Re: [DISCUSS] 1.0 Beta Release

Team, Glad to hear everyone is on board with a Beta. Sorry for not putting out an update earlier but I've been waiting to initiate the vote in order to get the all of the lingering framework level feature/improvement tickets in. The last one should be wrapping up shortly so look out for an RC

Re: [DISCUSS] 1.0 Beta Release

I've been playing with 1.x in the evenings, trying to understand the REST API and it's documentation for NIFI-2237 . I really like what I've seen so far, so I thought I'd toss out some observations before they slip away forever. The finer grained

Re: [DISCUSS] 1.0 Beta Release

+1 Sent from my iPhone > On Aug 1, 2016, at 10:14 PM, Joe Percivall > wrote: > > Hey Team, > > The big ticket elements of 1.0 look to be in a pretty good state. Lots of > things left to tighten up, primarily docs and bug fixes, but, it seems wise > for a

Re: [DISCUSS] 1.0 Beta Release

+1 > On Aug 1, 2016, at 10:14 PM, Joe Percivall > wrote: > > Hey Team, > > The big ticket elements of 1.0 look to be in a pretty good state. Lots of > things left to tighten up, primarily docs and bug fixes, but, it seems wise > for a major release like this

Re: [DISCUSS] 1.0 Beta Release

+1 On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 11:01 AM, Jeff wrote: > +1 > > On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 9:17 AM Joe Skora wrote: > > > +1 > > > > On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 10:49 PM, Tony Kurc wrote: > > > > > seems reasonable to me > > > > > > On Mon, Aug 1, 2016

Re: [DISCUSS] 1.0 Beta Release

+1 On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 9:17 AM Joe Skora wrote: > +1 > > On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 10:49 PM, Tony Kurc wrote: > > > seems reasonable to me > > > > On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 10:14 PM, Joe Percivall < > > joeperciv...@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote: > > > > > Hey Team,

Re: [DISCUSS] 1.0 Beta Release

+1 On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 10:49 PM, Tony Kurc wrote: > seems reasonable to me > > On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 10:14 PM, Joe Percivall < > joeperciv...@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote: > > > Hey Team, > > > > The big ticket elements of 1.0 look to be in a pretty good state. Lots of > >

Re: [DISCUSS] 1.0 Beta Release

seems reasonable to me On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 10:14 PM, Joe Percivall < joeperciv...@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote: > Hey Team, > > The big ticket elements of 1.0 look to be in a pretty good state. Lots of > things left to tighten up, primarily docs and bug fixes, but, it seems wise > for a major

[DISCUSS] 1.0 Beta Release

Hey Team, The big ticket elements of 1.0 look to be in a pretty good state. Lots of things left to tighten up, primarily docs and bug fixes, but, it seems wise for a major release like this to first kick out a Beta[1]. The relevant section of the Apache.org link: Releases that are