Re: JIRA Maintenance: Make Version 11.0 released

Hi Laszlo You should have this you've got the same permissions as I do. You can get to the project administration section by pressing the gear icon in the top right corner of JIRA Regards John On Mon 8 Apr 2019, 19:06 Geertjan Wielenga, wrote: > On Sat, Apr 6, 2019 at 9:19 PM Laszlo

Re: JIRA Maintenance: Make Version 11.0 released

gt; > On 4/6/19 12:43 PM, John McDonnell wrote: > > Hi laszlo > > > > I'll get to it tomorrow if no one else does(currently away will be near a > > PC tomorrow). > > > > To get yourself added as an admin I believe all you need to do is raise a > > infra

Re: JIRA Maintenance: Make Version 11.0 released

Hi laszlo I'll get to it tomorrow if no one else does(currently away will be near a PC tomorrow). To get yourself added as an admin I believe all you need to do is raise a infra ticket Regards John On Sat 6 Apr 2019, 20:19 Laszlo Kishalmi, wrote: > Dear all, > > I need some help again. We

Re: building github netbeans..

Hi Brad, I thought this error might have been on the confluence but cant see it. It's one of 3 things. 1. Incorrect java version, 2. Incorrect ant version 3. not everything is cloned correctly. Can you check the read me? and maybe try recloning if all is fine? Failing that, check the dev

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Netbeans 11.0 (incubating) [vote candidate 4]

+1 Looks fine to me. Built using openjdk8 was able to run and activate the additional modules etc. Regards John On Mon 25 Mar 2019, 05:48 Glenn Holmer, wrote: > On 3/21/19 2:41 AM, Laszlo Kishalmi wrote: > > This is our 4th voting candidate for the 11.0 release of Apache > > NetBeans. This

Re: [VOTE] Apache NetBeans graduation to Top Level Project

+1 On Mon 11 Mar 2019, 14:34 Josh Juneau, wrote: > +1 > > On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 5:48 AM Geertjan Wielenga > wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > After a discussion amongst the Apache NetBeans community on the dev > mailing > > list[1], voting on a PMC chair[2], checking the podling status page[3], >

Re: [VOTE] PMC chair for Apache NetBeans

+1 On Sat, 2 Mar 2019 at 12:37, Zoran Sevarac wrote: > +1 > > On Sat, Mar 2, 2019 at 5:11 AM Gaurav Gupta > wrote: > > > +1 > > > > On Sat, 2 Mar 2019 at 9:14 AM, Tushar Joshi > > wrote: > > > > > +1 > > > > > > (Most appropriate for Geertjan to be the first PMC Chair) > > > > > > with

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Netbeans 10.0 (incubating) [vote candidate 5]

Hi, Check out the readme: https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans I do not believe the entire NetBeans project builds with JDK 11 at the moment. Secondly you look to be on Windows, "./nbbuild/netbeans/bin/netbeans" will run the netbeans unix script to start the application. you'd want to

Re: JIRA component for new gradle support

Should be there now :) Regards John On Wed, 30 Jan 2019 at 18:55, Alessandro wrote: > Hi, > a component should be created in JIRA for categorizing bugs related to > the new gradle support. > > There is currently 'projects - Ant project' and 'projects - Maven' but no > 'projects - Gradle' or

Re: [VOTE] Apache NetBeans Version Number: 11.0

+1 (binding) On Sat, 26 Jan 2019 at 14:12, Josh Juneau wrote: > +1 > > Josh Juneau > juneau...@gmail.com > http://jj-blogger.blogspot.com > https://www.apress.com/index.php/author/author/view/id/1866 > > > > On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 9:51 PM Laszlo Kishalmi > > wrote: > > > Dear all, > > > >

Re: [tutorials] JIRA to review the donated tutorials / NetBeans 11

Hi, For the IDE portion, I might create a sub task for each page, as I wont get through all of them today, but can use the sub tasks to track my progress... Regards John On Mon, 7 Jan 2019 at 19:59, Brad Walker wrote: > I would suggest to create a CND C/C++ subtask and I'll help with it. > >

Re: [tutorials] JIRA to review the donated tutorials / NetBeans 11

Thats okay, it makes sense. Regards John On Mon, 7 Jan 2019 at 15:59, Geertjan Wielenga wrote: > I'd recommend only focusing on the English version at the moment. > > Gj > > On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 4:49 PM John McDonnell > wrote: > > > Quick question... > &g

Re: [tutorials] JIRA to review the donated tutorials / NetBeans 11

On Mon, 7 Jan 2019 at 15:33, Antonio wrote: > Thanks John! Greatly appreciated! > > El 07/01/2019 a las 16:30, John McDonnell escribió: > > Antonio, > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/RapidBoard.jspa?rapidView=303=null > > > > Any sub

Re: [tutorials] JIRA to review the donated tutorials / NetBeans 11

Antonio, https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/RapidBoard.jspa?rapidView=303=null Any sub task raised with the label "third-donation" will appear on this board. - I've also made you an admin so you should be able to tweak the flow if required. Regards John On Mon, 7 Jan 2019 at 08:00,

Re: Ambiguous reference when using Lombok

Hi, I have no issues with Lombok(1.18.4) on NB10. Can you send a sample project on, that highlights the issue please? Regards John On Mon, 7 Jan 2019 at 13:58, Rik Scarborough wrote: > When using lombok, version 1.18.4, I get the following error in the > Netbeans 10 (and Cool Beans),

Re: JIRA Maintenace: Make Version 10.0 released

11 Already exists, so we can bulk move 'Next' items to that. I can close off 10 later when I get near a laptop On Fri, 4 Jan 2019 at 00:53, Laszlo Kishalmi wrote: > Dear all, > > I need some help, in order to make version 10.0 released in our JIRA, > also rename "Next" -> 11.0 and create a new

Re: Automatic error reporting in pre-Apache NetBeans versions, going forward

Is this not something that could be customised to point to JIRA? If I remember correctly it allowed for credentials to be supplied and we could use the JIRA REST API to create tickets on that portal? This would keep all issues in the same place, so we don't have 2 areas where reporting is done?

Re: Find Bugs Integration - which donation?

w year... > > +1 for getting spot bugs supported... > > and we should have support for sonar lint as well... > > -Sven > > Am Di., 1. Jan. 2019, 05:34 hat John McDonnell > geschrieben: > > > Yes, > > > > FindBugs is effectively dead, but SpotBugs[1] ha

Re: Find Bugs Integration - which donation?

es...) [1]: https://spotbugs.github.io/ [2]: https://github.com/spotbugs/spotbugs Regards John On Tue, 1 Jan 2019 at 02:59, Laszlo Kishalmi wrote: > Well, just adding some note: FindBugs is not maintained and cannot > process bytecode from Java 9 and above. > > On 12/31/18 3:01 PM

Find Bugs Integration - which donation?

Hi All, Just looking at the transition page[1] and I notice theres no reference to the find bugs integration (When you selection Source->Inspect and select FindBugs as an analyser) page. Is there any update on this? Was it missed in the confluence page - relegated to a later drop? Thanks in

Re: Gradle Support for Apache NetBeans

Hi Laszlo, Hope you don't mind, but I have this building now(in progress), but I came across 2 issues, the one noted previously and another one related to the hash's of the slf4j dependencies. I have created 2 issues in your repository for them, to help track them, if thats okay with you? I

Re: Gradle Support for Apache NetBeans

existing Gradle plugin? Would it make > sense to merge your efforts? > > I would really like to see support for Gradle-based native C/C++ projects. > > Scott > > > > On Dec 29, 2018, at 6:02 PM, John McDonnell > wrote: > > > > Very cool, it'll be nice to h

Re: Gradle Support for Apache NetBeans

Very cool, it'll be nice to have Gradle and Maven in NetBeans moving forward. >From what I see, new frameworks seem to be coming out supporting Gradle, so being able to have Gradle as a first class citizen along with Maven that would be really great. Regards John On Sat, 29 Dec 2018 at 19:57,

Re: FYI: binding / non binding

That's for the correction Laszlo. I thought I'd seen that before but then again there's a lot of Apache documentation out there :) Regards John On Wed 19 Dec 2018, 16:37 Geertjan Wielenga Sure, makes sense, thanks for the correction. > > Gj > > On Wednesday, December 19, 2018, Laszlo Kishalmi

Re: FYI: binding / non binding

My bad... I'd marked mine as non-binding as for some reason I had thought I read somewhere that ppmc votes we're still non binding and only ipmc votes we're binding for incubator vote threads. I'll remember for next time. John On Wed 19 Dec 2018, 08:55 Geertjan Wielenga Hi all, > > In the VOTE

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Netbeans 10.0 (incubating) [vote candidate 5]

+1 (not binding) On Tue, 18 Dec 2018 at 17:59, Neil C Smith wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Built and tested with OpenJDK 8 on Ubuntu 18.04 (details below). > > No invisible nb-javac install! ;-) > > Minor niggle - one failure in RAT report, but *not* a license issue >

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Netbeans 10.0 (incubating) [vote candidate 5]

@Matthias as requested, I have opened NETBEANS-1803[1], I agree its not blocking the release, so will vote now. [1]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-1803 John On Tue, 18 Dec 2018 at 17:26, John McDonnell wrote: > Cool, > > I'll try to raise an idea when I get hom

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Netbeans 10.0 (incubating) [vote candidate 5]

discussion thread. > > > >For these two items mentioned I’d recommend just filing issues, they’re > >minor IMHO though great in the sense that they indicate everything else > >is > >in a good state. > > > >Gj > > > >On Tuesday, December 18, 2018, J

[DISCUSS] Release Apache Netbeans 10.0 (incubating) [vote candidate 5]

Hi, Kicking off a Discussion thread for the new vote thread :) When Im checking the Licence file I noticed 2 possible issues: 1. Near the end of the file it has: platform/o.n.swing.plaf/src/org/netbeans/swing/plaf/util/SmoothScrollPaneUI.java

Re: Publishing Maven Artifacts under netbeans.org (was Re: Publishing Maven artifacts under third-party coordinates (was: Set up Nexus staging profile for Dubbo ...))

Hi Eric, Forgive my ignorance I previously tried finding the minimum pom requirements but couldn't find them anywhere. I guess I was looking up the wrong thing. If you can send on a link then I might have time this weekend to modify the plug-in to support additional elements like license,scm etc

Re: module source location..

Hi Brad, Have a look at [1], this page tracks the Apache Transition steps. The CND modules are part of the forth code donation, I don't think there is an estimated ETA, as it looks like it's going to be done after the documentation donation is complete, and then it would have to be reviewed by

Re: 10-vc5

A less serious issue to some mentioned, but [1] will additional support for parameterized tests for JUnit 5. Regards John On Sat, 24 Nov 2018 at 18:52, Matthias Bläsing wrote: > Hi, > > Am Samstag, den 24.11.2018, 10:35 -0800 schrieb Laszlo Kishalmi: > > Hi all PR-973 broke HTML5, PHP. Going

Re: 10-vc5

Apologies... [1] refers to https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/1019 :) On Mon, 26 Nov 2018 at 21:43, John McDonnell wrote: > A less serious issue to some mentioned, but [1] will additional support > for parameterized tests for JUnit 5. > > Regards > > John >

Re: NetBeans - the UI for Maven

+1 I like this idea of making Maven the default. I'd also like to see if we could being Gradle support into the IDE by default as well. I know its worked on as a plugin but I think bringing it into the standard distribution would be a nice plus to have in the IDE as well. Regards John On Sat,

Re: Add a new component to JIRA for mavenutils

Done, Regards John On Thu, 25 Oct 2018 at 14:19, Eric Barboni wrote: > Hi, > > Would it be possible to add a component for mavenutilities > (https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans-mavenutils) > > One component for all (we have not so many issue) > > > > Best Regards > > Eric > >

Re: Add a new component to JIRA

Done Regards John On Thu, 25 Oct 2018 at 14:08, Junichi Yamamoto wrote: > Hi, > > Could someone please add "php - Code Analysis" as a JIRA component? > > Thanks, > Junichi > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: [Mentors] Altering the Release job

Hi I think this is a infra job to change your permissions on Jenkins. Regards John On Tue 2 Oct 2018, 01:02 Laszlo Kishalmi, wrote: > It seems we need to alter the release job on Apache Jenkins. > > Added mentor header as I've got the info on infra.chat that it might > require a mentor to

Re: Building javadoc: ant clean fails, NbTestCase not found

Hi Antonio, I think you need to build the main project before building the JavaDocs. Over the last few weeks when i have had time I've been playing about with creating a Jenkinsfile(attached), I'm fairly sure I had this task working a few weeks back - but it expected the project to be built

Re: AW: NetBeans 10.0 has been branched!

Hi, I tried to find the differences between the release90 and release100 branch: $ git log --left-right --oneline upstream/release90..upstream/release100 I got 771 commits, which can be further narrowed down by focussing on commits with related obviously (messages contain netbeans-) to a Jira

Re: NetBeans 10.0 has been branched!

I think we need to get better with Jira/ticket management moving forward. In the early days of 9 we skipped it a lot as we focused on fixing the rat report as opposed to implementing new Features, but when it comes to release management it will really help here. One thing we could look to do here

Re: Options, options (was Re: NetBeans javadoc at Apache)

Hi Antonio, To be honest I think there's a 4th option. If we get the Maven artefacts built and deployed we can also deploy javadoc artefacts to maven central. Then we can use https://www.javadoc.io/ and provide a link on our website to this. Each release will have javadocs accessible from there

Re: [news] NetCAT 10.0 proposal

My one concern with the timetable is that it looks like its under 2 months to do a release (if all goes well) from the 24th September to 15 November. While this is doable and I have no problems with Jiri's timeframe, it does imo put a little strain on us if we are attempting to do quarterly

Re: Per-cluster repo layout loose ends

Recently I've been looking at doing a complete end to end jenkinsfile to replace the 5 jenkins jobs down to 1 multibranch pipeline that will build and test both windows and linux and not duplicate some of the steps like some jobs do. This error happens every so often on my builds, and I've been

Re: NETBEANS-870

HI Glenn, I can't talk about the license as I cant see it at the moment(travelling) but you can continue pushing changes to your local branch, and GitHub will continue to include those changes into the PR. So no need to delete the existing PR. Regards John On Mon, 24 Sep 2018 at 16:18, Glenn

Re: Jenkins Builds

ucture needs to be > created first. > > Kind regards > > Peter > > > Am 23.09.18 um 15:31 schrieb John McDonnell: > > Hi, > > > > I was looking into the maven artifacts issue earlier and noticed the > linux > > build has been failing[1]. > >

Re: Needed: Release Manager for Apache NetBeans 10

> >>> > >>>> Awesome! > >>>> > >>>> Gj > >>>> > >>>> On Sat, Sep 22, 2018 at 1:44 AM, Laszlo Kishalmi < > >>>> laszlo.kisha...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>>

PR Submitted for JUnit 5 Support - Looking for help testing

Hi All, I have submitted a PR today for JUnit 5 Support inclusion into Apache NetBeans. This has been on my plate for a while and over time I just haven't come back to it as I would have liked. With Apache NetBeans 10 on the way, this might be cutting it too close, but I guess if it doesn't

Re: [VOTE] Accept donation Mojohaus NetBeans Maven Utilities

+1 On Fri 7 Sep 2018, 12:57 Carl Mosca, wrote: > +1 > > On Fri, Sep 7, 2018 at 7:54 AM Geertjan Wielenga > wrote: > > > +1 > > > > Gj > > > > On Fri, Sep 7, 2018 at 1:00 PM, Javier Ortiz > > wrote: > > > > > +1 > > > > > > On Fri, Sep 7, 2018, 5:30 AM Luff,Chris > > > > wrote: > > > > > > >

Re: Failing builds

> by one in rat-exclusions.txt > > >>> noticed in line 78 > > >>> > > >>> openide.nodes/test/unit/src/org/openide/nodes/data/** > > >>> > > >>> the module openide.nodes is a part of platform cluster and has been &g

Re: NetBeans javadoc at Apache

One idea for whoever takes this on is we could link from our website to https://www.javadoc.io/ when we start creating maven artefacts, and we just have to deploy the javadocs to https://search.maven.org/ Regards John On Thu, 23 Aug 2018 at 13:30, Geertjan Wielenga wrote: > Does someone want

Re: Failing builds

Morning, So the windows build is still red, but it seems it goes all the way to the RAT step and then fails. At the moment the windows build runs the following ant targets: 'build', 'test-platform', 'rat', while the Linux build runs: 'build', 'test-platform', 'rat', 'verify-libs-and-licenses',

Re: Failing builds

to them? Or they might be aware already and working on it. Regards John On Wed, 22 Aug 2018 at 20:28, John McDonnell wrote: > I'll take a look at the windows one now for a bit. > > I was looking at creating a pipeline build as an alternative over the next > week but fixing these wo

Re: Failing builds

I'll take a look at the windows one now for a bit. I was looking at creating a pipeline build as an alternative over the next week but fixing these would be a pre-requisite so makes sense... John On Wed, 22 Aug 2018 at 20:22, Geertjan Wielenga wrote: > Hi all, > > The builds have been failing

Re: NB 9 Platform Maven arifacts

Hi David, Have a look at the archives of this list: https://lists.apache.org/list.html?d...@netbeans.apache.org:lte=5M:maven%20release Check the email from Emilian Bold (4th one down as I search now), that's the last info on this topic I believe...\ Regards John On Mon, 20 Aug 2018 at 22:04,

Re: Apache Jenkins Help Needed: Testing Snap package build

be the strategy with these Jenkins files. Separate repo? > In the future I'd like to track two branches with this: master and the > actual release. > > > On 08/09/2018 03:21 PM, John McDonnell wrote: > > Right now it doesn't look like its set up correctly, as it cannot find > 'snapcraft

Re: Apache Jenkins Help Needed: Testing Snap package build

on, where shall I put my Jenkinsfile? > NetBeans repository? Which branch: master or release90, or some unique > one, or in a separate repo? > Right now I just need to know if snapcraft set up correctly for NetBeans > on node H29 > > On 08/09/2018 01:05 AM, John McDonnell

Re: [GROOVY] Enhancements to groovy support

Not sure how I'll be set work wise in September but I'd be happy to learn and help out if free or just learn from a distance if not. I do some stuff with Jenkinsfiles every so often at work and having better groovy support NetBeans might help here. Reach out closer to the time and I'll know

Re: Apache Jenkins Help Needed: Testing Snap package build

/ && snapcraft' } } Ideally, we could make this a multibranch pipeline moving forward so we don't care about the specific branch and maybe even could hook most of the rest of the release process into a pipeline and store the job config in our source code. On Thu, 9 Aug 2018 at 22:08, John M

Re: Apache Jenkins Help Needed: Testing Snap package build

: command not found Regards John On Thu, 9 Aug 2018 at 09:05, John McDonnell wrote: > @Laszlo Kishalmi > > If write a Jenkinsfile and commit it, then the Jenkins Job properties are > yours to adjust at any time, and the jenkins job will update accordingly. > We just

Re: JUnit 5

I have rebased my local branch so its more up to date. It can be found: https://github.com/mcdonnell-john/incubator-netbeans/tree/feature/NETBEANS-6 I won't get a chance this week to add anything to it, but maybe next week I might. On Wed, 8 Aug 2018 at 21:25, John McDonnell wrote: >

Re: Apache Jenkins Help Needed: Testing Snap package build

@Laszlo Kishalmi If write a Jenkinsfile and commit it, then the Jenkins Job properties are yours to adjust at any time, and the jenkins job will update accordingly. We just need to create a pipeline job and point it to the Jenkinsfile. Regards John On Tue, 7 Aug 2018 at 22:48, Laszlo

Re: JUnit 5

> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-6 > > > > John McDonnell, as mentioned in the issue above, has put this together: > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Feature+Request+-+JUnit+5+Outline > > > > Are there

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 (incubating) [vote candidate 3]

+1 Thanks Emilian! Regards John On Mon, 9 Jul 2018 at 16:02, Neil C Smith wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Built and tested on Ubuntu 16.04 with OpenJDK 8. > > Few little niggles - inc. be good if nb-javac was properly signed; > report issue fix wasn't cherry picked? > > Also, be good if the *.asc

Re: [DISCUSS] Proposed Release ProcessWAS: Merging back netcat@ intothe dev@ mailing list

or quite > some time, and, to me, it seemed to work fairly well. I believe the > branching occurred a months (or so) before the release, but I may be wrong > on that. > > But it surely is not the only process we could follow. > > Jan > > > On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 6:01 PM, Nei

[DISCUSS] Proposed Release ProcessWAS: Merging back netcat@ into the dev@ mailing list

people who have > been so valuable and enthusiastic over many years. > > And many thanks John McDonnell for the proposed possible release cycle -- > to me it looks good and makes sense, maybe this could be put on the Wiki, > and discussed in a separate thread. > > Gj > &

Re: [DISCUSS] Merging back netcat@ into the dev@ mailing list

Hi, Adding my 2 cents... 1. NetCat is an important part of NetBeans release process, and we need to find a way to make it work moving forward, in the Apache NetBeans world we live in now. 2. I don't agree, in their current state for the dev and netcat lists to be merged, I think there's a lot

Re: How to participate in Apache NetBeans without a GitHub account?

I think I'm missing something, but how did you create the PR that this review site picked up? - Whats the workflow of this from someone just coming to NetBeans? and how specifically does it differ to the workflow of someone willing to use GitHub? Also whats the point? A developer is more than

Re: NB 9.0 Splash Screen

Hi, I'm not a fan of the wording but to me, it reads like NetBeans IDE Apache v9.0. It's a splash screen I don't think we should be spending ages on it since it can change every release... Regards John On 21 May 2018 at 08:59, Geertjan Wielenga wrote: >

Re: Volunteer for producing 9.0 rc1 needed

When are you looking to do this? If there's no one named in your email that want to try this then I can put my hand up. Won't get a chance until near the end of the week(late Thursday/Friday) though at this rate. Regards John On 15 May 2018 at 13:31, Eric Barboni wrote: >

Re: NetBeans 2018W18 Weekly Report

> > Gj > > On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 5:11 PM, John McDonnell <mcdonnell.j...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > I realised that I haven't been pushing my JUnit 5 changes to my fork. > > > > I'll do this over the next day or so, and start marking on the confluence

Re: NetBeans 2018W18 Weekly Report

I realised that I haven't been pushing my JUnit 5 changes to my fork. I'll do this over the next day or so, and start marking on the confluence page what functionality I seem to have implemented, and whats remaining. If people want to help out, your more than welcome to :) Regards John On 8

Re: AW: (Git) Diff Window horizontal space rescue

I'd be the same as you Emilian, I often end up with multiple editor windows of the same diff, which is annoying. Maybe a separate dialog makes sense? Could this be a preference thing? I.e. allow this as an editor component or as a separate dialog? or is that a lot of effort? John On 3

Re: NetBeans Snap Packaging, Next Steps

What are the steps needed to do option 2? - I assume they could be added to the ant build process? Then as for sending to the app store, might be worth looking into if Apache/INFRA have an account already, or if Apache needs to do set up one first. This would be for only release artifacts? no

Re: PHP v7.2 support

Hi So PHP support in NetBeans 9 is in a later code drop, I believe second - which is due soon, once all the legal groups from both Oracle and Apache have gone through the donation and cleared it. As to if that patch made it into the donation or not I don't know. But if not it's something that

Re: JUnit 5 Support

on introducing this to NetBeans 9, maybe with some features even making a NetBeans 9.0 release :) Regards John On 25 April 2018 at 08:35, John McDonnell <johnmcdonn...@apache.org> wrote: > > > On 2017/05/17 17:50:30, Marc Philipp <mphilip...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Emi,

Re: Time to branch for the release candidate?

@Laszlo, Have you made it public? It's not loading for me, even when I'm logged in. Regards John On 27 April 2018 at 04:20, Laszlo Kishalmi wrote: > Well, I've got the rights to share my dashboard. > > It's called: NetBeans Overview > >

Re: Tracking Issues, Versions

I thought Jiri had marked some issues as blockers for 9.0 as part of netcat. Laszlo to get those permissions you need to raise an INFRA ticket. On 26 April 2018 at 19:23, Matthias Bläsing wrote: > Hi, > > Am Donnerstag, den 26.04.2018, 11:18 -0700 schrieb Laszlo

Re: [EVENT] NetBeans Day UK Reminder

Perfect, Thanks for the info John On 25 April 2018 at 16:45, Geertjan Wielenga < geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com> wrote: > Excellent! > > Gj > > On Wednesday, April 25, 2018, Ovi IDR wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > Just a quick reminder that NetBeans Day UK is this Friday,

Re: JUnit 5 Support

On 2017/05/17 17:50:30, Marc Philipp wrote: > Hi Emi, > > JUnit 5 introduces a new architecture: It supports running multiple engines > (i.e. testing frameworks) on a common platform. JUnit Vintage is an engine > implementation that makes it possible to run JUnit 3 and

Re: AW: The IDE for DevOps was: IntelliJ IDEA vs Netbeans

Yeah, I can confirm setting up debugging (for Maven) in IntelliJ is so complicated... The one thing I think they have right is having multiple configurations. I'd love the ability to save a configuration, either with a name, or hell even as simple as the host, and port number fields remembering

Re: IntelliJ IDEA vs Netbeans

@Gili/Laszlo Jiri already created a dashboard for NetBeans: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=12332455 We also have a Kanban board for all issues (its a little slow loading): https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/RapidBoard.jspa?rapidView=216 Regards John On 21

Re: Time to branch for the release candidate?

I agree, But we need to make sure that only agreed/safe fixes get merged into the release candidate. Whats the criteria to use? Only accept blocking bug fixes? John On 17 April 2018 at 12:10, Jaroslav Tulach wrote: > Yeah, there are changes in the queue for the

Re: Modules included in 2nd donation.

Nice, Great Job! On 13 April 2018 at 13:35, Sven Reimers wrote: > Grovy! > > Sven > > Junichi Yamamoto schrieb am Fr., 13. Apr. 2018, > 14:22: > > > Great news! > > > > 2018-04-13 21:00 GMT+09:00 Geertjan Wielenga < > >

Review Requested: https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/481

Hi, I've implemented a fix for https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-290 so that we can move to a given maven dependencies pom file quicker, using hyperlinks (something that until it was pointed out, I didn't know I was missing now I want to use it all the time :( ). It's a sizable

Re: Exception reporting broken

Their both community members (Allied is in the netcat program and I think Milo's is a former netbeans Dev?) maybe we can reach out and as for an exemption or if they can relicense it? John On Tue 3 Apr 2018, 16:37 Antonio, wrote: > I think it's GPL'ed: > >

Re: Help wanted with fixing NetBeans 9.0 blockers

A JIRA plugin already exists (it's not pretty but its there ;) ). I think it was created by the NetBeans team so we could take it over, and I would propose bringing it into the IDE by default since we want to make it easier for NetBeans users to raise defects. Regards John On 27 March 2018

Re: Help wanted with fixing NetBeans 9.0 blockers

But if you look at PR's in GitHub there's more activity there: https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pulse JIRA doesn't appear to be the place people are using to reference work their doing. John On 27 March 2018 at 18:14, cowwoc wrote: > The number of

Re: NetBeans splash screen discussion on Twitter

Thanks for pointing that out! I like the one on the right... It could also make for a nice wallpaper if it was done, like one of the tweets alluded too... John On 27 March 2018 at 12:41, Geertjan Wielenga < geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com> wrote: >

Re: Casual Error Reporting

run the web app in my browser. I am able to prove that all > is working. > > From what you wrote, are the EE components I downloaded still NB 8.2? > > Ken > > > -Original Message- > From: John McDonnell <mcdonnell.j...@gmail.com> > Sent: Monday, March 26, 2018

Re: Casual Error Reporting

Hi Kenneth, I don't use Java EE day to day so my knowledge might be hazy but, the Java EE portion of NetBeans hasn't been donated yet, as such is likely you'll see errors relating to this in the NetBeans 9.0 Beta. That means you can import the plugin from the plugin portal for Java EE, but I

Re: [PMC Chairs] Jenkins job permissions

I'm familiar with Jenkins also. On 26 March 2018 at 05:08, Wade Chandler wrote: > On Fri, Mar 23, 2018, 05:22 Bertrand Delacretaz > wrote: > > > Before we do that, are other committers willing to get the same > > permissions? > > You need to be

Re: netbeans maven support breaks trying to build JGit source

Apologies, the rest of this email thread only loaded in my mail client after responding. On 25 March 2018 at 10:04, John McDonnell <mcdonnell.j...@gmail.com> wrote: > What error are you getting? > > Does it build from the command line at all, or is the issue only happenin

Re: netbeans maven support breaks trying to build JGit source

What error are you getting? Does it build from the command line at all, or is the issue only happening in NetBeans? On 25 March 2018 at 04:06, Gary Bello wrote: > To clarify ... > I am not trying to have a build of netbeans make use of latest JGIt. > > I am simply

Re: The IDE for DevOps was: NetBeans at 8.2% in the StackOverflow 2018 developer survey

Interesting... I wouldn't have said NetBeans was great for DevOps (we at least w.r.t. some of the things that I look for it to do), due to the project nature of NetBeans - everything appears to need to be in a project. A use case I have at work is if I want to edit one of the many groovy scripts

Re: UnsatisfiedLinkError on exception report

I think this is related only to windows machines, had a brief look at the code and could reproduce (not using windows.) I'll add this info into the ticket, it might help someone that eventually takes a look. On 12 March 2018 at 22:02, John McDonnell <mcdonnell.j...@gmail.com> wrote:

Re: UnsatisfiedLinkError on exception report

Hi Victor, There's still ongoing conversations about the Exception Reporter as its still pointing to bugzilla, now that NetBeans is an Apache project we are using Jira(https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/NETBEANS/issues) to record defects. >From a quick search, its seems its raised:

Re: incubating-netbeans-java-9.0-beta-bin.zip

; automatically distributed to mirrors, wasn't it? > > > > > > I don't think we should raise a ticket against Apache security, > > should we? > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > Antonio > > > > > > \

Re: incubating-netbeans-java-9.0-beta-bin.zip

aybe have a dedicated signature verification > team) for the final release. > > Gj > > On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 8:21 PM, John McDonnell <mcdonnell.j...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Apologies for the spam, cross posting to dev. > > > > @Antonio, do you know if the

Re: incubating-netbeans-java-9.0-beta-bin.zip

. Regards John On 8 March 2018 at 07:47, John McDonnell <mcdonnell.j...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Leo, > > I didn't import the keys, as I had previously done this step... > > But > > I'm looking at a different file then you: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/in

Re: New committer and PPMC member: John McDonnell

3:39 PM, Antonio Vieiro <anto...@vieiro.net> wrote: > > > > > Congratulations John! > > > > > El 3 mar 2018, a las 14:18, Emilian Bold <emilian.b...@protonmail.ch> > > escribió: > > > > > > The Podling Project Management Committee (PMC

  1   2   >