On Nov 15, 2013 10:34 AM, "janI" wrote:
>
> On 15 November 2013 18:59, Kay Schenk wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 11:53 PM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann <
> > orwittm...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > >
> > > On 15.11.2013 08:38, janI wrote:
> > >
> > >> On 15 November 2013 08:25,
On 15 November 2013 18:59, Kay Schenk wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 11:53 PM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann <
> orwittm...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> >
> > On 15.11.2013 08:38, janI wrote:
> >
> >> On 15 November 2013 08:25, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann <
> >> orwittm...@googlemail.com
> >>
> >
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 11:53 PM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann <
orwittm...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> On 15.11.2013 08:38, janI wrote:
>
>> On 15 November 2013 08:25, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann <
>> orwittm...@googlemail.com
>>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>>
>>>
>>> On 15.11.2013 00:54, Kay Schenk w
Hi,
On 15.11.2013 08:38, janI wrote:
On 15 November 2013 08:25, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann
wrote:
Hi,
On 15.11.2013 00:54, Kay Schenk wrote:
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 11:26 PM, janI wrote:
On 14 November 2013 03:32, Kay Schenk wrote:
On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 5:11 AM, Andrea Pescetti
On 15 November 2013 08:25, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> On 15.11.2013 00:54, Kay Schenk wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 11:26 PM, janI wrote:
>>
>> On 14 November 2013 03:32, Kay Schenk wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 5:11 AM, Andrea Pescetti >>>
> wrote:
>
>>>
Hi,
On 15.11.2013 00:54, Kay Schenk wrote:
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 11:26 PM, janI wrote:
On 14 November 2013 03:32, Kay Schenk wrote:
On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 5:11 AM, Andrea Pescetti
wrote:
On 12/09/2013 Kay Schenk wrote:
Did we reach a consensus on this one?
Wait until 4.1 to "offic
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 11:26 PM, janI wrote:
> On 14 November 2013 03:32, Kay Schenk wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 5:11 AM, Andrea Pescetti > >wrote:
> >
> > > On 12/09/2013 Kay Schenk wrote:
> > >
> > >> Did we reach a consensus on this one?
> > >> Wait until 4.1 to "officially" change
On 14 November 2013 03:32, Kay Schenk wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 5:11 AM, Andrea Pescetti >wrote:
>
> > On 12/09/2013 Kay Schenk wrote:
> >
> >> Did we reach a consensus on this one?
> >> Wait until 4.1 to "officially" change java build environment to 7?
> >> Buildbots are still at 6, alth
On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 5:11 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> On 12/09/2013 Kay Schenk wrote:
>
>> Did we reach a consensus on this one?
>> Wait until 4.1 to "officially" change java build environment to 7?
>> Buildbots are still at 6, although I know some of us are using 7 for
>> building with no pro
On 22 September 2013 14:11, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> On 12/09/2013 Kay Schenk wrote:
>
>> Did we reach a consensus on this one?
>> Wait until 4.1 to "officially" change java build environment to 7?
>> Buildbots are still at 6, although I know some of us are using 7 for
>> building with no problem
On 12/09/2013 Kay Schenk wrote:
Did we reach a consensus on this one?
Wait until 4.1 to "officially" change java build environment to 7?
Buildbots are still at 6, although I know some of us are using 7 for
building with no problems.
We didn't reach consensus, the reason being (rather than disag
On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 9:23 AM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 2:56 AM, janI wrote:
>
>> On 8 August 2013 11:43, sebb wrote:
>>
>> > On 8 August 2013 02:26, Rob Weir wrote:
>> > > On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 5:23 PM, Kay Schenk
>> wrote:
>> > >> On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 11:24 AM, jan
On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 2:56 AM, janI wrote:
> On 8 August 2013 11:43, sebb wrote:
>
> > On 8 August 2013 02:26, Rob Weir wrote:
> > > On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 5:23 PM, Kay Schenk
> wrote:
> > >> On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 11:24 AM, janI wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> On 7 August 2013 18:55, Andrea Pescetti
On 8 August 2013 12:23, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 5:43 AM, sebb wrote:
>> On 8 August 2013 02:26, Rob Weir wrote:
>>> On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 5:23 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 11:24 AM, janI wrote:
> On 7 August 2013 18:55, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>>
On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 5:43 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 8 August 2013 02:26, Rob Weir wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 5:23 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>>> On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 11:24 AM, janI wrote:
>>>
On 7 August 2013 18:55, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
>
>
On 8 August 2013 11:43, sebb wrote:
> On 8 August 2013 02:26, Rob Weir wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 5:23 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
> >> On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 11:24 AM, janI wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 7 August 2013 18:55, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> >>>
> >>> > Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
> >>> >
>
On 8/8/13 5:21 AM, Dave Fisher wrote:
>
> On Aug 7, 2013, at 6:26 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 5:23 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>>> On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 11:24 AM, janI wrote:
>>>
On 7 August 2013 18:55, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
>
>
On 8 August 2013 02:26, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 5:23 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 11:24 AM, janI wrote:
>>
>>> On 7 August 2013 18:55, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>>>
>>> > Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> Important note for discussion: it is all about p
On Aug 7, 2013, at 6:26 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 5:23 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 11:24 AM, janI wrote:
>>
>>> On 7 August 2013 18:55, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>>>
Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
> Important note for discussion: it is all ab
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 5:23 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 11:24 AM, janI wrote:
>
>> On 7 August 2013 18:55, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>>
>> > Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
>> >
>> >> Important note for discussion: it is all about platform Windows.
>> >> On my work to update the AO
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 9:47 AM, janI wrote:
> question is do we also want to force our customers
> to use java 1.7 ?
Yes :) On Windows Java 6 is EOL'd.
On Linux, most distros ship OpenJDK7 already which is Java 1.7
One of the few remaining OpenJDK6 holdouts announced the switch to OpenJDK7
htt
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 7:13 AM, Peter Eberlein
wrote:
>
> If Java 6 has been dropped and Java 7 wasn't found on the system, wouldn't
> it be better to replace the general MsgBox "There was no Java environment
> found" by "Java 7 or higher wasn't found"?
> Otherwise people who know that they have 1
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 4:44 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann
wrote:
> My arguements for a drop of the Java 5 and Java 6 support on Windows are:
> - JRE 5 is quite old and no longer officially available
> - JRE 6 is no longer officially available
> - JRE 6 has certain security risks and the corresponding
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 11:24 AM, janI wrote:
> On 7 August 2013 18:55, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>
> > Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
> >
> >> Important note for discussion: it is all about platform Windows.
> >> On my work to update the AOO build environment for Windows I recognized
> >> that it is
On 7 August 2013 18:55, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
>
>> Important note for discussion: it is all about platform Windows.
>> On my work to update the AOO build environment for Windows I recognized
>> that it is hard to get an official JDK 1.5 (Java 5) or JDK 1.6 (Java 6
Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
Important note for discussion: it is all about platform Windows.
On my work to update the AOO build environment for Windows I recognized
that it is hard to get an official JDK 1.5 (Java 5) or JDK 1.6 (Java 6)
for Windows. Thus, I decided to go with JDK 1.7. The resul
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 5:47 AM, janI wrote:
> On 7 August 2013 14:02, Rory O'Farrell wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 7 Aug 2013 07:54:55 -0400
> > Rob Weir wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 3:44 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann
> > > wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > I would like to discuss here, if we
On 7 August 2013 13:47, janI wrote:
> On 7 August 2013 14:02, Rory O'Farrell wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 7 Aug 2013 07:54:55 -0400
>> Rob Weir wrote:
>>
>> > On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 3:44 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann
>> > wrote:
>> > > Hi,
>> > >
>> > > I would like to discuss here, if we drop the support
On 7 August 2013 14:02, Rory O'Farrell wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Aug 2013 07:54:55 -0400
> Rob Weir wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 3:44 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann
> > wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I would like to discuss here, if we drop the support for Java 5 and
> Java 6
> > > for AOO installati
On Wed, 7 Aug 2013 07:54:55 -0400
Rob Weir wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 3:44 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I would like to discuss here, if we drop the support for Java 5 and Java 6
> > for AOO installation on Windows.
> > Important note for discussion: it is all about p
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 3:44 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to discuss here, if we drop the support for Java 5 and Java 6
> for AOO installation on Windows.
> Important note for discussion: it is all about platform Windows.
>
> On my work to update the AOO build environmen
Hi,
On 07.08.2013 12:13, Peter Eberlein wrote:
Hi Oliver,
Am 07.08.2013 09:44, schrieb Oliver-Rainer Wittmann:
Hi,
I would like to discuss here, if we drop the support for Java 5 and Java
6 for AOO installation on Windows.
Important note for discussion: it is all about platform Windows.
On my
Hi Oliver,
Am 07.08.2013 09:44, schrieb Oliver-Rainer Wittmann:
Hi,
I would like to discuss here, if we drop the support for Java 5 and Java
6 for AOO installation on Windows.
Important note for discussion: it is all about platform Windows.
On my work to update the AOO build environment for Win
Hi,
I would like to discuss here, if we drop the support for Java 5 and Java
6 for AOO installation on Windows.
Important note for discussion: it is all about platform Windows.
On my work to update the AOO build environment for Windows I recognized
that it is hard to get an official JDK 1.5 (
34 matches
Mail list logo
