Please delete it.
Thank you
Damjan
On Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 2:33 AM Don Lewis wrote:
> It looks like there is some leftover debug code in trunk commit
> 5168e59c15cb9af435bdca9b78b99d1abe16c58e.
>
> main/scripting/source/protocolhandler/scripthandler.cxx:
> cdf0e10c (rcweir 2011-08-16
It looks like there is some leftover debug code in trunk commit
5168e59c15cb9af435bdca9b78b99d1abe16c58e.
main/scripting/source/protocolhandler/scripthandler.cxx:
cdf0e10c (rcweir 2011-08-16 17:05:51 + 147) void SAL_CALL
ScriptProtocolHandler::dispatchWithNotification(
cdf0e10c
Am 01.10.19 um 22:33 schrieb Peter Kovacs:
On 01.10.19 22:24, Dave Fisher wrote:
On Oct 1, 2019, at 1:16 PM, Peter Kovacs wrote:
On 01.10.19 20:18, Marcus wrote:
Am 01.10.19 um 19:31 schrieb Dave Fisher:
Heads up that I’m starting to do the migration,
Repos name must start with
Am 01.10.19 um 22:24 schrieb Dave Fisher:
On Oct 1, 2019, at 1:16 PM, Peter Kovacs wrote:
On 01.10.19 20:18, Marcus wrote:
Am 01.10.19 um 19:31 schrieb Dave Fisher:
Heads up that I’m starting to do the migration,
Repos name must start with OpenOffice.
thanks a lot for starting this beast
Hi Andrea,
"Open Document Editors" Developer room is accepted:
https://fosdem.org/2020/news/2019-10-01-accepted-developer-rooms/
Beware, it is not in alphabetical order but between "G" and "H"
Regards,
Matthias
Am 20.09.19 um 09:28 schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
> Peter Kovacs wrote:
>>
No problem.
Let’s go with the following.
openoffice-project for the project site - openoffice.apache.org
openoffice-org for the user site - www.openoffice.org
Regards,
Dave
> On Oct 1, 2019, at 2:38 PM, Peter Kovacs wrote:
>
> I am confused. I thought the developer site is something like
I am confused. I thought the developer site is something like dev doku I
found somewhere in the svn.
The developer side is not about development. It is about the project.
On 01.10.19 23:12, Matthias Seidel wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> Am 01.10.19 um 22:33 schrieb Peter Kovacs:
>> On 01.10.19 22:24,
Hi Peter,
Am 01.10.19 um 22:33 schrieb Peter Kovacs:
> On 01.10.19 22:24, Dave Fisher wrote:
>>> On Oct 1, 2019, at 1:16 PM, Peter Kovacs wrote:
>>>
>>> On 01.10.19 20:18, Marcus wrote:
Am 01.10.19 um 19:31 schrieb Dave Fisher:
> Heads up that I’m starting to do the migration,
>
Since I found out for uploading something in Cwiki the page needs
additional rights, I decided to go for MWiki.
I have updated https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Architecture
you can also do some sort of versioning there, which is nice.
I hope you are not too disappointed from the document.
On
On 01.10.19 22:24, Dave Fisher wrote:
>
>> On Oct 1, 2019, at 1:16 PM, Peter Kovacs wrote:
>>
>> On 01.10.19 20:18, Marcus wrote:
>>> Am 01.10.19 um 19:31 schrieb Dave Fisher:
Heads up that I’m starting to do the migration,
> Repos name must start with OpenOffice.
>>> thanks a lot
> On Oct 1, 2019, at 1:16 PM, Peter Kovacs wrote:
>
> On 01.10.19 20:18, Marcus wrote:
>> Am 01.10.19 um 19:31 schrieb Dave Fisher:
>>> Heads up that I’m starting to do the migration,
>>>
Repos name must start with OpenOffice.
>>
>> thanks a lot for starting this beast of migration.
>>
On 01.10.19 20:18, Marcus wrote:
> Am 01.10.19 um 19:31 schrieb Dave Fisher:
>> Heads up that I’m starting to do the migration,
>>
>>> Repos name must start with OpenOffice.
>
> thanks a lot for starting this beast of migration.
>
>>> I propose these:
>>>
>>> OpenOffice-DevWebsite
>>>
Am 01.10.19 um 21:43 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
> Am 01.10.19 um 20:18 schrieb Marcus:
>> Am 01.10.19 um 19:31 schrieb Dave Fisher:
>>> Heads up that I’m starting to do the migration,
>>>
Repos name must start with OpenOffice.
>> thanks a lot for starting this beast of migration.
>>
I
> On Oct 1, 2019, at 11:18 AM, Marcus wrote:
>
> Am 01.10.19 um 19:31 schrieb Dave Fisher:
>> Heads up that I’m starting to do the migration,
>>> Repos name must start with OpenOffice.
>
> thanks a lot for starting this beast of migration.
>
>>> I propose these:
>>>
>>>
Am 01.10.19 um 20:18 schrieb Marcus:
> Am 01.10.19 um 19:31 schrieb Dave Fisher:
>> Heads up that I’m starting to do the migration,
>>
>>> Repos name must start with OpenOffice.
>
> thanks a lot for starting this beast of migration.
>
>>> I propose these:
>>>
>>> OpenOffice-DevWebsite
>>>
Hi Marcus,
Am 01.10.19 um 20:20 schrieb Marcus:
> Am 01.10.19 um 10:33 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>> Am 01.10.19 um 01:23 schrieb Marcus:
>>> Am 30.09.19 um 22:59 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
Am 30.09.19 um 22:35 schrieb Peter Kovacs:
> We had constant 7 votes on 4.1.7 and 4.1.6 release.
Am 01.10.19 um 10:33 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
Am 01.10.19 um 01:23 schrieb Marcus:
Am 30.09.19 um 22:59 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
Am 30.09.19 um 22:35 schrieb Peter Kovacs:
We had constant 7 votes on 4.1.7 and 4.1.6 release. However only 3
volunteers voted in both releases.
These numbers are
Am 01.10.19 um 19:31 schrieb Dave Fisher:
Heads up that I’m starting to do the migration,
Repos name must start with OpenOffice.
thanks a lot for starting this beast of migration.
I propose these:
OpenOffice-DevWebsite
OpenOffice-OrgWebsite
May I ask you to use shorter names and all in
Hi -
Heads up that I’m starting to do the migration,
> Repos name must start with OpenOffice.
>
> I propose these:
>
> OpenOffice-DevWebsite
> OpenOffice-OrgWebsite
I’ll be tackling the project site first.
I plan to make use of https://S.apache.org/asfyaml so that we will have staging
and
Mwiki does have "versioning" of a sort. You can look at previous
versions of pages and do rollbacks.
I'm looking at the following --
https://wiki.openoffice.org/w/index.php?title=Architecture=245544=245542
in which you can see how revisions are managed.
Good that you are trying to deal with
Hi, folks,
(Note: You're receiving this email because you're on the dev@ list for
one or more Apache Software Foundation projects.)
For ApacheCon North America 2019, we asked projects to participate in
the creation of project/topic specific tracks. This was very successful,
with about 15
Hi, folks,
(Note: You're receiving this email because you're on the dev@ list for
one or more Apache Software Foundation projects.)
For ApacheCon North America 2019, we asked projects to participate in
the creation of project/topic specific tracks. This was very successful,
with about 15
+1
> On Sep 30, 2019, at 4:03 PM, Matthias Seidel
> wrote:
>
> Hi Jim,
>
> Great!
>
> One additional thought:
>
> We use $Revision$ in main/solenv/bin/build.pl and a lot of other files.
> That doesn't seem to work anymore since we switched from SVN to Git.
>
> We have AC_REVISION(
Hi Marcus,
Am 01.10.19 um 01:20 schrieb Marcus:
> Am 30.09.19 um 17:31 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>> No feedback=No interest?
>>
>> Maybe I should stop providing test builds.
>> That would save me a lot of my spare time...
>
> sorry for being silent for this topic. However, Java is not really my
>
Hi Marcus,
Am 01.10.19 um 01:23 schrieb Marcus:
> Am 30.09.19 um 22:59 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>> Am 30.09.19 um 22:35 schrieb Peter Kovacs:
>>> We had constant 7 votes on 4.1.7 and 4.1.6 release. However only 3
>>> volunteers voted in both releases.
>>> These numbers are low in general. Maybe
Sadly a picture as such is currently of no use. The picture has 1200 objects.
Most of them pointers from one Modul to another. And there are still errors or
modules are duplicated. Draw has some flaws for this use case. But I already
learned what we need to improve in Draw.
The map is still
26 matches
Mail list logo
