It's really nice to see you guys cooperating. Let me look forward to
the incoming patches. :-)
Cheers,
Trustin
On Jan 16, 2008 4:37 AM, Jeff Genender [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Keep in mind, I made a Mina 2 branch of AHC in the Geronimo sandbox a
few weeks back...Its basically the same as the
On Mon, 14 Jan 2008 23:30:15 -0700
Jeff Genender [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Trustin Lee wrote:
Sure we are! Please feel free to start to make contribution. :)
BTW is there any express procedure for accepting the existing AHC
committers (i.e. Sangjin and Rick) in the MINA PMC?
You
On Jan 15, 2008, at 1:26 AM, Trustin Lee wrote:
Hi Kevan,
On Jan 12, 2008 2:59 AM, Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Note that this is cross-posted to geronimo dev and mina dev lists...
Hopefully the last one...
Alex and Trustin,
Thanks for the info... More below...
On Jan 9, 2008, at
On 1/15/08, Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 15, 2008, at 1:26 AM, Trustin Lee wrote:
Hi Kevan,
On Jan 12, 2008 2:59 AM, Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Note that this is cross-posted to geronimo dev and mina dev lists...
Hopefully the last one...
Alex and
Keep in mind, I made a Mina 2 branch of AHC in the Geronimo sandbox a
few weeks back...Its basically the same as the AHC Mina 1, but the APIs
ere changed to work with Mina 2.
But the Mina version is significantly different from the one in G right now.
Jeff
Sangjin Lee wrote:
On 1/15/08,
Jeff,
Can you point me to the Mina 2 branch of AHC in G sandbox?
Thanks,
Sangjin
On 1/15/08, Jeff Genender [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Keep in mind, I made a Mina 2 branch of AHC in the Geronimo sandbox a
few weeks back...Its basically the same as the AHC Mina 1, but the APIs
ere changed to
Hi sangjin,
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/sandbox/async-http-client-mina2/
Jeff
Sangjin Lee wrote:
Jeff,
Can you point me to the Mina 2 branch of AHC in G sandbox?
Thanks,
Sangjin
On 1/15/08, Jeff Genender [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Keep in mind, I made a Mina 2 branch of AHC in
Hi Kevan,
On Jan 12, 2008 2:59 AM, Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Note that this is cross-posted to geronimo dev and mina dev lists...
Hopefully the last one...
Alex and Trustin,
Thanks for the info... More below...
On Jan 9, 2008, at 6:16 PM, Trustin Lee wrote:
Well, I think
Trustin Lee wrote:
Sure we are! Please feel free to start to make contribution. :)
BTW is there any express procedure for accepting the existing AHC
committers (i.e. Sangjin and Rick) in the MINA PMC?
You mean committer, not PMC? ;-)
As you know, they
are not ASF members and didn't
Note that this is cross-posted to geronimo dev and mina dev lists...
Hopefully the last one...
Alex and Trustin,
Thanks for the info... More below...
On Jan 9, 2008, at 6:16 PM, Trustin Lee wrote:
Well, I think it's OK for the Geronimo team to fork AHC, and I'd like
to respect them if Jeff
I think Jeff started working on some of it over at MINA btw. Excuse the
cross post.
Alex
On Jan 9, 2008 4:10 PM, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If it is better and easier than http-client are they interested in
it? Seems like a logical fit. That said, I think Genender boy wanted
AsyncWeb and Jeff's AsyncHttpClient are different projects. Anyways,
Jeff is free to modify the trunk, which already contains
AsyncHttpClient, whenever he wants. He made some big changes in
Geronimo sandbox before I made some big changes in his original
contribution, and that's why it's taking
Trustin Lee wrote:
AsyncWeb and Jeff's AsyncHttpClient are different projects. Anyways,
Jeff is free to modify the trunk, which already contains
AsyncHttpClient, whenever he wants. He made some big changes in
Geronimo sandbox before I made some big changes in his original
contribution,
On Jan 10, 2008 7:02 AM, Jeff Genender [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Trustin Lee wrote:
AsyncWeb and Jeff's AsyncHttpClient are different projects. Anyways,
Jeff is free to modify the trunk, which already contains
AsyncHttpClient, whenever he wants. He made some big changes in
Geronimo
On Jan 9, 2008 4:57 PM, Trustin Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
AsyncWeb and Jeff's AsyncHttpClient are different projects. Anyways,
Jeff is free to modify the trunk, which already contains
AsyncHttpClient, whenever he wants.
I know that.
You obviously missed why I posted this information.
I think you missed it again. See here:
On Jan 9, 2008 4:10 PM, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If it is better and easier than http-client are they interested in
it? Seems like a logical fit. That said, I think Genender boy
wanted
to melt some metal when he started
What's important is actually not where to host it or whether to fork
or not - Jeff, the main contributor of the project, and the MINA team
already decided to host it under the MINA trunk and Jeff wants to keep
working on here with AHC. So I think Jeff will take care of the
Geronimo discussion
Hey,
Alex just posted some X-post information to MINA and Geronimo, just to
inform MINA that Geronimo want to get Jeff's work out from Sandbox.
What are all the next mails about ? I see mentions of a kind of roadmap
for geronimo, and some other informations about asynchweb which is
totally
Ugg...yeah...we need to get that team looking at our stuff. The problem
is that the large delta is where the problem is going to be. I would
like to see the delta be made and brought over here and have them work
over here.
Jeff
Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
Hey,
Alex just posted some X-post
Jeff Genender wrote:
Ugg...yeah...we need to get that team looking at our stuff. The problem
is that the large delta is where the problem is going to be. I would
like to see the delta be made and brought over here and have them work
over here.
Jeff
As there is nothing like what you have
Not wrong at all. Its a little more complicated than that though :/
Let me get some of those guys to chime in.
Jeff
Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
Jeff Genender wrote:
Ugg...yeah...we need to get that team looking at our stuff. The problem
is that the large delta is where the problem is going to
Thanks Jeff for taking care of this! I know it's a complicated task
for anyone, but I believe you are the only one who can take care of
this this time. We don't need to rush but can move step by step. :-)
Cheers,
Trustin
On Jan 10, 2008 9:18 AM, Jeff Genender [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not
On Jan 10, 2008 9:00 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey,
Alex just posted some X-post information to MINA and Geronimo, just to
inform MINA that Geronimo want to get Jeff's work out from Sandbox.
What are all the next mails about ? I see mentions of a kind of roadmap
for
Trustin Lee wrote:
I am sorry if there was some confusion. :)
Confusion does not matter as soon as it has been clarified :)
Thanks Trustin !
--
--
cordialement, regards,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
directory.apache.org
24 matches
Mail list logo
