Forwarding a message from the ApacheCon NA organizers. See
http://na.apachecon.com/ for details. To those going to attend: you may
also consider to join some informal activities, see
http://wiki.apache.org/apachecon/HackathonNA13 and
http://wiki.apache.org/apachecon/BarCampApachePortland
On 03/02/2013 Ryan, Benjamin wrote:
1. Identify the software development approaches used in the development of the
Software? e.g Open office
What software development approaches were used eg Structured(top-down)
prototyping,RAD or Agile
I have little to add to what Rob already answered.
Galileo,
3.4.1 is the most recent version. You can download it from here:
http://www.openoffice.org/download/
- Shenfeng (Simon)
2013/2/3 Galileo Teco Juárez genital...@gmail.com
hi
I volunter
I volunteer
I begin to understand the development of extensions
I have a question.
which is
On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 6:25 AM, Sally Khudairi sallykhuda...@yahoo.com wrote:
Rob, et.al. --is there a preferred day/time you'd like to go live with this?
Given that you, Don, and I all live in the snow-socked East Coast, should we
give ourselves some blizzard recovery time or just go ahead
Hi,
Jürgen Schmidt schrieb:
On 2/7/13 9:44 PM, Regina Henschel wrote:
Hi Andrea,
Andrea Pescetti schrieb:
On 01/02/2013 David Gerard wrote:
Is .docx writing scheduled for AOO any given time, 4.0 or later?
I expect that sooner or later we will implement it. But, in order to
avoid
We currently have this message in Bugzilla:
Please Note: All users with accounts with the legacy OpenOffice.org
issue tracker must reset their passwords to gain access to their old
accounts. To reset your password, click on the Forgot Password link
in the header or footer and enter your user
On 9 February 2013 16:19, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
We currently have this message in Bugzilla:
Please Note: All users with accounts with the legacy OpenOffice.org
issue tracker must reset their passwords to gain access to their old
accounts. To reset your password, click on the
Rob Weir wrote:
We currently have this message in Bugzilla: ...
Is this still relevant? How does a password reset work today if the
legacy openoffice.org email forwarder is gone?
It is still relevant, but it doesn't need to stay in evidence. Anyway,
it works like this: if
I've added a new section to the 4.0 Release Notes for tracking changes
that impact backwards compatibility:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4.0+Release+Notes
This would include changes to the public interfaces of AOO, including
incompatible changes to API's (including
Steve,
Nothing substantive yet in working through the Windows build of the ia2 branch.
Should we build against Linux and OSX and be testing for impact on ATK/AT-SPI
and NSAccessibility User Interface?
And, with QA and testing of the ia2 branch proceeding what mechanism should
folks use for
Hi.
When do you expect a feature to enter the list.
1) Before development
2) Before committing to trunk (e.g. committed in a branch)
3) after QA.
The reason for my question, is that I work on l10n tools, which I hope will
make it to 4.0, The tools have a high effect on the translation process:
On 8 February 2013 21:52, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org wrote:
- Move cwiki to mwiki.
this has been discussed/decided earlier, but might need a positive
decision.
I agree, we can progressively move stuff by turning pages into redirects to
the MWiki. This may take time but could be
-- Forwarded message --
From: janI j...@apache.org
Date: 9 February 2013 19:17
Subject: Re: Changes that Impact Backwards Compatibility
To: janI j...@apache.org
Stupid browser sorry for that.
On 9 February 2013 19:15, janI j...@apache.org wrote:
Hi.
When do you expect
From: V Stuart Foote
Sent: Saturday, February 09, 2013 12:05 PM
And here is a generic BZ search for accessibility issues
On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 1:17 PM, janI j...@apache.org wrote:
-- Forwarded message --
From: janI j...@apache.org
Date: 9 February 2013 19:17
Subject: Re: Changes that Impact Backwards Compatibility
To: janI j...@apache.org
Stupid browser sorry for that.
On 9 February
On 08/02/2013 Rob Weir wrote:
So with a new top-level category, I can easily get to 3 or 4 top level
items, and then under applications reduce it to the core set of 5
products. Can we get anywhere close by combining products?
I had a look again. If the aim is to avoid presenting lists of more
On 04/02/2013 Kay Schenk wrote:
It would be great to get a blog on the outcome of this event...even a short
one!
I don't think this is worth a new post, but I've now added a
Post-conference update paragraph to
https://blogs.apache.org/OOo/entry/apache_openoffice_at_fosdem_2013
with links to
Thanks for adding this.
I have added a Calc and OpenFormat Support subsection there,
with description of the proposed change to have POWER(0,0) produce
an error value (#VALUE!) instead of 1, the current result. That
is explained on the Release Notes and at the Bugzilla Issue #114430
at
Hi all,
Andrea Pescetti schrieb:
On 04/02/2013 Kay Schenk wrote:
It would be great to get a blog on the outcome of this event...even a
short
one!
I don't think this is worth a new post, but I've now added a
Post-conference update paragraph to
On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 4:35 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton orc...@apache.org wrote:
Thanks for adding this.
I have added a Calc and OpenFormat Support subsection there,
with description of the proposed change to have POWER(0,0) produce
an error value (#VALUE!) instead of 1, the current result. That
Fred --
Thanks. We'll see if we can get some testing/build with this this coming
week.
On 02/07/2013 11:32 AM, Fred Ollinger wrote:
To whom it may concern,
Below is a patch to fix some java7 compilation bugs. Also, this is attached.
Index: hsqldb/jdbcDriver.java
A good practical example of backwards-incompatible changes in version
4.0 is the behavior of Calc while computing 0 ^ 0.
You can find a long issue, with different points of view, about this at:
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=114430
but in short:
- Obviously, 0 ^ 0 is an illegal
Rob Weir wrote:
On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 4:35 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
I have added a Calc and OpenFormat Support subsection there,
with description of the proposed change to have POWER(0,0) produce
an error value (#VALUE!) instead of 1, the current result.
Please reconsider the present macro language and the way it links to the
OOo API. Originally macro languages were added to office software to
enable non-programmers to automate repetitive jobs, but in the OOo
paradigm macros should apparently only be developed by programming
geeks. For
On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 6:11 PM, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org wrote:
A good practical example of backwards-incompatible changes in version 4.0 is
the behavior of Calc while computing 0 ^ 0.
You can find a long issue, with different points of view, about this at:
Am 02/10/2013 12:11 AM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
A good practical example of backwards-incompatible changes in version
4.0 is the behavior of Calc while computing 0 ^ 0.
You can find a long issue, with different points of view, about this at:
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=114430
It is not clear that OpenOffice-lineage software has returned the same value
for POWER(0,0) over the years. It seems that a third-party library has been
relied upon for the implementation and there was apparently not much attention
to edge cases. If that library changes or is different on
Hi,
I've looked in Wikipedia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zero_power_zero#Zero_to_the_power_of_zero
and for me it seems very reasonable to keep the old behaviour, as
according to this article many math and other software treats 0^0 = 1
(see the paragraphs under Treatment on computers).
On 2/9/2013 18:11, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
A good practical example of backwards-incompatible changes in version
4.0 is the behavior of Calc while computing 0 ^ 0.
You can find a long issue, with different points of view, about this at:
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=114430
but in
On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 7:39 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton orc...@apache.org wrote:
It is not clear that OpenOffice-lineage software has returned the same value
for POWER(0,0) over the years. It seems that a third-party library has been
relied upon for the implementation and there was apparently not
Do you all know about this?
http://ci.apache.org/builders/aoo-w7ia2/
We now have an automatic build of the ia2 branch running nightly. (and
successfully)
It is not loading up install bits for some reason, but I'll look at that
and fix it.
If you want to see the status of the latest build look
Please, I think I made it very clear that whatever the agreed direction, the
documentation needs to be explicit. I also looked in the AOO embedded help for
POWER and it is not helpful. (By the way, it would be great if it remained
possible to access the on-line help even if the embedded help
Please, I think I made it very clear that whatever the direction, the
documentation needs to be explicit. I also looked in the embedded help for
POWER and it is not helpful.
That is the only point of the note being replied to below.
Knuth and I will continue to disagree about that. Either
33 matches
Mail list logo
