Re: [Proposal] Update Icons for AOO 4.1

trunk to test, verify, improve this highly visible UI changes for the next release. We should not forget that such visible UI changes are always sensible and many different people have many different opinions. I am in favor of having this new icons available as soon as possible. Juergen >

Re: [RELEASE]: refined AOO 4.1 beta schedule

FYI: we start the build based on AOO410 branch revision 1572868 On 2/27/14 4:50 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > Hi, > > we are still verifying some fixes to identify the Beta as real beta, > means some branding elements, names etc. And we are working on some > serious bugfix

Re: Ask OpenOffice #2 Top Questions: Now for the answers....

On 2/27/14 11:54 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote: > Am 02/27/2014 11:00 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk: >> >> >> On 02/27/2014 10:02 AM, Rob Weir wrote: >>> Time to wrap this up. I've gone through the 275 questions from 430 >>> users and picked out the top ones. I dropped the ones that repeated >>> questions we alr

Re: Draw?

On 2/28/14 10:43 AM, Yakov Reztsov wrote: > > > > Пятница, 28 февраля 2014, 3:33 -05:00 от Dawn Lauryn <>: >> Hi, I used to have MS Visio, but that was with a biz. It's far too >> expensive for me to purchase now, but I have a vsd file I need to work >> with. Will Draw work at importing a vsd fi

Re: Übersetzungsfehler

On 2/28/14 10:35 AM, Raphael Bircher wrote: > Hallo zusammen > > Im Menü Einfügen steht in der 4.0.1 "Verzeichnisse vund Tabellen". Bin ich > einfach nur zu blöd um das im Pootle zu finden oder hat das schon wer > korrigiert? > > Einen schönen Tag euch allen. I can't find the string "vund" in

Re: How can we promote Crowdfunding Project relatet to AOO?

just one quick first remark. We should first discuss if we want such a LTS version and if we can manage and maintain it. If you plan do do that with your private business you have to request the normal trademark usage etc. and should probably rename it to make clear what it is and where it comes f

Re: Build error on Mac OS X 10.7 with AOO main in testtools

On 3/3/14 12:06 PM, Raphael Bircher wrote: > Hi Andre > > Am 03.03.2014 um 10:17 schrieb Andre Fischer: > >> On 03.03.2014 10:03, Raphael Bircher wrote: >>> Hi at all. >>> >>> I have a build error on my Mac OS X 10.7 in testtools >>> >>> >>> /Users/nacnaub/Documents/AOO_main/main/solenv/

Re: Build error on Mac OS X 10.7 with AOO main in testtools

On 3/3/14 12:56 PM, Raphael Bircher wrote: > Hi Jürgen, * > > Am 03.03.2014 um 12:20 schrieb Jürgen Schmidt: > >> On 3/3/14 12:06 PM, Raphael Bircher wrote: >>> Hi Andre >>> >>> Am 03.03.2014 um 10:17 schrieb Andre Fischer: >>> >>&g

Re: [RELEASE]: first Beta RC ... Bug 124272 - Error message "Truetype error 2704" when install language pack on en_US snapshot

of course this is a showstopper, means we will definitely make a new build. Juergen On 3/3/14 1:50 PM, Rainer Bielefeld wrote: > Hi, > > I still can't install Language packs because of > > > CU > > Rainer > > ---

Re: [RELEASE][DISCUSS] How to download AOO 4.1.0 Beta?

On 3/3/14 9:24 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote: > Am 02/14/2014 09:53 PM, schrieb Marcus (OOo): >> As this is our first beta release at Apache, I would like to clarify >> some things before it's maybe too late to change the facts and to >> prepare webpages: >> >> 3. File names: >> >> Of course the file name

Re: 4.1.0_release_blocker requested: [Bug 124338] Crash when opening user guides from LibreOffice

On 3/4/14 11:10 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote: > Hi, > > On 04.03.2014 10:41, jan i wrote: >> On 4 March 2014 10:35, wrote: >> >>> Oliver-Rainer Wittmann has asked for >>> 4.1.0_release_blocker: >>> Bug 124338: Crash when opening user guides from LibreOffice >>> https://issues.apache.org/ooo

Re: [RELEASE]: first Beta RC ... Bug 124272 - Error message "Truetype error 2704" when install language pack on en_US snapshot

On 3/3/14 3:34 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > > of course this is a showstopper, means we will definitely make a new build. to keep you all informed the upload of the rebuild Beta RC is ongoing and we expect to have all the bits in place later tonight. We will inform you... I plan to sta

Re: [RELEASE][DISCUSS] How to download AOO 4.1.0 Beta?

On 3/5/14 10:46 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote: > Am 03/04/2014 07:31 AM, schrieb Jürgen Schmidt: >> On 3/3/14 9:24 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote: >>> Am 02/14/2014 09:53 PM, schrieb Marcus (OOo): >>>> As this is our first beta release at Apache, I would like to clarify >>

[VOTE]: Release Apache OpenOffice 4.1.0 Beta (RC)

Hi all, this is a call for vote on releasing the available release candidate (RC) as Apache OpenOffice 4.1.0 Beta. The Beta release is intended to reach more early adopters and to receive more valuable feedback to improve potentially critical areas for the final release. Apache OpenOffice 4.1 is

[RELEASE]: msp install sets to upgrade AOO 4.0.1 to AOO 4.1

Hi, for the Beta it is not possible to provide msp installer for Windows to upgrade from an AOO 4.0.1 to 4.1. But for the final RC I am planning to provide msp installer as well. The msp can be applied on a finally released and installed AOO 4.0.1 only and I plan to split the vote for the final r

Re: [RELEASE][DISCUSS] How to download AOO 4.1.0 Beta?

On 3/6/14 9:20 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > On 3/5/14 10:46 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote: >> Am 03/04/2014 07:31 AM, schrieb Jürgen Schmidt: >>> On 3/3/14 9:24 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote: >>>> Am 02/14/2014 09:53 PM, schrieb Marcus (OOo): >>>>> As this is our

Re: [BUGZILLA] proposal for new entry in field Target Milestone

On 3/6/14 9:20 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote: > Hi, > > On 05.03.2014 22:46, Marcus (OOo) wrote: >> Am 03/05/2014 05:23 PM, schrieb Oliver-Rainer Wittmann: >>> Hi, >>> >>> On 05.03.2014 15:35, Rob Weir wrote: On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 8:38 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote: > Hi, >>>

Re: Link to Beta-SDK is broken

On 3/6/14 4:47 PM, Regina Henschel wrote: > Hi, > > on > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds > > the link to SDK is broken. > > It is > http://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/milestones/4.1.0-beta/binaries/SDK/Apache_OpenOffice-Beta-SDK_4.1.0_Win_x8

Re: Link to Beta-SDK is broken

On 3/6/14 6:15 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: > On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 7:59 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > >> On 3/6/14 4:47 PM, Regina Henschel wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> on >>> >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+B

OpenOffice Writer usability study???

Hi, I became aware of a planned OpenOffice Writer usability study from a research team in Spain [1] Does anybody know more about this or is in any kind involved in this study? I sounds interesting and I believe it can make sense to collaborate with them in some way. Juergen [1] https://sites.g

Re: OpenOffice Writer usability study???

On 3/7/14 10:44 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > Jürgen Schmidt wrote: >> I became aware of a planned OpenOffice Writer usability study from a >> research team in Spain... >> Does anybody know more about this or is in any kind involved in this >> study? > &g

Re: [RELEASE][DISCUSS] How to download AOO 4.1.0 Beta?

On 3/6/14 11:01 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote: > Am 03/06/2014 01:19 PM, schrieb Jürgen Schmidt: >> On 3/6/14 9:20 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: >>> On 3/5/14 10:46 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote: >>>> Am 03/04/2014 07:31 AM, schrieb Jürgen Schmidt: >>>>> On 3/3/14 9:24

Re: Anything we can do about premature redistribution?

On 3/7/14 4:21 PM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote: > Hi, > > On 07.03.2014 15:22, Rob Weir wrote: >> Evidently we're already released, on some websites at least: >> >> http://linux.softpedia.com/get/Office/Office-Suites/Apache-OpenOffice-253.shtml >> >> >> How much do we care about this? The risk,

Re: Anything we can do about premature redistribution?

On 3/7/14 4:33 PM, Rob Weir wrote: > On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 10:23 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: >> On 3/7/14 4:21 PM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> On 07.03.2014 15:22, Rob Weir wrote: >>>> Evidently we're alread

[RESULT][VOTE]: Release Apache OpenOffice 4.1.0 Beta (RC)

ll +1 Sylvain Denis +1 Shengfeng Liu On 3/6/14 9:55 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > Hi all, > > this is a call for vote on releasing the available release candidate > (RC) as Apache OpenOffice 4.1.0 Beta. The Beta release is intended to > reach more early adopters and to receive more

Re: Anything we can do about premature redistribution?

On 3/9/14 8:49 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote: > Am 03/09/2014 07:33 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk: >> On Sun, Mar 9, 2014 at 10:08 AM, Marcus (OOo) >> wrote: >> >>> Am 03/08/2014 12:09 AM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti: >>> Rob Weir wrote: > http://linux.softpedia.com/get/Office/Office-Suites/

[RELEASE]: final release preparation

Hi, release vote on the RC for AOO 4.1 Beta passed successful and we can continue with the final release preparation, announcement. What things are left? 1. download option for the Beta via our download page. Default should be still the 4.0.1. But the Beta should be at least available as optiona

[RELEASE][PROPOSAL]: annoncement

Hi, I started to prepare the release announcement # The Apache OpenOffice project is pleased to announce the immediate availability of OpenOffice 4.1.0 Beta You can download it from our website [1]. The 4.1.0 Beta update includes many bug fixes as well as new translations: Bulgarian, Danish

Re: [RELEASE][PROPOSAL]: annoncement

On 3/10/14 11:31 AM, Marcus (OOo) wrote: > Am 03/10/2014 10:29 AM, schrieb Jürgen Schmidt: >> Hi, >> >> I started to prepare the release announcement >> >> # >> The Apache OpenOffice project is pleased to announce the immediate >> availability of Op

Re: [RELEASE][PROPOSAL]: annoncement

On 3/10/14 12:53 PM, Rob Weir wrote: > On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 5:29 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I started to prepare the release announcement >> >> # >> The Apache OpenOffice project is pleased to announce the immediate >> availability

Re: [RELEASE][PROPOSAL]: revised annoncement

# The Apache OpenOffice project is pleased to announce the immediate availability of OpenOffice 4.1.0 Beta You can download it from our website [1]. We release Beta versions of OpenOffice to get early feedback from users. Beta versions may have more bugs than GA releases and may not be suita

Re: RIP soldep

On 3/10/14 3:41 PM, Andre Fischer wrote: > I have just removed the unused module soldep. It seems to have > contained ancient parts of the build system. I saw references to the old > build servers that, on Windows, had to be mounted on r:, n:, w:. I saw > Perl parsers for reading build.lst files

Re: [RELEASE]: final release preparation

03/10/2014 11:03 AM, schrieb Marcus (OOo): >>> Am 03/10/2014 09:40 AM, schrieb Jürgen Schmidt: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> release vote on the RC for AOO 4.1 Beta passed successful and we can >>>> continue with the final release preparation, announcemen

[ANN] Apache OpenOffice 4.1.0 Beta released

The Apache OpenOffice project is pleased to announce the immediate availability of OpenOffice 4.1.0 Beta You can download it from our website [1]. We release Beta versions of OpenOffice to get early feedback from users. Beta versions may have more bugs than GA releases and may not be suitable fo

Re: [RELEASE]: final release preparation

On 3/11/14 6:16 AM, Larry Gusaas wrote: > > > On 2014-03-10, 5:16 PM Marcus (OOo) wrote: >> Am 03/10/2014 11:56 PM, schrieb Larry Gusaas: >>> >>> >>> On 2014-03-10, 4:10 PM Marcus (OOo) wrote: >>>> Am 03/10/2014 10:44 PM, schrieb Larry Gusaas

Re: 4.1. Regressions

On 3/11/14 6:33 PM, Rainer Bielefeld wrote: > Hi, > > I think Bugzilla Help > tells it all. > There only is no common sense whether key word should be used also for > very old regressions (regression in OOo 1.0.1 compared to OOo 1.0.0), > from d

test build under macos 10.9

Hi, I have prepared a build on MacOS 10.9 to test the build env on such a newer system. The good news is that I was able to build with only one change to tweak a classpath for Oracle Java 7 (no Java from Apple). But the bad news is that it crashed immediately on my 10.7 system. Does anybody have

[RELEASE]: Beta downloads and feedback and a proposed way to the final

Hi, we have already >92,000 Beta downloads via SF, I can't say exactly how many full install sets and how many of them are language packs only. But I think the number is quite good we should be able to find serious problems if only 50% use the beta for some real testing under normal work condition

Re: Proposal to delete unused modules

On 3/13/14 9:46 AM, Andre Fischer wrote: > I would like to propose to delete two unused modules: main/splitbuild > and main/writerperfect > > - splitbuild looks like a collection of files that drive (drove) some > sort of build script to build selected parts of OpenOffice. > It may or may not be r

Re: openoffice4 not recognize different fonts

On 3/14/14 2:40 AM, panghon...@163.com wrote: > Hi, > > openoffice4 not recognize different Chinese fonts, but libreoffice4 can > identify. Annex word document. we need more information to get a more detailed picture of the problem. - which fonts, please provide the names etc. - a test document

Re: openoffice.lst, can wJRE be deleted?

On 3/14/14 8:55 AM, Andre Fischer wrote: > On 13.03.2014 23:15, Kay Schenk wrote: >> >> >> On 03/13/2014 06:49 AM, Raphael Bircher wrote: >>> Hi all >>> >>> In openoffice.lst there is still a configuration for the with JRE >>> build. We have anymor Builds with JRE, and I doubt that we will have >>>

Re: hi

Hi Rajeev, welcome at OpenOffice and with your knowledge I am thinking if you are interested in some new work for a document conversion server or something going in this direction. Designing some easy to to web service API, thinking about some infra structure that dispatch incoming calls via the

Re: [Website] Files missing

On 3/15/14 5:11 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > Andrea Pescetti wrote: http://www.openoffice.org/fr/Mac/ >> Maybe someone who can access the >> server has more information. > > Update: http://www.openoffice.org/fr/Mac/ exists on the server (thanks > to joes for investigating this on the server)

Re: [RELEASE]: Beta downloads and feedback and a proposed way to the final

On 3/17/14 1:16 AM, Dave Fisher wrote: > No links to snapshots from the website. It is ASF policy. it is a somewhat strange policy where the automated generated page is public available as well, isn't it? > > No advertising of snapshots, but we can let developers know on this list. where exactl

Re: [RELEASE]: Beta downloads and feedback and a proposed way to the final

On 3/18/14 12:34 AM, Kay Schenk wrote: > On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 4:02 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote: > >> Am 03/17/2014 06:31 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk: >> >> On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 5:33 AM, Rob Weir wrote: >>> >>> On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 3:52 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > Dave Fisher wrot

Re: there is a build break in the module of svl in ubuntu OS

On 3/19/14 9:47 AM, 赵少治 wrote: > hi, > > when do full build in ubuntu, there is a build break in the module of svl. > > here is the error info: > - > [ build LNK ] Library/fsstorage.uno.so > /u

Re: 4.1. Regressions

On 3/19/14 9:58 AM, Rainer Bielefeld wrote: > Hi, > > and we need help of an an experienced MAC user for [1], it seems we have > some MAC-Only issues in the list. > > CU > > Rainer > > > > Hyperlinks: > [1] >

[RELEASE]: update bundled dictionaries?

Hi, once again we got a very late request to update a dictionary for the upcoming release (see [1]). This is in general valid and ok but we should do that in the future a little bit earlier. Means once a new dictionary is released we should update it in our build asap. This is important to improv

Re: Better visibility for dev builds (Re: [RELEASE]: Beta downloads and feedback and a proposed way to the final)

On 3/20/14 1:22 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > Marcus (OOo) wrote: >> This means, normal users go to: >> www.openoffice.org/download/ >> Power users, dev's, qa's, etc. should be pointed to: >> openoffice.apache.org/developer-faqs.html >> So, putting text from Andrea's webpage proposal into the webpag

Re: Better visibility for dev builds (Re: [RELEASE]: Beta downloads and feedback and a proposed way to the final)

On 3/20/14 8:59 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > Jürgen Schmidt wrote: >> which builds exactly do you want to promote here and with what >> explanation? >> - build bots are fine, need no or only little explanation >> - manually built snapshot/milestones >> -- please n

Re: Better visibility for dev builds (Re: [RELEASE]: Beta downloads and feedback and a proposed way to the final)

On 3/20/14 3:13 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > Jürgen Schmidt wrote: >>> http://www.openoffice.org/download/devbuilds.html >> Development continues on trunk and completely new unrelated problems can >> come up here. > > I don't want to divert the discussion, b

Re: Extensions "wish list" placementt?

On 3/22/14 12:27 AM, Kay Schenk wrote: > On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 4:05 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > >> On 20/03/2014 Kay Schenk wrote: >> >>> Every once in a while a topic arises on this list and gets a response like >>> "that might be a good idea for an extension". >>> >> >> Right, but most of the

Re: URL-location for latest beanshell provider source code ?

On 3/24/14 4:00 PM, Rony G. Flatscher (Apache) wrote: > While going after the current implementation of a script provider, I would > like to target the > beanshell implemantion. > > Found an URL (via the web) pointing to: > > >

Re: German authorities want to improve AOO - LibO

On 3/24/14 5:09 PM, Louis Suárez-Potts wrote: > Hi, > On 2014-03-24, at 06:18, Rainer Bielefeld > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> is someone from Germany observing this? >> >> > I had a discussion on improving OO

Re: Extensions "wish list" placementt?

On 3/24/14 5:49 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: > On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 12:24 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > >> On 3/22/14 12:27 AM, Kay Schenk wrote: >>> On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 4:05 PM, Andrea Pescetti >> wrote: >>> >>>> On 20/03/2014 Kay Schenk wrote: &g

Re: Reason found for crash, a regression (Re: Does it make sense to raise a showstopper for MacOSX ?

ncidence that the Java thread where the crash occurs > is at the same time the > awt thread. That thread is not in jeopardy with the MacOSX AppKit thread. Cf. > <http://searchcode.com/codesearch/view/18259454> for > "com.sun.star.script.framework.provider. > SwingInvocation

Re: German authorities want to improve AOO - LibO

On 3/25/14 2:58 PM, Louis Suárez-Potts wrote: > Hi, > > On 2014-03-25, at 04:22, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > >> On 3/24/14 5:09 PM, Louis Suárez-Potts wrote: >>> Hi, >>> On 2014-03-24, at 06:18, Rainer Bielefeld >>> wrote: >>> >>>>

Re: AOO 4.1 Beta Survey Results

On 3/25/14 7:52 PM, Rob Weir wrote: > Responses to the dev mailing list only, please, so we can avoid > fragmenting the discussion. thank you for all the work on the survey, I think nit is very useful more comments below > > Regards, > > -Rob > > > 133 responses > > "Where did you first hea

Re: Pre-release IRC+video informal meeting?

On 3/27/14 1:59 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > I proposed this in another thread a couple weeks ago, but I didn't > follow up. > > Is there interest for a "live" (meaning: IRC + video, like Google > Hangouts or similar) meeting to make sure that we (developers, QA, > Localization, Documentation, web

[RELEASE]: propose refined schedule

Hi, *** follow up discussion please on the the dev list only *** I think we are going smoothly but straight forward to the AOO 4.1 release. By the way until today we have >208.000 downloads of the Beta. Only one requested showstopper [1] is open that is not really a showstopper from my perspecti

Re: [RELEASE]: propose refined schedule

On 3/27/14 11:28 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: > oops! sorry about the blank note...see comments below > > > On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 3:24 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: > >> >> >> >> On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 9:57 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: >> >>> Hi, >&

Re: 4.1.0_release_blocker requested: [Issue 124556] Broken SDK environment

On 3/30/14 1:03 PM, bugzi...@apache.org wrote: > Ariel Constenla-Haile has asked for > 4.1.0_release_blocker: > Issue 124556: Broken SDK environment > https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=124556 > > > --- Additional Comments from Ariel Constenla-Haile > - Install AOO 4.1.0 Beta an

Re: 4.1.0_release_blocker requested: [Issue 124482] InputBox-es don't refresh itself in gnome shell/Adwaita theme

On 3/29/14 12:52 PM, bugzi...@apache.org wrote: > Andrea Pescetti has asked for 4.1.0_release_blocker: > Issue 124482: InputBox-es don't refresh itself in gnome shell/Adwaita theme > https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=124482 > > > --- Additional Comments from Andrea Pescetti > S

Re: Pre-release IRC+video informal meeting?

On 3/29/14 5:29 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: > > > Sent from my iPhone > >> On Mar 29, 2014, at 6:44 AM, Rob Weir wrote: >> >>> On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 7:14 AM, Andrea Pescetti >>> wrote: >>>> On 27/03/2014 Jürgen Schmidt wrote: >>>&g

Problems on trunk ...

Hi, we have noticed some serious problems on trunk and I recommend not to use the current trunk for any testing. It simply doesn't make sense and we are analyzing the problem ... Juergen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr..

Re: Pre-release IRC+video informal meeting?

On 3/31/14 10:37 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > On 3/29/14 5:29 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: >> >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >>> On Mar 29, 2014, at 6:44 AM, Rob Weir wrote: >>> >>>> On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 7:14 AM, Andrea Pescetti >>>&g

[RELEASE]: propose AOO 4.1.0 RC

Hi, FOLLOW UP discussion please on the dev list!!! Last week I proposed a final schedule for our upcoming AOO 4.1 release. We are a little bit behind because the fact that we had to fix some further critical issues. Nevertheless I would like to propose a first RC based on revision 1583666 from th

Re: [RELEASE]: propose AOO 4.1.0 RC

I hope that nobody have a problem with the revision number ...666 and the build date April 1th ;-) I find it funny and you can expect a very hot version ... On 4/2/14 3:16 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > Hi, > > FOLLOW UP discussion please on the dev list!!! > > Last week I p

Re: Anything we can do about premature redistribution?

On 4/2/14 11:19 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote: > Am 04/02/2014 09:22 PM, schrieb Roberto Galoppini: >> 2014-04-02 21:15 GMT+02:00 Marcus (OOo): >> >>> Am 04/02/2014 06:20 PM, schrieb Roberto Galoppini: >>> >>> 2014-04-01 21:30 GMT+02:00 Marcus (OOo): Am 03/31/2014 11:56 PM, schrieb Kay Schen

[VOTE]: Release Apache OpenOffice 4.1.0 (RC)

Hi all, this is a call for vote on releasing the available release candidate (RC) as Apache OpenOffice 4.1.0. Apache OpenOffice 4.1 is a minor update with many bugfixes and at least 2 major improvements. It's the first version where we have the iAccessibility2 support integrated and available. A

Re: Anything we can do about premature redistribution?

On 4/3/14 12:09 PM, Roberto Galoppini wrote: > 2014-04-03 8:52 GMT+02:00 Jürgen Schmidt : > >> On 4/2/14 11:19 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote: >>> Am 04/02/2014 09:22 PM, schrieb Roberto Galoppini: >>>> 2014-04-02 21:15 GMT+02:00 Marcus (OOo): >>>> >>&g

Re: [VOTE]: Release Apache OpenOffice 4.1.0 (RC)

. Juergen On 4/3/14 9:56 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > Hi all, > > this is a call for vote on releasing the available release candidate > (RC) as Apache OpenOffice 4.1.0. > > Apache OpenOffice 4.1 is a minor update with many bugfixes and at least > 2 major improvements. It'

Re: [RELEASE]: propose AOO 4.1.0 RC

On 4/3/14 4:42 PM, Regina Henschel wrote: > Hi Jürgen, > > Jürgen Schmidt schrieb: >> Hi, >> >> FOLLOW UP discussion please on the dev list!!! >> >> Last week I proposed a final schedule for our upcoming AOO 4.1 release. >> We are a little bit be

Re: [RELEASE]: propose AOO 4.1.0 RC

On 4/3/14 5:02 PM, Regina Henschel wrote: > Hi Jürgen, > > Jürgen Schmidt schrieb: >> On 4/3/14 4:42 PM, Regina Henschel wrote: >>> Hi Jürgen, >>> >>> Jürgen Schmidt schrieb: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> FOLLOW UP discussion ple

Re: [RELEASE]: propose AOO 4.1.0 RC

potential 4.2 or 4.1.1 can't be applied to a patched 4.0.1. Juergen On 4/2/14 3:16 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > Hi, > > FOLLOW UP discussion please on the dev list!!! > > Last week I proposed a final schedule for our upcoming AOO 4.1 release. > We are a little bit behind because

Re: [RELEASE]: propose AOO 4.1.0 RC

On 4/3/14 5:34 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > ATTENTION: we have to repackage the windows builds, the vote will > continue because we change nothing, just repackage the install packages > > I have built with the release=t flag to be prepared for future patches > that will allow us

Re: [RELEASE]: propose AOO 4.1.0 RC

On 4/3/14 5:43 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > On 4/3/14 5:34 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: >> ATTENTION: we have to repackage the windows builds, the vote will >> continue because we change nothing, just repackage the install packages >> >> I have built with the release=t fla

Re: [RELEASE]: propose AOO 4.1.0 RC

On 4/3/14 6:06 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > On 4/3/14 5:43 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: >> On 4/3/14 5:34 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: >>> ATTENTION: we have to repackage the windows builds, the vote will >>> continue because we change nothing, just repackage the install pa

[RESULT][VOTE]: Release Apache OpenOffice 4.1.0 (RC)

further RC. [1] https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=124599 [2] https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=124607 On 4/3/14 9:56 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > Hi all, > > this is a call for vote on releasing the available release candidate > (RC) as Apache OpenOffice 4.1.0.

[RELEASE]: propose a second RC on revision 1585426

Hi, most of you have already noticed that we had found some serious issues in our RC build. That means we had to fix this issues and have to prepare a new RC2 based on revision 1585426 from AOO 410 branch. The RC2 build is currently ongoing and will be available soon. Besides the 2 critical issu

[VOTE]: Release Apache OpenOffice 4.1.0 (RC2)

Hi all, this is a call for vote on releasing the available release candidate (RC2) as Apache OpenOffice 4.1.0. Apache OpenOffice 4.1 is a minor update with many bugfixes and at least 2 major improvements. It's the first version where we have the iAccessibility2 support integrated and available.

Re: [RELEASE]: propose a second RC on revision 1585426

On 4/8/14 12:32 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > On 07/04/2014 Jürgen Schmidt wrote: >> The RC2 build is currently ongoing and will be available soon. >> Besides the 2 critical issues [1] and [2] we have integrated 2 further >> issues. ... [4] is an uncritical improvement to sup

Re: [RELEASE]: propose a second RC on revision 1585426

On 4/8/14 1:35 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > On 4/8/14 12:32 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: >> On 07/04/2014 Jürgen Schmidt wrote: >>> The RC2 build is currently ongoing and will be available soon. >>> Besides the 2 critical issues [1] and [2] we have integrated 2 furthe

Re: EXTERNAL: Re: Extension Manager Add Crashes

On 4/8/14 11:49 PM, Steele, Raymond wrote: > I installed the extension located at the following link with success, so what > is wrong with my extension > > http://extensions.openoffice.org/en/project/english-dictionaries-apache-openoffice it's difficult to say without having the code, y

Re: Is there a mistake for the RC2 version

On 4/9/14 4:56 AM, 赵少治 wrote: > hi, > > I have downloaded the redhat 64 RC2 install package from > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds > but I found the version is the old value:1583666. > > Is there a mistake for the version? > Marcus has see

Re: [VOTE]: Release Apache OpenOffice 4.1.0 (RC2)

report potential problems. A new RC 3 build will be prepared later this week. Juergen On 4/8/14 11:00 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > Hi all, > > this is a call for vote on releasing the available release candidate > (RC2) as Apache OpenOffice 4.1.0. > > Apache OpenOffice 4.1 is a

Re: [Issue 31880] drag and drop from nautilus file manager not functional

On 4/9/14 9:21 PM, Mathias Röllig wrote: > Hello! > > By writing a new issue I found that is was reported 10 years ago in > https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=31880 > > This issue is CLOSED FIXED for OOo2.0. > > Last comment is "Verified in mws src680_m63." > > But it doesn't work 10

Re: ApacheCon Denver, genLang and buildsystem talk.

On 4/10/14 5:40 AM, jan i wrote: > Hi > > For those interested, my presentations around AOO can be found at > http://people.apache.org/~jani/genlang.pdf do you have any concrete time plan for the integration of genLang in AOOs build env? It would be a huge step forward > http://people.apache.org

Re: [VOTE]: Release Apache OpenOffice 4.1.0 (RC2)

On 4/9/14 5:20 PM, Rob Weir wrote: >> On Apr 9, 2014, at 8:46 AM, "Jürgen Schmidt" wrote: >> >> We found a new showstopper 124639 and have to prepare a new RC 3. >> > > IMHO it would be best if, in such cases, the Release Manager formally > propose to

[CANCELED][VOTE]: Release Apache OpenOffice 4.1.0 (RC2)

/show_bug.cgi?id=124636 I am not sure if it is really a showstopper it is broken since 4.0. Well the related code is sub optimal to say it careful and the behaviour changed indirectly because of other changes. Juergen On 4/8/14 11:00 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > Hi all, > > this is a call fo

Re: EXTERNAL: Re: Extension Manager Add Crashes

On 4/11/14 1:11 AM, Steele, Raymond wrote: > The stack trace at the crash does lead me down into that area of the code. > > [1] cpp_vtable_call(nFunctionIndex = 3, nVtableOffset = 0, pCallStack > =0xe90acea8, nRegReturn = -1649035904490436800LL) in cpp2uno.cxx [2] > privateSnippetExecutorGeneral

[RELEASE]: propose RC3 on revision 1586584

Hi, I would like to propose a new RC3 based on revision 1586584 of our AOO410 release branch. Integrated fixes for https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=124617 https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=124639 The fix for https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=124636 is not int

[RELEASE]: RC3 available

Hi, the RC3 build (rev. 1586584) is uploading and most of the files are already available. Only 32 bit language packs for Linux are currently missing. I plan to start a vote later today but would like to invite everybody to test the new build already ... https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/displ

Re: Close, but not quite 100 million...

On 4/15/14 11:12 AM, Roberto Galoppini wrote: > Few hours ago we went live with a countdown counter on Apache OpenOffice > project page at SourceForge, check it out: > https://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/ > > This is a brand new feature we created for Apache OpenOffice 100 M mark

[PROPOSAL]: drop tar.gz source release, 1 of 3 formats

Hi, currently we are preparing 3 src releases packages with the same content. For example: apache-openoffice-4.1.0-r1586584-src.tar.bz2 -> size 217635696 apache-openoffice-4.1.0-r1586584-src.tar.gz -> size 287122205 apache-openoffice-4.1.0-r1586584-src.zip -> size 335796134 The first 2 are

Re: [PROPOSAL]: drop tar.gz source release, 1 of 3 formats

On 4/15/14 1:57 PM, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote: > Jürgen Schmidt schrieb: >> Hi, >> >> currently we are preparing 3 src releases packages with the same content. >> >> For example: >> >> apache-openoffice-4.1.0-r1586584-src.tar.bz2 -> si

[SOURCE]: build errors on MacOS

Hi, I thought it can be useful to do a build on MacOS to ensure that it sill works on this platform ... The latest fixes for FreeBSD in coinmp break the build ... When I have more time I will try to fix it. I would recommend to be careful with fixes for not release relevant platforms. Juergen -

Re: [RELEASE] Availability of machines for binary builds

On 24/07/15 18:36, jan i wrote: > On Friday, July 24, 2015, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > >> On 18/07/2015 Davide Dozza wrote: >> >>> I have a vm with visual studio express 2008 I use to build AOO for >>> win7. It is accessible from Internet. I can support the building >>> process. >>> >> >> I expecte

Re: [SOURCE]: build errors on MacOS

On 27/07/15 17:40, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > Hi, > > I thought it can be useful to do a build on MacOS to ensure that it sill > works on this platform ... > > The latest fixes for FreeBSD in coinmp break the build ... When I have > more time I will try to fix it. I would re

Re: [SOURCE]: build errors on MacOS

On 29/07/15 02:06, Jose R R wrote: > Niltze, Jürgen- > > > Building on Debian AMD66, after resolving multiple issues, build --all > *always* halts "at recompile with -fPIC" > > On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 4:06 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: >> On 27/07/15 17:40, Jü

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >