Re: Changes to MPI-operator

. > > Best, > Yuan > > On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 5:51 PM Rong Ou wrote: > >> Sounds great! Yes it would be nice to have some examples for MXNet. >> >> On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 3:36 PM Roshani Nagmote < >> roshaninagmo...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >&g

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.4.0.rc3

+1 Downloaded, installed on Ubuntu 16.04. Verified signatures. Built from source with cuda enabled. Ran train_mnist.py test successfully. Thanks, Roshani On Sun, Feb 17, 2019 at 12:13 PM Carin Meier wrote: > +1 Downloaded and verified the signature on the tar. Built and tested the >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.3.1.rc0

+1 Installed the release package on Ubuntu with CUDA, CUDNN enabled and ran train_cifar10.py example successfully. Thanks, Roshani On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 5:21 AM Anton Chernov wrote: > Thank you Carin, Steffen and Kellen for your votes. > > The results so far: > > * Binding * > > +1 votes: >

Re: Call for participation: evaluate Java API

Java APi SSD example code seems to be in this PR https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/12830 Thanks, Roshani On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 1:41 PM Pedro Larroy wrote: > To play around we use the java api branch? is there a link to some example > code? > > Thanks. > > On Fri, Oct 12, 2018

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release MXNet version 1.3.0

Thanks Chris. Will keep it in mind next time. :) Regards, Roshani On Fri, Sep 7, 2018 at 12:07 PM Chris Olivier wrote: > nit: using the "-" before peoples' names makes this kind of hard to read > for me, since "-" is part of "-1" > > On Fri, Sep 7, 2

Re: [VOTE] Release MXNet version 1.3.0.RC0

st(v.dtype) > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > net_fp16.collect_para

[RESULT][VOTE] Release MXNet version 1.3.0

Hi All, So, this vote passes with *seven* +1, *two* 0 and *three* -1 votes. *+1 votes* *Committers:* - Joshua Zhang - Carin - Naveen - Indu - Haibin *Community:* - Pigeon Lucky - Steffen *0 votes:* *Community:* - Thomas - Aaron *-1 votes:* *Committers:* - Sandeep - Anirudh *Community:* -

Re: [VOTE] Release MXNet version 1.3.0.RC0

se cycle again just for one fix. Users can cherry pick or build from > > master if they want the fix right away, right? I'd change my mind to -1 > if > > this wasn't the case, with good reason, and if the user impact was > critical > > to adoption or risks abandonment. > > >

[RESULT][VOTE] Release MXNet version 1.3.0

Hi All, Thank you for spending the time to test MXNet 1.3.0.RC0 release. Sandeep mentioned the issue when the user tries to load model params trained/saved as FP16 in gluon. The fix

Re: [VOTE] Release MXNet version 1.3.0.RC0

t; > > > > > > all the other known bugs, that this becomes a release > blocker? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Some facts to consider: > > > > > > > > - The bug exists since SymbolBlock was introduced a year ago &

[VOTE] Release MXNet version 1.3.0.RC0

Hi all, I would like to propose a vote to release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.3.0.RC0. Voting will start now (Friday, Aug 31st) and end at 7:00 PM PDT, Wednesday, Sept 5th. Link to release notes: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/releases Link to release candidate 1.3.0.rc0:

Re: Release plan - MXNET 1.3

Best would be to > > get the fix on the release branch. > > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/12421 > > > > Pedro > > > > On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 2:38 AM Roshani Nagmote < > roshaninagmo...@gmail.com > > > > > wrote:

Re: Release plan - MXNET 1.3

:24 AM kellen sunderland < kellen.sunderl...@gmail.com> wrote: > Great news! Thanks for the efforts Roshani + Sheng. > > On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 6:58 PM Roshani Nagmote > > wrote: > > > Release branch v1.3.x was cut yesterday night. Thanks, @Sheng for helping >

Re: Release plan - MXNET 1.3

Release branch v1.3.x was cut yesterday night. Thanks, @Sheng for helping with this and merging a bunch of PRs. I will be running tests on the branch and move forward with the release steps now. :) Thanks, Roshani On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 11:12 AM Roshani Nagmote wrote: > Thanks Pat

Re: Release plan - MXNET 1.3

"tanh", "softrelu" > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/10336 > > Debugging functionality: > +Result check > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/12069 > +Backend switch > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/12058 > > Tha

Re: Release plan - MXNET 1.3

+%28incubating%29+1.3.0+Release+Notes Please take a look and update if I have missed anything. I will be cutting RC0 tomorrow. Thanks, Roshani On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 2:28 PM Roshani Nagmote wrote: > Sure will do. thanks. > > -Roshani > > On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 11:53 AM Afrooze, Sina

Re: Release blocker? - buggy topk Op

Thanks Leonard for raising this issue. @ciyong Thanks for submitting the fix. I will be tracking mentioned PR #12202 for release. -Roshani On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 6:45 AM Zhao, Patric wrote: > Hi Leonard, > > Thanks to raising the issue of

Re: Release plan - MXNET 1.3

get them merged? Thanks, Roshani On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 12:46 PM Roshani Nagmote wrote: > Talked to the person who ran resnet50 benchmarks offline. Build flag was > not properly set so there was a difference in performance numbers observed. > There is no issue caught and he was able to g

Re: Release plan - MXNET 1.3

tps://mxnet.incubator.apache.org/faq/perf.html#scoring-results> We are good here. Thanks, Roshani On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 4:08 PM Roshani Nagmote wrote: > Hi Dom, > > I verified resnet50 run on MXNet master branch. Checked on single gpu > machine. Numbers match. I didn't see any perfo

Re: Release plan - MXNET 1.3

that I can try to reproduce it again? Thanks, Roshani On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 12:31 PM Roshani Nagmote wrote: > This is not a major feature. I meant other new feature requests PR won't > be accepted in 1.3 release now. > Bug fixes will be accepted. I will be trying to reproduce the r

Re: Release plan - MXNET 1.3

better that we remove these functions in this > release. This way we don't have to worry about major bumps in the next > release if they're removed. > > -Kellen > > > On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 7:24 PM Roshani Nagmote < > roshaninagmo...@gmail.com> >

Re: Release plan - MXNET 1.3

another datapoint. > > On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 3:15 AM Afrooze, Sina wrote: > > > Hi Roshani - I think this regression issue is a release blocker: > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/12116 - Sina > > > > > > On 8/8/18, 12:40 PM, "Roshani Nag

Re: Release plan - MXNET 1.3

Thanks, Kellen for letting me know. On Wed, Aug 8, 2018 at 12:09 PM kellen sunderland < kellen.sunderl...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hey Roshani, I think it should be ready by Friday. > > On Tue, Aug 7, 2018, 10:20 PM Roshani Nagmote > wrote: > > > Thanks Kellen. Ye

Re: Release plan - MXNET 1.3

2 instances. > > Best, > > - Zhi > > > On Aug 7, 2018, at 9:05 AM, Roshani Nagmote > wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > Right now, we are delaying MXNet 1.3 release for pending TensorRT PR ( > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/1132

Re: Release plan - MXNET 1.3

nclude TRT integration with v1.3 to > > enable users to try TRT with MXNet, minimize the risk and avoid breaking > > API change. > > To accommodate the change the request is to delay RC for a few days. > > > > Regards, > > Steffen > > > > On Tu

Re: Release plan - MXNET 1.3

/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/11325 Gluon RNN: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/11482 *Code freeze date is 08/02(Thursday).* Kindly try to complete ongoing work and get these PRs merged. Thanks, Roshani On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 1:02 PM Roshani Nagmote wrote: > Hi all, >

Re: Release plan - MXNET 1.3

XNet. This is great community > > effort and a good example of a community working together towards a > unified > > goal! > > > > Best regards, > > Marco > > > > [1]: > > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/d6d81401de796a96677a112d6cd

Re: Release plan - MXNET 1.3

posals I > > added a column with a link to the thread on dev@ for most projects. > > Appreciate for the project owners to fill in the blanks and to check > that I > > got the right threads. > > > > Regards, > > Steffen > > > > On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 7:11

Re: Release plan - MXNET 1.3

res? We'll target getting the release in and polished by the > 23rd. Design proposal is here: > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Runtime+Integration+with+TensorRT > and the lead contributor is Marek Kolodziej. > > -Kellen > > On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 8:32 P

Release plan - MXNET 1.3

Hi All, I am starting the process to prepare for Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.3 Release. Please find project proposal draft for this release here: <*https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Project+Proposals+for+next+MXNet+Release

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release MXNet version 1.2.1.RC1

e next few days. Thanks, Roshani On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 6:10 PM Roshani Nagmote wrote: > Hi All, > > Thank you for spending the time to test MXNet 1.2.1.RC1 release. > This vote passes with 9 +1 (binding votes). > > Binding +1: > Haibin > Indhu > Sandeep > Jun

[RESULT][VOTE] Release MXNet version 1.2.1.RC1

Hi All, Thank you for spending the time to test MXNet 1.2.1.RC1 release. This vote passes with 9 +1 (binding votes). Binding +1: Haibin Indhu Sandeep Jun Zhi Naveen Lin Sergio Hao Vote thread:

Re: [VOTE] Release MXNet version 1.2.1.RC1

Hi All, Could you please test and vote for this release? Voting will end tomorrow by 5:50 pm PDT. Thanks, Roshani On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 4:53 PM Roshani Nagmote wrote: > Hi all, > > I would like to propose a vote to release Apache MXNet (incubating) > version > 1.2.1.RC1. Vo

[VOTE] Release MXNet version 1.2.1.RC1

Hi all, I would like to propose a vote to release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.2.1.RC1. Voting will start now (Monday, Jul 9th) and end at 5:50 PM PDT, Thursday, July 12th. Link to release candidate 1.2.1.rc1: *https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/releases/tag/1.2.1.rc1

Re: MXNet 1.3 release - call for volunteers

Hi, I would like to volunteer. But as I am not a committer, I would need help from some committer. Please let me know if anyone is interested to help me with the release. Thanks, Roshani On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 5:52 PM Hagay Lupesko wrote: > Hello community! > > I'd like to kickstart the

Re: MXNet issues labeling

but as you said, it will still involve manual labeling. We can do this as a temporary solution but need a long-term solution. @Hao, will explore that option too! Thanks! Thanks, Roshani On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 9:52 AM, Roshani Nagmote <roshaninagmo...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thank

Re: MXNet issues labeling

rch and pick their contribution. > > > > > > > > > > I agree manually doing it all the time is not scalable and > efficient. > > > > Your > > > > > proposal on bot script to auto-label, similar to the working of >

MXNet issues labeling

Hi, Some of us here at Amazon as a part of our day job, are triaging Github issues to find where MXNet users are experiencing difficulty and help the community focus on those areas. This is done by assigning labels to the Github issues. We do know that only labeling won’t solve the real problem

Re: [VOTE] Change Scala namespace from dmlc to org.apache

+1 to change the namespace On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 3:05 PM, Chris Olivier wrote: > The assumption is that it would be changed more-or-less immediately. ie. > this is like a voted PR, I guess. > > On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 2:53 PM, Chris Olivier >

Re: [VOTE] Disconnect all non-C API's from mxnet versioning

-1 for different versioning. I feel its just added confusion for users. On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 2:35 PM, YiZhi Liu wrote: > Agree. > > And my reply to Marco's point, > > > Changing namespaces is one use-case, but there will be a lot more with > increasing activity - we

Re: Request for comments: Proposal for import/export model formats module into MXNet

Hi all, I wanted to follow up on the proposal I sent before. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Proposal%3A+ImportExport+ module It will be great if you can provide your feedback or suggestions. Thanks, Roshani On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 4:47 PM, Roshani Nagmote <roshanina

Request for comments: Proposal for import/export model formats module into MXNet

Hello all, I have written an initial design proposal for a `serde`(temporary name) module for importing and exporting different model formats like onnx, coreml to and from MXNet. Please take a look and feel free to provide suggestions in the comment section.

Request for suggestions- Supporting onnx in mxnet

Hi guys, I am working on supporting ONNX pre-trained models in Apache MXNet and would like to seek your opinion on the choice of implementation. I also have created a GitHub issue . Supporting ONNX in MXNet