Hi,
I'm not going to express my opinion on this matter, because the community
is who has to decide what's best for the project.
I just want to say that there is no ASF/Incubator requirement that a
project/podling must use Jira as issue tracking system. There are other
projects using other hosted
ll emails automatically get copied to dev@ to ensure
> high
> visibility initially. What do you think?
>
> Sebastian schrieb am Fr., 15. Juni 2018, 20:51:
>
> > I have already proposed this many times in the past and would strongly
> > encourage it.
> >
> > -s
>
se use of the term "Apache
> way" to force our mind into the entire community... Maybe I am wrong..
>
> Tianqi
>
> On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 9:39 PM, Sergio Fernández
> wrote:
>
> > Well, I do respect what you discussed in that meetup, if course. But for
> >
Tianqi
>
> On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 9:25 PM, Sergio Fernández
> wrote:
>
> > Are we targeting just Seattle as our community? I really hope we are
> > thinking a bit beyond that...
> >
> > On Fri, Jun 15, 2018, 21:22 Tianqi Chen
> wrote:
> >
> >
say we stick
> with that given the user community prefers that
>
> Tianqi
>
> On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 9:13 PM, Sergio Fernández
> wrote:
>
> > Then, if everybody agree, let's request the mailing list creation to
> INFRA
> > ;-)
> >
> > Marco, I woul
Hi,
is there any good reason why the podling doesn't have a users@ mailing list
yet?
Honestly speaking, I'm not a big fan of the other tools the podling is
using. Slack and Web forums a cool tools, and I used them a lot in other
contexts. But when it comes to transparency and community, mailing
r users to retrain their model if they update
> MXNet. That's a serious issue and we'd love to follow up.
>
> Best regards,
> Marco
>
> Sergio Fernández schrieb am Di., 29. Mai 2018, 02:35:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I can't find anything related on that in the 1.2.-0-incuba
mas
>
> 2018-05-29 11:50 GMT-07:00 Sergio Fernández :
>
> > Hi Mario,
> >
> > I can't give you much details. But it looks there is a bug exporting the
> > parameters' names to a JSON models.
> >
> > I wonder if anybody else in the community has faced thi
Hi,
I can't find anything related on that in the 1.2.-0-incubating changelog,
so I assume models produced by the latest version would be backward
compatible with old versions, such as 1.1.0. But we've found that the
parameter model produced is very different and doesn't load.
Can you point me to
Please, notice PPMC votes are not binding.
On Fri, Jun 22, 2018, 09:35 Anirudh wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Apologies for replying instead of sending out a new email.
>
> This vote has passed with 6 +1s:
>
> Binding:
> Sandeep
> Haibin
> Indhu
>
> Non Binding:
> Carin
> Pedro
> Lai
>
> I will proceed
Happy to help.
On Fri, Jun 22, 2018, 21:40 Chris Olivier wrote:
> thank you for the explanation
>
> On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 9:25 PM Sergio Fernández
> wrote:
>
> > No, the result at dev@ it's fine. You just need 3 binding votes together
> > in
> > the two votes
as binding those votes at the RESULT email.
On Fri, Jun 22, 2018, 17:38 Chris Olivier wrote:
> what do you mean? just curious.
>
> On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 4:44 PM Sergio Fernández
> wrote:
>
> > Please, notice PPMC votes are not binding.
> >
> > On Fri, Jun 2
>
> On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 9:15 PM, Sergio Fernández
> wrote:
>
> > Just wanted to refresh what
> > https://incubator.apache.org/guides/ppmc.html#ppmc_and_binding_votes
> says:
> > "The only time when a PPMC member’s vote is binding is for the addition
> of
Besides that I can't agree with the arguments about the warning at
1.2.1-RC1-incubating, but I guess I haven't much to say. Remember that "if
it didn't happen on a mailing list, it didn't happen".
On Mon, Jul 2, 2018, 17:37 Anirudh wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After an offline discussion, the current
+1 (binding)
On Mon, Jul 9, 2018, 16:53 Roshani Nagmote
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I would like to propose a vote to release Apache MXNet (incubating) version
> 1.2.1.RC1. Voting will start now (Monday, Jul 9th) and end at 5:50 PM
> PDT, Thursday, July 12th.
>
> Link to release candidate 1.2.1.rc1:
>
Hi,
one detail I've notices: is the Podling collecting all ICLA when people
contribute to the project?
I can' find traces for most of the folks in this list:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/blob/master/CONTRIBUTORS.md
Because that's a minor, but important, detail for the viability of
e current community was at discuss forum and
> many
> > > users
> > > >>>> prefer it, having a mail-list is only a burden we will bring
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Tianqi
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>&g
Python 2.7 reaches End of Life by the end on 2019.Take that into account.
About Python 3.x, why not having 3.6 docker images? I know 3.7 is not yet
supposed by MXNet. But starting with 3 5 doesn't make much sense for me
On Wed, Oct 17, 2018, 11:52 Meghna Baijal
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I am
If there is no downside on platforms not supporting AVX512 instructions,
then +1
On Wed, Oct 17, 2018, 14:10 Alex Zai wrote:
> Hey all,
> We have been working hard these past few months to integrate and stabilize
> Intel’s MKLDNN deep learning CPU accelerator into Mxnet and have made
>
+1 since the Beam model is much more open than the current one.
Here my two cents to the discussion:
You can see that in the past was different,, but we had evolved as
foundation. As general recommendation, the new way is to spend less effort
in ad-hoc bylaws on every project/podling and adopt
Zha, you should check you have permissions to post to annou...@apache.org,
because I don't think you announcement made it through:
https://lists.apache.org/list.html?annou...@apache.org:lte=1M:mxnet
[image: Screen Shot 2018-09-19 at 12.05.14 PM.png]
On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 3:51 PM Sheng Zha
I'm surprised we haven't properly announced such cool launch.
https://twitter.com/wikier/status/1176903475906482176
On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 12:32 PM Pedro Larroy
wrote:
> The new website looks great Aaron. Nice work to everyone involved !
>
> On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 5:26 PM Aaron Markham
>
22 matches
Mail list logo
