Hello World

Hi guys, I'm Aditya an enthusiastic student from India I know a little bit java, c++, html, css ,php, sql and python i would like to join this amazing community to gain more knowledge of tgis mysterious yet fascinating world which is quite new to me. Please pop in an email if you have any

Building AOO for Windows 10

Hello together, I am new to this list and new to the AOO-Project. I've been trying to build AOO and to get the source code since yesterday. I followed the step by step guide in this link: https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/ Building_Guide_AOO/Step_by_step Everything went fine until i

Re: Building AOO for Windows 10

The instructions need clarifying - I'll look into it later. The final argument "aoo-trunk" is the destination folder for the checkout. If you want to checkout into a folder called "aoo-trunk" do a "mkdir aoo-trunk" first. If you want a different destination, replace "aoo-trunk" with the

Re: Planning for emergency releases

Am 08/06/2016 12:57 AM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan: On 8/5/2016 2:20 PM, Marcus wrote: Am 08/05/2016 10:43 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan: This is mainly a summary of opinions I've already expressed on security@. The discussion does not actually involve anything that needs to be confidential, so

Re: Planning for emergency releases

Am 08/05/2016 11:59 PM, schrieb Dave Fisher: Until AOO can provide a simple auto-update that includes patches then from a user perspective Patricia is completely correct. I don't believe that this can be the only agrument to provide a full-blown release. ;-) Marcus On Aug 5, 2016, at

Re: Planning for emergency releases

On 8/7/2016 8:29 AM, Marcus wrote: ... I don't want to have it perfect. And we are already in this emergency situation. We have either a patch process nor a full-release process. We don't have what I consider to be the full emergency, a live exploit in the field. Why not both strategies? Go

Re: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows

Feedback for the .zip file: Do you have a reason in mind for the "apply" in the file name? I would delete this as I don't see a benefit and it would shorten the file name. When extracting a ZIP file I cannot stand it when no subdirectory is included and the files are extracted where the

Re: Planning for emergency releases

On 8/7/2016 8:29 AM, Marcus wrote: Am 08/06/2016 12:57 AM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan: ... I don't agree with the car analogy - bits are relatively cheap, and I will personally promise to recycle any obsoleted bits that are returned to us, without taking up any landfill space. I would not do

Re: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows

Am 08/07/2016 07:30 PM, schrieb Dennis E. Hamilton: -Original Message- From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de] Sent: Sunday, August 7, 2016 09:21 To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Cc: q...@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Re: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows Feedback

Re: branches/gbuild-reintegration merged

On Sun, Aug 7, 2016 at 12:59 PM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > Hi > > branches/gbuild-reintegration has been merged to trunk. It has > 136 > patches and makes many changes throughout the code, so you probably need to > "dmake clean" before rebuilding. > > I haven't fixed the

Re: expat upgrade patch needs testing

On 5 Aug, To: dev@openoffice.apache.org wrote: > I just submitted a patch to upgrade the bundled expat to version 2.2.0: > > > I've done some testing on FreeBSD and Windows. Unfortunately I can't > test Linux at the moment. After a Virtualbox

Re: [VOTE] Release apache-openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 Source

+1 Because of whitespace differences from the patch I had previously tests, I applied the patch to a clean 4.1.2 checkout, built from scratch, and tested the result. I have checked the signature and hashes. The signature file shows the web-of-trust issues previously discussed. On 8/2/2016

Re: Planning for emergency releases

Am 08/07/2016 07:38 PM, schrieb Dennis E. Hamilton: -Original Message- From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de] Sent: Sunday, August 7, 2016 10:16 To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Re: Planning for emergency releases Am 08/07/2016 06:14 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan: On

Re: branches/gbuild-reintegration merged

On 8/7/2016 2:30 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: On Sun, Aug 7, 2016 at 12:59 PM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: Hi branches/gbuild-reintegration has been merged to trunk. It has > 136 patches and makes many changes throughout the code, so you probably need to "dmake clean" before

Re: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows

On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 3:52 PM, Marcus wrote: > Am 08/05/2016 12:26 AM, schrieb Kay Schenk: > >> On 08/04/2016 02:21 PM, Marcus wrote: >> >>> Am 08/03/2016 05:31 AM, schrieb Dennis E. Hamilton: >>> Testing of an Apache OpenOffice 4.1.2-patch1 procedure is requested.

Re: Planning for emergency releases

Am 08/07/2016 06:14 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan: On 8/7/2016 8:29 AM, Marcus wrote: ... I don't want to have it perfect. And we are already in this emergency situation. We have either a patch process nor a full-release process. We don't have what I consider to be the full emergency, a live

Re: branches/gbuild-reintegration merged

On Sun, Aug 7, 2016 at 11:30 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: > On Sun, Aug 7, 2016 at 12:59 PM, Damjan Jovanovic > wrote: > > > Hi > > > > branches/gbuild-reintegration has been merged to trunk. It has > 136 > > patches and makes many changes throughout the code,

Re: Planning for emergency releases

Am 08/07/2016 06:19 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan: On 8/7/2016 8:29 AM, Marcus wrote: Am 08/06/2016 12:57 AM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan: ... I don't agree with the car analogy - bits are relatively cheap, and I will personally promise to recycle any obsoleted bits that are returned to us,

RE: Planning for emergency releases

> -Original Message- > From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de] > Sent: Sunday, August 7, 2016 10:16 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: Planning for emergency releases > > Am 08/07/2016 06:14 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan: > > > > On 8/7/2016 8:29 AM, Marcus wrote: > > ...

Re: Planning for emergency releases

On 8/7/2016 10:16 AM, Marcus wrote: Am 08/07/2016 06:14 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan: ... but meanwhile work on getting competent at preparing a full release promptly if needed. Maybe we are not that far aways from each other. What I want to to avoid is to provide hundreads of MBs for a

Review of the 4.1.2-patch1 MacOSX.README.txt file

Dennis Hamilton asked me to look at the 4.1.2-patch1 README file for Mac OSX. I have done so and include the following information. My test system info: OSX Version 10.11.6 "El Capitan" Hardware: Macbook Air (Late 2010) == (1) The text of the current MacOSX.README.txt file.

RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows

> -Original Message- > From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de] > Sent: Sunday, August 7, 2016 09:21 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Cc: q...@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows > > Feedback for the .zip file: > > Do you have

Re: [VOTE] Release apache-openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 Source

On Tue, Aug 02, 2016 at 07:48:12PM -0700, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: > Please vote by reply to this dev@-list thread on the approval of the > candidate for release. > > [ ] +1 Approve, with description > [ ] 0 Abstain > [ ] -1 Disapprove, with explanation +1 I've checked the signatures

branches/gbuild-reintegration merged

Hi branches/gbuild-reintegration has been merged to trunk. It has > 136 patches and makes many changes throughout the code, so you probably need to "dmake clean" before rebuilding. I haven't fixed the Windows build performance regression caused by issue #117845, so if you're building on Windows