Wow, split crowd. Keep in mind that we also want to adjust the times to
better accommodate people in different time zones. This could mean
something like 9am, 3pm, 9pm, 3pm (Pacific). If we do one of these a week,
then we end up with bi-weekly 3pm meetings, for those on the west coast
that don't
+1 for bi-weekly and I have been assuming rotating times in the first place, as
I suspect many others as well.
(9am and 3pm are not very far apart. Probably better to go for 8am and 5pm or
something like that.)
> On Oct 16, 2015, at 11:08 AM, haosdent wrote:
>
> If we
If we rotating times, weekly reasonable. I think 9am and 9pm(Pacific) OK
for UTC+8.
+1 weekly, with rotating times. And do we need confirm host places?
On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 4:45 PM, Adam Bordelon wrote:
> Wow, split crowd. Keep in mind that we also want to adjust the
+1 for bi-weekly.
2015-10-16 17:36 GMT+08:00 Bernd Mathiske :
> +1 for bi-weekly and I have been assuming rotating times in the first
> place, as I suspect many others as well.
>
> (9am and 3pm are not very far apart. Probably better to go for 8am and 5pm
> or something like
+1 for weekly.
Best Regards,
Diana Arroyo
darr...@us.ibm.com
From: tommy xiao
To: dev@mesos.apache.org
Date: 10/16/2015 07:20 AM
Subject:Re: Community Sync Interval
+1 for bi-weekly.
2015-10-16 17:36 GMT+08:00 Bernd Mathiske :
> +1