Re: Community Sync Interval

2015-10-16 Thread Adam Bordelon
Wow, split crowd. Keep in mind that we also want to adjust the times to better accommodate people in different time zones. This could mean something like 9am, 3pm, 9pm, 3pm (Pacific). If we do one of these a week, then we end up with bi-weekly 3pm meetings, for those on the west coast that don't

Re: Community Sync Interval

2015-10-16 Thread Bernd Mathiske
+1 for bi-weekly and I have been assuming rotating times in the first place, as I suspect many others as well. (9am and 3pm are not very far apart. Probably better to go for 8am and 5pm or something like that.) > On Oct 16, 2015, at 11:08 AM, haosdent wrote: > > If we

Re: Community Sync Interval

2015-10-16 Thread haosdent
If we rotating times, weekly reasonable. I think 9am and 9pm(Pacific) OK for UTC+8. +1 weekly, with rotating times. And do we need confirm host places? On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 4:45 PM, Adam Bordelon wrote: > Wow, split crowd. Keep in mind that we also want to adjust the

Re: Community Sync Interval

2015-10-16 Thread tommy xiao
+1 for bi-weekly. 2015-10-16 17:36 GMT+08:00 Bernd Mathiske : > +1 for bi-weekly and I have been assuming rotating times in the first > place, as I suspect many others as well. > > (9am and 3pm are not very far apart. Probably better to go for 8am and 5pm > or something like

Re: Community Sync Interval

2015-10-16 Thread Diana J Arroyo
+1 for weekly. Best Regards, Diana Arroyo darr...@us.ibm.com From: tommy xiao To: dev@mesos.apache.org Date: 10/16/2015 07:20 AM Subject:Re: Community Sync Interval +1 for bi-weekly. 2015-10-16 17:36 GMT+08:00 Bernd Mathiske : > +1