>> Greetings, dear AOO community.
>>
>> Please note first that this message is not supposed to be flaimbait or
>> trolling of any kind.
>
>It is. Have a nice day.
Well it is not! I am Solaris user and sometime ago I tried to compile
OpenOffice, when
in fact it should compile on Solaris out-of-th
> >
> > The hyphenation and other formatting information is on the Hunspell site
> > https://hunspell.github.io/
> >
Actually this is the spelling assistant not the hyphenator. This module is
described in the following URL:
https://www.openoffice.org/lingucomponent/hyphenator.html
There I rea
>
> The hyphenation and other formatting information is on the Hunspell site
> https://hunspell.github.io/
>
Thank yoy very much!
A.S.
--
Apostolos Syropoulos
Xanthi, Greece
>Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2016 14:58:34 -0400
> From: lui...@gmail.com
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Spelling of Ancient Greek
>
>
> louis=C2=A0
>
Which means what? BTW, let me ask again: Where are the
hyphenation files and how they are created?
A.S.
--
Apostolos Syropoulos
Xanthi
Hello,
Suppose i would like to prepare a document in ancient Greek using AOO.
Naturally, I would like to enable hyphenation. To the best of my knowledge,
AOO is borrowing UTF-8 hyphenation patterns that are used in the TeX world.
If this is true, could you please let me know how can I create a hyp
>
> yes, that's nice. But you shouldn't commit fixes without a possibility
> to test if it was good. Would you? ;-)
>
First I did this in the past. Please see
https://asyropoulos.wordpress.com/2014/02/05/compiling-openoffice4/
At that time I was sure the patches would find their way to source
>
> one problem of integrating patches is that you need to test them if the
> trunk builds are still OK or if some adjustments are necessary. However,
> AFAIK no developer has a Solaris machine under the desk and therefore
> it's not a good idea to commit fixes when you don't know what the
> r
> > We have a number of old Solaris related build issues that
> > could use some testing.
> >
> > https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=125361
> > https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=125362
> > https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=125364
> > https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=
>
> Joerg Schmidt shared an interesting whitepaper from Microsoft "White
> Paper: OpenOffice / LibreOffice Evaluation Criteria" on the dev-de list.
>
> I found it interesting and thought it can be of interest for others here
> as well.
>
> Juergen
>
>
> http://www.whymicrosoft.com/see-why/open
>
> We would need Apostolos to agree to contribute under the Apache
> License 2.0 as well, since this is based on his work. (Or did he
> already contribute the patches from his blog?) For example, it would
> be fine if he just sent a note to the mailing list, pointing to the
> blog posts, and sa
> -Original Message-
> From: Απόστολος Συρόπουλος [mailto:asyropoulos...@hotmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2014 12:24 AM
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: EXTERNAL: RE: NSS Module
>
> Hello,
>
> I have found a "solution" to this and oth
Hello,
I have found a "solution" to this and other problems:
http://asyropoulos.wordpress.com/2014/02/05/compiling-openoffice4/
Of course the final binaries do nor run but this is something I will
resume working on this autumn.
A.S.
--
Apostolos Syropoulos
Xanthi, Greece
http://asyropoulos.eu
strange because I can save files which are correct files. In my case the
problem is that the system complains that it cannot save while it actually
does. Also I can open and save doc files but I cannot open XML-based files.
A.S.
> From: raymond.ste...@lmco.com
> To: a...@openoffice.apache.org;
Hello,
I have recently built OpenOffice on Solaris. There are still some problems which
I try to sort out. One of them is that the panel with the File, Edit, etc menues
is empty and there are no icons on panel under this. In fact the whole upper
panel
is empty. Could you please let me know which
some
modifications.
Best regards,
Apostolos
> Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 13:07:29 +0100
> From: awf@gmail.com
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Solaris GCC or Sun Studio?
>
> On 07.02.2014 11:32, Απόστολος Συρόπουλος wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > As f
Hello,
As far it regards Solaris,I have noticed that the building scripts of OpenOffice
assume that one is building with Sun Studio. This compiler is a bit outdated
and of course GCC is available for most platforms. Since LibreOffice has
removed support for Sun Studio, I guess it would be a goof i
>
> This might also be a re-occurrence of a missing library or symbol.
>
After inspecting file
aoo4/main/instsetoo_native/unxsogi.pro/Apache_OpenOffice/installed/logging/en-US/log_AOO410_en-US.log
I found out that it was not possible to execute unopkg just because it picked
the system
libicuuc
Hello Herbert,
> >[...]
> > + // preserve potential 128bit stack alignment
>
> I'm not sure whether the SPARCv9 ABI spec is relevant for your build
> environment, but it mentions this 16byte stack alignment in [1] as
> something new. Maybe the other changes may be relevant too to solve t
>
> which configure options did you use?
>
Hello,
Here is how I have configured OpenOffice:
$ export CONFIG_SHELL=/bin/bash
$ export LD_ALTEXEC=/opt/gnu/bin/gld
$ PATH=/opt/gnu/ant/bin:/opt/gnu/perl5/5.16.3/bin:$PATH
$ export ANT_HOME=/opt/gnu/ant/
$ export JAVA_HOME=/usr/jdk/jdk1.7.0
$ autoc
Hello,
I have compiled all OpenOffice modules and now building stops as follows:
$ build --all:instsetoo_native
build -- version: 275224
=
Building module instsetoo_native
=
Entering
/extra/sources/OpenOffice/aoo4/main/instsetoo_native/inc_openoffice/unix
Entering
/
Hello,
After a number of efforts I have finally managed to find the proper patch for
file bridges/source/cpp_uno/gcc3_solaris_intel/uno2cpp.cxx and so
to build a functional bridge for Solaris. Previously, I could not build
the testtools module but now they compile just fine. Here is the patch:
--
>
> > There is one person (Apostols Syropoulos) trying to compile the
> latest version 4.0, but having trouble.
>
> Then there are at least 2. I've tried and so far failed to compile 4.0.
> [I'm using self built 3.4.1]
>
Hello,
What compiler are you using? I used gcc 4.7.2 and now I have s
>
> Ouch! None of the exception stuff works in your new build. That is a
> hard nut to crack...
>
I have recompiled the libraries used by uno with debugging info and I have
enabled this time
-fno-use-cxa-atexit. Now it dumps core and here is what I get with gdb:
gdb ../../../solver/410/unxsog
Hello,
In previous messages I reported my efforts to compile OpenOffice on
OpenSolaris. Since I thought
that certain things were not properly compiled, I recompiled everything and now
compilation
stops with the message that follows. Note that that I have compled everything
with -std=c++11
and
> Wonderful. Getting there means that both the dmake and the gbuild
> systems worked and the UNO bridge on this platform is doing alright.
> These are all critical steps on new (or occassionally unmaintained)
> platforms. With a bit of luck you should be able to build the remainder
> of AOO and hav
I spooke too soon. After adding
COM:=GCC
COMNAME:=gcc3
into main/solenv/inc/tg_compv.mk
the required library, that is, libgcc3_uno.so, was build
and compilation of i18npool finished successfully.
A.S.
--
Apostols Syropoulos
Xanthi, Greece
> > Google returns nothing about libg++_uno...
>
> A library like that should be automatically built as one of the bridges
> in main/bridge/source/cppu_uno/. In your case the gcc3_solaris_intel
> bridge might be a good candidate but as the name says it probably builds
> a libgcc3_uno.so instead
>
> Anyway, if we're lucky the problem is just a missing library or the failed
> loading
> of a library. In that case the patch below might help you to analyze the
> problem:
>
Indeed the problem is a missing library:
: &&
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/extra/sources/OpenOffice/aoo4/main/solver/410/un
Hello,
While building i18npool the process stops with the follwoing error message:
Entering /extra/sources/OpenOffice/aoo4/main/i18npool/source/localedata/data
: &&
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/extra/sources/OpenOffice/aoo4/main/solver/410/unxsogi.pro/lib${LD_LIBRARY_PATH:+:${LD_LIBRARY_PATH}}
../../
Hello Herbert,
Thank you very much for the patch. Currently, I am trying to finish the build
i18npool.
I have applied the patch but I am getting some "strange" errors:
[ build CXX ] comphelper/source/misc/docpasswordhelper
In file included from
/extra/sources/OpenOffice/aoo4/main/solver/410/unx
I have solved the problem by adding the line
#undef __EXTENSIONS__
in file main/solver/410/unxsogi.pro/inc/comphelper/locale.hxx
Whether this is a "valid" solution or not, I have no idea...
Best,
A.S.
--
Apostols Syropoulos
Xanthi, Greece
Hello,
While compiling comphelper under Solaris, compilation stopped with the
following error message:
In file included from
/extra/sources/OpenOffice/aoo4/main/comphelper/source/misc/locale.cxx:26:0:
/extra/sources/OpenOffice/aoo4/main/solver/410/unxsogi.pro/inc/comphelper/locale.hxx:74:29:
e
>
> Many of those projects have RTTI or C++ exceptions disabled, so problems
> with typeinfo visibility may not show up there.
>
I have figured out that I need to use GCC with the Solaris linker to avoid all
these problems. BTW, the GCC people suggest people who use their
compiler on Solaris to
>
> Speaking of symbol visibility on unxsogi platforms there is an
> interesting comment in
> main/solenv/inc/unxsogi.mk
> regarding that topic. In
> main/sal/inc/sal/types.h
> In that file there is some magic going on with that visibility and I'm
> quite sure that the Solaris+gcc sp
>
> You are making great progress! Congratulations!
>
Thank you Herbert!
>
> I wouldn't be surprised if exporting all the symbols of this library
> would work just as well. The reduction of the exported symbols to just
> the method mentioned above and its parameter types may just be cosmetic.
Dear Herbert,
>
> I have to admit that I have no clue about libxmlsec's detailed configure
> requirements, so I'm afraid I can't help here much. But with the
> knowledge that licrypto comes from openssl, with libxmlsec complaining
> about the one openssl is providing maybe some changed linker or
Hello Herbert,
>
> Did it build with these configure options? Except for the minor nit that
> --with-openssl is set twice, it looks good to me. The option has been
> set as "no" and as "/usr", but AFAIK the "no" should win.
>
The problem is that when configuring without the "/usr" value, the
Hello,
I am still struggling... Now I was trying to build libxmlsec and the
configuration parameters did not give the expected result. I had
to enter manually the following command
./configure ADDCFLAGS= CPPFLAGS= --with-pic --disable-shared
--disable-crypto-dl --with-libxslt=no --with-openssl=n
>
> I suggest to look into main/sal/osl/unx/util.c. The check for a
> __SUNPRO_C define in line 316 looks suspicious. Is this define still
> active in newer compilers for your platform? If not please change the
> check so that this part of the code becomes active.
>
> You also said you switche
After reading the reply by jan I. I decided to try again with GCC.
Now, compilation proceeds with no stupid problems as before.
BTW, main/soltools/adjustvisibility/adjustvisibility.c does not
compile with g++ but it compiles with CC so this is the only
thing I had to do manually. However, now comp
Hello again,
I have downloaded the source code and I have reconfigured etc.
What I have observed so far is that there are a number of
utilities that consist of C and C++ source files. In all these cases,
the build script uses the C compile and so obviously it fails to build
the object files. For
>
> This is really strange since the Mozilla dependency was removed a few weeks
> ago. At the least, you should do an svn update. Then, if I were you, maybe
> get into /main, do dmake clean, and reconfigure.
>
Thanks for the information! BTW, I was trying to compile the source tar-ball...
I am
> The quoted -features=rvalueref compiler option is probably caused by the
> ARCH_FLAGS define in main/solenv/inc/unxsoli4.mk
> I suggest to unquote it. But why did it work for others? Did dmake
> unquote automatically at one time?
>
I have no idea :-( However, I have managed to go further and
>
> I dont know how you managed to get that directory.
>
I was manually building inside this folder...
> the build system never add files or changes in the source directories. When
> I look in
> main/soltools/mkdepend on my system (after a complete build):
>
> cd mkdepend/
> ls
> collectdircon
> As with any makefile, the whole chain is checked, and when you are in
> soltools/mkdepend it check the object files against the source, and the exe
> against the object files.
>
> I work on changing the build system, and I often "cheat" the make system by
> doing "touch ", that way its not rebu
Hello,
I have come to the conclusion that OpenOffice cannot be configured (at least
easily)
to compile with GNU g++ under Solaris. So I have tried Solaris Studio. Now I am
getting the following error message:
=
Building module soltools
=
Entering /extra/sources/OpenOffi
>
> normally you need to run autoconf before configure
>
ΟΚ I was just copying/pasting some info from my notes and of course
I forgot to mention that I did the autoconf and bootstrap steps. My bad.
>
> it cannot find your compiler, maybe because you did not run bootstrap.
>
No I did run bootst
Hello,
Since there is no binary package for any version of Solaris x86, I am trying to
compile OpenOffice on OpenSolaris in the hope that the resulting binaries
will work in later versions.
I have downloaded the source code and I did the following:
$ export LD_ALTEXEC=/usr/bin/gld
$ export
48 matches
Mail list logo
