Re: (ofbiz-tools) branch master updated: Replaces 22.01 branch by 24.09 as stable

2024-09-12 Thread Jacques Le Roux
. I've removed the old demo-next log files. Thanks, Dan. On Wed, 11 Sept 2024 at 17:42, Jacques Le Roux wrote: Thanks to check Nicolas, With Docker, Dan has much simplified things. The BB script is also now easy to change*. If we did not miss anything, things happens as we know, as long a

Re: Unit testing for a custom module

2024-09-12 Thread Jacques Le Roux
Hi Carsten, I guess you found some explanations in "sourceSets{" ? HTH Jacques Le 11/09/2024 à 10:32, Carsten Schinzer a écrit : A little update here: This morning I found that when I place the integration tests in the main source tree they will not be executed in the JUnit run AND will be

Re: (ofbiz-tools) branch master updated: Replaces 22.01 branch by 24.09 as stable

2024-09-11 Thread Jacques Le Roux
2d66d54ebb3f0b4eb922e9278b2c91422bdc81ce Author: Jacques Le Roux AuthorDate: Wed Sep 11 17:07:51 2024 +0200 Replaces 22.01 branch by 24.09 as stable --- demo-backup/ofbizdocker/home/ofbizdocker/demo-next/docker-compose.yml | 2 +-   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/demo-backup

Re: Dependency configuration types in Gradle for components - testCompileOnly or testRuntimeOnly

2024-09-11 Thread Jacques Le Roux
that seem to the dependency config types that are recognized for plugins in OFBiz, right? Thanks again & warm regards Carsten Am 11.09.2024 um 08:36 schrieb Jacques Le Roux : Hi Carsten, Did you have a look at https://www.google.fr/search?q=gradle+testCompile&ie=UTF-8 ? Elese, &q

Re: Dependency configuration types in Gradle for components - testCompileOnly or testRuntimeOnly

2024-09-10 Thread Jacques Le Roux
Hi Carsten, Did you have a look at https://www.google.fr/search?q=gradle+testCompile&ie=UTF-8 ? Elese, "testRuntime is deprecated since many years and removed since Gradle 7" : https://discuss.gradle.org/t/documentation-of-dependency-configuration-testruntime/46219 HTH Jacques Le 10/09/202

Re: Bug when uploading image to a product

2024-09-09 Thread Jacques Le Roux
Le 09/09/2024 à 18:59, Jacques Le Roux a écrit : i wonder why even admin lack some permission, It's because webshell uploads are devastating. They easily lead to RCE. If for some reason we face a post-authN attack, we can't trust any authentication. And SecuredUpload is already enou

Re: refused

2024-09-09 Thread Jacques Le Roux
I did not find any advice about that. TIA Jacques Le 09/09/2024 à 16:16, sebb a écrit : On Mon, 9 Sept 2024 at 11:36, Jacques Le Roux wrote: Hi, After creating a new file usinghttps://projects.apache.org/create.html (DOAP Creation), I merged the changes got in to update our previous doap_OFB

Re: Bug when uploading image to a product

2024-09-09 Thread Jacques Le Roux
free to work on it with the suggestions you made which seem great. I have seen, and tested a bit (with some "attacking" images), your PR834. It sounds OK with me. Before pushing I'll though see if we can't handle the "All" case using isValidImageIncludingSvgFile() Than

Re: want to be apache contributor

2024-09-09 Thread Jacques Le Roux
Hi Lucille, It's done Have a good day Jacques Le 05/09/2024 à 11:27, Jacques Le Roux a écrit : Hi Lucille, We are sorry for your loss, I'll take care of that. Jacques Le 04/09/2024 à 21:25, Sales Vibralung a écrit : Hi all, My late husband was a Linux wiz.  How can I get

Re: Bug when uploading image to a product

2024-09-08 Thread Jacques Le Roux
BTW, there is already a Jira for that: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-12639 Any help is welcome :) Le 08/09/2024 à 17:03, Jacques Le Roux a écrit : Hi Groza, After facing several webshell uploads I made SecuredUpload.java as secure as possible OOTB. I see 2 options here

Re: [VOTE] [BRANCH] Create next stable Apache OFBiz branch : release24.09

2024-09-08 Thread Jacques Le Roux
+1 Jacques Le 08/09/2024 à 18:01, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit : +1 Jacopo On Fri, Sep 6, 2024 at 2:28 PM Nicolas Malin wrote: This is the vote thread to create the next stable branch "release24.09" from the current trunk If you need more information, please refer to this thread [1] Vote: [

Re: Bug when uploading image to a product

2024-09-08 Thread Jacques Le Roux
Hi Groza, After facing several webshell uploads I made SecuredUpload.java as secure as possible OOTB. I see 2 options here: * Increase maxLineLength in security.properties (could be unsecure, but not that bad) * Improve SecuredUpload by having a special treatment for Images at line 209 HTH

Re: 回复:Re: 回复:URL Issue

2024-09-08 Thread Jacques Le Roux
tart (before signing in) or during the session. That no longer happens in trunk for both cases. Please test, TIA Jacques Le 07/09/2024 à 18:01, Jacques Le Roux a écrit : Hi, Thanks All for your help. Here is the origin and the fix of this issue. The official documentation about @WebListener i

Re: Consultation for new plugin

2024-09-07 Thread Jacques Le Roux
Hi Groza, You need a Confluence write access. Have you created a Confluence account? If you did, what is your Confluence username? HTH Jacques Le 07/09/2024 à 19:05, Groza Danut a écrit : I propose we move the requirement planning and architectural design draft in a new temporary page on Con

Re: 回复:Re: 回复:URL Issue

2024-09-07 Thread Jacques Le Roux
13136 for that and will push now Jacques Le 06/09/2024 à 14:50, Jacques Le Roux a écrit : Thanks Groza, I have an idea about that, I'll check it does not introduce a regression Le 06/09/2024 à 11:29, Groza Danut a écrit : Yes it is, the line at 168 removes the char: .replaceAll(";

Re: 回复:Re: 回复:URL Issue

2024-09-06 Thread Jacques Le Roux
he.ofbiz.webapp.control.ControlFilter.doFilter(ControlFilter.java:172) javax.servlet.http.HttpFilter.doFilter(HttpFilter.java:53) org.apache.logging.log4j.web.Log4jServletFilter.doFilter(Log4jServletFilter.java:71) Note The full stack trace of the root cause is available in the server logs. Apache Tomcat/9.0.91

Re: 回复:Re: 回复:Re: ofibz causes system extremely slow after one night

2024-09-06 Thread Jacques Le Roux
more few days. 原始邮件 发件人:"Jacques Le Roux"< jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com >; 发件时间:2024/9/4 15:36 收件人:"dev"< dev@ofbiz.apache.org >;"雷咩咩"< 675686...@qq.com.INVALID >;"ofbiz user"< u...@ofbiz.apache.org &g

Re: want to be apache contributor

2024-09-05 Thread Jacques Le Roux
ed on that page. I can review your changes if you like... Warm regards, Craig > On Sep 3, 2024, at 23:34, Jacques Le Roux wrote: > > Thanks Craig, > > This page was written before the GitHub "era". I think we should rewrite it a bit in accorda

Re: want to be apache contributor

2024-09-04 Thread Jacques Le Roux
Hi, Not "pas" but "page" of course. I'll rewrite few parts. Jacques Le 04/09/2024 à 08:34, Jacques Le Roux a écrit : Thanks Craig, This pas was written before the GitHub "era". I think we should rewrite it a bit in accordance with what you said. Ja

Re: [PROPOSAL] freeze trunk for new features in favor of a release 24.x branch preparation / future roadmap

2024-09-03 Thread Jacques Le Roux
+1 Sounds good, thanks Jacques Le 03/09/2024 à 17:32, gil a écrit : +1 Thanks, Gil On 03/09/2024 15:21, Nicolas Malin wrote: Hello, After going through this thread [1], I propose to go ahead with the creation of the `release24` branch in a few weeks, and the release of the next official v

Re: Want to be a committer , ICLA filled

2024-09-02 Thread Jacques Le Roux
Hi Omar, We note that. Note on your side that it's the PMC to decide who should be a commiter. https://community.apache.org/contributors/becomingacommitter.html Thanks for your interest in OFBiz and keep it Jacques Le 02/09/2024 à 12:51, Omar Abdullwahhab a écrit : Hello developers at Ofbiz

Re: [VOTE] [RELEASE] Apache OFBiz 18.12.16 - Second attempt

2024-08-31 Thread Jacques Le Roux
Thanks Jacopo, Verification, back and front ends (small checks) work for me. Ubuntu 20.04 LTS openjdk version "1.8.0_422" +1 Jacques Le 31/08/2024 à 08:46, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit : This is the second vote thread to publish "Apache OFBiz 18.12.16", the 16th release from the release18.12 br

Re: 回复:URL Issue

2024-08-29 Thread Jacques Le Roux
s at configuring the applications with the names of their session cookies. All the back-end applications could then use a single 'backend' cookie, and any front-end consumer facing application could have their own distinct session cookie. Thanks, Dan. On Thu, 29 Aug 2024 at 09:17, Jacques Le Ro

Re: 回复:URL Issue

2024-08-29 Thread Jacques Le Roux
"Prevent special encoded characters sequences in URLs" So we need to clearly define steps to manually generate these URLs. Then, if it's OK, we could allow URLs containing ";jsessionid=" to bypass the security filter. I copy this email to the dev ML because of its impo

Re: [VOTE] [RELEASE] Apache OFBiz 18.12.16

2024-08-28 Thread Jacques Le Roux
Thanks Jacopo, Verification, back and front ends (small checks) work for me Ubuntu 20.04 LTS under Oracle VM virtualBox Version 7.0.6 r155176 (Qt5.15.2) on Windows 7 (yes! :) openjdk version "1.8.0_422" OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0_422-8u422-b05-1~20.04-b05) OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM

Re: [VOTE] [RELEASE] Apache OFBiz 18.12.15 - third attempt

2024-07-28 Thread Jacques Le Roux
Thanks Jacopo, verify-ofbiz-release.sh, back and front ends work with me +1 Jacques Le 19/07/2024 à 15:31, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit : This is the third vote thread to publish "Apache OFBiz 18.12.15", the 15th release from the release18.12 branch. The release files can be downloaded from her

Re: [jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-13122) Error with executeMRP service

2024-07-25 Thread Jacques Le Roux
Le 25/07/2024 à 08:41, Jacques Le Roux a écrit : Hi Omar, As Emad demonstrated at https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/13070416/13070416_Screenshot+2024-07-23+at+8.49.52+PM+%282%29.png he is correctly sending the requested data. Hi Omar, You were maybe right by suggesting to

Re: [jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-13122) Error with executeMRP service

2024-07-24 Thread Jacques Le Roux
--- Key: OFBIZ-13122 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-13122 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Bug Components: manufacturing Affects Versions: Upcoming Branch Reporter: Emad Radwan Assignee: J

Re: [VOTE] [RELEASE] Apache OFBiz 18.12.15 - second attempt

2024-07-15 Thread Jacques Le Roux
Fortunately we are able to fix these issues by reverting OFBIZ-13117 commits. I tried locally on trunk. Without surprises it works as expected Thanks Christian, I forgot your 1st June report :/ Le 15/07/2024 à 14:14, Jacques Le Roux a écrit : And of course locally for 18.12.015 on Ubuntu 20.04

Re: [VOTE] [RELEASE] Apache OFBiz 18.12.15 - second attempt

2024-07-15 Thread Jacques Le Roux
And of course locally for 18.12.015 on Ubuntu 20.04 with JDK 8 Le 15/07/2024 à 14:09, Jacques Le Roux a écrit : BTW, logically the same exists in trunk Le 15/07/2024 à 14:03, Jacques Le Roux a écrit : Hi Christian, You are right, and not only that I also get this one on stable demo with

Re: [VOTE] [RELEASE] Apache OFBiz 18.12.15 - second attempt

2024-07-15 Thread Jacques Le Roux
BTW, logically the same exists in trunk Le 15/07/2024 à 14:03, Jacques Le Roux a écrit : Hi Christian, You are right, and not only that I also get this one on stable demo with ordermgr/control/updateCheckoutOptions/quickcheckout org.apache.ofbiz.webapp.control.RequestHandlerException: Unknown

Re: [VOTE] [RELEASE] Apache OFBiz 18.12.15 - second attempt

2024-07-15 Thread Jacques Le Roux
Hi Christian, You are right, and not only that I also get this one on stable demo with ordermgr/control/updateCheckoutOptions/quickcheckout org.apache.ofbiz.webapp.control.RequestHandlerException: Unknown request [updateCheckoutOptions]; this request does not exist or cannot be called directly.

Re: [VOTE] [RELEASE] Apache OFBiz 18.12.15 - second attempt

2024-07-13 Thread Jacques Le Roux
Thanks Jacopo, verify-ofbiz-release.sh, back and front ends work for me me +1 Jacques Le 11/07/2024 à 10:52, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit : This is the second vote thread to publish "Apache OFBiz 18.12.15", the 15th release from the release18.12 branch. The release files can be downloaded from

Groovy compilation and @CompileStatic

2024-07-11 Thread Jacques Le Roux
Hi, With https://github.com/apache/ofbiz-framework/commit/231650e1b6 I fixed few errors that would not happen if we were using @CompileStatic  in Groovy files as mentioned at https://stackoverflow.com/questions/57982247/groovy-compiler-and-non-existing-call-method I vaguely remember having usi

Re: [VOTE] [RELEASE] Apache OFBiz 18.12.15

2024-06-25 Thread Jacques Le Roux
Thanks Jacopo, Verification, back and front ends work for me me +1 Jacques Le 24/06/2024 à 16:53, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit : This is the vote thread to publish "Apache OFBiz 18.12.15", the 15th release from the release18.12 branch. The release files can be downloaded from here: https://dist

Re: Welcome to Sebastian Tschikin as new committer

2024-06-20 Thread Jacques Le Roux
Hi Sebastian, Welcome on board Jacques Le 20/06/2024 à 21:02, michael.br...@ecomify.de a écrit : Congratulations and welcome, Sebastian! Michael Am 20.06.2024 um 16:21 schrieb Jacopo Cappellato: The OFBiz PMC has invited Sebastian Tschikin to become a committer and we are pleased to annou

Re: Overriding template Week.tpl

2024-06-13 Thread Jacques Le Roux
BTW, you should rather use the user ML for such questions. It's explained at https://ofbiz.apache.org/mailing-lists.html: <> TIA Le 13/06/2024 à 08:59, Jacques Le Roux a écrit : Hi San, Most of the Freemarker templates like Week.ftl  (not Week.tpl) are not part of the common-the

Re: Overriding template Week.tpl

2024-06-12 Thread Jacques Le Roux
Hi San, Most of the Freemarker templates like Week.ftl  (not Week.tpl) are not part of the common-theme. Because they are not common but specific to some applications. For instance Week.ftl is only used by workeffort and humanres. So it's not a simple task to adapt it to your own theme. Sincerel

Re: [jira] [Closed] (OFBIZ-11725) Have Order Entry Screen always show selection field for available agreement(s)

2024-06-09 Thread Jacques Le Roux
Hi Bill, Though, as explained at https://ofbiz.apache.org/mailing-lists.html: > the dev ML is also open as long as your are subscribed. Anyway, your report fits. Speak to you later... Jacques Le 07/06/2024 à 02:25, Bill Harder a écrit : I am new to this, but hav

Re: (ofbiz-framework) branch trunk updated: Fixed: PartyFinancialHistory shows parentTypeId of invoice, not invoiceTypeId (OFBIZ-13068)

2024-05-30 Thread Jacques Le Roux
Typo Le 30/05/2024 à 15:47, Jacques Le Roux a écrit : In "Invoices not yet (fully) applied", I'll also re-add the invoice description list as it was present before. In "Invoices not yet (fully) applied" list, I'll also re-add the invoice description as it was present before.

Re: (ofbiz-framework) branch trunk updated: Fixed: PartyFinancialHistory shows parentTypeId of invoice, not invoiceTypeId (OFBIZ-13068)

2024-05-30 Thread Jacques Le Roux
068) 6718c4645d is described below commit 6718c4645dba7195317de3084cf2a24116f7dfdc Author: Jacques Le Roux AuthorDate: Thu May 30 11:33:08 2024 +0200     Fixed: PartyFinancialHistory shows parentTypeId of invoice, not invoiceTypeId (OFBIZ-13068)     This fixes an old bug

Do we need both a menu and a button for same action?

2024-05-28 Thread Jacques Le Roux
Hi, Mostly for a creating action, do we need both a menu and a button for same action? And if so why? This has recently appeared at OFBIZ-13101, but IIRW some other cases where handled the same. If we do so (both) we then need to handle the permissions correctly. For instance, a person with o

Re: Docker and new release branch

2024-05-25 Thread Jacques Le Roux
esses and deployments to the demo server. I'll also write up some documentation about the process at the same time (including updating the WIKI page you linked to) On Sat, 25 May 2024 at 10:37, Jacques Le Roux wrote: Le 25/05/2024 à 11:32, Jacques Le Roux a écrit : Hi Daniel, I don't

Re: Docker and new release branch

2024-05-25 Thread Jacques Le Roux
Le 25/05/2024 à 11:32, Jacques Le Roux a écrit : Hi Daniel, I don't remember if we talk about that already, sorry if it's the case. Have we  a documentation on how to update Docker for demos in case of the creation of a new release branch? TIA Jacques And please add a link

Docker and new release branch

2024-05-25 Thread Jacques Le Roux
Hi Daniel, I don't remember if we talk about that already, sorry if it's the case. Have we  a documentation on how to update Docker for demos in case of the creation of a new release branch? TIA Jacques

Re: [VOTE] [RELEASE] Apache OFBiz 18.12.14

2024-05-24 Thread Jacques Le Roux
Thanks Jacopo, Works for me on Ubuntu 20.04 +1 Jacques Le 24/05/2024 à 11:31, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit : This is the vote thread to publish "Apache OFBiz 18.12.14", the 14th release from the release18.12 branch. The release files can be downloaded from here: https://dist.apache.org/repos/di

Re: Proposal: Merge (bundle) selected plugins into ofbiz-framework

2024-05-24 Thread Jacques Le Roux
Thanks Pierre, I relayed your propositions, not telling it's you, else... you know... Le 24/05/2024 à 10:49, Pierre Smits a écrit : Hi Daniel, Jacques, Given that the content application has some sort of dependency on the lucene plugin, please consider making the indexing functionality of luc

Re: Proposal: Merge (bundle) selected plugins into ofbiz-framework

2024-05-24 Thread Jacques Le Roux
Hi Daniel, I would add example (maybe not examplext), quite useful when starting a project. projectmgr and myportal seems interesting too. About ecommerce, after years of ecomseo introduction I believe it should replace ecommerce. So there would be no wondering about what to use. lucene (w/o

Re: [VOTE] Apache OFBiz 18.12.09

2024-05-24 Thread Jacques Le Roux
ther retrieving the relevant plugin files or running the appropriate gradle task. We already have framework-only versions of the docker images that we publish. Thanks, Dan. On Mon, 20 May 2024 at 08:08, Jacques Le Roux wrote: Hi, This thread is already a 7 month "discussion", actual

Re: [VOTE] Apache OFBiz 18.12.09

2024-05-20 Thread Jacques Le Roux
Hi, This thread is already a 7 month "discussion", actually a vote. But I don't remember another about this point (not releasing the plugins). So I reuse it, with a security perspective. The last CVEs we had are possible because of ecommerce. A bunch of others were related to Solr, etc. I be

Re: Documention about createPlugin Gradle task

2024-05-19 Thread Jacques Le Roux
Le 19/05/2024 à 10:58, Jacques Le Roux a écrit : Hi, Is there somewhere some documentation about createPlugin Gradle task? TIA Jacques Forgot, I did not find any at https://nightlies.apache.org/ofbiz/trunk/ofbiz/html5/developer-manual.html#_apache_ofbiz_plugins_for_developer

Documention about createPlugin Gradle task

2024-05-19 Thread Jacques Le Roux
Hi, Is there somewhere some documentation about createPlugin Gradle task? TIA Jacques

Re: [OFBIZ-12935] Test 2.3.33 FreeMarker release - ASF JIRA

2024-05-14 Thread Jacques Le Roux
subject ? Nicolas Le 28/03/2024 à 10:05, Jacques Le Roux a écrit : Hi, Without negative answer this week, I'll set the 2.3.33 version on trunk next week https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-12935 TIA (for your tests see also the patch in OFBIZ-12934) Jacques

Re: [PROPOSAL] freeze trunk for new features in favor of a release 24.x branch preparation / future roadmap

2024-05-09 Thread Jacques Le Roux
Le 09/05/2024 à 13:21, Jacques Le Roux a écrit : Hi Michael, Inline again Le 08/05/2024 à 21:00, Jacques Le Roux a écrit : 3. suddenly there was a mass of new PR's which were merged in a hurry unneccesarily (my personal point of view), with some corrections soon after 4. 3. blocks 1.

Re: Cleaning site repo

2024-05-09 Thread Jacques Le Roux
urhak) takes care of it. He is currently at University and returns end of June to finish his work. Best regards, Michael Am 09.05.2024 um 10:48 schrieb Jacques Le Roux : Hi, The pages https://ofbiz.apache.org/user-stories.html https://ofbiz.apache.org/service-providers.html https://ofbiz.apach

Re: [PROPOSAL] freeze trunk for new features in favor of a release 24.x branch preparation / future roadmap

2024-05-09 Thread Jacques Le Roux
Hi Michael, Inline again Le 08/05/2024 à 21:00, Jacques Le Roux a écrit : 3. suddenly there was a mass of new PR's which were merged in a hurry unneccesarily (my personal point of view), with some corrections soon after 4. 3. blocks 1. even further now because those changes are not com

Cleaning site repo

2024-05-09 Thread Jacques Le Roux
Hi, The pages https://ofbiz.apache.org/user-stories.html https://ofbiz.apache.org/service-providers.html https://ofbiz.apache.org/about-ofbiz.html https://ofbiz.apache.org/blog/ (It's only a link) exists but are not maintained. I propose to remove them from the repo. The News menu also would be

Re: [PROPOSAL] freeze trunk for new features in favor of a release 24.x branch preparation / future roadmap

2024-05-08 Thread Jacques Le Roux
Ah, last but not least: I think we should at least wait for Freemarker 2.3.33 that we successfully tested on demo. The vote should be soon, hence the release. Le 08/05/2024 à 20:47, Jacques Le Roux a écrit : Thanks to clarify Michael, Inline when needed... Le 08/05/2024 à 13:59, Michael

Re: [PROPOSAL] freeze trunk for new features in favor of a release 24.x branch preparation / future roadmap

2024-05-08 Thread Jacques Le Roux
e in trunk first? As far as which commits are later applied to the release-24.05 branch, shall we leave that up to the committers at the time, but with a reminder that adding new features on the release-24.05 branch will increase the test burden before a public release can be made? Thanks, Dan. O

Re: [PROPOSAL] freeze trunk for new features in favor of a release 24.x branch preparation / future roadmap

2024-05-08 Thread Jacques Le Roux
Thanks for confirming Le 08/05/2024 à 15:45, Pranay Pandey a écrit : Hi Jacques, Yeah, I wanted to say that. As long as we are sure of test coverage, all the critical paths are working. Best regards, Pranay Pandey On Tue, 7 May 2024 at 22:11, Jacques Le Roux wrote: Ha sorry Pranay, I

CVE-2024-32113: Apache OFBiz: Path traversal leading to RCE

2024-05-08 Thread Jacques Le Roux
Severity: important Affected versions: - Apache OFBiz before 18.12.13 Description: Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') vulnerability in Apache OFBiz.This issue affects Apache OFBiz: before 18.12.13. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 18.12.1

Re: [VOTE] [RESULT] Apache OFBiz 18.12.13

2024-05-08 Thread Jacques Le Roux
at 4:07 PM Jacques Le Roux wrote: Hi Jacopo, I see only KEYS TIA Jacqued Le 07/05/2024 à 11:41, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit : The vote is successful with seven positive votes (all binding) and no negative votes. I am going to publish and announce the release soon. Jacopo On Tue, Apr 30, 2024

Re: [PROPOSAL] freeze trunk for new features in favor of a release 24.x branch preparation / future roadmap

2024-05-07 Thread Jacques Le Roux
s which commits are later applied to the release-24.05 branch, shall we leave that up to the committers at the time, but with a reminder that adding new features on the release-24.05 branch will increase the test burden before a public release can be made? Thanks, Dan. On Tue, 7 May 2024 at 15:20,

Re: [PROPOSAL] freeze trunk for new features in favor of a release 24.x branch preparation / future roadmap

2024-05-07 Thread Jacques Le Roux
ing a release. Jacques Le 07/05/2024 à 17:42, Jacques Le Roux a écrit : Hi Pranay, OK, but then only that? So far we backported any bug. So we would release a branch with bugs in? Le 07/05/2024 à 16:42, Pranay Pandey a écrit : Hi Jacques, what is a blocker bug, only security? I think it should

Re: [PROPOSAL] freeze trunk for new features in favor of a release 24.x branch preparation / future roadmap

2024-05-07 Thread Jacques Le Roux
g improvements in release branches. I hope I'm clear :) Thanks Jacques Thanks, Dan. On Tue, 7 May 2024 at 15:20, Jacques Le Roux wrote: What is the difference between freezing the trunk in a release-24.xx where the rule is no improvements but if a consensus agrees with? In other words,

Re: [PROPOSAL] freeze trunk for new features in favor of a release 24.x branch preparation / future roadmap

2024-05-07 Thread Jacques Le Roux
regards, Pranay Pandey On Tue, 7 May 2024 at 19:48, Jacques Le Roux wrote: What is the difference between freezing the trunk in a release-24.xx where the rule is no improvements but if a consensus agrees with? In other words, apart exceptions only bugs and not only blockers,as we did so far

Re: [PROPOSAL] freeze trunk for new features in favor of a release 24.x branch preparation / future roadmap

2024-05-07 Thread Jacques Le Roux
thin the source tree - have been completed, so now might be a good time to go ahead and create the release-24.05 branch from trunk. Thanks, Dan. On Mon, 6 May 2024 at 18:01, Jacques Le Roux Le 06/05/2024 à 18:35, Jacques Le Roux a écrit : BTW, to avoid to speak in the void. Again, what are tho

Re: [VOTE] [RESULT] Apache OFBiz 18.12.13

2024-05-07 Thread Jacques Le Roux
Hi Jacopo, I see only KEYS TIA Jacqued Le 07/05/2024 à 11:41, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit : The vote is successful with seven positive votes (all binding) and no negative votes. I am going to publish and announce the release soon. Jacopo On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 5:06 PM Jacopo Cappellato wrot

Re: [PROPOSAL] freeze trunk for new features in favor of a release 24.x branch preparation / future roadmap

2024-05-06 Thread Jacques Le Roux
Le 06/05/2024 à 18:35, Jacques Le Roux a écrit : BTW, to avoid to speak in the void. Again, what are those tasks precisely? And that are their situations? BTW, to avoid to speak in the void. Again, what are those tasks precisely? And WHAT are their situations? Sorry, typo

Re: [PROPOSAL] freeze trunk for new features in favor of a release 24.x branch preparation / future roadmap

2024-05-06 Thread Jacques Le Roux
BTW, to avoid to speak in the void. Again, what are those tasks precisely? And that are their situations? Le 06/05/2024 à 18:24, Jacques Le Roux a écrit : Hi Stephen, As I can see it, because of the number of people really involved in such tasks. Jacques Le 06/05/2024 à 17:45, Stephen

Re: [PROPOSAL] freeze trunk for new features in favor of a release 24.x branch preparation / future roadmap

2024-05-06 Thread Jacques Le Roux
merged to Trunk? Regards, Steve On 5/6/24 04:07, Jacques Le Roux wrote: Hi, We should 1st clearly identify WIPs in trunk and at which stage they are each. We can't wait and complicate the situation before that. Jacques Le 06/05/2024 à 10:36, gil.portenseigne a écrit : Hi, I feel like

Re: [PROPOSAL] freeze trunk for new features in favor of a release 24.x branch preparation / future roadmap

2024-05-06 Thread Jacques Le Roux
o let user know the partial improvements contained in the release. i.e. creating release branch + roadmap :) WDYT ? Gil On 22/04/24 04:12, Jacques Le Roux wrote: Hi Guys, Without getting into details, I tend to disagree with your propositions. I can't see why we would change our very

Re: [VOTE] [RELEASE] Apache OFBiz 18.12.13

2024-05-01 Thread Jacques Le Roux
Thanks Jacopo, <<./verify-ofbiz-release.sh -a apache-ofbiz-18.12.13>> works perfectly on Ubuntu 20.04 +1 Jacques Le 30/04/2024 à 17:06, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit : This is the vote thread to publish "Apache OFBiz 18.12.13", the thirteenth release from the release18.12 branch. The release fi

Re: [PROPOSAL] freeze trunk for new features in favor of a release 24.x branch preparation / future roadmap

2024-04-22 Thread Jacques Le Roux
Le 22/04/2024 à 16:12, Jacques Le Roux a écrit : Without getting into details, I tend to disagree with your propositions. I start writing that. Maybe I should rather have started by saying that I don't understand why we should change our (simple) way of doing.

Re: [PROPOSAL] freeze trunk for new features in favor of a release 24.x branch preparation / future roadmap

2024-04-22 Thread Jacques Le Roux
Hi Guys, Without getting into details, I tend to disagree with your propositions. I can't see why we would change our very simple way of doing. When we freeze a branch, the activity can continue on trunk. It does not interfere with the new release branch. The only variable is the period we all

Re: (ofbiz-framework) branch trunk updated: Improved: FACILITY- Move from hard-coded menu location to parameterized (OFBIZ-12976) (#758)

2024-04-18 Thread Jacques Le Roux
Hi, Just FYI: I inadvertently pushed /webapp/common-theme/js/package-lock.json which was part of Pierre's PR. It uses lockfileVersion 3. So it was build with npm 9* which is "Backwards compatible to npm v7." Actually it's also "Backwards compatible to v1 lockfiles as I experienced (using Win7

Re: (ofbiz-framework) branch CharlesNereide-seo-improvements created (now d272bbf512)

2024-04-11 Thread Jacques Le Roux
I no longer maintain the 22.01 branch, but use "git push all" when backporting to 18.12 Not sure what happened there, we can neglect it anyway : "No new revisions were added by this update." Jacques Le 11/04/2024 à 11:14, jler...@apache.org a écrit : This is an automated email from the ASF dua

Re: Discussion on OFBiz Tomcat upgrade

2024-04-11 Thread Jacques Le Roux
Hi, There is yet no specified EOL for Tomcat 9. We can expect 2027: https://lists.apache.org/thread/qlzpscgoqct9wspkj5qjkm34s66jswj0 I guess Daniel thought about freezed (for 24.xx) rather than released. I guess we all agree on that. Gaetan can of course start to work on the Tomcat 10 migrati

Re: UEL migration

2024-04-10 Thread Jacques Le Roux
Le 10/04/2024 à 09:45, Florian Motteau a écrit : Sure, I just question the fact that this important discussion (updating tomcat, which leads to a lot of work/implications) occurs via a remote task. It may need its own thread (updating tomcat : yes ? no ? why ? how ? people insights about this sub

Re: Any ideas on how to make demo-site logs accessible and whether it is safe to do so?

2024-04-08 Thread Jacques Le Roux
Hi Daniel, Team, For 3 days now I have collected trunk demo errors in error.log. I have created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-13005 for that Jacques Le 29/02/2024 à 16:15, Daniel Watford a écrit : Hello, I was just checking the demo-stable logs - accessible on ofbiz-vm1 at /hom

Re: Groovy integration tests

2024-04-07 Thread Jacques Le Roux
Hi Gil, Nicolas, I agree it was a good thing to do. We just missed some information and documentation. I have added some at OFBIZ-12320 I have also replaced all groovy-test-suite by junit-test-suite in OOTB code. I still wonder why Eclipse proposes but does not accept groovy-test-suite as a r

Re: Buildbot failure in on ofbizTrunkFramework

2024-04-04 Thread Jacques Le Roux
WIP with https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-12995 Le 04/04/2024 à 19:13, build...@apache.org a écrit : Build status: BUILD FAILED: failed './gradlew --no-daemon ...' (failure) Worker used: bb_worker4_ubuntu URL: https://ci2.apache.org/#builders/49/builds/843 Blamelist: Jacqu

Re: Groovy tests fails in trunk (OK in 18.12)

2024-04-01 Thread Jacques Le Roux
Sorry for the buzz (and multiple description editions), it seems easier than I thought... Le 01/04/2024 à 12:55, Jacques Le Roux a écrit : Hi, Please have a look at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-12985 TIA Jacques

Groovy tests fails in trunk (OK in 18.12)

2024-04-01 Thread Jacques Le Roux
Hi, Please have a look at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-12985 TIA Jacques

[OFBIZ-12935] Test 2.3.33 FreeMarker release - ASF JIRA

2024-03-28 Thread Jacques Le Roux
Hi, Without negative answer this week, I'll set the 2.3.33 version on trunk next week https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-12935 TIA (for your tests see also the patch in OFBIZ-12934) Jacques

Re: Shiro and Maven

2024-03-24 Thread Jacques Le Roux
version somewhere unexpectedly. On Mar 24, 2024, at 11:32 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: Thanks Lenny, Oops, indeed it should be 2.0.0 everywhere. Else nothing would work ;) I did not want to repeat all what's in links, that why I just put links. Anyway, I'll have a look at Crypto c

Re: Shiro and Maven

2024-03-24 Thread Jacques Le Roux
u sure you have the correct version? Crypto classes’ package names have changed. All you would need to do is change Java source to reflect this. On Mar 24, 2024, at 3:51 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: Hi, We (the Apache OFBiz project) use Shiro mostly for ciphering. We use Gradle and ref

Shiro and Maven

2024-03-24 Thread Jacques Le Roux
Hi, We (the Apache OFBiz project) use Shiro mostly for ciphering. We use Gradle and refer to Maven for dependencies. We recently upgraded from 1.13.0 to 2.0.0 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-12961 As we we had only this dependency, I started by replacing shiro-core:1.13.0 by shiro-

Re: [FYI] No relation longer between Git commits and Jira comments

2024-03-24 Thread Jacques Le Roux
Fixed Le 23/03/2024 à 07:23, Jacques Le Roux a écrit : https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-25642

Re: [jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-12961) Upgrade Apache Shiro from 1.13.0 to 2.0.0

2024-03-23 Thread Jacques Le Roux
.0.10' +    implementation 'org.apereo.cas:cas-server-core-util:5.0.10' +    implementation 'org.apereo.cas:cas-server-support-ldap-core:5.0.10' Still not sure what to do yet anyway Jacques Le 23/03/2024 à 12:11, Jacques Le Roux a écrit : Thanks Daniel for the quick answer :)

Re: [jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-12961) Upgrade Apache Shiro from 1.13.0 to 2.0.0

2024-03-23 Thread Jacques Le Roux
e without plugins. Thanks, Dan. On Sat, 23 Mar 2024 at 10:28, Jacques Le Roux wrote: Hi, I'd appreciate confirmations about local build. And, before reverting, if you have an idea don't hesitate :) TIA Jacques Le 23/03/2024 à 11:23, Jacques Le Roux (Jira) a écrit :

Re: [jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-12961) Upgrade Apache Shiro from 1.13.0 to 2.0.0

2024-03-23 Thread Jacques Le Roux
Hi, I'd appreciate confirmations about local build. And, before reverting, if you have an idea don't hesitate :) TIA Jacques Le 23/03/2024 à 11:23, Jacques Le Roux (Jira) a écrit : [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-

[FYI] No relation longer between Git commits and Jira comments

2024-03-22 Thread Jacques Le Roux
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-25642

Re: [apache/ofbiz-framework] Run failed: Scorecard supply-chain security - trunk (a9a3d13)

2024-03-17 Thread Jacques Le Roux
Happens: https://www.google.com/search?q=GitHub+Actions+has+encountered+an+internal+error Le 18/03/2024 à 07:41, Jacques Le Roux a écrit : [apache/ofbiz-framework] Run failed: Scorecard supply-chain security - trunk (a9a3d13) GitHub [apache/ofbiz-framework] Scorecard supply-chain

Fwd: [jira] [Created] (OFBIZ-12934) Test next FreeMarker release

2024-03-09 Thread Jacques Le Roux
Le Roux (Jira) Répondre à :dev@ofbiz.apache.org Pour : notificati...@ofbiz.apache.org Jacques Le Roux created OFBIZ-12934: --- Summary: Test next FreeMarker release Key: OFBIZ-12934 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-12934 Project: OFBiz

Re: Apache Project Website Checks

2024-03-05 Thread Jacques Le Roux
Hi, Forgot to say that this has been done as suggested below and can be easily seen on site Jacques Le 21/02/2024 à 09:56, Jacques Le Roux a écrit : Le 19/02/2024 à 09:55, Jacques Le Roux a écrit : Le 18/02/2024 à 20:05, Jacques Le Roux a écrit : Le 13/02/2024 à 09:35, Jacques Le Roux a

Re: [GH] (ofbiz-framework): Workflow run "Build and push docker images" failed!

2024-03-02 Thread Jacques Le Roux
Pierre's help was successful: https://github.com/apache/ofbiz-framework/actions/runs/8122898106 Le 02/03/2024 à 08:17, Jacques Le Roux a écrit : Hi Daniel, I don't know what to do with that. I locally tried "gradlew --console plain distTar"  and it works. But when I rebui

Re: Any ideas on how to make demo-site logs accessible and whether it is safe to do so?

2024-03-02 Thread Jacques Le Roux
Hi Dan, About the logs in Webtools it's also limited to "OFBiz logs". I mean you can't see the access_logs. They are sometime very useful too. So yes I agree this would be something we could do. Jacques Le 29/02/2024 à 16:15, Daniel Watford a écrit : Hello, I was just checking the demo-stabl

Re: [GH] (ofbiz-framework): Workflow run "Build and push docker images" failed!

2024-03-01 Thread Jacques Le Roux
Hi Daniel, I don't know what to do with that. I locally tried "gradlew --console plain distTar"  and it works. But when I rebuild on GH it does not. Jacques Le 01/03/2024 à 21:24, GitBox a écrit : The GitHub Actions job "Build and push docker images" on ofbiz-framework.git has failed. Run st

Re: Buildbot failure in on ofbizTrunkFrameworkPlugins

2024-03-01 Thread Jacques Le Roux
Hi, @committers: I don't remember if I already told you so: in case BB fails and it works locally, you can rebuild in BB by login with you complete a.o email address (eg: jler...@apache.org) and your ASF password Jacques Le 29/02/2024 à 20:09, build...@apache.org a écrit : Build status: BUIL

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >