Re: ONNX Support

Chai continue the great work he’s doing by > disabling the failing tests (like we normally do for any failing/flaky > tests already) > > Sam > > > On Oct 7, 2019, at 12:45 PM, Anirudh Acharya > wrote: > > > > Hi Chaitanya, > > > > The last I checked(

Re: ONNX Support

Hi Chaitanya, The last I checked( a couple of months back) there are a few customers/users of MXNet in Amazon who use ONNX in production. The last commit for ONNX module was on Aug 29th - b7cca015553d707cd1c4ce292826d7311309419c So IMO disabling any of the tests is not a good idea. Thanks

Re: [Announcement] New Committer - Anirudh Acharya

t; > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Congratulations Anirudh! Well deserved! > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, 26 Sep 2019 at 10:10, Chris Olivier < > cjolivie...@apache.org> > > > > > wrote: > > > > >

Re: new website, docs code freeze

Hi, In the operator tutorial( http://mxnet.incubator.apache.org/api/faq/add_op_in_backend), there are sections which do not render properly, for example - forward function, backward function and shape inference. Thanks Anirudh On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 7:53 AM Aaron Markham wrote: > I'm

Re: [Discuss] MXNet Python 2 Support Deprecation

+1 On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 11:03 AM Marco de Abreu wrote: > +1 > > -Marco > > Sheng Zha schrieb am Do., 18. Juli 2019, 19:59: > > > Dear MXNet community, > > > > I'd like to reopen the discussion on deprecating python2 support. This > > would help modernize the design and engineering practice

Re: assimilation of mshadow into the MXNet codebase

Hi Pedro, mshadow is mostly used for tensor arithmetic. There have been discussions about including it within mxnet. I think it is a good idea. As a more long term solution using libraries like eigen to perform linear algebra operations was also suggested by anirudh2290@. I think xtensor(

Re: Include R-package

There was a conversation on this some time back here - https://lists.apache.org/list.html?d...@mxnet.apache.org:2018-12:Rcpp%20licensing%20in%20Apache%20MXNet - Anirudh On Mon, Apr 1, 2019 at 12:19 PM Zach Kimberg wrote: > As part of the current MXNet release process, the R-package is

Re: R help

model/Inception-BN-0126.params")" > > Looks like the > http://data.dmlc.ml/models/imagenet/inception-bn/Inception-BN-0126.params > is failing for me as well. > > > On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 10:37 AM Anirudh Acharya > wrote: > > > Hi Per da Silva, > > > >

Re: R help

Hi Per da Silva, Let me know if I can help, we can chat offline. >From first glance it would seem - R:MKLDNN CPU is passing whereas R:CPU is failing - R:GPU might have failed due to this "cannot open URL ' http://data.dmlc.ml/models/imagenet/inception-bn/Inception-BN-0126.params '"

Re: [DISCUSS] Rebrand Gluon to MXNet imperative or something MXNet.

I have also faced this problem, when talking to someone external( at meetups etc.. ) using two names like gluon and mxnet gets confusing and people usually have not heard of gluon. I get around it by referring to gluon as "gluon-mxnet" while talking to anyone outside the community. - Anirudh

HPO for MXNet models

some wiggle room there. MXNet needs HPO functionality and instead of building something from scratch we could just use existing open source projects. Would like to hear more from the community. Thanks Anirudh Acharya

Re: Call for Ideas and Approaches to Community Building

Having only non-organization PMC members nominate new committers could un-level the playing field. 1. Many times contributions might not require a contributor to have direct 1:1 discussion with PMC members outside his org. 2. It would give inordinate power/responsibility to the few non-Amazon

Re: [DISCUSS] Process to remove deprecated operators

Hi Lin, This is a good idea. Here is an issue - https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/9686 that is already attempting to collate all the breaking changes that might be necessary for v2.0. We could start by adding things to that issue. I think eventually we will need a separate branch

Re: [Announcement] New Committer -- Lin Yuan

Congratulations Lin On Sat, Feb 2, 2019, 3:27 PM Tianqi Chen Dear Community: > > Please join me to welcome Lin Yuan(@apeforest) as a new committer of > Apache(incubating) MXNet! > > He has contributed to various improvements, including better compatibility > of larger arrays across the codebase.

Re: [DISCUSS] About the PR merging policy

Thanks Qing for bringing this up. I think the cwiki can contain pointers to apache guidelines - - https://www.apache.org/dev/committers.html - https://www.apache.org/dev/new-committers-guide.html - And a few thumb rules( not hard and fast rules, we should trust the committers to act

Re: Rcpp licensing in Apache MXNet

Hi Steffen, We had a similar discussion with a legal team in Amazon, and we made this PR - https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/12559 to fix the licensing issues in the R-package. I think the R-package should be good to include in the release, but we should try to get a confirmation

Re: A New API for creating .rec files

erl...@gmail.com> wrote: > This makes a lot of sense to me Anirudh. > > On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 11:38 AM Anirudh Acharya > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > During some recent MXNet user surveys, one of the user requests was to > have > > a im2rec API that wi

Re: [Question] Difference between "Feature" and "Feature request" labels in Github

This issue was raised before here - https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/3e988e6bd82cb2d69ba20c21bf763952ed22a5732e61f6fba1f89ac8@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E We need someone with committer privileges to fix it. Thanks Anirudh On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 4:36 PM Lin Yuan wrote: > Dear Community,

Re: Nightly/Weekly tests for examples

features. I am curious to know how you will write tests for these things. Looking forward to seeing the design of this test bed/framework. Thanks Anirudh Acharya On Fri, Nov 9, 2018 at 2:39 PM Marco de Abreu wrote: > Hello Ankit, > > that's a great idea! Using the tutorial tests as

Re: Run Sphinx checks on MXNet CI

this guide as more PRs come in that > exhibit new ways of handling errors or warnings. That way, creating > docs and troubleshooting any build issues will be much easier. > > Please let me know if you have any questions or feedback. You can > always add that directly to the wiki too. >

Run Sphinx checks on MXNet CI

to the CI? Regards Anirudh Acharya

Re: MXNet - Label Bot functionality

Hi Harsh, Thanks for working on this. This will be very helpful for people who triage issues and reviews PRs regularly. Few concerns from this design document - https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Machine+Learning+Based+GitHub+Bot and the conversation in the comment section 1.

A New API for creating .rec files

this functionality from the PyPi package itself, instead of cloning the repo. I was thinking of converting the tool into an API call under the mx.io package. I will send the API design shortly. I wanted to know what the community thinks of this change. Thanks Anirudh Acharya

Re: Propose to discontinue supporting Apache MXNet on Windows 7

+1 for discontinuing. On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 4:11 PM Naveen Swamy wrote: > +1 to stop supporting Win7 > > On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 3:54 PM Lin Yuan wrote: > > > Dear Community, > > > > > > > > Currently, our MXNet installation guide for Windows does not work for > > Windows 7. e.g. Microsoft

Re: Duplication of Operators for sampling from random distributions

> invoke either sample_xxx or random_xxx correspondingly. > > Best, > Haibin > > On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 1:42 PM, Anirudh Acharya > wrote: > > > Hi All, > > > > I had earlier filed an issue with functionality-duplication/code-refactor > > h

Re: Publish MXNet images to DockerHub

ith TensorRT enabled, would it > be possible to get that image pushed to the MXNet Dockerhub repo by a > committer? > > On Sun, Jul 22, 2018 at 3:57 PM Anirudh Acharya > wrote: > > > @Naveen No, I meant in general, for all bindings. Irrespective of whether > > we use a p

Duplication of Operators for sampling from random distributions

Hi All, I had earlier filed an issue with functionality-duplication/code-refactor here - https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/11811 As per the suggestion in the github issue I would like to bring it to the attention of the wider community - The operators defined in sample_op.cc and

Re: Publish MXNet images to DockerHub

to CRAN do you still see a need for docker ? > Could > > you elaborate how this would be helpful and easy if they were to use > other > > packages in CRAN? > > > > On Sat, Jul 21, 2018 at 10:51 PM, Anirudh Acharya > > > wrote: > > > > > Yes, co

Re: Publish MXNet images to DockerHub

at 9:56 PM Mu Li wrote: > cu90 and cu90mkl are also available, see > https://hub.docker.com/r/mxnet/python/tags/ > > On Sat, Jul 21, 2018 at 9:51 PM, Anirudh Acharya > wrote: > > > The python binding that is actively maintained is > > > > mxnet-mkl 1.2.1 >

Re: Publish MXNet images to DockerHub

ber we > can easily push all bindings into docker hub through the script in > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/tree/master/docker. > > On Sat, Jul 21, 2018 at 5:03 PM, Anirudh Acharya > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > Docker Hub( https://hub.docker.com/u/mxnet

Publish MXNet images to DockerHub

of use and access to our users. Is this something that should be included as part of the release process? What does the community think? Thanks Anirudh Acharya

Re: Release plan - MXNET 1.3

@sandeep krishnamurthy the bug fixes in the R-package is something we have just begun, there will not be anything significant to announce before the v1.3 code freeze. On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 10:08 PM Steffen Rochel wrote: > To make it easier to find the discussions related to project proposals

Re: [VOTE] Subscribe dev@ to Github Activities

+1 On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 9:58 AM Anirudh wrote: > Its not foregoing transparency since people can easily subscribe to the > github activities individually. dev@ has been used till now for design > discussions, other project discussions, > votes etc. After we subscribe dev@ to all activities,

Re: [DISCUSS] Subscribe dev@ to Github Activities?

@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > -1 It's a lot of traffic, whomever wants to subscribe can do it > > in > > > > github. I'm afraid it will decrease signal to noise ratio in the > > list. > > > > > >

Re: [DISCUSS] Subscribe dev@ to Github Activities?

+1 On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 11:51 AM Piyush Ghai wrote: > +1 > > On Jul 12, 2018, at 11:50 AM, Tianqi Chen > wrote: > > > > +1 > > > > On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 11:10 AM, Sheng Zha wrote: > > > >> Hi all, > >> > >> Should we subscribe dev list to github updates on mxnet repo? Both > github > >>

Re: C++ api issue labeling

There is another instance of label duplication - We have labels "Feature" ( https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/labels/Feature ) and "Feature Request" ( https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/labels/Feature%20request ). I don't think there is much difference between these two labels. It

Re: Release process for R

Hi Marco, A release process for the R-package would probably involve publishing the package to CRAN. Currently it is not done and the r-package would need considerable changes/improvements before it can get published to CRAN. So at present accessing the package from the S3 bucket is the surest

Proposed Change to Reshape Operator

the shape of second input( as it is done now) or take the second input as the shape array itself. Please let me know your comments and feedback. Regards Anirudh Acharya

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.2.0.RC0

slf4j.LoggerFactory > >> >^ > >> > warning: there was one deprecation warning; re-run with > >> > -deprecation for details > >> > warning: there were 11 feature warnings; re-run with -feature > for > >> > details

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.2.0.RC0

ok as well. > > > > Best, > > Da > > > > Sent from my iPhone > > > > On Apr 21, 2018, at 1:12 PM, Anirudh Acharya <anirudhk...@gmail.com > > <mailto:anirudhk...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > > > @ThomasDelteil that might be due

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.2.0.RC0

@ThomasDelteil that might be due to the fact that in the example, the context is being set as CPU and not GPU. But I will still take a look as soon as possible. Regards Anirudh On Sat, Apr 21, 2018 at 11:10 AM, Thomas DELTEIL wrote: > *-0* > > compiled from source

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.2.0.RC0

+1 Checked the following - - source compiles - the tests for the onnx import API passes. Regards Anirudh On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 1:11 PM, Meghna Baijal wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > > I Checked the following: > > 1. Signatures are ok > > 2. Source compiles

Re: blog for MXNet

There is already an AWS Evangelist, Julien Simon, who has quite a few posts about mxnet/gluon on medium - https://medium.com/@julsimon Regards Anirudh On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 3:27 PM, Sebastian Gutierrez < sebast...@aiworkbox.com> wrote: > Aaron and Thomas > > Great ideas! > > One thing worth