On Dec 11, 2012, at 2:09 PM, Erwan de FERRIERES wrote:
> BTW, Jacopo, I have resolved all the issues you were having in the previous
> patch, and I'm waiting for your comments.
> Are there still some issues ?
I apologize for the late reply.
First of all a premise: I have already expressed my per
Please use another thread..
This one is for the webdriver integration, not the addon system.
BTW, Jacopo, I have resolved all the issues you were having in the previous
patch, and I'm waiting for your comments.
Are there still some issues ?
Thanks,
2012/12/11 Jacques Le Roux
> From: "Jacopo C
From: "Jacopo Cappellato"
> On Dec 10, 2012, at 8:34 PM, Olivier Heintz wrote:
>
>> I don't want to say all I do is correct, but for ofbiz addon
>> 1) I have start by a situation status on my mail "OFBiz Plugin
>> Management, status and propositions" 18th March
>> 2) as proposed by Jacopo, wor
On Dec 10, 2012, at 8:34 PM, Olivier Heintz wrote:
> I don't want to say all I do is correct, but for ofbiz addon
> 1) I have start by a situation status on my mail "OFBiz Plugin
> Management, status and propositions" 18th March
> 2) as proposed by Jacopo, work in OFBiz extra to be able to pre
On Dec 10, 2012, at 8:34 PM, Olivier Heintz wrote:
> I'm just disappointed that with 25 commiters, there is not enough time for
> review. It's not a blame, it's only a fact and we should do with it.
I think you got plenty of reviews recently; the problem is that, when the
contributor doesn't l
Le 06/12/2012 17:20, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
> From: "Scott Gray"
>> On 7/12/2012, at 12:43 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
>>
>>> On Dec 6, 2012, at 12:29 PM, Olivier Heintz wrote:
>>>
If I correctly understand the commiter groups roles, it's to coordinate,
animate and help the community
Le 06/12/2012 16:40, Erwan de FERRIERES a écrit :
> 2012/12/6 Jacques Le Roux
>
>> From: "Jacopo Cappellato"
>>> On Dec 5, 2012, at 2:54 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
> ../..
>>> All that said, I want to clarify that I am not feeling any pressure and
>>
>> Sure but what is refraining you for web dr
Hi Youssef,
please see inline:
On Dec 6, 2012, at 11:00 PM, lemine youssef wrote:
> I personally have the feeling that ofbiz PCM get more and more isolated and
> disconnected form the reality for some reasons :
>-Jacopo argue a contribution refusal because non one of the community !
> does
From: "lemine youssef"
> Hi every body,
>
> I feel the duty to participate to this discussion even that I think that
> e-amil
> may not be the best way for discussion like this one and that distance get
> things more complicated.
>
> If anyone find that some words are inappropriate, non constru
Hi every body,
I feel the duty to participate to this discussion even that I think that
e-amil
may not be the best way for discussion like this one and that distance get
things more complicated.
If anyone find that some words are inappropriate, non constructive or
hurtful,
be sure that is not
From: "Erwan de FERRIERES"
> 2012/12/6 Jacques Le Roux
>
>> From: "Jacopo Cappellato"
>> > On Dec 5, 2012, at 2:54 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>> >
>>
> ../..
>
>> >
>> > All that said, I want to clarify that I am not feeling any pressure and
>> no one at Neogia tried to put pressure on me so I
From: "Ean Schuessler"
> Maybe more of this work needs to be done in feature branches? You can make
> the argument that SVN (at least as far as I know) encourages an "everything
> goes in the central repository" work flow because it doesn't have the GIT
> distributed workflow. We certainly don'
From: "Scott Gray"
> On 7/12/2012, at 12:43 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
>
>>
>> On Dec 6, 2012, at 12:29 PM, Olivier Heintz wrote:
>>
>>> If I correctly understand the commiter groups roles, it's to coordinate,
>>> animate and help the community to enhance (technically, functions,
>>> quality,
2012/12/6 Jacques Le Roux
> From: "Jacopo Cappellato"
> > On Dec 5, 2012, at 2:54 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
> >
>
../..
> >
> > All that said, I want to clarify that I am not feeling any pressure and
> no one at Neogia tried to put pressure on me so I am good and I appreciate
> their efforts
From: "Jacopo Cappellato"
> On Dec 5, 2012, at 2:54 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>
>> I must say I don't. The Neogia team is. And they are an important part of
>> the OFBiz ecosystem. Their efforts should not be neglected. Erwan is no
>> longer part of the Neogia team but he is still in contact w
Maybe more of this work needs to be done in feature branches? You can make the
argument that SVN (at least as far as I know) encourages an "everything goes in
the central repository" work flow because it doesn't have the GIT distributed
workflow. We certainly don't want to discourage new and adv
:
Nelly Burns
From: Scott Gray
To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, December 6, 2012 7:13 AM
Subject: Re: OFBIZ-4872: webdriver integration
On 7/12/2012, at 12:43 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
>
> On Dec 6, 2012, at 12:29 PM, Olivier Heintz wrote:
>
On 7/12/2012, at 12:43 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
>
> On Dec 6, 2012, at 12:29 PM, Olivier Heintz wrote:
>
>> If I correctly understand the commiter groups roles, it's to coordinate,
>> animate and help the community to enhance (technically, functions,
>> quality, ...) the project, not to forc
Le 06/12/2012 08:07, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit :
> On Dec 5, 2012, at 2:54 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>
>> I must say I don't. The Neogia team is. And they are an important part of
>> the OFBiz ecosystem. Their efforts should not be neglected. Erwan is no
>> longer part of the Neogia team but he
On Dec 6, 2012, at 12:29 PM, Olivier Heintz wrote:
> If I correctly understand the commiter groups roles, it's to coordinate,
> animate and help the community to enhance (technically, functions,
> quality, ...) the project, not to force or constrain to work only on a
> short list of subject.
Cor
Le 05/12/2012 11:52, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit :
> On Dec 5, 2012, at 8:54 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>
>> Sounds indeed logical to have embedded a mean to test the UI available to
>> all user OOTB.
> Why embedded? All users already have a mechanism to test the UI:
test the UI is one of the import
On Dec 6, 2012, at 12:07 PM, Olivier Heintz wrote:
> So attack him on this subject seems inappropriate.
Olivier, I am not *attacking* anyone, we are discussing and not fighting so
please do your best to keep the conversation in the right mood.
Jacopo
Le 05/12/2012 11:29, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit :
> On Dec 5, 2012, at 8:54 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>
>> Note: I intentionally used the verb reject, because it seems it how some
>> contributors are now feeling the way the OFBiz project is doing with their
>> proposed contributions
> I understan
On Dec 5, 2012, at 2:54 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
> I must say I don't. The Neogia team is. And they are an important part of the
> OFBiz ecosystem. Their efforts should not be neglected. Erwan is no longer
> part of the Neogia team but he is still in contact with them. At least
> AFAIK...
T
2012/12/5 Jacopo Cappellato
> On Dec 5, 2012, at 8:54 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>
> > Sounds indeed logical to have embedded a mean to test the UI available
> to all user OOTB.
>
> Why embedded? All users already have a mechanism to test the UI: they can
> use Selenium or any other similar tool
Yes, but I have also this feeling, may I?
I have even a feeling that OFBiz is currently fossilising :/
This is my opinion
Jacques
From: "Jacopo Cappellato"
> On Dec 5, 2012, at 8:54 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>
>> Note: I intentionally used the verb reject, because it seems it how some
>> c
From: "Jacopo Cappellato"
> On Dec 5, 2012, at 8:54 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>
>> Sounds indeed logical to have embedded a mean to test the UI available to
>> all user OOTB.
>
> Why embedded? All users already have a mechanism to test the UI: they can use
> Selenium or any other similar tool
On Dec 5, 2012, at 8:54 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
> Sounds indeed logical to have embedded a mean to test the UI available to all
> user OOTB.
Why embedded? All users already have a mechanism to test the UI: they can use
Selenium or any other similar tool of their preference. We should not
>
On Dec 5, 2012, at 8:54 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
> Note: I intentionally used the verb reject, because it seems it how some
> contributors are now feeling the way the OFBiz project is doing with their
> proposed contributions
I understand that this "feeling" could indeed happen but unfortunat
Sounds indeed logical to have embedded a mean to test the UI available to all
user OOTB.
Even if not all users will use it, some have already their own way.
At least something would exist and I don't see any objective reasons to reject
it out of OFBiz.
Note: I intentionally used the verb reject
Hi every one,
At Nereide, we were using selenium four our functional test for two
years at lest but
Selenium staff was integrated as a maven sub project which is not very
simple
to use and does not meet our needs and expectations.
Two month ago, I started using the patch proposed by Erwan (th
Jacopo,
using localhost is the way it should be. Like you are running unit tests on
your local instance, you are running functional tests on your local
instance.
This patch is only adding a new testing type which is not existing today.
It's why it is designed to be part of OFBiz as a new functional
Thank you Erwan, but the information below doesn't help me to change my point
of view: the fact that the contribution was made to be part of the trunk and
that we already have Junit tests integrated doesn't necessarily imply that we
have to add this new one.
What do other think about this topic?
I don't think this should be seen as an external component. The new
implementation is made to be part of OFBiz, like the junit tests we have.
The main issue for selenium integration was the license, there was some
components not consistent with the ASL2. I used ivy to download the jars
only if need
Isn't it a good candidate for an external component (i.e. not bundled in OFBiz
and maintained by the OFBiz community)? I think we have already discussed this
topic some time ago and we concluded that
I also cursorily reviewed the patch and I have seen a series of issues (e.g.
hardcoded componen
I have not tested you last patch, but for what I have already seen this sounds
good to me
Jacques
From: "Erwan de FERRIERES"
> Hi all,
>
> I'm planning on committing the patch in OFBIZ-4872 which will add webdriver
> testing in OFBiz this week-end.
> Is that OK for everyone, or are there some
Hi all,
I'm planning on committing the patch in OFBIZ-4872 which will add webdriver
testing in OFBiz this week-end.
Is that OK for everyone, or are there some issues with this ?
Thanks,
--
Erwan de FERRIERES
37 matches
Mail list logo