Fantastic! This is going to be great for the Clojure MXNet users as well.
On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 1:39 PM YiZhi Liu wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I am happy to announce that the availability of the experimental
> nightly-build Scala package on Maven in Nexus. The nightly-builds,
> currently published as
on the adopting
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Become+an+Apache+MXNet+%28incubating%29+Committer+and+PPMC+Member+Proposal
> > > to
> > > replace our current document
> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/conf
Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 8:32 AM Carin Meier wrote:
> Thanks for publishing the notes and also thanks everyone for providing
> valuable feedback and discussion.
>
> I encourage everyone that has ideas for improvement to the document to
> feel free to edit and revise. If you need a lo
should be to have separation between committer and
> >PPMC election
> >- Criteria are vague, should we add some example persona?
> >- Spell out privileges of committer and PPMC member
> >
> >
> > Note: I update the project proposal to address first bullet.
> >
ns to Committer Criteria thread.
Thanks,
Carin
On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 5:05 PM Carin Meier wrote:
> I think it was removed from the document by Steffen from feedback
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/4ed84034f9cac4cacae865dd5b5699aa1f9d650c0feee37072df41fa@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E
>
I think it was removed from the document by Steffen from feedback
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/4ed84034f9cac4cacae865dd5b5699aa1f9d650c0feee37072df41fa@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E
The diff is here
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/diffpagesbyversion.action?pageId=95652053&selectedPa
a hard rule, but recommendation.
>
> Steffen
>
> On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 2:18 PM Carin Meier wrote:
>
> > Thanks Steffen helping draft up the proposal for Committer and PPMC
> > guidelines.
> >
> > Please everyone review and provide feedback
> >
> >
> h
discussions/revisions are
complete.
- Carin
On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 12:03 PM Carin Meier wrote:
> Great!
>
> I started a rough draft for collaboration at
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Become+a+Committer+Proposal
> .
>
> Everyone feel free to enhance
+1 Great idea. Adding a name to the contributor list is a good idea. Also,
I've found that thanking the person for the review on the PR is another way
to express gratitude for their time and effort.
On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 2:51 PM Tianqi Chen wrote:
> Dear MXNet Community:
>
> There is a great d
t; I'm willing to collaborate to create a draft proposal.
> Steffen
>
> On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 5:35 AM Carin Meier wrote:
>
> > Background:
> >
> > There is a desire to increase the committer pool and grow the community.
> > This thread is to discuss the
Background:
There is a desire to increase the committer pool and grow the community.
This thread is to discuss the possibility of revision the current committer
criteria in light of the following goals:
- Make it easier to newcomers to be committers
- Recognize non-code contributions as paths to
such
> > emails
> > > but I didn't find any official guidance on that. Maybe it is a project
> > by
> > > project decision, I did find
> > >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/EDGENT/Sample+process+emails
> > .
> > > I totall
this case?
(Anyone feel free to answer the question - mentor or not :) )
- Carin
On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 7:48 PM Carin Meier wrote:
> This has been a very interesting discussion and I think it underlined a
> desire to increase the committer pool and community for the project. I'm
>
This has been a very interesting discussion and I think it underlined a
desire to increase the committer pool and community for the project. I'm
wondering now what the next steps would look like?
Do any mentors have any advice on how to proceed?
- Carin
On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 1:23 PM Jim Jagiel
dar Raorane
> *Subject:* Re: Develop a video course on Gluon with Packt
>
> Hello Mandar,
>
> thanks for your interest. We'd really appreciate it if you could create
> Video Tutorials for MXNet.
>
> We're always ready to help, but maybe you could be a bit m
Thanks for thinking of me but I don't have time for a project like that.
- Carin
On Sun, Oct 14, 2018 at 7:33 PM Mandar Raorane wrote:
> Hello Team,
>
>
> I am Mandar Raorane, a Video Acquisition Editor at Packt Publishing. Packt
> has been in IT publishing for over a decade now and we have bee
ed, https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-16690. But I think
> they intend for it to stay that way. Is that what the community would want
> for the MXNet repo? Or would you want to enable it for this and disable it
> again?
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 7:29 PM Carin Meier w
ide the green squash and
> merge button?
>
> On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 9:09 AM Carin Meier wrote:
>
> > Thank you Mike!
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 8:54 AM Michael Wall wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Carin,
> > >
> > > I will take a look at this
ike
>
> On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 8:36 AM Carin Meier wrote:
>
> > I just found out that since we are a podling, we should route all our
> Infra
> > tickets through one of our mentors and link the dev list discussion in
> > JIRA.
> >
> > Is there a mentor tha
t;> > >
>> > > [image: image.png]
>> > >
>> > > My guess is that this is disabled for the reason to avoid creating
>> > > non-linear history for standard PRs (as oppose to technical problem).
>> But
>> > > this is only my gu
m).
> But
> > > this is only my guess, it would be great if someone could confirm.
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > Chiyuan
> > >
> > > On Sat, Sep 29, 2018 at 3:50 AM Carin Meier
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >> I believe
ome
> technical limitation? If we are certain, we can ask out mentors to create a
> ticket with Apache Infra to make that switch.
>
> -Marco
>
> Carin Meier schrieb am Sa., 29. Sep. 2018, 01:17:
>
> > I made a test regular merge commit into a copy of master. It seemed to go
on on the
> web might simply work.
>
> Best,
> Chiyuan
>
> On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 2:53 PM Carin Meier wrote:
>
> > Pedro - Maybe a merge commit is a better answer in this case. I
> originally
> > ruled it out since it wasn't an option in the github w
5:07 PM Carin Meier wrote:
> We are actually running into troubles with using the subtree and the
> rebase. Since it looks like this is not going to be a simple, "click the
> button" through the web page merge, I rather hand this task off to someone
> with more context in m
g and rebase
> > 2. or merge without rebasing or squashing.
> >
> > Pedro.
> >
> >> On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 3:10 PM Carin Meier
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Thanks everyone for the input. I'll try to summarize the feedback from
> the
> >&
Sorry bad paste on the gist - here is the good one
https://gist.github.com/gigasquid/01cd48f563db4739910592dd9ac9db20
On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 10:24 AM Carin Meier wrote:
> +1 on option #2
>
> In the case of minimizing the the overhead for code maintenance, I wanted
> to suggest t
+1 on option #2
In the case of minimizing the the overhead for code maintenance, I wanted
to suggest the option of investigating generating code from the Java
Reflection for the Java APIs. I did a quick gist from Clojure of what the
generated classes look like from the current Scala Symbol.api fo
n <
> > tqc...@cs.washington.edu>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > In this particular case, I would suggest rebase and merge.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The main reasoning is that the commit log of the Julia binding is
> > not
>
xt: the PR actually contains 700+ commits, and it
> dates back to 2015. The development of the Julia binding started in the
> early stage of MXNet. We started with a separate repo due to the
> requirement of the package system of julia.
>
> Best,
> Chiyuan
>
> On Wed, Sep
y commits and then force push.
> I try to ensure that I also leave a backup branch in GitHub that contains
> my original git history. If you have an atomic chain of commits then it
> might make more sense to rebase and merge.
>
> On Wed, Sep 26, 2018, 3:41 PM Carin Meier wrote:
>
>
The Import Julia binding PR ,(
https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/10149), is getting very
close to being merged. Because of the large number of commits there was a
suggestion not to use the usual "Squash and Merge". The only option would
be "Rebase and Merge" since merging with a merge
Totally agree about the potential huge benefit of having new research
papers having implementation examples in MXNet. Wondering if anyone had any
brainstorm ideas about how to facilitate/ encourage this?
Also wanted to note that I think the recent progress and attention to
stability will help to b
Naveen,
Thanks for putting together the detailed document and kickstarting this
effort. It will benefit all the MXNet JVM users and will help solve a
current pain point for them.
- Carin
On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 5:37 PM Naveen Swamy wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I am working on managing Off-Heap Memory
I would suggest trying
* Remove bundle/source jar from 1.3.0 and attempt publishing OSX package.
and seeing if that solves the problem and allows publishing to staging.
If it does work then it helps to identity the cause.
If the effort does not take to long. I would recommend timeboxing the
effo
Checked out the tag, built and tested the Clojure package. +1
On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 10:59 PM Roshani Nagmote
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I would like to propose a vote to release Apache MXNet (incubating) version
> 1.3.0.RC0. Voting will start now (Friday, Aug 31st) and end at 7:00 PM
> PDT, Wednesda
I put a possible solution to investigate on the PR. At least it will get
the ball rolling again :)
On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 2:46 PM Sheng Zha wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is regarding https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/10149.
> The
> author ran into an mxnet CI issue, and has tried to reach
It looks great!
Just a minor correction that Macro is listed twice, but you can use the
extra slot and add me in :)
- Cain
On Sun, Aug 12, 2018 at 5:16 PM Steffen Rochel
wrote:
> I would like to thank Sebastian for his help to update
> http://incubator.apache.org/projects/mxnet.html
> Please h
Thank you. I'm excited to get more involved and help MXNet grow :)
On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 12:40 PM Marco de Abreu
wrote:
> Dear MXNet community,
>
> the Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache MXNet (incubating)
> has invited Carin Meier to become a committer and PMC
Hi,
I was thinking about the process for publishing the Clojure jar as well. I
think, since it will be published to Nexus/Maven and the building of it
depends on the Scala jar artifact, it might make sense to combine the
publishing of the Clojure jar at the same time as the Scala Jar. I haven't
wo
less, please review :)
>
> -Marco
>
> On Sun, Jul 1, 2018 at 12:46 PM Carin Meier wrote:
>
> > Yay on the merge! and Oh No! on the RAT. I'm up now too and taking a look
> > too.
> >
> > On Sun, Jul 1, 2018 at 5:56 AM, Marco de Abreu <
> > marco.g.ab...@go
now.
>
> http://jenkins.mxnet-ci.amazon-ml.com/blue/organizations/jenkins/
> incubator-mxnet/detail/master/1118/pipeline
>
> Best regards,
> Marco
>
> Pedro Larroy schrieb am So., 1. Juli 2018,
> 09:05:
>
> > Congrats on the PR being merged.
> >
> &g
s and grows...
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 11:11 AM Carin Meier
> wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks everyone for your feedback and efforts with the Clojure package
> PR.
> > >
> > > I'm delighted to join the MXNet community and work with you all a
Thanks everyone for your feedback and efforts with the Clojure package PR.
I'm delighted to join the MXNet community and work with you all and am
excited to invite the Clojure community to grow with it :)
Thanks,
Carin
On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 1:38 PM, Pedro Larroy
wrote:
> Yes, great work Cari
+1 I tested the Scala jars (through the clojure package) on staging on for
the various platforms and they look good.
On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 5:20 PM, Anirudh wrote:
> That looks like a flaky test because of atol being too small. please force
> rtol and atol values and see if you are still able
lay/MXNET/
> Project+Proposals+for+next+MXNet+Release
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 5:52 AM Carin Meier wrote:
>
> > Kovas Boguta https://twitter.com/kovasb, from the Clojure/AI community,
> > graciously took some time to review the PR for the clojure package.
> >
>
/incubator-mxnet/pull/11205
Feel free to join in on the discussion here or on the PR.
- Carin
On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 6:49 PM, Carin Meier wrote:
> I'm fine with whatever process works best and what makes everyone the most
> comfortable.
>
> I've completed one of the requests
> > 4. Improvements
> > > > > 5. Mark as stable and announce Julia officially
> > > > >
> > > > > I know how much effort Carin and the other maintainers are putting
> > into
> > > > > that project and thus I'd like to make t
you alone can't
> have
> >> everything in one go, I am hoping more contributors will join the
> effort.
> >>
> >> My guess is Chen is recommending generation of Clojure code from Scala.
> >>
> >>> On Sun, Jun 10, 2018 at 2:55 PM, Carin Meier
> wrot
t, Jun 9, 2018 at 2:38 AM, YiZhi Liu wrote:
> >
> > > Carin,
> > >
> > > Thank you for the great work. I'll do the review. As I have no
> > > expertise in Clojure, it will really help to have people from Clojure
> > > community reviewing it as
other suggestions.
Thanks,
Carin
On Fri, Jun 8, 2018 at 4:06 PM, Carin Meier wrote:
> Here is the PR https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/11205
>
> I've ported in the content from the external github repo (
> https://github.com/gigasquid/clojure-mxnet), that has been t
there would be a good starting
point for collaboration.
Feedback welcome.
- Carin
On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 11:40 AM, Carin Meier wrote:
> Thanks everyone. I'll work on getting together a PR with your feedback and
> post it here.
>
> On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 4:05 AM, Chen HY wrote
, Jun 6, 2018 at 5:54 AM, Pedro Larroy
wrote:
> Hi
>
> These Java classes that the document refers to, where are they located? Do
> we have a Java API atm? The origin of my question is that for android I
> think we need a Java API.
>
> Pedro.
>
> On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at
t to run some benchmarks and document. One of the
> reasons
> > users use MXNet is because of its performance and we want to ensure that
> we
> > maintain it across language bindings.
> >
> > Also invite your other clojure programmer buddies to the party :)
> >
> >
that we shouldn't need the user to change
> their code. I am not sure if we can release under org.apache.clojure-mxnet
> we might have to stick with our primary group id org.apache.mxnet and may
> be create a sub-package under it? any creative ideas?
>
> On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at
>>> specifically were interested in the Clojure packages, I think those are
> >>> people who might have tried and understand the complexity of making
> Scala
> >>> work in Clojure.
> >>>
> >>> I am in support of a MXNet-Clojure package,
with almost zero effort?
>
>
> 2018-06-01 21:58 GMT+01:00 Carin Meier :
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I've been working on a Clojure package for MXNet. Since Clojure is a JVM
> > language, the package leverages the great work of the existing Scala
> > package.
&g
/8971
Architecture & Design:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/MXNet+Clojure
and the github repo for rapid testing and issue fixing before of opening an
official PR https://github.com/gigasquid/clojure-mxnet
I'm also active in the slack channel so feel free to ping me there.
Thanks,
Carin Meier
Thanks for your work on this!
It's going to make it much easier for Scala, (and soon Clojure users), to
get up and running on MXNet.
- Carin
On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 10:27 AM, Naveen Swamy wrote:
> All, I have created a guide to maven publish process here;
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/
t;
> Hopefully we can publish with the 1.2.0 release.
>
> -Naveen
>
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 12:18 PM, Carin Meier
> wrote:
>
> > I would like to be keep in the loop as the in-progress Clojure package is
> > built on the Scala api and classes generated
I would like to be keep in the loop as the in-progress Clojure package is
built on the Scala api and classes generated by the macros.
I certainly don't mind adjusting the code, just a good heads up and if
possible a stable release of the Scala jars to maven so that the Clojure
package could continu
+1 as well. I'm actively developing a Clojure package for MXNet that uses
the jars from the Scala package.
- Carin
On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 4:44 PM, YiZhi Liu wrote:
> +1 for changing the namespace asap. for the maven deploy, we can have
> it build along with pip deployment.
>
>
> 2018-03-09 10:1
Could I please get an invite to the slack too?
Thanks,
Carin Meier
On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 7:14 PM, Chris Olivier wrote:
> Invite sent
>
> On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 6:30 AM, Rand Xie wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I would like to join the slack channel and contribute
Hi I would like to join the mailing list
101 - 163 of 163 matches
Mail list logo
