz Pik' Cc:

RE: ClearCase implementation

2005-11-14 Thread Jeff Jensen
Hi guys, I've recently started monitoring this list as I am very interested in the Perforce Maven SCM implementation (I recently obtained the source and started looking at how far along it is). I'm butting in here as I have some thoughts that may have use to your implementations. I have used a

Test org.apache.maven.artifact.PomRewriterTest FAILED

2005-06-10 Thread Jeff Jensen
Brett, I am building from bootstrap. I think the latest PomWriter changes cause this test to fail. Does it pass for you? [exec] test:test: [exec] [junit] Running org.apache.maven.artifact.PomRewriterTest [exec] [junit] Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Time elapsed:

RE: [vote] demote plugins

2005-06-11 Thread Jeff Jensen
I as well use Simian and it works well. PMD's CPD report does the same, but they give different output (which is a different issue! :-) Not that I have a vote...+1 all too. I hope to see good info like docbook - superseded by the SF one included on the doc pages for the plugins, and why they

Newbie on doc:text-xdoc

2005-06-11 Thread Jeff Jensen
Apologies in advance for such beginner question, but I just can't find what plugin runs for doc:text-xdoc. I am adding some things to the findbugs plugin (upgrade to latest, adding more params), and learning my way through it. New findbugs versions have xdoc output. I have changed the plugin to

RE: Newbie on doc:text-xdoc

2005-06-11 Thread Jeff Jensen
/section /body /document /j:file /define:tag Jeff Jensen wrote: Apologies in advance for such beginner question, but I just can't find what plugin runs for doc:text-xdoc. I am adding some things to the findbugs plugin (upgrade to latest, adding more params

Findbugs plugin maintenance?

2005-06-12 Thread Jeff Jensen
Hi, Is anyone actually maintaining the FindBugs plugin? I ask because the web pages don't match releases, the FindBugs plugin source in SourceForge CVS has needed fixes, SourceForge has no FindBugs plugin downloads available, something called 1.0-SNAPSHOT from ibiblio maven-plugins does not

RE: What's block maven-toolchains-plugin getting *any* release at all?

2009-09-04 Thread Jeff Jensen
+1 -Original Message- From: Arnaud HERITIER [mailto:aherit...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, September 04, 2009 8:20 AM To: Maven Developers List Subject: Re: What's block maven-toolchains-plugin getting *any* release at all? +1 to propose you to join us as committer :-) Arnaud On Fri, Sep

RE: [vote] Invite Stephen Connolly to join Maven committers

2009-09-06 Thread Jeff Jensen
+1 -Original Message- From: aherit...@gmail.com [mailto:aherit...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Arnaud HERITIER Sent: Sunday, September 06, 2009 6:25 PM To: Maven Developers List Cc: Stephen Connolly Subject: [vote] Invite Stephen Connolly to join Maven committers Hi all, I'd like to

RE: [VOTE] Commit access for Kristian Rosenvold

2010-01-04 Thread Jeff Jensen
+1 -Original Message- From: Olivier Lamy [mailto:ol...@apache.org] Sent: Monday, January 04, 2010 3:47 AM To: Maven Developers List Subject: Re: [VOTE] Commit access for Kristian Rosenvold +1 -- Olivier 2010/1/4 Jason van Zyl ja...@sonatype.com: Hi, I have reviewed the patches for

RE: [VOTE] Release Maven PMD plugin version 2.5

2010-05-01 Thread Jeff Jensen
+1 -Original Message- From: Hervé BOUTEMY [mailto:herve.bout...@free.fr] Sent: Saturday, May 01, 2010 9:35 AM To: Maven Developers List Subject: [VOTE] Release Maven PMD plugin version 2.5 Hi, We solved 24 issues:

RE: Maven 3 versions of the plugins

2010-05-18 Thread Jeff Jensen
+1 It's clear, it allows me to continue if I want to try it anyway, and I think there was plenty of prior discussion of it on the list. -Original Message- From: Kristian Rosenvold [mailto:kristian.rosenv...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2010 2:57 PM To: Maven Developers List

RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-beta-3 (take 2)

2010-08-31 Thread Jeff Jensen
+1 (non-binding) better, stronger, faster :-) -Original Message- From: Benjamin Bentmann [mailto:benjamin.bentm...@udo.edu] Sent: Monday, August 30, 2010 8:09 AM To: Maven Developers List Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-beta-3 (take 2) Hi, what's a better start for a week

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Surefire Plugin version 2.7

2010-12-15 Thread Jeff Jensen
and/or lots of console output; It turned out for test number N, any stdout/stderr output would be duplicated into N tee-streams, and they were'nt going away. That's a lot of memory going nowhere. Kristian on., 15.12.2010 kl. 08.g08 -0600, skrev Jeff Jensen: +1 (non-binding) We can finally

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Surefire Plugin version 2.7, Take 2

2010-12-16 Thread Jeff Jensen
+1 (non-binding) This one works great too! On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 5:38 AM, chemit che...@codelutin.com wrote: On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 11:46:40 +0100 Kristian Rosenvold kristian.rosenv...@gmail.com wrote: +1 (non binding) -- Tony Chemit tél: +33 (0) 2 40 50 29 28

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Surefire Plugin version 2.7.1

2010-12-24 Thread Jeff Jensen
+1 (non-binding) On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 2:40 AM, Lukas Theussl ltheu...@apache.org wrote: +1 -Lukas Kristian Rosenvold wrote: Hi, We solved 10 issues: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10541version=17014 There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:

Re: svn commit: r1077924 - in /maven/plugins/trunk/maven-site-plugin/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/plugins/site: AbstractDeployMojo.java SiteDeployMojo.java SiteStageDeployMojo.java

2011-03-08 Thread Jeff Jensen
Hi Lukas! I have a question on this commit, as it causes our site gen to now fail. With the following change: +if ( site == null ) +{ +throw new MojoExecutionException( +Missing site information in the distribution management of the project +

Re: svn commit: r1077924 - in /maven/plugins/trunk/maven-site-plugin/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/plugins/site: AbstractDeployMojo.java SiteDeployMojo.java SiteStageDeployMojo.java

2011-03-08 Thread Jeff Jensen
the DeployMojo. However, I see that it could break site:stage-deploy, is this what you are seeing? I don't exclude that I broke something somewhere else, but I need more info to track it down, a stack trace or better a test project would help. Cheers, -Lukas Jeff Jensen wrote: Hi Lukas

Re: svn commit: r1077924 - in /maven/plugins/trunk/maven-site-plugin/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/plugins/site: AbstractDeployMojo.java SiteDeployMojo.java SiteStageDeployMojo.java

2011-03-09 Thread Jeff Jensen
it? However, you have to build it yourself as I'm getting a 500 when trying to deploy to apache right now, so no snaps are deployed yet. HTH, -Lukas Jeff Jensen wrote: Yes, :-)  3.0-beta-4-SNAPSHOT.  The fixes over the past months have been very helpful, so I'm using the snapshot. Sorry for my

Re: svn commit: r1077924 - in /maven/plugins/trunk/maven-site-plugin/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/plugins/site: AbstractDeployMojo.java SiteDeployMojo.java SiteStageDeployMojo.java

2011-03-10 Thread Jeff Jensen
Works great again... thank you Lukas! :-) On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 2:04 PM, Lukas Theussl ltheu...@apache.org wrote: snapshots are deployed by now, let me know if it helps... -Lukas Jeff Jensen wrote: Thanks Lukas!  Sorry - haven't had a moment to get source and build it (finishing

Re: org.codehaus.plexus.util.CollectionUtils.intersection

2011-06-12 Thread Jeff Jensen
With what JUnit version? I just tested is() and hasItems() and the failure reporting message is 99% the same as assertEquals() with JUnit 4.8.2. They both display toString()s of the expected and actuals, just prefixed with different names/words. What am I missing? On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 2:52

PMC change explanation?

2011-06-16 Thread Jeff Jensen
Is there a forthcoming explanation for a seemingly Maven PMC shakeup? I find it odd that consistently excellent contributors such as Lukas, Brian, et al are suddenly not on the Maven PMC. This is concerning as these are people who have drastically improved and moved Maven forward. It's very

Re: Is Maven Site Plugin 3.0-beta-4 ready for release?

2011-07-07 Thread Jeff Jensen
We've been running the beta for (I don't know how many) months, and works better than it ever has. I agree with Lukas; release it. On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 2:26 AM, Lukas Theussl ltheu...@apache.org wrote: Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: the rationale behind not going directly to 3.0 was that site

Re: [VOTE] Use aether 1.13 and sisu 2.3.0 as dependencies of Apache Maven

2011-11-10 Thread Jeff Jensen
+1 (non-binding) On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 9:53 AM, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote: Hello, Since last vote things have changed: * aether is in incubation process @eclipse * sisu is in incubation process @eclipse Due to the fact that those process can be long before having an official

Re: fixing transfer listener in trunk

2012-11-11 Thread Jeff Jensen
On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 7:59 AM, Jesse McConnell jesse.mcconn...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 6:35 AM, Anders Hammar and...@hammar.net wrote: Here's my suggestion: We keep the current state where we have the new logging API (slf4j) and the System.out style implementation. Then we

Re: 3.1.0 decision making

2012-12-01 Thread Jeff Jensen
Milestones are great idea, and there has already been a few (just named the same! :-). +1 for 3.1.0 Nice infra improvements including SLF4J. Appreciating you patiently RM'ing this Jason... (and +1 for Logback; haven't used Log4j in 4 years). On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 2:29 PM, Jason van Zyl

Re: Re-spinning 3.1.0

2012-12-01 Thread Jeff Jensen
On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 2:39 PM, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote: Hi, Why do we have to force our users to a specific logging implementation than we choose ? Doesn't the product have to establish a default? Isn't that the one forced on the users? Substitution of the default for

Re: Logging

2012-12-09 Thread Jeff Jensen
On Sun, Dec 9, 2012 at 6:51 AM, Stephen Connolly stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com wrote: On Sunday, 9 December 2012, Kristian Rosenvold wrote: 2012/12/9 Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org javascript:;: Perso I'm fine using log4j2. I use the branch I pushed for some weeks now and I'm happy.

Re: Multi-project releases

2013-03-24 Thread Jeff Jensen
-N Same for other operations to not recurse into children/modules. On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 11:55 AM, Andrei Pozolotin andrei.pozolo...@gmail.com wrote: *Robert* unrelated question, may be you can clarify: in the current maven-release-plugin what is the way to release

Re: Multi-project releases

2013-03-24 Thread Jeff Jensen
Yes, good point to know of in case that causes a problem. On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 2:30 PM, Stephen Connolly stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com wrote: That's still going to result in all the children being part of the tag though On Sunday, 24 March 2013, Jeff Jensen wrote: -N Same

Re: Multi-project releases

2013-03-24 Thread Jeff Jensen
part of the tag though On Sunday, 24 March 2013, Jeff Jensen wrote: -N Same for other operations to not recurse into children/modules. On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 11:55 AM, Andrei Pozolotin andrei.pozolo...@gmail.com javascript:; wrote: *Robert* unrelated question

Re: [DISCUSS] [VOTE] Should we respin CANCELLED releases with the same version number?

2013-05-29 Thread Jeff Jensen
It seems that most people care about X.Y and X.Y.Z numbers of the versioning scheme, not X.Y.Z.N. To spin through version numbers without concern during release candidates, perhaps using the 4th position, N, would then allow continued use of the familiar X.Y and X.Y.Z references?

Re: [VOTE] All new (non-patch) releases of Maven Core after 30th Sep 2013 to require Java 6+

2013-07-23 Thread Jeff Jensen
+1 (non-binding) On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 8:59 AM, Stephen Connolly stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com wrote: This vote is to cover the minimum required version of Java for Maven Core. Maven Plugins produced by the Apache Maven Project that are flagged as compatible with older versions of Maven

Re: [2/2] git commit: o change the scope of org.eclipse.sisu to test in the maven-aether-provider to prevent it from leaking out to clients.

2013-07-27 Thread Jeff Jensen
That message indicates you need to git pull first. Even though you may already have done so and no one else has pushed since, this usually happens when modifying a commit that has been pushed/shared. On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 8:08 AM, Hervé BOUTEMY herve.bout...@free.fr wrote: the last 2 commits

Re: [2/2] git commit: o change the scope of org.eclipse.sisu to test in the maven-aether-provider to prevent it from leaking out to clients.

2013-07-27 Thread Jeff Jensen
on! :-) Yes, very good! - Arnaud Le 27 juil. 2013 à 15:19, Jeff Jensen jeffjen...@upstairstechnology.com a écrit : That message indicates you need to git pull first. Even though you may already have done so and no one else has pushed since, this usually happens when

Re: New logo?

2013-12-16 Thread Jeff Jensen
Looks good. I like the left nav better tho! I don't think the Maven logo in the upper right corner looks bad/out of place, however, a new logo is fun to have! On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 6:17 PM, Stephen Connolly stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com wrote:

Re: Why is dependency:unpack evil

2014-04-13 Thread Jeff Jensen
Agreed, we put the WSDL and related schemas in a domain module and its build generates these domain classes in its build. Then other modules use the domain jar... The only place we currently use dependency:unpack is in an AT (acceptance test) module that retrieves the war and unpacks it to an

Re: Why is dependency:unpack evil

2014-04-13 Thread Jeff Jensen
: On Apr 13, 2014, at 11:14 AM, Jeff Jensen jeffjen...@upstairstechnology.com wrote: Agreed, we put the WSDL and related schemas in a domain module and its build generates these domain classes in its build. Then other modules use the domain jar... The only place we currently use

Re: Why is dependency:unpack evil

2014-04-13 Thread Jeff Jensen
and 3rd party. The WAR module is not in the list of deps. On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 10:49 AM, Stephen Connolly stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com wrote: On Sunday, 13 April 2014, Jeff Jensen jeffjen...@upstairstechnology.com wrote: Agreed, we put the WSDL and related schemas in a domain module

Re: Anyone else having issues reaching https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/Maven+4.0.0 ?

2014-05-23 Thread Jeff Jensen
I just successfully viewed the page, so no problems reaching it. On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 7:30 AM, Jason van Zyl ja...@takari.io wrote: For the last few days the instance seems to be in distress. Anyone else having issues? Thanks, Jason

Re: svn commit: r1595491 - in /maven/shared/trunk/maven-dependency-tree: ./ src/it/multi-module-plugin/ src/it/multi-module-plugin/resources/ src/it/multi-module-plugin/resources/META-INF/ src/it/mult

2014-05-23 Thread Jeff Jensen
+1 In my circles, changing method params is a bad practice. Enforcement of rules is key - I do the same thing Manfred, fail the build on a set of FindBugs, PMD, and CheckStyle violations. Really makes coders adhere! On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 10:15 PM, Manfred Moser manf...@mosabuam.comwrote: I

Re: git commit: Deprecate unused version of the project dependencies resovler in the core

2014-07-05 Thread Jeff Jensen
Jason, for: 1) Include a since statement indicating at point the API was deprecated You didn't mention if you are against doing so or not. Do you find it of value for yourself and others? 2) include a statement pointing to the replacement API (or non-replacement and reason for same). Do

Re: Maven Developer Hangout Summary (2014-07-31)

2014-08-01 Thread Jeff Jensen
Awesome! Thank you very much for the summary. On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 7:56 AM, Jason van Zyl ja...@takari.io wrote: Here's a short summary of yesterdays discussion: --- Manfred Moser 1) Alternative verifier use in maven-android-plugin for testing. Igor created an alternative verifier

Re: PlexusTestCase ?

2014-10-16 Thread Jeff Jensen
...and even though dbUnit has a base test class for extension, you can use composition of it instead. Same for Spring Test - can configure it with annotations and use a test runner. No base class needed in either case. On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 3:19 PM, Lennart Jörelid lennart.jore...@gmail.com

Re: Proposal: Ease the usage of Failsafe

2014-10-28 Thread Jeff Jensen
Integrating Failsafe in the same way as Surefire would be great for a lot of people I think. I agree! Personally, I wonder why we don't merge them. I've wondered the same thing... is there a technical reason why it won't or is difficult to make work? On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 11:54 AM,

Re: [VOTE] Maven 3.2.4 Release

2014-12-13 Thread Jeff Jensen
While I agree with your assessment Paul, the problem with upgrading non-sequential release numbers that I encounter with some of my customers (the larger organizations or ones with regulated products [think medical]) is it usually causes some confusion (we're on version n.2 and I see n.8 but

Re: Preview release: Plexus Archiver multithreaded Zip edition

2015-01-10 Thread Jeff Jensen
Sounds like an awesome improvement! Will we see speed improvement on war file creation with many megs of jars in the lib dir or only with compressing of files into the archive (ignoring the web files for this question)? On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 7:43 AM, Kristian Rosenvold

Re: Jekyll experiment

2015-03-19 Thread Jeff Jensen
+1 asciidoctor On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 4:56 AM, Martijn Dashorst martijn.dasho...@gmail.com wrote: While I use jekyll for lots of stuff (blogs and wicket website), I'd urge to use asciidoc[tor] as the markup format. Markdown is great, but rather limited for technical documentation. There is

Re: Jekyll experiment

2015-03-19 Thread Jeff Jensen
I agree Fred... the reports are very helpful. I've always thought of it as handling two needs: reports and docs; reports basically working OOTB and docs as the team decides to hand-create. On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 10:43 PM, Fred Cooke fred.co...@gmail.com wrote: Well, if you created it, then a

Re: Feedback wanted on Checktyle plugin ruleset docs

2015-05-02 Thread Jeff Jensen
I suggest alternative 2 as 1 doesn't scale well with new versions and 3 is more confusing than 2. On Sat, May 2, 2015 at 4:11 PM, Christopher ctubb...@apache.org wrote: Of the choices, alternative 1 seems the easiest for me. On Sat, May 2, 2015, 16:10 Dennis Lundberg denn...@apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Add Manfred Moser as committer

2015-05-13 Thread Jeff Jensen
+1 On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 4:17 AM, Martin Gainty mgai...@hotmail.com wrote: +1 Martin Date: Wed, 13 May 2015 09:16:19 +0100 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Add Manfred Moser as committer From: stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com To: dev@maven.apache.org +1 On 13 May 2015 at 08:36, Kristian

  1   2   >