Re: Planning for emergency releases

Am 08/10/2016 12:25 AM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan: On 8/9/2016 3:12 PM, Marcus wrote: ... we have a documented release process here [1]. Of course it's for a full release. But for a bugfix (or emergency) release it can be derived and then shortend. [1]

Re: Download Junit and Hamcrest in ./bootstrap?

On 08/11/2016 01:42 AM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > Hi > > If you've been checking the buildbots you'll see that all who don't use > --without-junit are currently broken in ./configure due to junit being too > old. This is unlikely to change, as the buildslaves are running Ubuntu > 10.04 which

Re: Download Junit and Hamcrest in ./bootstrap?

On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 6:03 PM, Kay sch...@apache.org wrote: > > On 08/11/2016 01:42 AM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > > Hi > > > > If you've been checking the buildbots you'll see that all who don't use > > --without-junit are currently broken in ./configure due to junit being

Re: Download Junit and Hamcrest in ./bootstrap?

On 11 Aug, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > Hi > > If you've been checking the buildbots you'll see that all who don't use > --without-junit are currently broken in ./configure due to junit being too > old. This is unlikely to change, as the buildslaves are running Ubuntu > 10.04 which doesn't have

Re: Download Junit and Hamcrest in ./bootstrap?

On 11 Aug, Kay sch...@apache.org wrote: > > On 08/11/2016 01:42 AM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: >> Hi >> >> If you've been checking the buildbots you'll see that all who don't use >> --without-junit are currently broken in ./configure due to junit being too >> old. This is unlikely to change, as the

Re: Planning for emergency releases

On 8/11/2016 10:45 AM, Marcus wrote: Am 08/10/2016 12:25 AM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan: On 8/9/2016 3:12 PM, Marcus wrote: ... we have a documented release process here [1]. Of course it's for a full release. But for a bugfix (or emergency) release it can be derived and then shortend. [1]

Re: [PACKAGING 4.1.2-patch1 Binaries] (was RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows)

Am 08/10/2016 05:03 AM, schrieb Dennis E. Hamilton: -Original Message- From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de] Sent: Tuesday, August 9, 2016 15:26 To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Re: [PACKAGING 4.1.2-patch1 Binaries] (was RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for

Re: [PACKAGING 4.1.2-patch1 Binaries] (was RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows)

On 08/09/2016 02:12 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: > [top posting] > I'm in the process of trying to "sync" instructions for Linux32, > Linux64, and MacOSX at the moment. As far as instructions on the actual > HOTFIX page, we need to have just a "general" instruction for ALL zips > that simply says --

Re: Download Junit and Hamcrest in ./bootstrap?

On 08/11/2016 01:05 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: > > On 08/11/2016 09:53 AM, Don Lewis wrote: >> On 11 Aug, Kay sch...@apache.org wrote: >>> >>> On 08/11/2016 01:42 AM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: Hi If you've been checking the buildbots you'll see that all who don't use

Re: [PACKAGING 4.1.2-patch1 Binaries] (was RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows)

On 11 Aug, Kay sch...@apache.org wrote: > > > On 08/11/2016 12:50 PM, Kay sch...@apache.org wrote: >> >> >> On 08/09/2016 02:12 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: >>> [top posting] >>> I'm in the process of trying to "sync" instructions for Linux32, >>> Linux64, and MacOSX at the moment. As far as

Re: Download Junit and Hamcrest in ./bootstrap?

On 11 Aug, Kay Schenk wrote: > > > On 08/11/2016 01:05 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: >> >> On 08/11/2016 09:53 AM, Don Lewis wrote: >>> On 11 Aug, Kay sch...@apache.org wrote: On 08/11/2016 01:42 AM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > Hi > > If you've been checking the buildbots you'll see

Re: [PACKAGING 4.1.2-patch1 Binaries] (was RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows)

On 08/11/2016 12:50 PM, Kay sch...@apache.org wrote: > > > On 08/09/2016 02:12 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: >> [top posting] >> I'm in the process of trying to "sync" instructions for Linux32, >> Linux64, and MacOSX at the moment. As far as instructions on the actual >> HOTFIX page, we need to have

Re: [PACKAGING 4.1.2-patch1 Binaries] (was RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows)

Kay Schenk wrote: My openssl version on does NOT supply digest sha256. Is it OK to use sha1? MD5 already computed for each of these. Guidelines recommend SHA256. But it should not be difficult for you to get a sha256sum binary or a generic shasum binary to run as "shasum -a256 FILENAME".

Download Junit and Hamcrest in ./bootstrap?

Hi If you've been checking the buildbots you'll see that all who don't use --without-junit are currently broken in ./configure due to junit being too old. This is unlikely to change, as the buildslaves are running Ubuntu 10.04 which doesn't have newer versions of Junit available in apt. This is

RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows

BETA 0.1.0 WITH AUTOMATED SCRIPTS IS NOW AVAILABLE The scripts make life much easier, since users don't have to go hunting for anything and digging around in operating-system locations. You should be able to go through the procedure that uses the automated steps pretty easily. It is very

Re: Download Junit and Hamcrest in ./bootstrap?

Sadly it's not that simple: Junit builds with Maven, and Hamcrest with Gradle. Is it ok to download the binaries, or is only source code allowed under ext_sources? On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 10:42 AM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > Hi > > If you've been checking the buildbots you'll

Re: [PACKAGING 4.1.2-patch1 Binaries] (was RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows)

Am 08/11/2016 09:50 PM, schrieb Kay sch...@apache.org: On 08/09/2016 02:12 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: [top posting] I'm in the process of trying to "sync" instructions for Linux32, Linux64, and MacOSX at the moment. As far as instructions on the actual HOTFIX page, we need to have just a "general"