On Sun, Dec 9, 2012 at 6:51 AM, Stephen Connolly < stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sunday, 9 December 2012, Kristian Rosenvold wrote: > > > 2012/12/9 Olivier Lamy <ol...@apache.org <javascript:;>>: > > > Perso I'm fine using log4j2. > > > I use the branch I pushed for some weeks now and I'm happy. > > > Log4j2 has quickly added a feature I needed and release it. > > > Furthermore I'm fine working with an Apache community in case of any > > > issue we could have. > > > > I'm not entirely sure I follow where this discussion is actually > > going, but I'm firmly opposed > > to including a brand new logging framework as default in m3. > > > > > +1 > +1 I also prefer Logback if sfl4j-simple doesn't have enough features.
