Hello,
-Original Message-
From: acolor...@gmail.com [mailto:acolor...@gmail.com] On
But a note:
The M in TM is shown cut off and the representation of TM is
different in Internet Explorer and Firefox, once serifs,
once without
serifs, at an official logo should not be.
Seems to be a pretty odd bug and relies on the browser, I have a
sample using Opera, Firefox and Konqueror.
http://imagebin.org/272253
As you can see konqueror display the same issue, once I zoom out the
logo was displayed correctly. So it has to do with the browser itself.
Strangely enough
The compile errors of the branch ia2 were fixed. And the branch was
synchronized with the latest trunk.
On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 11:17 PM, Steve Yin steve.yin@gmail.com wrote:
An error occurred in the editeng module. I will check it soon.
On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 1:34 AM, Andrew Rist
Rainer,
It 123348 the issue you met?
- Shenfeng (Simon)
2013/9/29 Rainer Bielefeld rainerbielefeld_ooo...@bielefeldundbuss.de
Hi all,
Edwin Sharp and some other users found several bugs [1] under Linux64, in
summary the conclusion seems to be that AOO currently is more or less
unusable
From: acolor...@gmail.com [mailto:acolor...@gmail.com] On
Behalf Of Alexandro Colorado
Sent: Sunday, September 29, 2013 8:41 AM
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: Where can I find the new AOO4-Logo as a vector format?
Seems to be a pretty odd bug and relies on the browser, I have
On 9/29/13, Jörg Schmidt joe...@j-m-schmidt.de wrote:
From: acolor...@gmail.com [mailto:acolor...@gmail.com] On
Behalf Of Alexandro Colorado
Sent: Sunday, September 29, 2013 8:41 AM
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: Where can I find the new AOO4-Logo as a vector format?
Seems to be
On 9/29/13, Jörg Schmidt joe...@j-m-schmidt.de wrote:
From: acolor...@gmail.com [mailto:acolor...@gmail.com] On
Behalf Of Alexandro Colorado
Sent: Sunday, September 29, 2013 8:41 AM
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: Where can I find the new AOO4-Logo as a vector format?
Seems to be
2013/9/29 Rainer Bielefeld rainerbielefeld_ooo...@bielefeldundbuss.de
Hi all,
Edwin Sharp and some other users found several bugs [1] under Linux64, in
summary the conclusion seems to be that AOO currently is more or less
unusable with Linux 64.
Can some developers please have a look?
Can you give a link to a defect report from ooo that is
incorrectly
showing up in your query?
The problem is not : reports from ooo incorrectly showing up.
But: reports that should showing up, are not showing up (like reports from
os_ooo, mst.ooo and wuyan.ooorg)
So every report containing ooo
btw. is there a difference between you executing some batch operations on the
assignee field and me doing that manually?
Won't the amount of emails be the same?
So it does not matter if the assignee-resetting is done manually or via a batch
command?
thx
On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 7:59 AM, bugreporte...@hushmail.com wrote:
Can you give a link to a defect report from ooo that is
incorrectly
showing up in your query?
The problem is not : reports from ooo incorrectly showing up.
But: reports that should showing up, are not showing up (like reports
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 6:21 PM, Kay Schenk kay.sch...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 1:30 PM, Alexandro Colorado j...@oooes.org wrote:
I notice a lot of dead links gives a horrible default error. Can we put a
more design friendly error handler for missing or outdated links. Also
Steve,
Steve Yin wrote
The compile errors of the branch ia2 were fixed. And the branch was
synchronized with the latest trunk.
--
Best Regards,
Steve Yin
Wow, excellent that for your r1527279 build of the branch you've again
synchronized with AOO trunk! With any luck we'll have a clean
Marcus mar...@apache.org has denied Pedro Albuquerque
pmralbuquer...@apache.org's request for review:
Bug 123377: Download link not shown in main download page
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=123377
Attachment 81665: Snapshot of the page
On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 7:11 AM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 6:21 PM, Kay Schenk kay.sch...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 1:30 PM, Alexandro Colorado j...@oooes.org
wrote:
I notice a lot of dead links gives a horrible default error. Can we put
a
On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 2:26 AM, Alexandro Colorado j...@oooes.org wrote:
On 9/29/13, Jörg Schmidt joe...@j-m-schmidt.de wrote:
From: acolor...@gmail.com [mailto:acolor...@gmail.com] On
Behalf Of Alexandro Colorado
Sent: Sunday, September 29, 2013 8:41 AM
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 1:19 AM, Jörg Schmidt joe...@j-m-schmidt.de wrote:
From: acolor...@gmail.com [mailto:acolor...@gmail.com] On
Behalf Of Alexandro Colorado
Sent: Sunday, September 29, 2013 8:41 AM
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: Where can I find the new AOO4-Logo as a
Rainer Bielefeld wrote:
Edwin Sharp and some other users found several bugs [1] under Linux64,
in summary the conclusion seems to be that AOO currently is more or less
unusable with Linux 64.
It is usable for me. I tried to reproduce one of the problems
On 25/09/2013 janI wrote:
I find it disturbing that, 4.0 was postponed due to QA issues, and we even
made a blog about it. 4.0.1 goes out despite a public rejection from QA.
The rejection was then retracted, so this isn't an issue any longer, but
still it deserves some comments.
We won't
Am 09/26/2013 10:12 PM, schrieb Marcus (OOo):
Am 09/26/2013 05:02 PM, schrieb Rob Weir:
https://blogs.apache.org/preview/OOo/?previewEntry=announcing_apache_openoffice_4_0
Short and direct.
Is there anything else worth mentioning, from a project perspective?
I tried to avoid simply repeating
2013/9/29 Marcus (OOo) marcus.m...@wtnet.de
Am 09/26/2013 10:12 PM, schrieb Marcus (OOo):
Am 09/26/2013 05:02 PM, schrieb Rob Weir:
https://blogs.apache.org/**preview/OOo/?previewEntry=**
Howdy,
Alright, well I did not have a chance to retrieve emails last night and
this morning then I put a few hours into pushing the quality a bit on the
release video.
Everything that was exported from AOO in jpeg or png is now exported as
SVG, with one exception of the opening screen with
Darn it - forgot the new URL on gdrive
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0Bx7ZNEXlmR0IMWtzaFN6YW54X0E
On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 4:13 PM, Drew Jensen drewjensen.in...@gmail.comwrote:
Howdy,
Alright, well I did not have a chance to retrieve emails last night and
this morning then I put a few
Can you point me to an
issue where the Assignee field is equal to ooo?
I don't get it. When I choose is and type ooo in the Search by people
section I also get NULL results.
But when I choose contains, I get some reports which are assigned to ooo.
for example
Am 09/29/2013 09:23 PM, schrieb Keith N. McKenna:
Marcus (OOo) wrote:
Am 09/26/2013 10:12 PM, schrieb Marcus (OOo):
Am 09/26/2013 05:02 PM, schrieb Rob Weir:
https://blogs.apache.org/preview/OOo/?previewEntry=announcing_apache_openoffice_4_0
Short and direct.
Is there anything else worth
Am 09/29/2013 10:00 PM, schrieb Ricardo Berlasso:
2013/9/29 Marcus (OOo)marcus.m...@wtnet.de
Am 09/26/2013 10:12 PM, schrieb Marcus (OOo):
Am 09/26/2013 05:02 PM, schrieb Rob Weir:
https://blogs.apache.org/**preview/OOo/?previewEntry=**
On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 2:14 PM, Marcus (OOo) marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote:
Am 09/29/2013 10:00 PM, schrieb Ricardo Berlasso:
2013/9/29 Marcus (OOo)marcus.m...@wtnet.de
Am 09/26/2013 10:12 PM, schrieb Marcus (OOo):
Am 09/26/2013 05:02 PM, schrieb Rob Weir:
Am 09/29/2013 11:46 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk:
On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 2:14 PM, Marcus (OOo)marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote:
Am 09/29/2013 10:00 PM, schrieb Ricardo Berlasso:
2013/9/29 Marcus (OOo)marcus.m...@wtnet.de
Am 09/26/2013 10:12 PM, schrieb Marcus (OOo):
Am 09/26/2013 05:02 PM,
On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 2:53 PM, Marcus (OOo) marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote:
Am 09/29/2013 11:46 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk:
On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 2:14 PM, Marcus (OOo)marcus.m...@wtnet.de
wrote:
Am 09/29/2013 10:00 PM, schrieb Ricardo Berlasso:
2013/9/29 Marcus (OOo)marcus.m...@wtnet.de
On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 4:43 PM, bugreporte...@hushmail.com wrote:
Can you point me to an
issue where the Assignee field is equal to ooo?
I don't get it. When I choose is and type ooo in the Search by people
section I also get NULL results.
But when I choose contains, I get some reports
2013/9/30 Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org
On 25/09/2013 janI wrote:
I find it disturbing that, 4.0 was postponed due to QA issues, and we even
made a blog about it. 4.0.1 goes out despite a public rejection from QA.
The rejection was then retracted, so this isn't an issue any longer,
On Sep 29, 2013 1:15 PM, Drew Jensen drewjensen.in...@gmail.com wrote:
Darn it - forgot the new URL on gdrive
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0Bx7ZNEXlmR0IMWtzaFN6YW54X0E
VERY nice!
Thanks...
On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 4:13 PM, Drew Jensen drewjensen.in...@gmail.com
wrote:
Howdy,
Hi Stuart,
r1527279 is building normally until now. Hope we can get a valid build
soon. : )
On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 10:27 PM, V Stuart Foote vstuart.fo...@utsa.eduwrote:
Steve,
Steve Yin wrote
The compile errors of the branch ia2 were fixed. And the branch was
synchronized with the
33 matches
Mail list logo
