Re: OFBiz demo certificate

There are yaml files for the Puppet scripts to configure the demo sites of OFBiz. Pierre Smits ORRTIZ.COM OFBiz based solutions & services OFBiz Extensions Marketplace http://oem.ofbizci.net/oci-2/ On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 8:17 PM, Jacques Le Roux <

buildbot failure in on ofbiz-trunk

The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder ofbiz-trunk while building . Full details are available at: https://ci.apache.org/builders/ofbiz-trunk/builds/1852 Buildbot URL: https://ci.apache.org/ Buildslave for this Build: silvanus_ubuntu Build Reason: The AnyBranchScheduler

buildbot success in on ofbiz-trunk

The Buildbot has detected a restored build on builder ofbiz-trunk while building . Full details are available at: https://ci.apache.org/builders/ofbiz-trunk/builds/1850 Buildbot URL: https://ci.apache.org/ Buildslave for this Build: silvanus_ubuntu Build Reason: The AnyBranchScheduler

Re: OFBiz demo certificate

Le 14/01/2017 à 17:06, Michael Brohl a écrit : Hi Jacques, inline also: Am 14.01.17 um 12:51 schrieb Jacques Le Roux: Hi Michael, Inline... Le 13/01/2017 à 16:56, Michael Brohl a écrit : Hi, we have several initiatives to raise the adoption of OFBiz by new users. For new users, one of the

Re: Issue when using cleanGradle task

Thanks Taher, That sounds like a good news. I indeed did not cross any issue by commenting out the content of the cleanGradle task About the cleanAnt, I think we can indeed remove it now that it's in the R16.11. I'll remove both in a few days if nobody complains Jacques Le 14/01/2017 à

Re: Issue when using cleanGradle task

Hi Jacques, My suspicion is that the upgrade to gradle 3+ (which automatically starts the daemon) leads to locking the above mentioned file and hence the problem that you're facing. I think it is safe to remove cleanGradle and also while we are at it cleanAnt tasks from build.gradle On Sat,

Re: OFBiz demo certificate

Hi Jacques, inline also: Am 14.01.17 um 12:51 schrieb Jacques Le Roux: Hi Michael, Inline... Le 13/01/2017 à 16:56, Michael Brohl a écrit : Hi, we have several initiatives to raise the adoption of OFBiz by new users. For new users, one of the first steps to learn about OFBiz or look

Issue when using cleanGradle task

Hi, It's now 2 weeks that I need to comment out the cleanGradle task even on a fresh checked out working copy (named ofbizCleanGradle), else I get C:\projectsASF\ofbizCleanGradle>svn st C:\projectsASF\ofbizCleanGradle> C:\projectsASF\ofbizCleanGradle>gradlew cleanGradle :cleanGradle FAILED

Re: OFBiz demo certificate

Hi Michael, Inline... Le 13/01/2017 à 16:56, Michael Brohl a écrit : Hi, we have several initiatives to raise the adoption of OFBiz by new users. For new users, one of the first steps to learn about OFBiz or look around what's in it, might be our OFBiz demo instances. Unfortunately, the

Re: What is the "Apache OFBiz" product?

Just a caution about naming conventions. We should not use names that make internal sense while the user base (existing and potential) get confused about exactly what we mean. If its a spade, let's call it a spade. The terms which may cause confusion are "Enterprise" and "Automation" as used in

Re: What is the "Apache OFBiz" product?

Very nice Jacopo, I really like it. Each layer communicates its intent clearly, and maps nicely to the name of the svn repository (ofbiz-framework, ofbiz-core, ofbiz-erp, ofbiz-plugins) On Jan 14, 2017 1:37 PM, "Jacopo Cappellato" < jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxsystems.com> wrote: > On Sat, Jan 14,

Re: What is the "Apache OFBiz" product?

I think it's indeed a better way to think about it, as Jacopo explained we can deliver several products Jacques Le 14/01/2017 à 11:21, Taher Alkhateeb a écrit : Very interesting, Michael's work actually made me realize that we should think about the name differently. Given our discussion in

Re: What is the "Apache OFBiz" product?

On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 11:21 AM, Taher Alkhateeb < slidingfilame...@gmail.com> wrote: > [...] But if we break the code similar to the way it > was discussed in the above thread, then maybe we should have multiple > names: > I agree we should find a product name for each of our (future)

Re: What is the "Apache OFBiz" product?

Very interesting, Michael's work actually made me realize that we should think about the name differently. Given our discussion in another thread about breaking down the repositories into multiple chunks (http://markmail.org/message/bjvqu23ofwzuk57y) I think we should consider multiple names for

Re: What is the "Apache OFBiz" product?

Thanks Michael. The list makes the differences stand out clearly. Gavin On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 11:55 AM, Michael Brohl wrote: > addition: I took the freedom to adjust the uppercase/lowercase of the > proposals. > > > Am 14.01.17 um 10:53 schrieb Michael Brohl: > >

Re: What is the "Apache OFBiz" product?

addition: I took the freedom to adjust the uppercase/lowercase of the proposals. Am 14.01.17 um 10:53 schrieb Michael Brohl: Thanks for starting this initiative, Jacopo. I have started a compilation of the proposals and suggestions coming out of this discussion here:

Re: What is the "Apache OFBiz" product?

Thanks for starting this initiative, Jacopo. I have started a compilation of the proposals and suggestions coming out of this discussion here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/IBUIB @Sharan: I thought it's agood place to put it under your drafts tree, please suggest another place if it