Ok, it's on my todo-list!
Thanks for the reminder, in any case.
regards,
Martin
On 8/16/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mike,
I think abit has been already done, I remember
when martin asked me about family for adf/trinidad.
-Matthias
On 8/16/06, Mike Kienenberger [EMAIL
Ok, as long as it's compatible with the RI and someone commits the
work, I'm +1 for a custom resolver.
If we want to go for the easier solution of a bean and someone commits
the work for this, I'm +1 for the bean as well.
regards,
Martin
On 8/17/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOBAGO-115?page=comments#action_12428585 ]
Bernd Bohmann commented on TOBAGO-115:
--
Is Ajax enabled in tobago?
myFaces/Tobago does not work in Internet Explorer on Windows 2000 2003
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1208?page=all ]
Matthias Weßendorf updated MYFACES-1208:
Status: Open (was: Patch Available)
JSR-252 Issue #16: Provided additional I18n attributes dir and land for
the tags h:outputText,
Security Resolver
-
Key: TOMAHAWK-607
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-607
Project: MyFaces Tomahawk
Issue Type: New Feature
Reporter: Cagatay Civici
Assigned To: Cagatay Civici
A
I've thought more on this and read the entire discussion again. Since resolver seems more flexible than the bean, I'd say resolver now.http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-607
I've assigned it to myself.Cheers,CagatayOn 8/17/06, Martin Marinschek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:Ok, as long as
where to go?
tomahawk ?
myfaces?
extra lib?
shale ?
On 8/17/06, Cagatay Civici [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've thought more on this and read the entire discussion again. Since
resolver seems more flexible than the bean, I'd say resolver now.
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-607
getDataModel is not called on dataTable
---
Key: TOMAHAWK-608
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-608
Project: MyFaces Tomahawk
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Data List, Data
Tomahawk for now, if there's ever something like Faces-Goodies or
Faces-Commons, it should go there.
regards,
Martin
On 8/17/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
where to go?
tomahawk ?
myfaces?
extra lib?
shale ?
On 8/17/06, Cagatay Civici [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've
Title: My faces on a WebAS
Hy all,
I don't know if someone as already tested to work with JSF and MyFaces on its WebAS (Web Application Server of SAP).
In fact I've started by developping a simple JSF page
and next I would like to add some sweet component by using MyFaces and Tomawakh.
Hello,
I created a datatable and datascroller dynamically(from backing bean), which
are working fine.
My problem is, (my table has three pages each page having five rows) when i
delete all rows in first and third page, the rows are deleted,
but the pager is not coming on the second(the rows
I finally spent some time and created a FAQ for use in closing JIRA issues.
It may need some refinement, but I think it offers solid guidance on
when to open a JIRA issue, and I plan to put this as the comment in
all of the issues I'm closing as invalid.
Now that JIRA supports bulk operations, I'd like to propose that we
use the resolve status to identify things that are fixed, but not yet
available in a release.As part of the release process, we would
change all resolved issues for a snapshot to closed after the release
is made.
We have Application which used the PreserveDataModel = true atrribute
of Extended Data Table of Tomahawk which we are doing because we wanted
to implement client side sorting in our application.
But I see a strange behaviour if I get results based on the criteria
from the database for the first
sounds good to me!
regards,
Martin
On 8/17/06, Mike Kienenberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now that JIRA supports bulk operations, I'd like to propose that we
use the resolve status to identify things that are fixed, but not yet
available in a release.As part of the release process, we
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-596?page=comments#action_12428689
]
Mike Kienenberger commented on TOMAHAWK-596:
This only renders the children of a facet.
It doesn't render the non-facet children of datascroller.
I
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-596?page=comments#action_12428702
]
Ryan Wynn commented on TOMAHAWK-596:
I hear what you are saying about the facet and non-fact children. But that is
not the behavior I am experiencing.
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-596?page=comments#action_12428705
]
Mike Kienenberger commented on TOMAHAWK-596:
If you use your patch in a non-portlet environment, what happens?
Between the two of us, you're the
sounds reasonalbe.
On 8/17/06, Mike Kienenberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now that JIRA supports bulk operations, I'd like to propose that we
use the resolve status to identify things that are fixed, but not yet
available in a release.As part of the release process, we would
change all
Use the resetDataScroller workaround shown in TOMAHAWK-548 in your
delete action.
On 8/17/06, Ramesh Narayanan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I created a datatable and datascroller dynamically(from backing bean), which
are working fine.
My problem is, (my table has three pages each page
On 8/17/06, Mike Kienenberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now that JIRA supports bulk operations, I'd like to propose that we
use the resolve status to identify things that are fixed, but not yet
available in a release.As part of the release process, we would
change all resolved issues for a
at
com.sun.faces.application.ViewHandlerImpl.renderView(ViewHandlerImpl.java:130)
at ...
at org.apache.myfaces.lifecycle.LifecycleImpl
you mix two impls
sun ri (probably shipped by the container)
and myfaces.
You need to remove all refs to the RI.
Other application servers
I like that.
I think this is also valid for other ASF projects.
On 8/17/06, Mike Kienenberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I finally spent some time and created a FAQ for use in closing JIRA issues.
It may need some refinement, but I think it offers solid guidance on
when to open a JIRA issue, and
I totaly agree.RegardsCagatayOn 8/17/06, Mike Kienenberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/17/06, Mike Kienenberger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote: Now that JIRA supports bulk operations, I'd like to propose that we use the resolve status to identify things that are fixed, but not yet available in a
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOBAGO-115?page=comments#action_12428781 ]
Bernd Bohmann commented on TOBAGO-115:
--
You can enable disable ajax in the tobago-config.xml
ajax-enabledtrue/ajax-enabled
please look at
+1
On 8/17/06, Mike Kienenberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think we should get rid of the wish issue type.
I don't see that we're likely to have someone surfing the jira issue
tracker looking for things to do.
If someone wants to wish for something, the user list (or maybe a wiki
page) seems
I agree. I think this would be helpful on a large project where the developers
don't use things like mailing lists to stay in touch w/ end users.
Dennis Byrne
-Original Message-
From: Mike Kienenberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2006 03:57 PM
To: 'MyFaces Dev
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOBAGO-115?page=comments#action_12428796 ]
John Allan commented on TOBAGO-115:
---
I enabled ajax within tobago-config.xml (apparently the default is disabled -
I had assumed the reverse).
I connect from
Alllow workweek view to show saturday
-
Key: TOMAHAWK-609
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-609
Project: MyFaces Tomahawk
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: Schedule
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOBAGO-115?page=comments#action_12428805 ]
Bernd Bohmann commented on TOBAGO-115:
--
Can you send the Exception with the stacktrace, please.
Can you change the switch type to reloadPage, please.
Can
I don't see that we're likely to have someone surfing the jira issuetracker looking for things to do.
Well, I'm doing that and assign the issues that I find reasonable to myself.On 8/17/06, Matthias Wessendorf
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:+1On 8/17/06, Mike Kienenberger
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I
Well, I'm doing that and assign the issues that I find reasonable to myself.
for a wish ?
I look at open issues (bugs) but not wishes.
On 8/17/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
On 8/17/06, Mike Kienenberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think we should get rid of the
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOBAGO-115?page=comments#action_12428844 ]
John Allan commented on TOBAGO-115:
---
Ok here is the result of all your requested tests...
1) Here is the output on STDERR with AJAX enabled with ReloadTab -
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1383?page=all ]
Scott O'Bryan updated MYFACES-1383:
---
Status: Patch Available (was: Open)
FacesContextFactoryImpl issue using trinidad any myfaces core
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1383?page=comments#action_12428845
]
Scott O'Bryan commented on MYFACES-1383:
Hmmm. I don't know why it WOULD have to do this. I'll take a look at the
Portlet Bridge, but it seems to me
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1383?page=comments#action_12428849
]
Scott O'Bryan commented on MYFACES-1383:
Ok, this is not en entirely correct. The issue is that the current
FacesContext which is stored on the
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1383?page=comments#action_12428850
]
Scott O'Bryan commented on MYFACES-1383:
I think I have a solution which I'll try to apply tomorrow. The portlet is
using the setExternalContext
On 8/7/06, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For example, on Firefox you can check that one of the nodes on the
Tree 2 nonav example is there with:
|| assertText || //html/body/form/span/table[3]/tbody/tr/td[3]/span ||
Requires Foo ||
But that test fails in IE, even though the tree renders
38 matches
Mail list logo
