swapnil.s...@hotwaxsystems.com>
> > >>> wrote:
> > >>> > > Thanks all your suggestions.
> > >>> > > I think similarity of the discussed requirements with ordering
> flow
> > >>> lead
> > >>> > to
> > >>&
:
> >>> > > Thanks all your suggestions.
> >>> > > I think similarity of the discussed requirements with ordering flow
> >>> lead
> >>> > to
> >>> > > the suggestions to use Order model. I don't have strong preference
te:
> >>> > > Thanks all your suggestions.
> >>> > > I think similarity of the discussed requirements with ordering flow
> >>> lead
> >>> > to
> >>> > > the suggestions to use Order model. I don't have strong preferenc
t;> lead
>>> > to
>>> > > the suggestions to use Order model. I don't have strong preference
>>> to use
>>> > > one over another as long as we are able to support bulk of the
>>> discussed
>>> > > requirements in this thread in a less co
e tax implications but its
>> > > > > > applicability
>> > > >
>> > > > > >varies depending upon the laws of the land or
>> > > >
>> > > > > > country/state-specific
>> > > >
>> >
.
> > >
> > > If we all are in agreement to take Inventory Transfer route then let's
> > cut a
> > > JIRA to proceed with it.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Swapnil
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-
> > > From: James Yong [mailto:
eed with it.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Swapnil
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: James Yong [mailto:jamesy...@apache.org]
> > Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2017 8:27 PM
> > To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: RE: RE: RE: Quantity mis
let's cut a
> JIRA to proceed with it.
>
> Thanks,
> Swapnil
>
> -Original Message-
> From: James Yong [mailto:jamesy...@apache.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2017 8:27 PM
> To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
> Subject: Re: RE: RE: RE: Quantity missing for inventory transfe
@ofbiz.apache.org
Subject: Re: RE: RE: RE: Quantity missing for inventory transfer records
Hi all,
Having suggested possible entity changes to both approaches (with or without
Order entity), I prefer not to make use of Order entity for inventory
transfer. Order entity is currently shared by Sales Order
gt; > facility) Ã
>
> > > âIn-transitâ Ã âReceivedâ (at destination facility). As it
> > > needs to
> be
>
> > >tracked internally.
>
> > >- The deemed transaction value and tax liability against the
>
-
From: Vaibhav Jain [mailto:vaibhav.j...@hotwaxsystems.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2017 6:46 PM
To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
Subject: Re: RE: RE: Quantity missing for inventory transfer records
Hello All,
Thanks Swapnil for the detailed business scenarios.
Thanks James for the reply.
I
nce any feature like
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6964 gets implemented)
> >
> >
> >
> > I hope it should help to come up with a generic enough solution that can
> > work across geographies with required level of flexibility.
> >
>
hould help to come up with a generic enough solution that can
> work across geographies with required level of flexibility.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Swapnil
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: James Yong [mailto:jamesy...@apache.org]
>
pnil
-Original Message-
From: James Yong [mailto:jamesy...@apache.org]
Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2017 9:22 PM
To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
Subject: Re: RE: RE: RE: Quantity missing for inventory transfer records
Hi Swapnil,
Thanks for explaining the business case for associating Ship
mesy...@apache.org]
> Sent: Monday, October 16, 2017 9:26 PM
> To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
> Subject: Re: RE: RE: Quantity missing for inventory transfer records
>
> Hi Swapnil,
>
> Shipment is currently used for Delivery and Goods Inwards.
> Why would you want a Shipme
-
From: James Yong [mailto:jamesy...@apache.org]
Sent: Monday, October 16, 2017 9:26 PM
To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
Subject: Re: RE: RE: Quantity missing for inventory transfer records
Hi Swapnil,
Shipment is currently used for Delivery and Goods Inwards.
Why would you want a Shipment for Inventory
ferShipment.
>
> Thanks & Regards,
> Swapnil
>
> -Original Message-
> From: James Yong [mailto:jamesy...@apache.org]
> Sent: Sunday, October 15, 2017 9:26 PM
> To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
> Subject: Re: RE: Quantity missing for inventory transfer records
>
17 matches
Mail list logo
