Thanks for the update Marco and all the hard work put into the CI!
On Sat, Dec 1, 2018 at 1:21 PM Marco de Abreu
wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> the move has just been completed and the old big pipeline as well as the
> according job have been disabled. From now on, you will see the details
> statu
Hello everyone,
the move has just been completed and the old big pipeline as well as the
according job have been disabled. From now on, you will see the details
status messages below your PRs.
Some people wanted to make modifications to the Jenkinsfiles recently. In
that case, your PR will show a
Thanks Naveen and Gavin!
#1 has been completed and every job has finished its processing.
#2 is the ticket with infra:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-17346
I'm now waiting for their response.
-Marco
On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 8:25 PM Naveen Swamy wrote:
> Hi Marco/Gavin,
>
> Thanks
Hi Marco/Gavin,
Thanks for the clarification. I was not aware that it has been tested on a
separate test environment(this is what I was suggesting and make the
changes in a more controlled manner), last time the change was made, many
PRs were left dangling and developers had to go trigger and I tr
Hey Folks,
Marco has been running this change in dev, with flying colors, for some
time. This is not an experiment but a roll out that was announced. We also
decided to make this change post the release cut so limit the blast radius
from any critical obligations to the community. Marco is accoun
Hello Naveen, this is not an experiment. Everything has been tested in our
test system and is considered working 100%. This is not a test but actually
the move into production - the merge into master happened a week ago. We
now just have to put all PRs into the catalogue, which means that all PRs
h
Marco, run your experiments on a branch - set up, test it well and then bring
it to the master.
> On Nov 30, 2018, at 6:53 AM, Marco de Abreu
> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I'm now moving forward with #1. I will try to get to #3 as soon as possible
> to reduce parallel jobs in our CI. You might not
There are still pending PRs pending that needs to be merged and cherry picked
to the branch
> On Nov 30, 2018, at 6:53 AM, Marco de Abreu
> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I'm now moving forward with #1. I will try to get to #3 as soon as possible
> to reduce parallel jobs in our CI. You might notice s
Hello,
I'm now moving forward with #1. I will try to get to #3 as soon as possible
to reduce parallel jobs in our CI. You might notice some unfinished jobs. I
will let you know as soon as this process has been completed. Until then,
please bare with me since we have hundreds of jobs to run in orde
Hello,
since the release branch has now been cut, I would like to move forward
with the CI improvements for the master branch. This would include the
following actions:
1. Re-enable the new Jenkins job
2. Request Apache Infra to move the protected branch check from the main
pipeline to our new one
Sorry, [1] meant to reference
https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-37984 .
On Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 5:41 PM kellen sunderland <
kellen.sunderl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Marco and I ran into another urgent issue over the weekend that was
> causing builds to fail. This issue was unrelated to a
Marco and I ran into another urgent issue over the weekend that was causing
builds to fail. This issue was unrelated to any feature development work,
or other CI fixes applied recently, but it did require quite a bit of work
from Marco (and a little from me) to fix.
We spent enough time on the pr
Hi Marco - suggest to retrigger PRs, if needed in stages:
- pr-awaiting-merge
- pr-awaiting-review
that would cover 78 PR. In any case I would exclude pr-work-in-progress.
Steffen
On Sat, Nov 24, 2018 at 9:11 PM kellen sunderland <
kellen.sunderl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hey Marco, I'm still havin
Hey Marco, I'm still having quite a few issues passing PRs. Would you be
able to at least test a handful of PRs and make sure they pass/fail tests
as you expect?
On Sat, Nov 24, 2018, 7:01 PM Marco de Abreu
Hello Steffen,
>
> thank you for bringing up these PRs.
>
> I had to abort the builds dur
Hello Steffen,
thank you for bringing up these PRs.
I had to abort the builds during the outage which means that the jobs
didn't finish and not even the status propagation could have finished
(hence they show pending instead of failure or aborted).
Recently, we merged a PR that adds utility slav
Thanks Marco for the updates and resolving the issues.
However, I do see a number of PR waiting to be merged with inconsistent PR
validation status check.
E.g. https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/13041 shows 9 pending
checks being queued. However, when you look at the details, either the
Thanks everybody, I really appreciate it!
Today was a good day, there were no incidents and everything appears to be
stable. In the meantime I did a deep dive on why we has such a significant
performance decrease with of our compilation jobs - which then clogged up
the queue and resulted in 1000 j
Appreciated for your effort and help to make CI a better place!
Qing
On 11/21/18, 4:38 PM, "Lin Yuan" wrote:
Thanks for your efforts, Marco!
On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 4:02 PM Anirudh Subramanian
wrote:
> Thanks for the quick response and mitigation!
>
> On Wed
Thanks for your efforts, Marco!
On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 4:02 PM Anirudh Subramanian
wrote:
> Thanks for the quick response and mitigation!
>
> On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 3:55 PM Marco de Abreu
> wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > today, CI had some issues and I had to cancel all jobs a few minutes ago.
>
Thanks for the quick response and mitigation!
On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 3:55 PM Marco de Abreu
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> today, CI had some issues and I had to cancel all jobs a few minutes ago.
> This was basically caused by the high load that is currently being put on
> our CI system due to the pre-re
Hello,
today, CI had some issues and I had to cancel all jobs a few minutes ago.
This was basically caused by the high load that is currently being put on
our CI system due to the pre-release efforts for this Friday.
It's really unfortunate that we just had outages of three core components
within
Yes, let me add to the kudos, very nice work Marco.
"I'm trying real hard to be the shepherd." -Jules Winnfield
> On Nov 21, 2018, at 5:04 PM, Sunderland, Kellen
> wrote:
>
> Appreciate the big effort in bring the CI back so quickly. Thanks Marco.
>
> On Nov 21, 2018 5:52 AM, Marco de Abr
Appreciate the big effort in bring the CI back so quickly. Thanks Marco.
On Nov 21, 2018 5:52 AM, Marco de Abreu
wrote:
Thanks Aaron! Just for the record, the new Jenkins jobs were unrelated to
that incident.
If somebody is interested in the details around the outage:
Due to a required mainte
Thanks Aaron! Just for the record, the new Jenkins jobs were unrelated to
that incident.
If somebody is interested in the details around the outage:
Due to a required maintenance (disk running full), we had to upgrade our
Jenkins master because it was running on Ubuntu 17.04 (for an unknown
reaso
Marco, thanks for your hard work on this. I'm super excited about the new
Jenkins jobs. This is going to be very helpful and improve sanity for our
PRs and ourselves!
Cheers,
Aaron
On Wed, Nov 21, 2018, 05:37 Marco de Abreu
Hello,
>
> the CI is now back up and running. Auto scaling is working as
Hello,
the CI is now back up and running. Auto scaling is working as expected and
it passed our load tests.
Please excuse the caused inconveniences.
Best regards,
Marco
On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 5:24 AM Marco de Abreu
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'd like to let you know that our CI was impaired and dow
Hello,
I'd like to let you know that our CI was impaired and down for the last few
hours. After getting the CI back up, I noticed that our auto scaling broke
due to a silent update of Jenkins which broke our upscale-detection. Manual
scaling is currently not possible and stopping the scaling won't
27 matches
Mail list logo