, December 15, 2014 13:37
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org javascript:;
Subject: Re: Deflecting the Attack of the Clones
[ ... ]
We are in good relationship with the author. The current branding and
wording of AndrOpen Office were approved by the OpenOffice PMC. If
any
changes are needed
@openoffice.apache.org javascript:;
Subject: Re: Deflecting the Attack of the Clones
Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
However, there are now apparent forks of AOO, such as AndrOpen
Office
(boldly dubbed AOO and which seems to confuse some folks even
though it is described as a fork
[Not cross-posting to private@.]
-- replying to --
From: Kay Schenk [mailto:kay.sch...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2014 10:20
To: OOo Apache
Cc: dennis.hamil...@acm.org; privateAOO
Subject: Re: Deflecting the Attack of the Clones
On Sun, Dec 21, 2014 at 10:17 AM, jan i j
On 23/12/14 23:00, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
Here is a typical example of confusion about this product,
https://www.marshut.net/pyzxp/aoo-for-android-not-worth-the-download.html.
Notice Apache's Open Office for Android. And folks speak of AOO for
Android as if it is the
On Wed, Dec 24, 2014 at 1:02 PM, jonathon toki.kant...@gmail.com wrote:
On 23/12/14 23:00, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
Here is a typical example of confusion about this product,
https://www.marshut.net/pyzxp/aoo-for-android-not-worth-the-download.html
.
Notice Apache's Open
On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 6:29 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton dennis.hamil...@acm.org
wrote:
-- Replying to below --
From: Rob Weir [mailto:r...@robweir.com]
Sent: Monday, December 15, 2014 06:26
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org; Dennis Hamilton
Subject: Re: Deflecting the Attack of the Clones
-- in reply to --
From: Andrea Pescetti [mailto:pesce...@apache.org]
Sent: Monday, December 15, 2014 13:37
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: Deflecting the Attack of the Clones
Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
However, there are now apparent forks of AOO, such as AndrOpen Office
On Sunday, December 21, 2014, Dennis E. Hamilton dennis.hamil...@acm.org
wrote:
-- in reply to --
From: Andrea Pescetti [mailto:pesce...@apache.org javascript:;]
Sent: Monday, December 15, 2014 13:37
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org javascript:;
Subject: Re: Deflecting the Attack of the Clones
On 16/12/14 00:20, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
I'll ask the particular user what led him to users @oo.a.o.
Photographs at
http://libreoffice-environment.blogspot.com/2014/12/when-is-apache-open-office-not-apache.html
to show why Apache Open Office is the expected support site.
For some
On Sun, Dec 14, 2014 at 1:37 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote:
I have been watching the arrival of support requests for AOO knock-offs on
Android and plain-old PCs with some dismay. Some of this damage is
self-inflicted: The Apache OpenOffice source code compiles to
-- Replying to below --
From: Rob Weir [mailto:r...@robweir.com]
Sent: Monday, December 15, 2014 06:26
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org; Dennis Hamilton
Subject: Re: Deflecting the Attack of the Clones
[ ... ]
My impression is that Firefox does something similar. I think I read
someplace
Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
However, there are now apparent forks of AOO, such as AndrOpen Office
(boldly dubbed AOO and which seems to confuse some folks even
though it is described as a fork and as not associated with the project).
We are in good relationship with the author. The
the particular user what led him to users @oo.a.o.
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Andrea Pescetti [mailto:pesce...@apache.org]
Sent: Monday, December 15, 2014 13:37
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: Deflecting the Attack of the Clones
Dennis E. Hamilton wrote
13 matches
Mail list logo
