/
load-components parent-directory=specialpurpose/
load-components parent-directory=themes/
load-components parent-directory=hot-deploy/
/component-loader
Thank you,
Bruno
2009/2/22 David E Jones david.jo...@hotwaxmedia.com:
It sounds like there is some sort of conflict between the theme
Yeah, something like appcommon or commonext would be clear and
consistent with stuff.
Thanks for getting this started Hans.
-David
On Feb 26, 2009, at 10:15 AM, Adrian Crum wrote:
In previous discussions, appcommon was used.
-Adrian
Jacques Le Roux wrote:
I thought that, for the sake
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2201?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12677221#action_12677221
]
David E. Jones commented on OFBIZ-2201:
---
Don't worry too much about something
Are the entity field labels actually used for all of these entities?
Generally this feature ONLY makes sense for things that are part of
seed data, things that may be entered by users should use other
patterns for i18n.
The suspect entities that are included here include:
- Content (has
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2208?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12677729#action_12677729
]
David E. Jones commented on OFBIZ-2208:
---
Karim: could you verify that you are using
of it ?
Thanks
Marco
Il giorno 27/feb/09, alle ore 22:29, David E Jones ha scritto:
Are the entity field labels actually used for all of these entities?
Generally this feature ONLY makes sense for things that are part of
seed data, things that may be entered by users should use other
patterns for i18n
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2227?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12678685#action_12678685
]
David E. Jones commented on OFBIZ-2227:
---
BJ: This issue is about CC capture
Why not just use different test-suite elements for this? Why have an
hierarchy in this?
Actually... I'm not even sure what this is, ie what is the point of
a group? Maybe we should discuss that first...
-David
On Mar 4, 2009, at 7:40 PM, doo...@apache.org wrote:
Author: doogie
Date:
On Mar 4, 2009, at 8:03 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
David E Jones wrote:
Why not just use different test-suite elements for this? Why have an
hierarchy in this?
Actually... I'm not even sure what this is, ie what is the point
of a
group? Maybe we should discuss that first...
The service
*** First off Adam: it's great to see you working on this stuff, the
testing stuff in general needs a LOT more work and hasn't seen much
attention, so yeah... this is great.
On Mar 4, 2009, at 9:25 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
The service engine tests define several different test cases. The
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2208?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12679215#action_12679215
]
David E. Jones commented on OFBIZ-2208:
---
This patches substantially changes an entity
I wrote this stuff and what you wrote still doesn't make any sense to
me...
Are you saying this is an issue with the latest version? Are you using
the second commit which fixed these issues or are you saying that
somehow you don't want to use that and we should fix it in a different
On Mar 5, 2009, at 11:35 AM, David E Jones wrote:
I wrote this stuff and what you wrote still doesn't make any sense
to me...
Are you saying this is an issue with the latest version? Are you
using the second commit which fixed these issues or are you saying
that somehow you don't want to use
I've been thinking more about the XSRF problem and what we can do to
make OFBiz more secure from this sort of attack. This is related to
OFBIZ-1959 and there is more discussion and introduction to it there.
The trick is that we want to allow certain things:
1. the client's IP address can
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1235?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12679502#action_12679502
]
David E. Jones commented on OFBIZ-1235:
---
You might want to wait until Jacopo posts
Yes, AJAX calls are an interesting point... If AJAX requests used the
random token even a single call would reset the token and break
things. If they did not use the random token they are a gaping
security hole.
I don't think we're going to do the random token thing, unless someone
Please revert this patch:
1. the ServiceVariantEventHandler is in the framework and is dependent
on the applications/product component
2. creating an event handler for this is pure silliness in the first
place and should simply be done with a custom event
-David
On Mar 6, 2009, at
I looks like it comes from the original one in the ecommerce web.xml
file.
-David
On Mar 6, 2009, at 9:21 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Mmm, it seems that there is much more than that : 29 occurrences of
the same string in OFBiz, not sure all are correct...
descriptionA unique ID used to
the WebSite entity/
description
If you are OK I will update it.
-Bruno
2009/3/6 David E Jones david.jo...@hotwaxmedia.com:
I looks like it comes from the original one in the ecommerce
web.xml file.
-David
On Mar 6, 2009, at 9:21 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Mmm, it seems
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2231?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12679756#action_12679756
]
David E. Jones commented on OFBIZ-2231:
---
What does this have to do with encoding
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2227?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12679794#action_12679794
]
David E. Jones commented on OFBIZ-2227:
---
When you're working on this make sure you
I'm still for running tests as a set for each suite.
If you disagree with me, take a look at some of the current test suite
XML files and explain to me how it makes sense, or is even possible,
to run most of them with 100% independent tests. You can't even load
or assert data if you run
this is just my ignorance on this
particular data setup or if my assumptions above are incorrect.
Cheers,
Tim
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595
- David E Jones david.jo...@hotwaxmedia.com wrote:
I'm still for running tests as a set for each
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2220?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12679987#action_12679987
]
David E. Jones commented on OFBIZ-2220:
---
Why do you say it is misleading
On Mar 5, 2009, at 2:55 PM, David E Jones wrote:
One thing that we could do to help with this problem, at least for
secure pages, is to tighten things up a bit. I'm thinking of 2 things:
1. if a request has https=true then we will not accept http requests
AT ALL, we will just return
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2186?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12680011#action_12680011
]
David E. Jones commented on OFBIZ-2186:
---
What are the 2 different objects? I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2186?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12680088#action_12680088
]
David E. Jones commented on OFBIZ-2186:
---
Thank you for the additional information
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2233?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12680331#action_12680331
]
David E. Jones commented on OFBIZ-2233:
---
This patch does not do what is described
This is one of the new security constraints that we were discussing
over the last week.
All data going into secure requests should be in the body so it is
actually secure, and NOT in the URL where it is not encrypted. This is
a good general practice, and now we're playing with enforcing
I did write some message and sent them to this list, one to propose
these changes and another to communicate that they were in place... :)
Of course, now that people are seeing the downside to security, maybe
opinions won't be so in favor of it? ;)
-David
On Mar 10, 2009, at 4:28 PM,
is working again but...how people was able to
change the theme?
I tried to use party/visits and webtools/logs in order to discover the
hack but no way.
I would be interesting to know how to track the user activity that
took to this. How to?
-Bruno
2009/3/10 David E Jones david.jo...@hotwaxmedia.com:
I
with it. I wasn't sure what to do about it.
Your other reply was helpful.
-Adrian
David E Jones wrote:
I did write some message and sent them to this list, one to propose
these changes and another to communicate that they were in
place... :)
Of course, now that people are seeing
think we'll need to introduce a
new field type, like a form-backed link that we can use instead of the
hyperlink field type that we currently use to pass parameters in the
URL.
-David
On Mar 10, 2009, at 11:38 PM, David E Jones wrote:
Actually, I'm starting to wonder if we should revert
On Mar 11, 2009, at 4:53 AM, Bilgin Ibryam wrote:
On Mar 11, 2009, at 9:43 AM, David E Jones wrote:
So, until then...
To get there with the form widget I think we'll need to introduce a
new field type, like a form-backed link that we can use instead of
the hyperlink field type that we
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2238?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
David E. Jones closed OFBIZ-2238.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: SVN trunk
Assignee: David E. Jones
Thanks
This was discussed a while back around the time that specialpurpose
was introduce, and pos and other things were moved there, but we
decided on not doing it at the time because of concerns about non-
backward-compatible impact.
Since we are getting ready to do a release branch, probably
I wrote an early rough draft for the Board Report for Mar 2009. It is
available here:
http://docs.ofbiz.org/display/OFBADMIN/ASF+Board+Report+2009-03
This is not finalized yet and there are a couple of days left before I
have to submit it, so please send comments and thoughts to make it
Bakker wrote:
You might want to mention the issue i raised about the Apache
infrastructure:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-1877
On Fri, 2009-03-13 at 00:57 -0600, David E Jones wrote:
I wrote an early rough draft for the Board Report for Mar 2009. It is
available here:
http
...@ofbiz.apache.org list on Jan25.
My intention was to first move and then change the installation to
what
we wanted. At that time i did not see any problems from our end. Do we
have them now?
Regards,
Hans
On Fri, 2009-03-13 at 01:38 -0600, David E Jones wrote:
That's an interesting link
On Mar 13, 2009, at 1:35 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
Adam Heath wrote:
David E Jones wrote:
I wrote an early rough draft for the Board Report for Mar 2009. It
is
available here:
http://docs.ofbiz.org/display/OFBADMIN/ASF+Board+Report+2009-03
This is not finalized yet and there are a couple
Okay, this is now moved...
-David
On Mar 13, 2009, at 12:56 AM, David E Jones wrote:
This was discussed a while back around the time that specialpurpose
was introduce, and pos and other things were moved there, but we
decided on not doing it at the time because of concerns about non
I have implemented an improvement to the form widget (still needs
introduction in other places in the form and other widgets).
For an example see the UpdateProductPrice form in the ProductForms.xml
file, namely the deleteLink field which now looks like this:
field name=deleteLink
On Mar 15, 2009, at 7:09 AM, Hans Bakker wrote:
I am sorry but i do not agree with this.
The roleTypes on a communication event is a big problem.
did you ever send an email stating you are a customer or an employee?
You do however know if you are the originator and which parties you
to come up with requirements for this
data model (only saying this or that design is the way to go)... there
it is.
-David
On Mar 15, 2009, at 11:57 AM, David E Jones wrote:
On Mar 15, 2009, at 7:09 AM, Hans Bakker wrote:
I am sorry but i do not agree with this.
The roleTypes
On Mar 11, 2009, at 10:52 AM, David E Jones wrote:
On Mar 11, 2009, at 4:53 AM, Bilgin Ibryam wrote:
On Mar 11, 2009, at 9:43 AM, David E Jones wrote:
So, until then...
To get there with the form widget I think we'll need to introduce
a new field type, like a form-backed link that we
?
so finally Jacques succeeded to get this slowly resolved :-)
Regards,
Hans
On Sun, 2009-03-15 at 12:04 -0600, David E Jones wrote:
Since we seem to be back to this issue...
What you're saying Hans is an over-simplification of the issue as I
explained before.
If you want to properly model
On Mar 16, 2009, at 3:03 AM, Bilgin Ibryam wrote:
I haven't implemented this in the screen widget or in the menu or
tree widgets yet either. Actually, after implementing it for the
sub-hyperlink element in the form widget I couldn't find any places
where a request that calls a service was
On Mar 17, 2009, at 5:59 AM, Bilgin Ibryam wrote:
On Mar 15, 2009, at 11:30 AM, David E Jones wrote:
In short all of the hyperlink fields need to be updated with these
two changes. As soon as the framework is extended so that this is
supported for the sub-hyperlink element in the form
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2243?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12682724#action_12682724
]
David E. Jones commented on OFBIZ-2243:
---
As a follow-up to the mailing list comment
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2243?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12682749#action_12682749
]
David E. Jones commented on OFBIZ-2243:
---
Yes, I agree Adam. One trend I've been
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2243?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12682753#action_12682753
]
David E. Jones commented on OFBIZ-2243:
---
Adrian: you're right that this could
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2243?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12682778#action_12682778
]
David E. Jones commented on OFBIZ-2243:
---
Okay, done in SVN rev 755377.
In hyperlink
On Mar 17, 2009, at 9:08 AM, Bilgin Ibryam wrote:
On Mar 17, 2009, at 4:31 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
It would be better to fix the Java code that reads the XML files so
this doesn't happen.
Yes thats true, but I still think we need also a way for overriding
the events as it is with
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2231?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12682943#action_12682943
]
David E. Jones commented on OFBIZ-2231:
---
Jacques: if you're going to have a look
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2244?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
David E. Jones closed OFBIZ-2244.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: SVN trunk
Thanks Ashish, this looks good and is in SVN
This would be great to have done before the release. It would allow us
to get a LOT of stuff off the classpath, which can be a painful part
of deployment.
-David
On Mar 18, 2009, at 11:28 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
I had a closer look
service
My personal favorite (I am admittedly biased), including diagrams and
videos, is:
http://docs.ofbiz.org/display/OFBTECH/Framework+Introduction+Videos+and+Diagrams
More generally a good read through this page and the documents it
links to will help you a lot:
path=org/ofbiz/ecommerce/customer/
CustomerEvents.xml invoke=processCustomerSettings/
WDYT ?
--
Ashish
Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Done at revision: 755977
Jacques
From: David E Jones david.jo...@hotwaxmedia.com
This would be great to have done before the release. It would
allow us to get
On Mar 19, 2009, at 3:04 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
David E Jones wrote:
Stepping back a little, why do you want to cache data from those
entities?
Two steps forward, one step back
Why would you *not* want to?
Sorry, I asked first and I want to hear someone's understand of when
it's
On Mar 19, 2009, at 3:06 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
David E Jones wrote:
It should be supported now, but yeah it would be a good idea to
test it
before doing a mass change. And yes, a mass change there would be
great
too.
Once those are done we could probably remove the ${component-dir
On Mar 19, 2009, at 7:03 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
David E Jones wrote:
On Mar 19, 2009, at 3:04 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
David E Jones wrote:
Stepping back a little, why do you want to cache data from those
entities?
Two steps forward, one step back
Why would you *not* want to?
Sorry
.
Would we be better off to create another entity, keyed by orderId and
orderItemSeqId, just for this purpose?
-Al
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 2:24 PM, David E Jones
david.jo...@hotwaxmedia.comwrote:
Stepping back a little, why do you want to cache data from those
entities?
-David
On Mar 19
Since it has been about 12 hours and no word from Adam I disabled the
webslinger build and component load in SVN rev 756990.
For now at least we can build and run everything else (only the
webslinger component and webapp should be affected by this).
I looked around a little for the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2231?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
David E. Jones closed OFBIZ-2231.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: David E. Jones (was: Jacques Le Roux)
Escaped ampersands
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2231?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12688211#action_12688211
]
David E. Jones commented on OFBIZ-2231:
---
This should be fixed along with related
On Mar 24, 2009, at 10:08 AM, Bob Morley wrote:
One thing that has come up is situations where we have entries in our
controller that reference missing screens and/or screens that
reference
missing widgets (mostly forms). What I wanted to do was create a unit
tester that would walk the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2252?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12688809#action_12688809
]
David E. Jones commented on OFBIZ-2252:
---
This looks good in general Deepesh
bad stuff people had checked in.
David E Jones-3 wrote:
The WebTools ArtifactInfo stuff does something like this (not sure if
it will meet your needs). It does parse and load all of the various
artifacts in OFBiz and in the initialization log shows warnings about
missing things (bad references
On Mar 25, 2009, at 11:37 AM, Adam Heath wrote:
jone...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jonesde
Date: Tue Mar 24 06:27:03 2009
New Revision: 757671
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=757671view=rev
Log:
Removed some more references to applications stuff from framework,
including small cleanup
I've started putting together some ideas for the press release for our
upcoming release branch. The time is a little tight... I had planned
on doing this last week but it got lost among other things.
To facilitate collaboration on this I've created a confluence page for
it here:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2252?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
David E. Jones reassigned OFBIZ-2252:
-
Assignee: David E. Jones
Exception occurs while changing the order status
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2252?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
David E. Jones closed OFBIZ-2252.
-
Resolution: Fixed
I'm applying this patch and making some changes right away since this really
.
Comments more than welcome. In fact, I demand that you comment right
now! ;)
-David
On Mar 25, 2009, at 4:32 PM, David E Jones wrote:
I've started putting together some ideas for the press release for
our upcoming release branch. The time is a little tight... I had
planned on doing this last
in Chinese. :) Or 9.5?
Shi Yusen/Beijing Langhua Ltd.
在 2009-03-25三的 16:32 -0600，David E Jones写道：
I've started putting together some ideas for the press release for
our
upcoming release branch. The time is a little tight... I had planned
on doing this last week but it got lost among other things
creating jiras for all these
then someone can be pointed to it as things they can do to help.
David E Jones sent the following on 3/26/2009 9:19 AM:
I'm thinking we should delay the release branch for a couple of
weeks.
Some reasons:
1. more opportunity to collaborate with the PRC on the press
On Mar 26, 2009, at 12:58 PM, Bruno Busco wrote:
Hi,
when trying to select a different theme in the backoffice I get this.
The Following Errors Occurred:
Error calling event: org.ofbiz.webapp.event.EventHandlerException:
Found URL parameter [userPrefTypeId] passed to secure (https)
It might be better to stick with a self-signed certificate for now. We
don't know where these demo servers will be in the future. There are
two main options being pursued (as has been discussed on the private
list):
1. host on ASF infra controlled by the current infra team and on
the
last time.
-Adrian
David E Jones wrote:
On Mar 26, 2009, at 12:58 PM, Bruno Busco wrote:
Hi,
when trying to select a different theme in the backoffice I get
this.
The Following Errors Occurred:
Error calling event: org.ofbiz.webapp.event.EventHandlerException:
Found URL parameter
do not quite understand what idea you have moving the myportal into
the framework because it think most of it is already there?
regards
Hans
On Thu, 2009-03-26 at 10:19 -0600, David E Jones wrote:
I'm thinking we should delay the release branch for a couple of
weeks.
Some reasons:
1. more
Thanks for your work on that Jacques, it's a great improvement.
-David
On Mar 28, 2009, at 11:36 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
I have recently done some massive changes using Eclipse S/R with
regexp.
As it was a bit complex I had have my hand dirty. So maybe some
typos slipped in
Also I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2256?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12693641#action_12693641
]
David E. Jones commented on OFBIZ-2256:
---
We might want to leave this open for the FTL
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2243?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12693646#action_12693646
]
David E. Jones commented on OFBIZ-2243:
---
Wow... that's quite the set of regexps
This has been discussed a few times and I think is on a few of the
lists around were people have brainstormed on things they'd like to
add/change/etc. I'm personally very in favor of it and I do believe it
has been needed for a long time.
As for the design, I'm very against the concept
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2259?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12693978#action_12693978
]
David E. Jones commented on OFBIZ-2259:
---
This looks pretty good in general.
One
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2259?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12693980#action_12693980
]
David E. Jones commented on OFBIZ-2259:
---
Thinking about this more I like the idea
On Mar 30, 2009, at 9:38 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
David E Jones wrote:
This has been discussed a few times and I think is on a few of the
lists
around were people have brainstormed on things they'd like to
add/change/etc. I'm personally very in favor of it and I do believe
it
has been
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2260?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12694260#action_12694260
]
David E. Jones commented on OFBIZ-2260:
---
Yes, JavaScript is kind of the only way
Yes, this looks much better Marco, and is just the direction I was
trying to communicate.
There are a few things you could do to clarify the structure, and make
it more consistent with other sets of entities that are using the type/
etc pattern:
1. make a PaymentGatewayConfigType entity
On Apr 1, 2009, at 3:13 AM, Bilgin Ibryam wrote:
On Mar 17, 2009, at 10:55 PM, David E Jones wrote:
A name or some sort of an identifier on each might be a good way to
go...
-David
David, thanks for the advice.
Do you mean a new optional name attribute on event element, so
Adding a prefix would make finding these entities easier. We didn't do
that with others like Party/Person and ContactMech/PostalAddress, but
yes we certainly could.
-David
On Apr 1, 2009, at 3:38 AM, mrisal...@libero.it wrote:
Ok, thanks a lot for those important clarification.
I will
This is kind of a bad pattern since it puts presentation-specific code
in the data preparation, ie the CMSContentFindQueryString variable is
a presentation-specific parameter string that is prepared in a the
data preparation code. While not a terrible thing to do, it does
reduce
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2269?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12695682#action_12695682
]
David E. Jones commented on OFBIZ-2269:
---
Looks like a great start Marco.
One small
There should never be any OOTB components in hot-deploy. It is just an
empty directory that is a placeholder for custom extensions that
people want to use (either their own or from somewhere else outside of
the main ofbiz project).
-David
On Apr 4, 2009, at 6:46 AM, Jacques Le Roux
On Apr 5, 2009, at 5:11 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
We have also targets with params in forms : look for
form(.*)target=(.*)\?(.*)=(.*) and form.(*)\R(.*)target=(.*)\?
(.*)=(.*).
So I think we should extend the param-name scheme for forms also...
If it is a parameter on the form target it
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2269?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12695884#action_12695884
]
David E. Jones commented on OFBIZ-2269:
---
In this case the paymentService field should
The easiest thing to do is have Log4J send the emails with a little
setting in the log4j.xml file. We could do this for all ERROR and
FATAL level messages.
Where to send them is another issue. I suppose if we really wanted
people to get on these then having them go to the dev list would
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2260?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12695965#action_12695965
]
David E. Jones commented on OFBIZ-2260:
---
A couple of quick notes:
1
Some of these settings should NOT go in the trunk, especially those
that enable mail notifications and send them to a specific IP address.
-David
On Apr 5, 2009, at 10:36 PM, jler...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jleroux
Date: Mon Apr 6 04:36:28 2009
New Revision: 762207
URL:
This is another weird one... why is the action set in the JavaScript?
It makes the javascript unnecessarily complex as the action should be
defined on the form element.
In general there is no need for the href to contain anything other than:
javascript:document.${formName}.submit()
In
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2275?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12696409#action_12696409
]
David E. Jones commented on OFBIZ-2275:
---
Thanks for reporting this CJ. I must have
301 - 400 of 2419 matches
Mail list logo
