Hi
+1
Thanks
Dhiraj Gupta
-
dhirajgupta
--
View this message in context:
http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble.com/VOTE-RELEASE-Apache-OFBiz-10-04-02-tp4548537p4550963.html
Sent from the OFBiz - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi Jean-Luc, Pierre,
Just if you did not notice, thanks to Adrian, this discussion is now on user ML
(does not belong me)
Please use the new thread there: http://markmail.org/message/gnn5ardilphvu5e7
Jacques
From: Jean-Luc Malet jeanluc.ma...@nereide.biz
Pierre,
I agree with Jacques on this
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4801?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacques Le Roux closed OFBIZ-4801.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: SVN trunk
Assignee: Jacques Le Roux
Thanks
I believe Tidy is used by some of the HTTP client libraries, and Commons
VFS was used by Webslinger (it might be used currently by Jackrabbit).
-Adrian
On 4/11/2012 5:49 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
Hi all,
the following are housekeeping tasks that could be part of the SlimDown
roadmap we
BTW, how to you checkout OFBiz or download the source if there is no
Internet connection. I know we can build with Maven without Internect
connection once you have downloaded the dependencies when you build
first time. Also, OFBiz similar to other should have a different binary
release and
Thanks Adrian,
I can confirm that Commons VFS was used by Webslinger... can someone confirm
that it is now required by Jackrabbit? And if yes, what is the version required
by Jackrabbit? Can we at least use a stable version of it rather than a
snapshot?
Jacopo
On Apr 12, 2012, at 9:23 AM,
The following ant targets have different depends attributes:
* start (it was run) don't have the depends attribute set
* start-debug has depends=build
I would like to remove depends=build from start-debug to make it faster to
run and also make it consistent with start.
What do you think?
Hi all,
Back in the day in 2009 I submitted a patch regarding the JIRA mentioned
above and I noticed that a certain Gavin made some modifications in 2010.
Since then nothing has happened with it.
It is about adding an overview of Agreements to the dashboard of Accounts
in the SFA module
Should
My preference is to keep all issues open until they are resolved. Just
because an issue hasn't had activity recently, it doesn't mean it will
never get resolved.
-Adrian
On 4/12/2012 10:20 AM, Pierre Smits wrote:
Hi all,
Back in the day in 2009 I submitted a patch regarding the JIRA
Improve help screens in Manufacturing
-
Key: OFBIZ-4802
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4802
Project: OFBiz
Issue Type: Bug
Components: manufacturing
Affects Versions: SVN
Hi Raj,
From: Rajbir Saini rajbsa...@yahoo.com
BTW, how to you checkout OFBiz or download the source if there is no Internet
connection. I know we can build with Maven without
Internect connection once you have downloaded the dependencies when you build
first time.
A real important issue
Hi Jacques,
I agree there are minor problems when libraries are downloaded form
different repositories. I had been in similar situation couple of time
in the past. But again, source repository is not really to store the
binary contents. We cant main any versioning information of the jars in
Hi Doogie,
a long time ago, you committed code to test the presence of the
cobertura classes:
https://fisheye6.atlassian.com/changelog/ofbiz?cs=889839.
Today (maybe since ?), this is not working with the ant shell script
located at the OFBiz's root.
I created the related Jira issue:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4783?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13252375#comment-13252375
]
Adrian Crum commented on OFBIZ-4783:
It might help to learn the differences between
Hi Adrian,
Please see inline comments
Op 12 april 2012 14:21 schreef Adrian Crum (Commented) (JIRA)
j...@apache.org het volgende:
[
I think it is fair to say that more than a year since creation is beyond
recently and reasonable. Hence my question.
Pierre
Op 12 april 2012 11:22 schreef Adrian Crum
adrian.c...@sandglass-software.com het volgende:
My preference is to keep all issues open until they are resolved. Just
To be frank, when I 1st read Pierre's proposition I thought it was a good idea
and just wanted to ask him for patches :p
Then I put my black hat (played the devil's advocate if you prefer) and began to think about drawbacks and possibles issues. No
Internet connection poped to my mind and then
2012/4/12 Jacques Le Roux jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com:
To be frank, when I 1st read Pierre's proposition I thought it was a good
idea and just wanted to ask him for patches :p
Then I put my black hat (played the devil's advocate if you prefer) and
began to think about drawbacks and possibles
Please follow the best practices: keep your comments related to a Jira in the
Jira.
Thanks
Jacques
From: Pierre Smits pierre.sm...@gmail.com
Hi Adrian,
Please see inline comments
Op 12 april 2012 14:21 schreef Adrian Crum (Commented) (JIRA)
j...@apache.org het volgende:
[
Well, I think it is important to bundle all the jars required to build, run and
test the system in the OFBiz package; and they have to be properly listed in
LICENSE/NOTICE files.
See in particular:
http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#what-must-every-release-contain
Jacopo
On Apr 12, 2012,
I agree with you Jacopo regarding bundling the jars in release. But
source code is not release. Apache projects using Maven do not keep jars
in the repository but they do bundle the jars in release.
Thanks,
Raj
On Thursday 12 April 2012 07:38 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
Well, I think it
../..
My main questions are: what is the real advantage of doing this? How this
would solve the problems I posted at the beginning of this thread (that has
been ignored to discuss about tools)?
ivy would rename the jars the way we want (eg package-version.jar),
and using ivy, we would then
I see what you mean but... source code releases are required by the ASF.
Quoting http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html :
All releases are in the form of the source materials needed to make changes to
the software being released. In some cases, binary/bytecode packages are also
produced as a
Thanks Erwan,
That was not clear to me.
So then maybe we could discuss Pierre's proposition. But to have a real idea of the time added (not an estimate) if we use Ivy
instead of having the libs in the repo, we need to have all done already...
Jacques
From: Erwan de FERRIERES
Yes, I was only dicussing about trunk checkout. As proposed Raj a specific ant
task could be used to prepare the releases.
Anyway more a brainstorming than anything else at this stage
Jacques
From: Jacopo Cappellato jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxmedia.com
Well, I think it is important to bundle all
On Apr 12, 2012, at 4:37 PM, Erwan de FERRIERES wrote:
ivy would rename the jars the way we want (eg package-version.jar),
and using ivy, we would then reduce the LICENSE file, as less jars
would be released with OFBiz. From an extremist POV, we could only
whip ant + ivy, and one of the
+1
2012/4/12 dhiraj.g dhira...@nic.in
Hi
+1
Thanks
Dhiraj Gupta
-
dhirajgupta
--
View this message in context:
http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble.com/VOTE-RELEASE-Apache-OFBiz-10-04-02-tp4548537p4550963.html
Sent from the OFBiz - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
I am
First of all I believe that (packaged) releases are intended for
non-developers (end users) and not for developers. That in mind, releases
should have everything that is needed to run generic production systems.
And nothing more, not test code, not demo data.
When developers want to look at what
Le 11/04/2012 12:44, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit :
* apache-ofbiz-10.04.02.zip: the release package, based on the 10.04 branch at
revision 1324645 (latest as of now)
* KEYS: text file with keys
* apache-ofbiz-10.04.02.zip.asc: the detached signature file
* apache-ofbiz-10.04.02.zip.md5,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4793?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13252534#comment-13252534
]
Francis ANDRE commented on OFBIZ-4793:
--
Jacques
IMHO, it is likely to leads to some
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4803?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Francis ANDRE updated OFBIZ-4803:
-
Attachment: ofbiz-eclipse.patch
The patches for the launchers and additional patches for runnign
Improve Eclipse integration
---
Key: OFBIZ-4803
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4803
Project: OFBiz
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: framework
Affects Versions: SVN trunk
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4803?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Francis ANDRE updated OFBIZ-4803:
-
Attachment: jackrabbit-core-2.3.3.jar
The jcr core patched jar
Improve Eclipse
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4793?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13252555#comment-13252555
]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-4793:
Hi Francis,
You are right, I don't
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4803?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13252568#comment-13252568
]
Erwan de FERRIERES commented on OFBIZ-4803:
---
Please Francis keep the issues
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4783?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13252643#comment-13252643
]
Erwan de FERRIERES commented on OFBIZ-4783:
---
using revision 889900 (just after
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4768?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13252664#comment-13252664
]
Wai commented on OFBIZ-4768:
Hello Committers,
Is this enhancement going into the repository?
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4803?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13252731#comment-13252731
]
Francis ANDRE commented on OFBIZ-4803:
--
Erwan
The jar is linked with this ofbiz
Update Company Contact Infromrtion Fails
Key: OFBIZ-4804
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4804
Project: OFBiz
Issue Type: Bug
Reporter: Tom Burns
--
This message is
39 matches
Mail list logo
