> -Original Message-
> From: Don Lewis [mailto:truck...@apache.org]
> Sent: Friday, August 12, 2016 14:09
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Cc: dennis.hamil...@acm.org
> Subject: Re: Officially releasing a patch for CVE-2016-1513
>
> On 12 Aug, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
> > Don,
> >
> >
Courtney,
I tried to reply directly to your email three days ago. Please check
whether a message from me got caught in a spam filter etc.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional
> -Original Message-
> From: Patricia Shanahan [mailto:p...@acm.org]
> Sent: Friday, August 12, 2016 13:55
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Planning for emergency releases
>
>
>
> On 8/12/2016 1:40 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
> >> -Original Message- From:
> -Original Message-
> From: Keith N. McKenna [mailto:keith.mcke...@comcast.net]
> Sent: Friday, August 12, 2016 13:49
> To: q...@openoffice.apache.org; dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows
>
> Attached is a text file with the
On 12 Aug, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
> Don,
>
> Having worked through the 4.1.2-patch1 (CVE-2016-1513 remediation) for
> Windows, I learned a few more things about what can be done.
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:dennis.hamil...@acm.org]
>> Sent: Sunday,
On 12 Aug, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Don Lewis [mailto:truck...@apache.org]
>> Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2016 14:41
>> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org; ksch...@apache.org
>> Subject: Re: [PACKAGING 4.1.2-patch1 Binaries] (was RE: [TESTING]
>> Applying
On 8/12/2016 1:40 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
-Original Message- From: Patricia Shanahan
[mailto:p...@acm.org] Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2016 11:07 To:
dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Re: Planning for emergency
releases
[ ... ]
Meanwhile, it is interesting for contemplating a
Attached is a text file with the
tests that I ran and the results of each. The only problem
encountered was in verifying tl.dll.new with the .asc signature
file. This was due to the web of trust issue discussed earlier in
this thread.Patricia's signature had not
> -Original Message-
> From: Patricia Shanahan [mailto:p...@acm.org]
> Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2016 11:07
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Planning for emergency releases
>
[ ... ]
>
> Meanwhile, it is interesting for contemplating a ready-to-release
> strategy. We would
Am 08/12/2016 10:01 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan:
On 8/12/2016 12:22 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
...
[Anecdotal Side Note: I just discovered that the MD5 hash for the
4.1.2 Windows .exe fails to check on my Windows system because of a
defect in the .md5 file. For reasons unknown, the md5sum
On 8/12/2016 12:22 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
...
[Anecdotal Side Note: I just discovered that the MD5 hash for the
4.1.2 Windows .exe fails to check on my Windows system because of a
defect in the .md5 file. For reasons unknown, the md5sum tool that I
have requires exactly two spaces
I thought that the basic requirement is that the release manager(s) do any
builds on a machine under their [exclusive] individual control. That also
means satisfying baseline requirements for release builds though. That pretty
much requires use of a VM if the main development system of a
Don,
Having worked through the 4.1.2-patch1 (CVE-2016-1513 remediation) for Windows,
I learned a few more things about what can be done.
> -Original Message-
> From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:dennis.hamil...@acm.org]
> Sent: Sunday, July 24, 2016 15:45
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> -Original Message-
> From: Keith N. McKenna [mailto:keith.mcke...@comcast.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 3, 2016 12:47
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows
>
> Replies in line
>
> Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
> > Testing
14 matches
Mail list logo
