Agree with only releasing src.
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 11:32 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote:
Or just not ship a bin release at all. Src is the only thing we really
VOTE on legally though bin is provided for convenience purposes. Will type
more on this
+1
On 15 June 2012 09:00, Ferdy Galema ferdy.gal...@kalooga.com wrote:
Agree with only releasing src.
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 11:32 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote:
Or just not ship a bin release at all. Src is the only thing we really
VOTE on legally
I'll push this in an hour or so guys.
Thanks for the input.
Lewis
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 9:39 AM, Julien Nioche
lists.digitalpeb...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
On 15 June 2012 09:00, Ferdy Galema ferdy.gal...@kalooga.com wrote:
Agree with only releasing src.
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 11:32
Before you do, could you check that NutchGora passes ant test successfully.
I just tried and got an error related to the parse-tika tests. Am about to
open a JIRA to update to the latest version of Tika for NutchGora which
should fix the problem and put it at the same level as trunk
J
On 15 June
see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-1396
On 15 June 2012 10:43, Julien Nioche lists.digitalpeb...@gmail.com wrote:
Before you do, could you check that NutchGora passes ant test
successfully. I just tried and got an error related to the parse-tika
tests. Am about to open a JIRA to
OK you are just making us all look bad now Juls ;)
Super fast!
Cheers,
Chris
On Jun 15, 2012, at 2:54 AM, Julien Nioche wrote:
see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-1396
On 15 June 2012 10:43, Julien Nioche lists.digitalpeb...@gmail.com wrote:
Before you do, could you check
That was not intented. Just that am on holidays, it's raining and the
children were either asleep or playing nicely :-)
On 15 June 2012 18:19, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote:
OK you are just making us all look bad now Juls ;)
Super fast!
Cheers,
Chris
On
Maybe just 1392? I went ahead and made a patch that should fix this. Feel
free to commit or ignore prior to RC2.
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 1:44 AM, Lewis John Mcgibbney
lewis.mcgibb...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Sebastian,
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 11:30 PM, Sebastian Nagel
wastl.na...@googlemail.com
We only supply src distributions...
Does this principle apply to Nutch 2 as well?
Maybe, yes.
The situation with the current binary package is uncomfortable:
I had to copy/link gora-hbase and hbase jars into lib/ to get nutch running.
2012/6/13 Lewis John Mcgibbney lewis.mcgibb...@gmail.com
Aye this is no good at all. Depending on which backend you wish to use with
Gora, you will need to go and manually fetch the correct .jar's from maven
central.
Does anyone else have either solution or a workaround before I push RC2
with just src dists?
Thanks
Lewis
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 4:52
Hey Guys,
I think the annoyance is probably something folks can live with as they have
been
waiting for an official release of 2.x for years :)
My +1 to roll RC #2 with or without a solution to this and mark it as a TODO.
release
eary, release often :)
Cheers,
Chris
On Jun 14, 2012, at 10:04
I disagree. You'd expect a binary release to work out of the box - which is
not the case. Plus we'd have to spend more time explaining the workaround,
answering the same questions over and over on the ML etc... Fixing this
should not be a big deal (i.e. add the gore-x modules for the backends to
Hi Julien,
Do you suggest with the binary release that we simply open up all gora-*
deps and ship it with every jar available?
Lewis
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 9:39 PM, Julien Nioche
lists.digitalpeb...@gmail.com wrote:
I disagree. You'd expect a binary release to work out of the box - which
yep, remember that you can't build from the bin package so inevitably
someone will wonder why only such or such backend is available etc...
another option is to NOT have a binary release at all, in which case it is
acceptable I think not to include the deps in ivy. Maybe we should at least
add
This is what is currently done and what I was essentially proposing.
I really don't know about the size of the bin artifact if we enable all
gora-* dependencies before packaging it for distribution... thanks to input
from yourselves we recently sorted out some size issues with 1.5, it would
be
Or just not ship a bin release at all. Src is the only thing we really VOTE on
legally though bin is provided for convenience purposes. Will type more on this
later...
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 14, 2012, at 2:18 PM, Lewis John Mcgibbney
Findings about Nutch-2.0 RC 1.
The Nutch job jar is not present in the binary archive. This means
distributed running of jobs is not supported. I'm not sure if this is a
problem (since users can always build one themselves), merely pointing it
out. The recently released 1.5 also lacks this job
Hmm please ignore the parse text limited to 100 chars, this is actually
not the case. (Only in our branch that has a fix for limiting anchor texts;
not yet present in in the nutchgora branch because it still needs
polishing). So no need to wait for commits on my part.
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at
Hi Seb,
As Chris said, the issues you highlight well justify another RC.
I can shift it by the end of play today.
Thanks very much for having a look through guys
Lewis
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 11:33 PM, Sebastian Nagel
wastl.na...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi Lewis,
my first steps with 2.0 (to
Hi Seb,
Quick update
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 11:33 PM, Sebastian Nagel
wastl.na...@googlemail.com wrote:
1 some guidance would be nice. README.txt points
to http://wiki.apache.org/nutch/NutchTutorial which refers to 1.x
Please see http://wiki.apache.org/nutch/Nutch2Tutorial which is an
update
Ferdy
The Nutch job jar is not present in the binary archive. This means
distributed running of jobs is not supported. I'm not sure if this is a
problem (since users can always build one themselves), merely pointing it
out. The recently released 1.5 also lacks this job jar, so at least no
Hi Guys,
Whilst updating the Nutch2Tutorial I got thinking that within Gora we don't
supply binary distributions of the code, this is because when using Gora a
user may wish/require to recompile the code to accomodate config changes
etc. We only supply src distributions...
Does this principle
Hi Lewis,
Please see http://wiki.apache.org/nutch/Nutch2Tutorial which is an
update of Julien's (I think) page on GORA_HBase. Thsi will get you
rocking with HBase. The changes between Cassandra, Accumulo and the
other data stores are fairly trivial.
I'll managed to perform a crawl with 2.0
Hi Sebastian,
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 11:30 PM, Sebastian Nagel
wastl.na...@googlemail.com wrote:
I'll managed to perform a crawl with 2.0 and HBase: it rocks, indeed.
Much simpler than 1.x (no segments!).
:0)
% ./bin/nutch readdb -stats
WebTable statistics start
WebTableReader:
Hi Everyone,
I appreciate that most of the core dev's are using trunk, however I
would appeal to you guys to at least check out the artifacts and check
sigs, tests, license headers if possible. Although this does not fully
satisfy the requirements of a thoroughly reviewed RC, hopefully the
Hey Lewis,
I will get to this tonight, for sure.
Thanks!
Cheers,
Chris
On Jun 12, 2012, at 1:16 PM, Lewis John Mcgibbney wrote:
Hi Everyone,
I appreciate that most of the core dev's are using trunk, however I
would appeal to you guys to at least check out the artifacts and check
sigs,
Thank you
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 9:19 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote:
Hey Lewis,
I will get to this tonight, for sure.
Thanks!
Cheers,
Chris
On Jun 12, 2012, at 1:16 PM, Lewis John Mcgibbney wrote:
Hi Everyone,
I appreciate that most of the core
Hi Lewis,
my first steps with 2.0 (to be continued, still struggling).
Two points (I'll try to give a final vote tomorrow):
1 some guidance would be nice. README.txt points
to http://wiki.apache.org/nutch/NutchTutorial which refers to 1.x
(I'm using
Hey Guys,
#2 is probably reason enough for a respin.
Lewis if you don't have time to do it before Thursday, I could probably
give it a whack. Let me know.
Cheers,
Chris
On Jun 12, 2012, at 3:33 PM, Sebastian Nagel wrote:
Hi Lewis,
my first steps with 2.0 (to be continued, still
Good Evening Everyone,
A candidate for the Apache Nutch 2.0 RC1 is available at:
http://people.apache.org/~lewismc/nutch-2.0
The release candidate is a src.zip, bin.zip, src.tar.gz and bin.tar.gz
archive of the sources in:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/nutch/tags/release-2.0rc1
Further, a
30 matches
Mail list logo
