Github user nickwallen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/711
> The alert or list of alerts should be annotated with the user who
escalated the alert(s) and time the alert(s) was escalated.
That JIRA works for me @merrimanr . So the assumption right
Github user merrimanr commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/711
I create a Jira for this:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/METRON-1147. It's could probably use
some more description but this is a start.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can rep
Github user merrimanr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/694#discussion_r136439615
--- Diff:
metron-interface/metron-rest/src/test/java/org/apache/metron/rest/controller/AlertsProfileControllerIntegrationTest.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,226 @@
Github user ottobackwards commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/727#discussion_r136436430
--- Diff:
metron-stellar/stellar-common/src/test/java/org/apache/metron/stellar/dsl/functions/StringFunctionsTest.java
---
@@ -449,4 +450,68 @@ public
Github user ottobackwards commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/727#discussion_r136438190
--- Diff:
metron-stellar/stellar-common/src/main/java/org/apache/metron/stellar/dsl/functions/StringFunctions.java
---
@@ -450,4 +454,40 @@ public Obj
GitHub user anandsubbu opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/727
METRON-1146: Add ability to parse JSON string into JSONObject for stellar
## Contributor Comments
This pull request allows the ability to parse a given JSON string and
return a JSON object. H
Github user cestella commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/713
Hm, yeah, I can't seem to assign it to you either @as22323
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/726
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user ottobackwards commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/690
I have refactored this to be stellar centric.
We will create a second archive for the stand alone shell from
stellar-common.
I also documented it in the stellar README.md.
The q
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/717
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
GitHub user ottobackwards reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/690
METRON-1091 Package STELLAR shell as stand alone
This PR adds metron-deployment/packaging/archive, and the
metron-stellar-shell module.
This module packages a stellar shell environment t
Github user merrimanr commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/717
Looks good +1
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Github user merrimanr commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/726
Tested this in full dev with Kerberos enabled. The profiler topology
starts up without issue and data appears in HBase after creating a profile. +1
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Please mark them 0.4.1, as that’s what the community says we want to call the
upcoming release, and everything that’s there when I throw the switch will be
included.
Jon and Anand, will they be in by end/day Friday?
Thanks,
--Matt
On 8/31/17, 7:45 AM, "Nick Allen" wrote:
Matt, et al - For
Github user ottobackwards closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/725
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user ottobackwards commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/725
so, the commits don't close pr's on branches I guess??
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user cestella commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/717
Ok, added the workers and ackers in the README. Take a look and let me
know if you see anything else.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear o
Github user cestella commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/717#discussion_r136409849
--- Diff: metron-platform/metron-parsers/README.md ---
@@ -103,6 +103,15 @@ then it is assumed to be a regex and will match any
topic matching the pattern (
Github user merrimanr commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/712
I think suppressing the warnings is good enough for now.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not hav
Github user ottobackwards commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/726
You should add something to the PR Template
[ ] Does this require ACL's
or something
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user merrimanr commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/702
The latest commit adds the ability to sum a field within each group with
the "scoreField".
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
My use case is a little different than #690. I just want to be able to
test things in the REPL during development. I am just trying to find the
quickest way to go from code change to executing that code change in the
REPL.
On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 11:02 AM Otto Fowler
wrote:
> If this is over d
GitHub user cestella opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/726
METRON-1145: Profiler mpack does not create kafka acl and hbase acls
correctly in kerberized cluster
## Contributor Comments
Title says it all. The management pack will not start the profiler i
Github user JonZeolla commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/690
Right, I think the disconnect is that I would envision a stellar shell with
metron stellar functions added as libs, as you suggested. That's why I was
thinking we would doc in stellar-common, I mi
Github user ottobackwards closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/690
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user ottobackwards commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/690
I'm going to close this and refactor
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user ottobackwards commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/690
@JonZeolla I don't want to document it in the stellar-common module.
Stellar is being broken out of metron. The packaging of stellar as a
shell, with the likely inclusion of metron-* stella
Github user ottobackwards commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/690
bump - any comments on this? Any ideas for deployment? can we leave for
later?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
If this is over doing it based on your question, I apologize ahead of time.
There are a few things here:
* the way the stellar functions in metron are package with regards to
dependencies and usage
* the way the functions are categorized ( ie. should some functions even
try to load based on runni
Github user nickwallen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/725
+1 by inspection, assuming CI build passes. Thanks @ottobackwards
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/721
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
So there is https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/690, but that is not what
you are asking.
The issue is that even if you -pl metron-platform/metron-management it
does not bring in
all the dependencies ( you are getting FSDataInputStream or some other
error right?). I can get both to load by
doin
Matt, et al - For JIRAs that are going into master, should we be marking
these as "Next + 1" or "0.4.1" ?
On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 8:17 AM zeo...@gmail.com wrote:
> Can I advocate to get METRON-1129 in the RC, and throw in a second vote for
> METRON-1134? Both in an attempt to better support of
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/716
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
GitHub user ottobackwards opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/725
METRON-1136 : Track Master
Track master for feature branch. This PR resolves conflicts in the rpm
spec and resource copy area of the pom.
- [x] Is there a JIRA ticket associated with
Previously, I found that you could run the REPL from the Metron source by
running the following command from the
source root
directory. This is useful because it lets you run the REPL with the
libraries that will be available
during Enrichment.
mvn exec:java \
-Dexec.mainClass="org.apache.m
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/704
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user cestella commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/721
+1 by inspection, this is really great.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
ena
Github user cestella commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/704
+1 by inspection, great stuff
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and w
Github user cestella commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/716
+1 by inspection, this is great stuff @nickwallen
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Can I advocate to get METRON-1129 in the RC, and throw in a second vote for
METRON-1134? Both in an attempt to better support of prod/offline use.
Happy to provide testing cycles for the former.
Jon
On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 11:41 AM Anand Subramanian <
asubraman...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
> Hi M
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/719
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
That looks like it's the front for when there was versioning of config in the
rest api. The versioning was based on hibernate envers so had licence issues,
and stored change history into the rest rdbms.
That functionality should probably come back one day once we have a proper
approach to confi
https://github.com/apache/metron/blob/master/metron-interface/metron-config/src/app/model/sensor-parser-config-history.ts
Can anyone explain the usage and purpose of this type and how it relates to
sensor-parser-config?
ottO
44 matches
Mail list logo
