+1 for bi-weekly and I have been assuming rotating times in the first place, as I suspect many others as well.
(9am and 3pm are not very far apart. Probably better to go for 8am and 5pm or something like that.) > On Oct 16, 2015, at 11:08 AM, haosdent <haosd...@gmail.com> wrote: > > If we rotating times, weekly reasonable. I think 9am and 9pm(Pacific) OK > for UTC+8. > > +1 weekly, with rotating times. And do we need confirm host places? > > On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 4:45 PM, Adam Bordelon <a...@mesosphere.io> wrote: > >> Wow, split crowd. Keep in mind that we also want to adjust the times to >> better accommodate people in different time zones. This could mean >> something like 9am, 3pm, 9pm, 3pm (Pacific). If we do one of these a week, >> then we end up with bi-weekly 3pm meetings, for those on the west coast >> that don't want to wake up early or stay up late. And we can still include >> Europe and Asia with the early/late meetings, so they get to attend at >> least one a month, hopefully with at least a one committer present. >> Nobody's expected to attend every meeting, but those who crave weekly >> meetings have a chance. >> >> +1 weekly, with rotating times. Let's decide soon, so we can get it on the >> calendar! >> >> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 8:22 PM, Klaus Ma <kl...@cguru.net> wrote: >> >>> +1 for weekly >>> >>> Agree with a shorter weekly meeting to sync up, make progress step by >> step >>> >>> >>> On 2015年10月16日 10:49, Yong Qiao Wang wrote: >>> >>>> +1 for bi-weekly. >>>> >>>> Regards! >>>> >>>> Yong Qiao Wang（王勇桥） >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> From: Jojy Varghese <j...@mesosphere.io> >>>> To: dev@mesos.apache.org >>>> Date: 16/10/2015 09:01 >>>> Subject: Re: Community Sync Interval >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> +1 bi-weekly >>>> >>>> >>>> On Oct 15, 2015, at 5:42 PM, Isabel Jimenez >>>>> >>>> <contact.isabeljime...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> +1 for bi-weekly >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 4:18 PM, Alex Rukletsov <a...@mesosphere.com> >>>>> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> +1 for bi-weekly. >>>>>> >>>>>> On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 12:50 AM, Elizabeth Lingg >>>>>> >>>>> <elizab...@mesosphere.io >>>> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> +1 Weekly >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -Elizabeth >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Thursday, October 15, 2015, Greg Mann <g...@mesosphere.io> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I agree with Daniel, +1 for weekly and we can re-evaluate in a bit to >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> see >>>>>> >>>>>>> how people are liking it. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 3:33 PM, Guangya Liu <gyliu...@gmail.com >>>>>>>> <javascript:;>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> +1 for bi-weekly >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Guangya >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 6:08 AM, Daniel Mercer < >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> dmer...@fantoccini.com >>>>>> >>>>>>> <javascript:;>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> +1 for weekly -- if this results in diminishing returns we can >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> always >>>>>> >>>>>>> reset >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> to biweekly. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 2:44 PM, Kapil Arya <ka...@mesosphere.io >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> <javascript:;>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> +1 for bi-weekly. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 4:40 PM, Jan Schlicht <j...@mesosphere.io >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> <javascript:;>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> +1 for weekly. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 1:36 PM, Artem Harutyunyan < >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> ar...@mesosphere.io <javascript:;>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> +1 for weekly. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 10:41 AM, haosdent < >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> haosd...@gmail.com >>>>>> >>>>>>> <javascript:;>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> +1 for bi-weekly >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 1:19 AM, Michael Park < >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> mcyp...@gmail.com <javascript:;> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> We discussed whether the community syncs should be weekly >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> or >>>>>> >>>>>>> bi-weekly >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> (once every 2 weeks). >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There were differing opinions on the subject during the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> community >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> sync >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> today. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> An argument for weekly: meetings can be shorter and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> missing >>>>>> >>>>>>> a >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> meeting >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> won't >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> be as big a deal as missing a longer meeting. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> An argument for bi-weekly: there are many people involved >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> in >>>>>> >>>>>>> these >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> meetings, we should keep it infrequent so that it reduces >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> people's >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> time >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> commitments. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This email is intended to capture your +1s or other ideas >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> you >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> might >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> have! >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> MPark. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Haosdent Huang >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>> *Jan Schlicht* >>>>>>>>>>>> Distributed Systems Engineer, Mesosphere >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> -- >>> Da (Klaus), Ma (马达) | PMP® | Advisory Software Engineer >>> Platform Symphony/DCOS Development & Support, STG, IBM GCG >>> +86-10-8245 4084 | mad...@cn.ibm.com | http://www.cguru.net >>> >>> >> > > > > -- > Best Regards, > Haosdent Huang
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
