Re: Building AOO under Debian9
Hi Mechtilde, On Sun, Nov 10, 2019 at 5:23 AM Mechtilde wrote: > > Hello again, > > I did a recent git pull AOO42X and try to build it under Debian 9. > > It didn't build. it fails with error in main/cui/Library_cui.mk:37 > > If I patched it as before then it builds succesfully. > > Either we need a switch for Debian 9 and may be newer > distribution/versions or we need another fix. The contents of BUILD_VER_STRING might be the problem, attach your LinuxX86-64Env.Set.sh and someone may reproduce the error. Regards -- Ariel Constenla-Haile La Plata, Buenos Aires Argentina - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: [openoffice] 03/03: Fixes from upstream for newer GCC
Hi Don, On Sat, Nov 2, 2019 at 3:09 PM Don Lewis wrote: > What version do we need for python 3? This page https://devguide.python.org/setup/#windows tells VS 2017. aoo has a lot of external dependencies, I guess that switching to this version will force updating to newer versions (something not that trivial, thinking of ICU for example). Regards -- Ariel Constenla-Haile La Plata, Buenos Aires Argentina - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: [openoffice] 03/03: Fixes from upstream for newer GCC
On Sat, Nov 2, 2019 at 5:53 AM Peter Kovacs wrote: > On Windows the issue is that the Git() command checks out the data at a > position where cygwin does not see it. > > On the other hand if I pass the command directly no checkout happens. It's always useful to see the logs: https://ci.apache.org/builders/openoffice-win7/builds/37/steps/git%20clone%20under%20cygwin/logs/stdio + cd /home/buildslave ... + git clone --single-branch --branch trunk https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice.git build fatal: destination path 'build' already exists and is not an empty directory. You have to cd to the right dir, quite strange some line below you seem to do so... You also removed the svn revision stuff but left got_revision. It looks like the underlying OS was changed from Win7 32 bits to Win10 64 bits, that's good news, the buildbot is capable of building releases. Quite strange you changed the name (aoo - openoffice) but not the win7 ;) Now the buildbot stops due to missing NASM https://ci.apache.org/builders/openoffice-win7/builds/40/steps/configure/logs/stdio checking nasm.exe assembler path... checking for nasm.exe... no configure: error: NASM is required to build on Windows, please install or use --with-nasm-home program finished with exit code 1 I don't have any machine with Windows to build, so please someone building master/trunk on Windows (Matthias?) open a jira ticket requesting to install NASM (once installed, the shell command should include the new switch). Regards -- Ariel Constenla-Haile La Plata, Buenos Aires Argentina - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Building AOO42X under Debian9
Hi Mechtilde, On Sat, Nov 2, 2019 at 11:49 AM Mechtilde wrote: > > Hello Ariel, > > I have 22 cores. What can be good values for build --all? It's just a question of doing maths: if I have 6 cores: -P3 -- -P2 = 3 modules in parallel, 2 jobs per module -P2 -- -P3 = 2 modules in parallel, 3 jobs per module WIth 22 cores, you can try -P5 -- -P4. But expect that build system might be broken. Regards -- Ariel Constenla-Haile La Plata, Buenos Aires Argentina - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Building AOO42X under Debian9
Hi Mechtilde, On Sat, Nov 2, 2019 at 2:53 AM Mechtilde wrote: > > I can sort of reproduce this, but with other modules, always if I > > build with a single process; I guess you are building with > > build --all > > yes I do so > > without the -P switch. > > I use build --all -P12 -- -P12 > > we have sponsoring of a multicore maschine to build AOO > > What is the right configuration to build with as much Cores as possible? It depends on how many cores you have, because the first -PN is for build.pl, it will process N modules at the same time, the second -PN is passed to (d)make. Anyway, it should work with a single process; something is really broken: drawinglayer is a dependency for svx, it should be built first. Regards -- Ariel Constenla-Haile La Plata, Buenos Aires Argentina - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: [openoffice] 03/03: Fixes from upstream for newer GCC
On Sat, Nov 2, 2019 at 5:53 AM Peter Kovacs wrote: > > I fixed the git statements on Linux. However now perl moduls are > missing. I have asked infra to fix it. Maybe I miss some pointers. Last time I added packages via puppet (*), but things changed since then, I asked on the INFRA issue. Is there a way to contact infra more directly? (*) https://github.com/apache/infrastructure-puppet/commit/66422bb0e21c204a6118e5bba15f028b92fe4e7a Regards -- Ariel Constenla-Haile La Plata, Buenos Aires Argentina - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: [openoffice] 03/03: Fixes from upstream for newer GCC
Hi Don, On Fri, Nov 1, 2019 at 8:06 PM Don Lewis wrote: > nss really needs to be updated. Unfortunately very recent versions > can't be built with some of the ancient compilers that we are stuck with > (like the old version of Visual C++ that we use for 32-bit Windows > builds), or at least not without an insane amount of patching. Python 2 is going EOL on January 1 2020 https://www.python.org/doc/sunset-python-2/ https://pythonclock.org/ But Python 3 needs a more recent Visual Studio https://devguide.python.org/setup/#windows Unless AOO drops support for Python, updating the version of the Windows compiler seems a priority, python clock is ticking. > I don't know if gcc on CentOS 6 is also a problem. It seems Jim was building 4.1.7 on CentOS 5 and 4.2 on 7 Regards -- Ariel Constenla-Haile La Plata, Buenos Aires Argentina - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Building AOO42X under Debian9
Hi Mechtilde, On Fri, Nov 1, 2019 at 6:31 AM Mechtilde wrote: > I tried o build the recent branch AOO42X under Debian 9. It stopped at > building svx. I can sort of reproduce this, but with other modules, always if I build with a single process; I guess you are building with build --all without the -P switch. It looks like something is broken with the modules dependencies. Regards -- Ariel Constenla-Haile La Plata, Buenos Aires Argentina - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: [openoffice] 03/03: Fixes from upstream for newer GCC
Hi Matthias, On Fri, Nov 1, 2019 at 6:17 AM Matthias Seidel wrote: > C:/Source/openoffice/main/nss/wntmsci12.pro/misc/build/nss-3.25/nss/cmd/signtool/sign.c(85) > : warning C4013: 'snprintf' undefined; assuming extern returning int Try with commit 60374adc815ee4dfe39410d357c22db295ee1026 Are the buildbots dead? Regards -- Ariel Constenla-Haile La Plata, Buenos Aires Argentina - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Building AOO with Java11
Hello Mechtilde, On Sun, Oct 27, 2019 at 9:13 AM Mechtilde wrote: > I cherry-picked it in a local test branch for AOO42X too. > > Then I tried a build > > I doesn't build. It looks for ../8.3.0/utility. There is only ../8/utility Can you paste the output? (In the meantime, I started building AOO42X) Regards -- Ariel Constenla-Haile La Plata, Buenos Aires Argentina - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Building AOO with Java11
Hello Mechtilde, On Sun, Oct 27, 2019 at 3:54 AM Mechtilde wrote: > > The logic in this boost header is quite broken, I guess you don't have > > a /usr/include/c++/9.2.1. > > On Debian 10 (Buster) I only have /usr/include/c++/8/ > > On the next upcomming release (Debian 11 named Bullseye) it will bei gcc 9 > > > > > On Fedora 30 there is only /usr/include/c++/9 > > On Debian 8 there is a symlink /usr/include/c++/4.9.2 pointing to 4.9. > > > > Try the attached patch. > > Should the patch also work with gcc 8? I committed the change in trunk and cherry-picked this and other fixes in AOO418, both build now with gcc 9 so I guess they should build with gcc 8, give it a try and let me know. (Didn't have the time to build AOO42X yet) Regards -- Ariel Constenla-Haile La Plata, Buenos Aires Argentina - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: OpenGrok
Hi *, On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 4:29 PM Matthias Seidel wrote: > Yes, I think Ariel can do this as he has root access. > > And https redirection can be done via .htaccess file in web root (or > configured somewhere in the web server). I guess this is done via puppet, see for example https://github.com/apache/infrastructure-puppet/blob/deployment/data/nodes/ooo-forums3-vm.apache.org.yaml#L90 I'll have to ask infra how to do that ;) Regards -- Ariel Constenla-Haile La Plata, Buenos Aires Argentina - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Building AOO with Java11
Hi Mechtilde, On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 8:46 AM Mechtilde wrote: > > Hello > > I try to build AOO with Java 11 under Debian 10. > > It stops at xml2cmp. > > I add a screenshot. (C&P dosn't work for me from KVM) In file included from /home/ariel/aoo/build/src/branch-aoo418/main/solver/418/unxlngx6.pro/inc/boost/tr1/tr1/vector:16, from /home/ariel/aoo/build/src/branch-aoo418/main/solver/418/unxlngx6.pro/inc/stl/vector:31, from /home/ariel/aoo/build/src/branch-aoo418/main/xml2cmp/source/finder/dependy.hxx:28, from /home/ariel/aoo/build/src/branch-aoo418/main/xml2cmp/source/finder/dependy.cxx:25: /home/ariel/aoo/build/src/branch-aoo418/main/solver/418/unxlngx6.pro/inc/boost/tr1/detail/config_all.hpp:103:44: fatal error: ../9.2.1/utility: No such file or directory 103 | #define BOOST_TR1_STD_HEADER(name) <../__GNUC__.__GNUC_MINOR__.__GNUC_PATCHLEVEL__/name> |^ compilation terminated. The logic in this boost header is quite broken, I guess you don't have a /usr/include/c++/9.2.1. On Fedora 30 there is only /usr/include/c++/9 On Debian 8 there is a symlink /usr/include/c++/4.9.2 pointing to 4.9. Try the attached patch. Regards -- Ariel Constenla-Haile La Plata, Buenos Aires Argentina diff --git a/main/stlport/systemstl/list b/main/stlport/systemstl/list index 283880bec..58ee3eadf 100644 --- a/main/stlport/systemstl/list +++ b/main/stlport/systemstl/list @@ -25,6 +25,8 @@ #ifdef HAVE_STL_INCLUDE_PATH // TODO: use computed include file name #include_next +#elif defined(__cplusplus) && (__cplusplus >= 201103L) + #include_next #elif defined(_MSC_VER) #include <../../VC/include/list> // MSVC's list would cause a lot of expression-result-unused warnings diff --git a/main/stlport/systemstl/map b/main/stlport/systemstl/map index 13f783b43..ec1c3db03 100644 --- a/main/stlport/systemstl/map +++ b/main/stlport/systemstl/map @@ -25,6 +25,8 @@ #ifdef HAVE_STL_INCLUDE_PATH // TODO: use computed include file name #include_next +#elif defined(__cplusplus) && (__cplusplus >= 201103L) +#include_next #elif defined(_MSC_VER) #include <../../VC/include/map> #else // fall back to boost/tr1 diff --git a/main/stlport/systemstl/numeric b/main/stlport/systemstl/numeric index 975612b48..5bd6b90e2 100644 --- a/main/stlport/systemstl/numeric +++ b/main/stlport/systemstl/numeric @@ -25,6 +25,8 @@ #ifdef HAVE_STL_INCLUDE_PATH // TODO: use computed include file name #include_next +#elif defined(__cplusplus) && (__cplusplus >= 201103L) +#include_next #elif defined(_MSC_VER) #include <../../VC/include/numeric> #else // fall back to boost/tr1 diff --git a/main/stlport/systemstl/set b/main/stlport/systemstl/set index 2d9905387..674cab06d 100644 --- a/main/stlport/systemstl/set +++ b/main/stlport/systemstl/set @@ -27,6 +27,8 @@ // TODO: use computed include file name #include "utility" #include_next +#elif defined(__cplusplus) && (__cplusplus >= 201103L) +#include_next #elif defined(_MSC_VER) #include <../../VC/include/set> #else // fall back to boost/tr1 diff --git a/main/stlport/systemstl/vector b/main/stlport/systemstl/vector index 8b4e86ffc..32753722e 100644 --- a/main/stlport/systemstl/vector +++ b/main/stlport/systemstl/vector @@ -25,6 +25,8 @@ #ifdef HAVE_STL_INCLUDE_PATH // TODO: use computed include file name #include_next +#elif defined(__cplusplus) && (__cplusplus >= 201103L) +#include_next #elif defined(_MSC_VER) #include <../../VC/include/vector> #else // fall back to boost/tr1 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: OpenGrok
Hi * On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 8:26 PM Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: > think of a subdomain name, > for example source.openoffice.org, opengrok.openoffice.org, > xref.openoffice.org, etc. OpenGrok is at http://opengrok.openoffice.org Regards -- Ariel Constenla-Haile La Plata, Buenos Aires Argentina - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Availability of Pootle server
Hi Mechtlide, * On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 9:25 AM Mechtilde wrote: > > Hello, > > I want to inform you that the server translate.apache.org is down for > maintenance. > > It's getting a complete update with hardware and software. > > I will inform you when the server is up agein. Hopefully the update solves a bugs that makes integrating the translations back quite impossible and error prone; I guess janiv updated the server the last time without testing before that the generated files actually build, because even if some files pass gsicheck, they could contain errors breaking the build, and solving the errors on pootle didn't have any effect. . Regards -- Ariel Constenla-Haile La Plata, Buenos Aires Argentina - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: [Issue 123192] Word Count Dialog: last digit truncated at the right
On Sat, Oct 19, 2019 at 7:26 AM wrote: > > https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=123192 > > Matthias Seidel changed: > >What|Removed |Added > > Latest|4.1.6 |4.1.7 > Confirmation in|| > > --- Comment #19 from Matthias Seidel --- > Committed to AOO418 with: > > 580337070b8e737894370d6796856e30ebef7361 It looks like there should be a git version of the nice SVN Robot . https://wiki.mozilla.org/Bugzilla:Addons#Integration_with_Source_Code_Management_programs Though https://github.com/gera/gitzilla seems to be unmaintained. Regards -- Ariel Constenla-Haile La Plata, Buenos Aires Argentina - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Mac Builds
Hi Jim, On Sat, Oct 19, 2019 at 2:02 PM Jim Jagielski wrote: > > Yes, please. I've been playing around and some issues are related to how, in > moving to Mojave/Catalina, Apple removed some *.o files from /usr/lib, as > well as some issues related to Xcode11 in general. I was hoping to have a > single setup that allows for both 4.1.x and 4.2.x+later but that doesn't seem > viable. > > Yeah, I think it's time to consider making macOS 10.9 the min allowed for > 4.2.x+later. I build on Catalina basically with MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET="10.9" MACOSX_SDK_PATH="/Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/Platforms/MacOSX.platform/Developer/SDKs/MacOSX10.15.sdk" Some of the external dependencies need some tweaking because in Catalina there are no system headers on /usr/include (the workaround for Mojave does not work for Catalina, there is no package with the headers to install). And OpenSSL is a problem, I don't recall the rationale to build with system openssl on macOS, but now it makes sense to build the internal version. > Quite interested in the QTkit fix. The fix is quite trivial and should work with 10.7 (I can only test on Catalina ATM), the AV Foundation port was already done by hdu, it's on trunk, I'll remove the QTKit bits and cherry-pick in aoo418. Regards -- Ariel Constenla-Haile La Plata, Buenos Aires Argentina - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: OpenGrok
Hi Dave, On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 8:53 PM Dave Fisher wrote: > Thanks. Looking forward to your work. Any thoughts on what Jim noticed with > Xcode versions and Mojave? > > I would not complain if we pushed the current version of MacOS to something > more recent than 10.7 Lion. I could build trunk on macOS Catalina and Xcode 11.0 (11A420a) with a few hacks, and yes, it requires to change the system runtime requirement to macOS 10.9, which deserves to increase 4.1.x to 4.2.0; but in the meantime, 4.1.7 can be fixed to remove QTKit while still building with target 10.7. Regards -- Ariel Constenla-Haile La Plata, Buenos Aires Argentina - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: OpenGrok
Hi *, On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 3:15 AM Peter Kovacs wrote: > Server is openoffice-vm1-he-de.Apache. Org A first attempt is now live at http://openoffice-vm1-he-de.apache.org It has trunk/master and AOO42X and AOO418 branches indexed. Tomcat is behind mod_proxy_ajp, I've seen that http://androidxref.com/ uses Apache Coyote, which is said to be a better configuration, but I've no idea how to use it, if someone is in the know, just comment. Try it and comment if you find errors, and think of a subdomain name, for example source.openoffice.org, opengrok.openoffice.org, xref.openoffice.org, etc. I'll try to puppetize as much as I can, but opengrok needs manual intervention. Regards -- Ariel Constenla-Haile La Plata, Buenos Aires Argentina - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: OpenGrok
On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 10:08 AM Peter Kovacs wrote: > > It is our VM with root access. I think you need to ask infra for root access > if there is an issue let me know I arrange for the missing stuff. I requested access on INFRA-19293 > The Ubuntu machine only offered a tomcat 7, newer opengrok need at least > tomcat 8. So I decided in favour of a newer opengrok version. Ubuntu 18.04.3 LTS has tomcat 9 Regards -- Ariel Constenla-Haile La Plata, Buenos Aires Argentina - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: OpenGrok
Hi there, On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 3:15 AM Peter Kovacs wrote: [...] > Server is openoffice-vm1-he-de.Apache. Org Is this server managed by ASF infra with puppet or is it possible to gain root access to do the installation? I've just tested with tomcat 9.0.27 and opengrok 1.3.3. Tomcat is quite straightforward, it would be better to use the packages provided by the VM's system. Regards -- Ariel Constenla-Haile La Plata, Buenos Aires Argentina - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Impress problem on linux?
On 03/02/17 19:47, Rory O'Farrell wrote: >> On Linux, OpenOffice uses gstreamer (on Fedora there are tow packages >> for the older gstreamer API and the newer gstreamer1 API), besides >> installing gstreamer you need to install the plugins, they may have >> names like gstreamer-plugins-bad, gstreamer-plugins-bad-free, >> gstreamer-plugins-ugly, etc. [...] > I'm fairly sure I have these installed; it is too late in my day for detailed > work, so I'll check tomorrow that they are definitely installed. AFAIK Ubuntu comes with gstreamer1.0 by default, you need to install gstreamer0.10 and its plugins. Regards -- Ariel Constenla-Haile La Plata, Argentina signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Impress problem on linux?
Hi Rory, On 03/02/17 16:56, Rory O'Farrell wrote: > Before I raise an issue on Bugzilla, I would like confirmation of the > following problem: > > Using AOO 4.1.3 running on Xubuntu 16.04.1 I am not able to get Impress to > play embedded videos. Any attempt to embed an .avi or an .mpg file is > blocked by "The format of the selected file is not supported" message and the > file will not insert on the slide. The .avi and .mpg files play perfectly > using the system video player (Parole) or VLC. From memory this problem > occurred with AOO 4.0.0 - I have older presentations prepared in 2008 in > which these embeddings worked correctly, but such presentations do not play > in current AOO 4.1.3. I have tried a number of different .avi and .mpg > files, all to no avail within Impress. > > I have checked using the same multimedia files on AOO 4,1.3 running on > Windows XP - they work correctly > > My workaround is to insert a hyperlink to the .avi/.mpg files, which calls > the system video player. This is a bit clunky, but at least the videos get > shown. > > Would other users please confirm if this problem shows up on other linux > versions (please indicate linux distro and version) so that I can post as > detailed an issue as possible on Bugzilla. > On Linux, OpenOffice uses gstreamer (on Fedora there are tow packages for the older gstreamer API and the newer gstreamer1 API), besides installing gstreamer you need to install the plugins, they may have names like gstreamer-plugins-bad, gstreamer-plugins-bad-free, gstreamer-plugins-ugly, etc. Regards -- Ariel Constenla-Haile La Plata, Argentina signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Pootle server admins (was Re: create a Pootle account for me)
On 20/12/16 16:56, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > You are a "superuser" in Pootle now. Please check if you see an > "ADMIN" link top right next to your username (logout/login might be > needed). Yes, I can see the ADMIN. Thanks. Regards -- Ariel Constenla-Haile La Plata, Argentina signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Pootle server admins (was Re: create a Pootle account for me)
On 19/12/16 13:58, Andrea Pescetti wrote: >> Do you have access to add more admins? > > Yes, very likely (I can mark a web user as an admin, and I think it's > all that is needed). > > Would you like me to try with your account? Yes, please do so. > In that case, please login with your ASF (id.apache.org) credentials > on Pootle, so that it can see your account in case you haven't > already done so. And then I can try to make you an admin. I already have https://translate.apache.org/accounts/arielch/, not sure how I got it, it was a long time ago; it's using my arie...@apache.org mail account, but the password is not the same I use on the ASF. Is Pootle using ASF's LDAP? It does not seem to do so. Regards -- Ariel Constenla-Haile La Plata, Argentina signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Pootle server admins (was Re: create a Pootle account for me)
On 24/11/16 19:07, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > There are several Pootle admins, since this is a shared instance for > all Apache projects. Out of the current OpenOffice PMC members, I > can recognize me and jsc. We can (should?) add more. Do you have access to add more admins? Regards -- Ariel Constenla-Haile La Plata, Argentina signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
MSDN Subscriptions for ASF Committers (was: Re: Building with the latest SDK on Windows)
On 26/11/16 07:21, Marcus wrote: > Yes, here and there I see some mails from Apache members regarding > "How can I get access to MSDN?" but I haven't followed this. So, at > the moment I cannot tell you what to do. Information is in the committers repo: https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/committers/donated-licenses file msdn.txt for the MSDN subscription. Regards -- Ariel Constenla-Haile La Plata, Argentina signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: 4.1.4_release_blocker granted: [Issue 127201] Integrate latest translations from Pootle
On 27/11/16 14:29, Matthias Seidel wrote: > Am 27.11.2016 um 13:18 schrieb Ariel Constenla-Haile: >> unfortunately I don't have to provide builds myself until the 8/12 >> holidays. This meant "I don't have time...", which means I'll try to provide builds once I'm on holidays (but not yet traveling). Regards -- Ariel Constenla-Haile La Plata, Argentina signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [PROPOSAL] Buildbot builds should include more than en-US only
On 24/11/16 18:31, Marcus wrote: > Am 11/24/2016 08:43 PM, schrieb Matthias Seidel: >> +1 >> >> Especially for Linux64. 64bit is almost standard now, so we need >> localized builds from the build bots. 32bit has plenty of them... > > @Don: AFAIK you were working on the buildbots. We, AOO comitters, are supposed to work on this. The repo is https://svn.apache.org/repos/infra/infrastructure/buildbot The file containing the buildbot configuration is ^/aegis/buildmaster/master1/openofficeorg.conf The web page on https://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/ is ^/aegis/buildmaster/master1/public_html/projects/openoffice/ and the dynamic content is generated with a script on https://github.com/apache/infrastructure-puppet full path: deployment/modules/buildbot_asf/files/create-ooo-snapshots-index.sh https://s.apache.org/buildbot_aoo_script > Can you please change > the setup so that we can get AOO builds with en-US, de, pt, ja? Do you mean for builds based on trunk *and* release branch? Regards -- Ariel Constenla-Haile La Plata, Argentina signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: 4.1.4_release_blocker granted: [Issue 127201] Integrate latest translations from Pootle
On 23/11/16 07:32, Matthias Seidel wrote: > Hi Ariel, > > Any news on the Windows buildbots? You can track the progress by following https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-12786 Progress is rather slow, unfortunately I don't have to provide builds myself until the 8/12 holidays. Regards -- Ariel Constenla-Haile La Plata, Argentina signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Pootle server admins (was Re: create a Pootle account for me)
Hello Slimane, On 12/11/16 08:23, Slimane AMIRI wrote: > Hello my name is slimane amiri > Please create a Pootle account for me. I state that my contributions are > under the Apache 2 license and I will work on Kabyle Language > My preferred username is slimaneamiri Sorry for the delay. I don't known how has admin access in the Pootle server, I'll let you know as soon as we find it out. @dev: According to https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-12787 arist, jsc, pescetti, jani and me have access to the pootle vm, but does not grant admin rights in the pootle server, at least I'm just a simple user, I cannot add Slimane. Do we have a list of pootle admins? Regards -- Ariel Constenla-Haile La Plata, Argentina signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [PROPOSAL] Google+
On 17/11/16 16:55, Matthias Seidel wrote: > Thank you for your confidence! > > The work is done for the moment: > https://plus.google.com/+openoffice You were added also as moderator in the G+ Community https://plus.google.com/communities/103683488250592271079 Regards -- Ariel Constenla-Haile La Plata, Argentina signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Test Link status (was Re: [QA])
Hello Abhishek, On 14/11/16 19:34, Abhishek Mehendale wrote: > Hey Team, > > Can somebody Help me with TestLink? Can anybody add me on TestLink > project for doing manual testing? Sorry for the delay in answering. I'm afraid nobody may have access to this server. We'll try find out, and let you know. > I can do some manual testing on my Mac OS. That would be great. @dev: Does anyone know the status of the test link instance, how has admin access, etc.? See http://aootesting.adfinis-sygroup.org/login.php and https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/QA/Testlink Regards -- Ariel Constenla-Haile La Plata, Argentina signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: build error
On 15/11/16 17:54, Peter Kovacs wrote: > Hello all, > > > I have following build error on trunk: > > "./scripts/fuse_gtest_files.py" "./fused-src" File > "./scripts/fuse_gtest_files.py", line 93 print 'ERROR: Cannot find %s > in directory %s.' % (relative_path, ^ SyntaxError: invalid syntax > make: *** [Makefile:1340: fused-gtest] Error 1 dmake: Error code 2, > while making './unxlngx6.pro/misc/build/so_built_oo_gtest' > > I do not understand this. Anyone has an Idea? > > Google did not know either. I guess your system python defaults to Python 3. Take a look at the output of /usr/bin/env python --version gtest does not work with Python 3, at least the version we use, see https://github.com/google/googletest/issues/434 Regards -- Ariel Constenla-Haile La Plata, Argentina signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [PROPOSAL] Google+
On 13/11/16 19:13, Andrea Pescetti wrote: >>> I would like to volunteer as "owner" of our Google+ account. >> IMO it should be owned by a PMC member, to be agreed on private@; >> once agreed on that, you can be added as manager. > > This would still allow Matthias to carry out all the activities he > listed, right? I mean, beside the (correct) formalities about > governance all the plan would still hold regardless of the role of > Matthias as owner or manager. Yes, the only difference is that only the page owner can add or remove managers, a manager can remove only himself as manager from a page. Regards -- Ariel Constenla-Haile La Plata, Argentina -- Ariel Constenla-Haile La Plata, Argentina signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: "module jpeg error" on compiling
On 13/11/16 07:52, Peter Kovacs wrote: > > > On 11.11.2016 20:34, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: >> >> Try to configure with --with-system-stdlibs >> > Ariel if I d this I get the following: > > [legine@Keynix2 instsetoo_native]$ build --all --with-system-stdlibs > build -- version: 275224 That option is for configure, not for build, "try to configure" means add this option to the ones you pass to configure, for example: ./configure \ --enable-category-b \ --enable-bundled-dictionaries \ --with-build-version="$(date +"%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S") - `uname -sm`" \ --enable-verbose \ --enable-crashdump=yes \ --enable-wiki-publisher \ --enable-opengl \ --enable-dbus \ --enable-gstreamer \ --with-package-format="archive" \ --with-dmake-url=http://sourceforge.net/projects/oooextras.mirror/files/dmake-4.12.tar.bz2 \ --with-epm-url=http://www.msweet.org/files/project2/epm-3.7-source.tar.gz \ --without-stlport \ --with-system-stdlibs \ Regards -- Ariel Constenla-Haile La Plata, Argentina signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [PROPOSAL] Google+
Hi Matthias, On 13/11/16 13:50, Matthias Seidel wrote: > My proposal for Google+: > > Until things are cleared with Infra Infra has nothing to do with these social accounts, they are managed by the PMC. > I would like to volunteer as "owner" of our Google+ account. IMO it should be owned by a PMC member, to be agreed on private@; once agreed on that, you can be added as manager. Regards -- Ariel Constenla-Haile La Plata, Argentina signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: "module jpeg error" on compiling
On 04/11/16 14:17, "Christoph Körner" wrote: > I just tried to compile the original source and i got following error: > > > root@abc:~/Schreibtisch/aoo-4.1.3/main/instsetoo_native# build --all:jpeg Side comment, you shouldn't be building as root. > Entering /root/Schreibtisch/aoo-4.1.3/main/jpeg > > mkdir: cannot create directory './unxlngx6.pro/misc/build/jpeg-8d/': File > exists > Compiling: jpeg/unxlngx6.pro/misc/build/jpeg-8d/jaricom.c > afl-cc 2.35b by > afl-as 2.35b by > [!] WARNING: No instrumentation targets found. > /root/Schreibtisch/aoo-4.1.3/main/solver/413/unxlngx6.pro/bin/makedepend: > error while loading shared libraries: > /root/Schreibtisch/aoo-4.1.3/main/solver/413/unxlngx6.pro/lib/libgcc_s.so.1: > invalid ELF header > dmake: Error code 127, while making > '../../../../unxlngx6.pro/slo/jaricom.obj' > dmake: '../../../../unxlngx6.pro/slo/jaricom.obj' removed. > dmake: Error code 255, while making './unxlngx6.pro/misc/build/so_built_jpeg' Try to configure with --with-system-stdlibs Regards signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [Google+] Administration?
Cc: Bcc: Subject: Re: [Google+] Administration? Reply-To: In-Reply-To: <3611c4b5-a47b-775d-2c00-544128024...@hamburg.de> Hi Matthias, On Wed, Nov 09, 2016 at 12:21:36AM +0100, Matthias Seidel wrote: > Maybe Infra can help here?! This king of stuff is responsibility of the PMC, on our records the owner of https://plus.google.com/+openoffice is TBD. IIRC Rob was managing that account. @Rob: any idea about this? > Am 23.10.2016 um 03:06 schrieb Matthias Seidel: > > Anything new on Google+ ? > > > > https://plus.google.com/u/0/+openoffice/posts > > > > As this is a so-called Brand-Account on Google+, AOO (as the owner) can > > give other users (like me) administrative rights. At any time AOO can > > withdraw these rights again. > > > > Therefore I would volunteer to do some basic changes, e.g. replacing the > > outdated background graphic, posting the official announcement/release > > notes for 4.1.3. etc. > > > > There are over 8.000 followers. I don't know how many of them are still > > active but it would be a start... > > > > regards, Matthias > > > > P.S.: From 18.-20.11.2016 I am at the UbuCon Europe > > (http://ubucon.org/en/events/ubucon-europe/) in Essen/Germany. > > If someone wants to have a talk/beer?! ;-) Regards -- Ariel Constenla-Haile La Plata, Argentina signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: 4.1.4_release_blocker granted: [Issue 127201] Integrate latest translations from Pootle
On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 08:03:32PM +0100, Marcus wrote: > Am 10/31/2016 02:59 AM, schrieb Ariel Constenla-Haile: > >On Sun, Oct 30, 2016 at 09:48:18PM +0100, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > >>On 29/10/2016 bugzilla wrote: > >>>https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127201 > >>>--- Description --- > >>>The current translations in the source code repository are from more than > >>>two > >>>years ago. The latest translations from Pootle should be integrated back > >>>in the > >>>source code. > >> > >>I would advise against this. I'll explain the reason: Pootle does not have > >>the 4.1.x strings, so translators in Pootle are translating strings that > >>came from trunk (4.2.0, so to say). > > > >Things are rather more complicated than this, due to more than two years > >of inactivity merging translations; take this example: > > > >https://translate.apache.org/es/aoo40/translate/cui/source/tabpages.po#unit=13107269 > > > >In the current SDF files, both on trunk and AOO41* branch, this string > >isn't inside RID_OFAPAGE_AUTOCORR_EXCEPT, all these SDFs have the string > >inside RID_OFAPAGE_AUTOCORR_QUOTE, this is a change (may be a bug, we > >should check this) introduced with the integration of ia2: > > > >https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/openoffice/branches/AOO414/main/cui/source/tabpages/autocdlg.src?r1=1465678&r2=1541847&diff_format=h > > > >several string were move from one tabtage to the other. > > > >In trunk and AOO414 source, STR_PB_DBL_START and others are part of > >RID_OFAPAGE_AUTOCORR_EXCEPT, the same on pootle. So pootle does have > >4.1.* strings. But 4.1.* are not on the SDFs from trunk and AOO414. > > > > > >>This means we don't have a clean way for > >>reintegrating strings into the AOO41x branches. > >> > >>Of course, integrating translations should be a priority for 4.2.0; and of > >>course, it is still possible to integrate translation fixes into 4.1.4 (I > >>did this for fixing a few Italian strings in 4.1.2, but I edited the SDF > >>files directly, after doing the same fixes in Pootle for trunk). > >> > >>So if this is about integrating some important fixes, I'm all for it. If it > >>is about completely reimporting translations, I would prefer to do it in > >>4.2.0 since it is more correct in general: Pootle has 4.2.0, the time for > >>updating translations is 4.2.0 and translators expect a translation schedule > >>for 4.2.0. > > > >Pootle does not have trunk, see the example above. If we get the > >original en-US SDF used to generate the pootle templates, the date in it > >may give us an idea of what svn revision is reflecting pootle. > > > >So far, what we have in the SDFs on trunk and the branches is a merge > >that has as base an en-US SDF generated on 20130618 17:22:18, that is > >the date on al the SDFs on trunk, branch AOO41* and > >http://home.apache.org/~jsc/translation/aoo40new_en-US.sdf > > > >I assume the current pootle strings are closer to branch AOO412-4 than > >trunk, this is my conclusion after doing some test with jsc SDF on > >home.apache.org and one generated from AOO414 source. So I will > >integrate translations on demand, starting with the Spanish translation > >as a proof of concept; integration won't be automatic, a lot of manual > >work is needed, and the pootle server won't be modified in any way, all > >work is done offline by downloading the po files. > > sorry for asking as it's not clean for me. Do you plan to update the > translations already for 4.1.4 or not before 4.2.0? If 4.1.4, then the final > decision depends on the tests you will do? I have already been studying and testing for two weeks, I will integrate translations on AOO414 branch but only on demand, because (a) it is a lot of work to merge translations from pootle to svn and (b) we need people to start doing QA as soon as possible not on the RC1. For (a) I'll try to do my best, for (b) we have working buildbots (Windows buildbot is waiting for some Infra fixes). Regards -- Ariel Constenla-Haile signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: 4.1.4_release_blocker granted: [Issue 127201] Integrate latest translations from Pootle
On Sun, Oct 30, 2016 at 09:48:18PM +0100, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > On 29/10/2016 bugzilla wrote: > >https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127201 > >--- Description --- > >The current translations in the source code repository are from more than two > >years ago. The latest translations from Pootle should be integrated back in > >the > >source code. > > I would advise against this. I'll explain the reason: Pootle does not have > the 4.1.x strings, so translators in Pootle are translating strings that > came from trunk (4.2.0, so to say). Things are rather more complicated than this, due to more than two years of inactivity merging translations; take this example: https://translate.apache.org/es/aoo40/translate/cui/source/tabpages.po#unit=13107269 In the current SDF files, both on trunk and AOO41* branch, this string isn't inside RID_OFAPAGE_AUTOCORR_EXCEPT, all these SDFs have the string inside RID_OFAPAGE_AUTOCORR_QUOTE, this is a change (may be a bug, we should check this) introduced with the integration of ia2: https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/openoffice/branches/AOO414/main/cui/source/tabpages/autocdlg.src?r1=1465678&r2=1541847&diff_format=h several string were move from one tabtage to the other. In trunk and AOO414 source, STR_PB_DBL_START and others are part of RID_OFAPAGE_AUTOCORR_EXCEPT, the same on pootle. So pootle does have 4.1.* strings. But 4.1.* are not on the SDFs from trunk and AOO414. > This means we don't have a clean way for > reintegrating strings into the AOO41x branches. > > Of course, integrating translations should be a priority for 4.2.0; and of > course, it is still possible to integrate translation fixes into 4.1.4 (I > did this for fixing a few Italian strings in 4.1.2, but I edited the SDF > files directly, after doing the same fixes in Pootle for trunk). > > So if this is about integrating some important fixes, I'm all for it. If it > is about completely reimporting translations, I would prefer to do it in > 4.2.0 since it is more correct in general: Pootle has 4.2.0, the time for > updating translations is 4.2.0 and translators expect a translation schedule > for 4.2.0. Pootle does not have trunk, see the example above. If we get the original en-US SDF used to generate the pootle templates, the date in it may give us an idea of what svn revision is reflecting pootle. So far, what we have in the SDFs on trunk and the branches is a merge that has as base an en-US SDF generated on 20130618 17:22:18, that is the date on al the SDFs on trunk, branch AOO41* and http://home.apache.org/~jsc/translation/aoo40new_en-US.sdf I assume the current pootle strings are closer to branch AOO412-4 than trunk, this is my conclusion after doing some test with jsc SDF on home.apache.org and one generated from AOO414 source. So I will integrate translations on demand, starting with the Spanish translation as a proof of concept; integration won't be automatic, a lot of manual work is needed, and the pootle server won't be modified in any way, all work is done offline by downloading the po files. Regards -- Ariel Constenla-Haile signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: need help with ASF's,Apple developer account
On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 11:30:30PM +0200, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: > >These prerequisites are not trivial, our build process is already too > >cumbersome to make integrating > >https://reference.apache.org/pmc/codesigning appear as something > >trivial. > > That guide refers to the Symantec service for Windows code signing, not to > the signing services for MacOS X. For Windows we know that this would be > complex and it was investigated about two years ago. For MacOS X, as far as > I know, we never investigated the issue in depth (note: I'm only speaking of > pleasing Gatekeeper, not of entering the App Store which apparently would > pose bigger challenges). According to Mark's answer in this thread, the Symantec service covers Windows binaries and Java JARs and there is a separate web service for Apple code signing. I assume this implies also sending build artifacts over the internet to be signed by this web servicie. This is what I was pointing as no trivial at all, OpenOffice has already support for Windows signing (grok signtool) at build time with a local certificate, using a web service at build time does not look promising. I've found https://reference.apache.org/pmc/appleappstore https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-174 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-11183 @Mark: is there a documentation about the macOS signing service? Regards -- Ariel Constenla-Haile signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: need help with ASF's,Apple developer account
Hello Peter, On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 07:59:11PM +0200, Peter Kovacs wrote: > *bump* call for help because of issue > > https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127198 > > > On 22.10.2016 07:17, Peter Kovacs wrote: > >Hello , > > > >The given ressource i have no access to. > >Can sombody support who has access to the internal Apache stuff and check > >the ressource? > > > >I would like to have access. How ever I am with you only for roughly one > >and a half month. > >Talking more then delivering ;) So I am unsure if you trust me enough to > >give me the same. > >(hehe. No issues if you dont.) > > > >So I can drive the topic atm further. :) This does not seem to be the first priority for delivering a signed macOS application, I can think of: 1) do you have a Mac? 2) do you build AOO in a Mac? 3) do you know the AOO source code and build environment enough to integrate as a part of the build process the signing workflow currently supported by the ASF? These prerequisites are not trivial, our build process is already too cumbersome to make integrating https://reference.apache.org/pmc/codesigning appear as something trivial. Regards -- Ariel Constenla-Haile signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: recruitment@
On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 08:30:47AM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote: > Methinks that the creation of recruitment@ was ill-advised... > Most new people are joining dev@ This might be because of the current documentation workflow: recruitment@ is listed in get-involved.mdtext, but this page may lead to the orientation modules, where the introduction to development says "Your first task is to subscribe to our Development mailing list. You can subscribe by sending an email to dev-subscr...@openoffice.apache.org." May be we should replace dev@ with the recruitment@ in all the orientation pages. Regards -- Ariel Constenla-Haile signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: New AOO414 branch?
On Wed, Oct 05, 2016 at 11:37:38PM +0200, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > Can we open the AOO414 branch? Everything seems to show that 4.1.3 will be > coming in a week or so and for sure there is no further code work to do on > it. So I'd like to have an AOO414 branch where (once they are approved) we > can start merging changes. OpenOffice 4.1.4 is not going to take another > year, so better start early. If the "4.1.4 Release Manager?" thread ended with me as RM for 4.1.4, I'll be branching aoo-4.1.4 on Tuesday (right now I'm on travel). Regards -- Ariel Constenla-Haile La Plata, Argentina signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Post vote release actions
On Wed, Oct 05, 2016 at 08:26:17AM -0700, Patricia Shanahan wrote: > I plan to start the 4.1.3 vote today. This is a draft of the action list > assuming the vote passes. Please help by correcting, expanding, and adding > anything missing. > > RM: Update https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4.1.3 to > show vote result etc. > > RM: Edit > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4.1.3+Release+Notes > release notes to delete "DRAFT" note. - RM > > RM: Use svn to move > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.3-rc1/ to > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/openoffice/4.1.3/. See > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/0b3416c973088efdf60056d2aae7f6cee0bd125be4370f3c0ff5324b@%3Cdev.openoffice.apache.org%3E > for Ariel's tip on how to do this without a full checkout. > > Someone with SourceForge access: Upload to SourceForge using rsync. > > Modify OpenOffice web pages to reflect the new release. > > Press release and announcement on apache.org home page. IIRC the last step is updating the update feed so that current installations get an update notification. This is under subversion at https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/updates-site/trunk/ Regards -- Ariel Constenla-Haile La Plata, Argentina signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: {Dicuss] [Vote]
On Wed, Oct 05, 2016 at 08:10:40PM -0700, Patricia Shanahan wrote: > >Ariel; > > > >In all the builds that I have been involved in with AOO we have included > >a link to a Bugzilla query for all bugs fixed by that release.My concern > >was 2 fold. One that it would give a wrong impression to anyone that > >followed the link and the second was to try to keep Bugzilla up to date. > > > >If it is possible we should construct a query that excludes anything in > >Product = Build Tools for the Release Notes. > > I think calling out the important stuff directly in the release notes but > providing a Bugzilla link that shows everything, including tools, is a > reasonable compromise. However, I am very open to suggestions for improving > the release notes. IMO yes, there should be a link to the bugzilla query, but it does not make sense to mention those build-related bugs individually. Regards -- Ariel Constenla-Haile signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: {Dicuss] [Vote]
On Wed, Oct 05, 2016 at 07:17:27PM -0400, Keith N. McKenna wrote: > Patricia Shanahan wrote: > > I believe, based on my tracking and testing, that the release blockers > > are all fixed. I was hoping the people working on the bugs, especially > > those who requested release_blocker, will update them ASAP. > > > I have no doubt that they have been fixed, but they need to be updated > as we link to a query for them from the Release Notes and what message > does it give to the world if the Release Notes show Release Blockers as > still open? Most of these bugs don't make any sense in the release notes, they are too aoo-build specific. Regards -- Ariel Constenla-Haile signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Testing 4.1.3
On Mon, Oct 03, 2016 at 12:52:50PM -0700, Patricia Shanahan wrote: > There were German dictionary changes. In this case, we only update the dictionaries to the latest version available at the time, but there is nothing else to check here, the dictionaries do not belong to the AOO source nor this project; if they have issues, they should be reported to their respective maintainers. > Can you tell the difference between > de, de_AT, and de_CH? If so, could you perhaps do a test in each of the > other dialects? Regards -- Ariel Constenla-Haile signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Infra notification?
Hi Patricia, On Mon, Oct 03, 2016 at 07:18:30PM -0700, Patricia Shanahan wrote: > What is the total size of our binaries? Linux 32 12759M Linux 64 13328M Windows 6178M macOS 7185M This includes hashes and signatures. Regards -- Ariel Constenla-Haile signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Testing 4.1.3
Hi Carl,
On Mon, Oct 03, 2016 at 09:58:25PM -0400, Carl Marcum wrote:
> On 09/25/2016 10:33 AM, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
> >I suggest that people start downloading and testing 4.1.3 as soon as there
> >are binaries they can run. I can't start the formal vote period until we
> >have a complete release candidate.
> >
> >-
> >To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> >For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> >
>
> I'm trying to build 4.13.rc1 from
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.3-rc1/source/
>
> with
> ./configure \
> --with-build-version="$(date +"%Y-%m-%d %H:%M") - `uname -sm`"
> \
> --enable-verbose \
> --with-system-stdlibs \
> --enable-crashdump=yes \
> --enable-category-b \
> --enable-wiki-publisher \
> --enable-bundled-dictionaries \
> --enable-opengl \
> --enable-dbus \
> --enable-gstreamer \
> --with-package-format="rpm deb" \
> --with-lang="${LANGS}" \
> --with-dmake-url=http://dmake.apache-extras.org.codespot.com/files/dmake-4.12.tar.bz2
> \
> --with-epm-url=http://www.msweet.org/files/project2/epm-3.7-source.tar.gz \
> --with-package-format="installed" \
> --with-jdk-home=/usr/java/jdk1.7.0_60
>
>
> and getting
> ...
> downloading dmake-4.12.tar.bz2
> downloading to
> /home/carl/dev/aoo/aoo-4.1.3-rc1/aoo-4.1.3/ext_sources/dmake-4.12.tar.bz2.part
> download from
> http://dmake.apache-extras.org.codespot.com/files/dmake-4.12.tar.bz2 failed
> (404 Not Found)
> download failed
> epm-3.7.tar.gz exists
> making and entering
> /home/carl/dev/aoo/aoo-4.1.3-rc1/aoo-4.1.3/main/solenv/unxlngx6.pro/misc/build/
> can not find the dmake package
>
> Should I be using a different dmake?
apache-extras used googlecode, which is dead.
Both the building guide and configure's help point to a working dmake
url:
https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/Building_Guide_AOO
https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/openoffice/branches/AOO413/main/configure.in?revision=1761303&view=markup#l29
http://sourceforge.net/projects/oooextras.mirror/files/dmake-4.12.tar.bz2
Regards
--
Ariel Constenla-Haile
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Re: Which source files in release?
On Sat, Oct 01, 2016 at 06:24:50PM +0200, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > Patricia Shanahan wrote: > >The idea is to start from a clean check-out, not configured, move the > >LICENSE, NOTICE, and README files, and delete what is not needed. "what > >is not needed" should be a relatively short list, including the .svn > >files and also ext_sources. > > While I would have gone for Bash too, A shell script may not work, the programs needed to create the packages may vary in different OS, or even in different versions of the same OS; I guess that ant tasks provide some sort of system abstraction layer. Regards -- Ariel Constenla-Haile signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Which source files in release?
On Sat, Oct 01, 2016 at 04:34:48PM +1000, Gavin McDonald wrote: > Instead of removing the .svn dirs/files with a script, use the built in 'svn > export' which exports the > checkout without all the .svn dirs/files. > > http://svnbook.red-bean.com/en/1.7/svn.ref.svn.c.export.html I guess that they didn't use svn export before because that will export the external sources in ext_sources/, I'm not sure if there is a way to tell svn export to ignore tracked folders. Regards -- Ariel Constenla-Haile La Plata, Argentina signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Which source files in release?
On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 07:19:25AM -0700, Patricia Shanahan wrote: > > > On Sep 30, 2016, at 07:00, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: > > > >> On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 06:28:01AM -0700, Patricia Shanahan wrote: > >> I just saw the bug report https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=126605, > >> "Make sure the source package does not contain extra files" > >> > >> Since our build instructions and processes are based on the result of an > >> svn > >> checkout, basing the source package on one seemed obvious to me. The only > >> change that seems to me to be absolutely required is removing the .svn > >> directories, and that is a one-liner: > > > > You better do this inside the build environment: > > > > Why? Because there is no need to reinvent the wheel, I guess ;) (you need to fix the ant build script first, see the bug report) Regards -- Ariel Constenla-Haile signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Which source files in release?
On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 06:28:01AM -0700, Patricia Shanahan wrote: > I just saw the bug report https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=126605, > "Make sure the source package does not contain extra files" > > Since our build instructions and processes are based on the result of an svn > checkout, basing the source package on one seemed obvious to me. The only > change that seems to me to be absolutely required is removing the .svn > directories, and that is a one-liner: You better do this inside the build environment: cd main source cd instsetoo_native/util/ dmake aoo_srcrelease This calls ant with solenv/bin/srcrelease.xml, which has the bug that was written for macOS, thus it only excludes MacOSXX86Env.* for example, see https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/openoffice/branches/AOO413/main/solenv/bin/srcrelease.xml?revision=1760467&view=markup#l32 ant ignores those .svn folders, see https://ant.apache.org/manual/dirtasks.html#defaultexcludes Regards -- Ariel Constenla-Haile signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: [DISCUSS] 4.1.4 Release Manager?
On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 03:58:11PM -0700, Patricia Shanahan wrote: > There are now release blocker requests for 4.1.4, so we need a release > manager to decide on them. If nobody steps in, and/or nobody has any objection, you can count with me. Regards -- Ariel Constenla-Haile signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Github mirror (Re: Bootstrap fails)
On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 10:19:50AM +0200, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > Gavin McDonald wrote: > >>From: Andrea Pescetti > >>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-11601 > >How long has it been broken? > > I opened the above issue in April 2016. > > >Has infra been asked to fix it? > > In the issue I say that the Github mirror is broken and I ask if there is a > way to fix it. I consider this as a request to Infra to fix it. > > >Github mirrors do get stuck and go stale on occasion, and an Infra Jira to > >ask them to unstick it on those occasions should work. > > OK thanks, I'll give it a try unless one can simply reopen the above. > > >(If not then we ask to have it removed) And why not moving completely to git? https://git-wip-us.apache.org/ Regards -- Ariel Constenla-Haile La Plata, Argentina signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: 4.1.3 building
On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 12:45:02PM +0200, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: > >IMO providing different builds for same arch will make it difficult to > >QA, so I will go on with the Linux 64-bit builds. > > Yes, if you already started uploading Linux-64 I agree this is the best > solution. > > > If someone wants to > >build on CentOS 5 32 bit and upload the binaries, please tell and do so. > > I haven't done it yet, but it's likely I can upload and build them by Friday > night European time (if bandwidth allows). I'm more confident with Linux-64 > since I have plenty of machines where I can test it. But Linux-32 should > work too. If it helps to get things ready earlier, I can thus do Linux-32. > Just let me know. I started uploading the Linux 32-bit packages; Windows installers with newer VC redist come next. So the only thing missing is the source release tars and zip. Regards -- Ariel Constenla-Haile signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Bootstrap fails
On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 05:15:06PM -0700, Don Lewis wrote: > >> In theory, when linking the library. I opened > >> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127139 to track this issue. > >> I don't have a system to reproduce it right now. I will try to set up > >> a vm on the weekend. > >> > > > > OK. So if I understand correctly, it is not possible to build AOO on > > Ubuntu right now. Or is there a workaround? > > I haven't had any problems building trunk on Ubuntu 12 or 16. It's been > a few weeks since I last tried, but I don't think anything significant > has changed recently. This happens on the 32 bit Ubuntu buildot, with trunk and AOO413, on Ubuntu 14: bb_slave5_ubuntu Ubuntu 14.04 32 bit https://ci.apache.org/builders/openoffice-linux32-nightly https://ci.apache.org/builders/openoffice-linux32-41x since https://ci.apache.org/builders/openoffice-linux32-nightly/builds/407/steps/build%20--all/logs/stdio Last completed build was on the old vm ==> /etc/lsb-release <== DISTRIB_ID=Ubuntu DISTRIB_RELEASE=12.04 DISTRIB_CODENAME=precise DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION="Ubuntu 12.04.5 LTS" ==> /etc/os-release <== NAME="Ubuntu" VERSION="12.04.5 LTS, Precise Pangolin" ID=ubuntu ID_LIKE=debian PRETTY_NAME="Ubuntu precise (12.04.5 LTS)" VERSION_ID="12.04" Linux bb-vm2 3.2.0-97-generic-pae #137-Ubuntu SMP Thu Dec 17 21:37:53 UTC 2015 i686 athlon i386 GNU/Linux see https://ci.apache.org/builders/openoffice-linux32-nightly/builds/404/steps/configure/logs/stdio The new vm: ==> /etc/lsb-release <== DISTRIB_ID=Ubuntu DISTRIB_RELEASE=14.04 DISTRIB_CODENAME=trusty DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION="Ubuntu 14.04.5 LTS" ==> /etc/os-release <== NAME="Ubuntu" VERSION="14.04.5 LTS, Trusty Tahr" ID=ubuntu ID_LIKE=debian PRETTY_NAME="Ubuntu 14.04.5 LTS" VERSION_ID="14.04" https://ci.apache.org/builders/openoffice-linux32-nightly/builds/407/steps/configure/logs/stdio Regards -- Ariel Constenla-Haile signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Bootstrap fails
Hello Aleksandr, On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 12:00:09PM +0300, Aleksandr Andreev wrote: > Hello Ariel, > > On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 10:21 AM, Ariel Constenla-Haile > wrote: > > > > In theory, when linking the library. I opened > > https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127139 to track this issue. > > I don't have a system to reproduce it right now. I will try to set up > > a vm on the weekend. > > > > OK. So if I understand correctly, it is not possible to build AOO on > Ubuntu right now. Or is there a workaround? Not that I'm aware of; so yes, the build is broken on this Ubuntu system. Regards -- Ariel Constenla-Haile signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Test planning for 4.1.3
Hi Patricia, On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 08:51:40AM -0700, Patricia Shanahan wrote: > I am currently thinking about testing, and test result collection, for > 4.1.3. > > Is there an OpenOffice QA person in the house? > > If so, I would like to let you take charge of organizing testing, and just > provide some suggestions. There used to be some formal QA, including test link instance a https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/QA/Testlink that seems to be up and running at http://aootesting.adfinis-sygroup.org/lostPassword.php You may find some QA information on the cwiki too. These all was driven forward by the former IBM Symphony QA members, so I guess these is all abandoned now, Regards -- Ariel Constenla-Haile signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: 4.1.3 building
On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 03:43:40AM +0200, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > On 23/09/2016 Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: > >it might be time to start building it ;) > >I'll start doing so on Windows, as Jim and Andrea seem to cover the > >other platforms. > > Sorry for the miscommunication, Yes, as I saw no reply to this on the weekend, I started uploading Mac + Windows; once finished those, I started with Linux 64-bits as I saw no further reply. > I see that the message where I was saying > that http://home.apache.org/~pescetti/openoffice-4.1.3-dev-r1761989/ (full > Linux-64 in all languages) was being uploaded reached the list, but that the > one where I said that upload (to home; not to dist yet) was complete did not > make it. > > As for speed, uploading all Linux-64 builds to home took 6-8 hours. Not > fantastic, but not bad either, especially compared to the performance I > remembered from dist+SVN. I can confirm this speed issue; last weeks I uploaded Windows and macOS builds for some bugs, and my upload speed for sftp://home.apache.org was from two to three times what I see now on svn://dist.apache.org. > I see you are uploading Linux-64 builds right now. Unless you believe it's > faster if I upload mine, I would say that you can continue the upload. IMO providing different builds for same arch will make it difficult to QA, so I will go on with the Linux 64-bit builds. If someone wants to build on CentOS 5 32 bit and upload the binaries, please tell and do so. Regards -- Ariel Constenla-Haile signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Status of "Base 4.1.2 does not open Tables and Queries in Mac OSX"
Hi Mechtilde, On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 05:46:33PM +0200, Mechtilde wrote: > Hello > > > Am 26.09.2016 um 08:49 schrieb Patricia Shanahan: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.3/binaries/ > > > > On 9/25/2016 10:29 PM, Mechtilde wrote: > >> Hello > >> Do we have a test build for MacOSX 64 bit? > >> > >> Then I will check it > >> > >> > >> Mechtilde > >> > >> Am 25.09.2016 um 23:30 schrieb Marcus: > >>> Am 09/25/2016 11:05 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan: > >>>> What is the status of > >>>> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=126622 ? > > I did a first test under MacOSX El Capitain: > > Install dev build 4.1.3 > Install java JRE 8U101 > > activate JavaRe > start Base creating a new database > > it wants to connect to a Java 6 version. This is a known bug on Oracle Java, listed on https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4.1.2+Release+Notes Mac OS X: Due to a known bug in Oracle Java installations of Apache OpenOffice on OSX that do not have the legacy Apple Java 6 installed will not be able to recognize Oracle Java 7, 8, and possibly 9. The work around until the Java bug is fixed is to install the legacy version of Apple Java from the following link: Legacy Apple Java 6. This will allow the portions of AOO that require Java to run properly. You can try a Java-less database, linked to a spreadsheet document. Regards -- Ariel Constenla-Haile signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Status of "Base 4.1.2 does not open Tables and Queries in Mac OSX"
On Sun, Sep 25, 2016 at 02:05:46PM -0700, Patricia Shanahan wrote: > What is the status of https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=126622 ? > > Empirically, it does not reproduce in 4.1.3. Do we have a definite patch for > it? Should I list it in the 4.1.3 release notes as having been fixed. The fix will have to wait for 4.1.4, just like all the Mac OS X El Capitan and macOS Sierra build bugs (it is fixed just by building on an OS X Mountain Lion): https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127099 OpenSSL headers removed on El Capitan, can be worked around by installing OpenSSL from macports or homebrew; but this is just to build for developing, a release cannot be built in this condition. https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127137 Xcode 8 not recognized in configure, patches attached on the bug. Not much helpful as you cannot build do to the following https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127138 Build broken on macOS Sierra due to QuickTime Kit framework removal. Apple removed the headers, but applications using the framework still work; that is, you can insert and play audio and video on macOS Sierra with 4.1.3, but 4.1.3 cannot be built. In short, AOO cannot be built on El Capitan nor Sierra. Besides this macOS build issues, there is https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127139 on some Linux 32-bit systems. IMO these are not stoppers for this release, and they are not regressions introduced on the branch. Regards -- Ariel Constenla-Haile signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Bootstrap fails
On Sun, Sep 25, 2016 at 05:11:24PM +0300, Aleksandr Andreev wrote: > On Sun, Sep 25, 2016 at 12:12 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile > wrote: > > It's OK; I just asked because I haven't seen this error before on trunk; > > it seems some Ubuntu specific problem > > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ToolChain/CompilerFlags > > there, it suggested to add -fno-stack-protector or -nostdlib. > > > > Do these flags need to be passed to build or to configure? In theory, when linking the library. I opened https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127139 to track this issue. I don't have a system to reproduce it right now. I will try to set up a vm on the weekend. Regards -- Ariel Constenla-Haile signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Question: Naming the dev/openoffice/4.1.3 folders
On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 09:13:08AM -0700, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: > I've been puzzling about the folder names. Let me test my understanding. > > If all of the dev/openoffice/4.1.3/ files being uploaded become RC1, will it > be by renaming the folder (e.g., from 4.1.3 to 4.1.3-rc1) without changing > anything in the folders? (The files have the name they will have if they > become the release - no rc* in the file naming inside the release-candidate > folder.) > > That seems to be how folders were named with the rc number in the past. When > an rc* passes a release vote, that folder is moved to > release/openoffice/4.1.3 (without the -rc* suffix) and we are good to go. > > Is that the plan? The name of a folder is something trivial and meaningless to discuss; once all packages are uploaded it is just a svn mv, so there is no point to waste time on this topic right now. Regards -- Ariel Constenla-Haile signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Bootstrap fails
On Sun, Sep 25, 2016 at 11:51:44AM +0300, Aleksandr Andreev wrote: > Hello Ariel, > > On Sep 25, 2016 12:11 PM, "Ariel Constenla-Haile" > wrote: > > > > > > This looks the build bot error: > > > https://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/buildlogs/lin41x/main/svl/unxlngi6.pro/misc/logs/prj.txt > > > > Are you building trunk or a branch? > > > > I was trying to build trunk. Is that not the right course of action? It's OK; I just asked because I haven't seen this error before on trunk; it seems some Ubuntu specific problem https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ToolChain/CompilerFlags there, it suggested to add -fno-stack-protector or -nostdlib. Regards -- Ariel Constenla-Haile signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Bootstrap fails
Hi Aleksandr, On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 09:05:55PM +0300, Aleksandr Andreev wrote: > The build fails on Linux Mint 17.1 with the following messages: > > [ build LNK ] Library/passwordcontainer.uno.so > /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libc_nonshared.a(stack_chk_fail_local.oS): In > function `__stack_chk_fail_local': > (.text+0x10): undefined reference to `__stack_chk_fail' > collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status > make: *** > [/home/vlad/aoo/main/solver/420/unxlngi6.pro/workdir/LinkTarget/Library/passwordcontainer.uno.so] > Error 1 > dmake: Error code 2, while making 'all' > > 1 module(s): > svl > need(s) to be rebuilt > > Reason(s): > > ERROR: error 65280 occurred while making /home/vlad/aoo/main/svl/prj > > Any suggestions? This looks the build bot error: https://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/buildlogs/lin41x/main/svl/unxlngi6.pro/misc/logs/prj.txt Are you building trunk or a branch? Regards -- Ariel Constenla-Haile signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: svn commit: r15519 - in /dev/openoffice/4.1.2: ./ binaries/ binaries/ast/ binaries/ast/Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.3_MacOS_x86-64_install_ast.dmg.asc
On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 07:37:41PM -0700, Patricia Shanahan wrote: > It looks as though these commits are going under 4.1.2, not 4.1.3. Is that > deliberate? Yes ;) See my other mail, I want to test svn mv with my spare-dirs checkout. If it works, it would be just svn mv 4.1.2 4.1.3 with no need to checkout the folder's content. (I don't like subversion, so I'm learning it as I need it...). > On 9/24/2016 7:25 PM, arie...@apache.org wrote: > >Author: arielch > >Date: Sun Sep 25 02:25:41 2016 > >New Revision: 15519 > > > >Log: > >Prepare 4.1.3 release > > > >Added: > >dev/openoffice/4.1.2/ > >dev/openoffice/4.1.2/binaries/ > >dev/openoffice/4.1.2/binaries/ast/ > > > > dev/openoffice/4.1.2/binaries/ast/Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.3_MacOS_x86-64_install_ast.dmg.asc > >(with props) > > > >Added: > >dev/openoffice/4.1.2/binaries/ast/Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.3_MacOS_x86-64_install_ast.dmg.asc > >== > >Binary file - no diff available. > > > >Propchange: > >dev/openoffice/4.1.2/binaries/ast/Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.3_MacOS_x86-64_install_ast.dmg.asc > >-- > >svn:mime-type = application/pgp-signature > > > > > > --------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > -- Ariel Constenla-Haile signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: [4.1.3 release] Procedure for uploading binaries
On Sun, Sep 25, 2016 at 09:25:16AM +1000, Gavin McDonald wrote: > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Ariel Constenla-Haile [mailto:arie...@apache.org] > > Sent: Sunday, September 25, 2016 9:01 AM > > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > > Subject: [4.1.3 release] Procedure for uploading binaries > > > > Hi there, > > > > IIRC we used to upload the packages to our home directory at > > people.apache.org, once there I don't recall what the RM did until the > > packages ended on the subversion dist repo. > > > > Where should we upload the binaries now? > > The normal place is > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/ > > From there the RM can just 'svn mv' them from 'dev' to 'release' OK. So I started playing (do not get nervous, just with 4 files). This is my experiment: "svn mv" needs a working copy, so you need to checkout the repo, but there is no need to checkout the whole repo. Using http://svnbook.red-bean.com/en/1.7/svn.advanced.sparsedirs.html you can do the following: svn co --depth immediates https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist cd dist/ svn up --set-depth immediates dev svn up --set-depth immediates dev/openoffice svn up --set-depth immediates release svn up --set-depth immediates release/openoffice If different committers are going to upload different binaries, it seems better to use svn import instead of checking out and then committing; for example: svn import \ -m "Prepare 4.1.3 release" \ --username arielch \ Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.3_MacOS_x86-64_install_ast.dmg.asc \ https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.3/binaries/ast/Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.3_MacOS_x86-64_install_ast.dmg.asc (right now I checked these 4 files under dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.2 in order to test svn mv 4.1.2 4.1.3 with my previous sparse-dirs checkout). If someone knows a better way of doing this, please share it :) Regards -- Ariel Constenla-Haile La Plata, Argentina signature.asc Description: Digital signature
[4.1.3 release] Procedure for uploading binaries
Hi there, IIRC we used to upload the packages to our home directory at people.apache.org, once there I don't recall what the RM did until the packages ended on the subversion dist repo. Where should we upload the binaries now? Regards -- Ariel Constenla-Haile La Plata, Argentina signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Bootstrap fails
On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 12:44:46PM +0300, Aleksandr Andreev wrote: > Hello Ariel, > > I am building the source code I checked out from the Git repository here: > https://github.com/apache/openoffice It seems this repo isn't up-to-date, strange... I would have guessed this was synchronized; compare this repo with the subversion trunk: https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/openoffice/trunk/main/external_deps.lst?revision=1761808&view=markup#l267 https://github.com/apache/openoffice/blob/trunk/main/external_deps.lst#L270 If you dislike subversion, you will have to use git svn. Regards -- Ariel Constenla-Haile signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Bootstrap fails
Hi Aleksandr, On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 11:25:10AM +0300, Aleksandr Andreev wrote: > Hello list members, > > I am trying to build AOO from source, but the bootstrap script fails > because it cannot download something from svn.codespot.com. Is the > server down or is it a permanent problem? What version are you trying to build? I assume you are trying to build something old, like AOO411. https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/openoffice/tags/AOO411/main/external_deps.lst?view=markup https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/openoffice/tags/AOO412/main/external_deps.lst?view=markup Regards -- Ariel Constenla-Haile signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: 4.1.3 building
On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 12:25:19AM +0200, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > - Source revision r1761818 Isn't this time to agree that this revision will be the one we release? Haven't seen any call from the RM, but it might be time to start building it ;) I'll start doing so on Windows, as Jim and Andrea seem to cover the other platforms. -- Ariel Constenla-Haile La Plata signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Ready to setup release build machines?
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 12:10:29AM +0200, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> On 04/09/2016 Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> >https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/Building_Guide_AOO/Step_by_step#CentOS_5
> >Ideally, this would become a semi-scriptable recipe for preparing a
> >"standard" CentOS 5 VM for building OpenOffice releases, at least for
> >the 4.1.x series
>
> The recipe has now been updated including some clarifications from Ariel at
>
> https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/Building_Guide_AOO/Step_by_step#CentOS_5
>
> and (the way it is now; I haven't checked
> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127120 yet) it uses only packages
> from CentOS and EPEL repositories, plus custom Ant and Perl as the versions
> shipping with CentOS 5 are too old.
With the commit for this bug, in AOO413 you can use Perl from CentOS
repos, see
https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/Building_Guide_AOO#General_Build_Requirements
yum install \
perl-libwww-perl \
perl-Archive-Zip \
perl-Digest-SHA \
perl-XML-Parser \
perl-Crypt-SSLeay \
Regards
--
Ariel Constenla-Haile
La Plata, Argentina
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Re: building on Windows 10 breaks at guistdio.exe
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 07:12:29PM -0700, Patricia Shanahan wrote: > 4.1.3 does have changes to the language library URLs. Has anyone else done a > build that included Italian? His logs say aoo-trunk, so I assume John isn't building branch AOO413. NSIS >= 3.* is only on that branch. Regards -- Ariel Constenla-Haile signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: building on Windows 10 breaks at guistdio.exe
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 03:22:40AM +0200, John D'Orazio wrote: > I wound up building in stages, since the build was breaking here and there. > I just picked it up from where it left off as I fixed things. So I don't > have a single output... unless there is a log file that collects various > build stages together into one single output? > I would also recommend installing as many packages in cygwin as possible > without going through the extra step of installing lynx or apt-cyg... While > that does make the environment more similar to a linux build environment, > it's still an extra step and I believe it could be indicated as a second > possibliity. Somewhere in the Step by Step guide I added which packages to > choose in the cygwin interface if installing them from the cygwin > interface. I think installing the packages from the cygwin interface should > be indicated as the first step to take when first installing cygwin, adding > all the necessary packages along with the first install. > The only package I couldn't find from the cygwin interface was the Perl > LWP::UserAgent package, so I installed that using "cpan -i LWP::UserAgent". That is perl-LWP-Protocol-https, please see the updated version of https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/Building_Guide_AOO#General_Build_Requirements Regards -- Ariel Constenla-Haile signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Building 4.1.3: Error with dmake and further packages
On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 10:57:10PM +0200, Marcus wrote:
> it breaks again at the same place:
>
> ...
>
> [ info ALL ] LinkTarget Library/libxcr.so not defined: Assuming headers to
> be there!
> R=/share/linux2/AOO413 && S=$R/main && O=$S/solver/413/unxlngx6.pro &&
> W=$O/workdir && mkdir -p $W/ExternalHeaders/Library/ && touch
> $W/ExternalHeaders/Library/libxcr.so && mkdir -p $W/LinkTarget/pdb/Library/
> R=/share/linux2/AOO413 && S=$R/main && O=$S/solver/413/unxlngx6.pro &&
> W=$O/workdir && mkdir -p $W/Headers/Library/ && touch
> $W/Headers/Library/libxcr.so
> R=/share/linux2/AOO413 && S=$R/main && O=$S/solver/413/unxlngx6.pro &&
> W=$O/workdir && mkdir -p $W/ExternalHeaders/Library/ && touch
> $W/ExternalHeaders/Library/libsvx.so && mkdir -p $W/LinkTarget/pdb/Library/
> R=/share/linux2/AOO413 && S=$R/main && O=$S/solver/413/unxlngx6.pro &&
> W=$O/workdir && mkdir -p $W/Headers/Library/ && touch
> $W/Headers/Library/libsvx.so
> [ build DEP ] LNK:Library/libsvx.so
> R=/share/linux2/AOO413 && S=$R/main && O=$S/solver/413/unxlngx6.pro &&
> W=$O/workdir && mkdir -p $W/Dep/LinkTarget/Library/ &&
> RESPONSEFILE=/tmp/gbuild.ViuwkU && cat ${RESPONSEFILE} /dev/null | xargs -n
> 200 cat > $W/Dep/LinkTarget/Library/libsvx.so.d && rm -f ${RESPONSEFILE}
> /share/linux2/AOO413/main/solenv/gbuild/LinkTarget.mk:163: *** Unable to
> find generated C++ file
> /share/linux2/AOO413/main/solver/413/unxlngx6.pro/workdir/svx/source/sdr/attribute/sdrallfillattributeshelper.cxx
main/svx/source/sdr/attribute/sdrallfillattributeshelper.cxx
main/svx/inc/svx/sdr/attribute/sdrallfillattributeshelper.hxx
where introduced in revision 1599233 and are only part of trunk, not
branch AOO41*. How did you get the AOO413 source?
Regards
--
Ariel Constenla-Haile
La Plata, Argentina
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Re: Building 4.1.3: Error with dmake and further packages
Hi Marcus, On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 12:51:08PM +0200, Marcus wrote: > Hi all, > > I want to build the current 4.1.3 source. > > Therefore I've checked out today the new AOO413 branch (incl. Ariels last > commit r1761157 !). > > Configure was successful but bootstrap throws an error: > > > > download from > http://sourceforge.net/projects/oooextras.mirror/files/dmake-4.12.tar.bz2 > failed > download failed > making and entering > /share/linux2/AOO413/main/solenv/unxlngx6.pro/misc/build/ > can not find the dmake package > > > > It doesn't matter if it's a HTTP or HTTPS URL. It matters, sourceforge is redirecting all HTTP to HTTPS. > I can workaround this by using the dmake binary built in trunk with the > "--with-dmake-path" option. Then I can build until errors in these modules: > > more_fonts (which are the dejavu fonts), libxml2, expat, curl > > Looking at the errors it seems that the 4 package files cannot be build as > they were not downloaded. > > I think the downloading of external libraries/dependencis isn't working like > for trunk. Any reason for the difference? There have been some changes in the code that hasn't been cherrypicked, I'd try to merge those changes and test. > Needless to say that with trunk I don't have this problem. ;-) > > Any hint for root cause and solution? You might be missing some perl modules that enable HTTPS, the configure on branch AOO413 does not fail if those are not installed. Check if you have the following modules: perl-Archive-Zip perl-XML-Parser perl-Digest-SHA perl-Digest-MD5 perl-Crypt-SSLeay perl-libwww-perl perl-LWP-Protocol-https Do not install modules using CPAN, use the packagemanager, yum or dnf on newer Fedora. For example: dnf info perl-Crypt-SSLeay yum info perl-Crypt-SSLeay If the packages do not exist with this names, use the perl module path to find out which package provides it: dnf whatprovides */Crypt/SSLeay.pm yum whatprovides */Crypt/SSLeay.pm I opened two tasks: https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127119 https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127120 Regards -- Ariel Constenla-Haile signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: 4.1.4 Release Manager?
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 09:14:33PM +0200, Marcus wrote: > Am 09/15/2016 05:44 PM, schrieb Pedro Giffuni: > >I am rather amazed by the idea of 4.1.4, shouldn't we release > >4.2.0 instead? I mean ... > > > >- I thought the idea behind 4.1.3 was to make a quick fix for > >4.1.2 and to give more time for the 4.2.0 release process. > >- the code in trunk has over two years of development and is > >more secure than what lives in the 41* branch. It is rather > >disappointing to not see the code out sooner. trunk does not even compile on MacOSX, gbuild integration is broken, so until this gets fixed, it's IMHO better to keep the AOO41* branches buildable. > >I believe you should continue as Release Manager for 4.1.4, > >or 4.2.0; the changes for 4.1.3 will already have to be > >included in future releases and we could benefit from the > >momentum of the dot release. Your vacations should also > >not be a problem as other people are likely to be in > >vacations during December as well. > > I still think we should put more QA effort into a 4.2.0 as we have changed > to many things. I cannot remember anymore which libraryies we have changed > in the last time. So, at least this is a risk in my eyes that deserves much > more attention. Most of the library updates do not even have a bug report where the change can be tracked by QA. Updating a library should not be outside of the normal QA process, it means not only checking the source builds in all platforms, there should be a bug report where the developer that did the change identifies what functionality should be tested by QA volunteers. > Up to now I think tests where done here and there, e.g., when using a 4.2.0 > dev build for daily tasks. But I would like to see more efforts for deeper > tests before release this. AFAIK there is no formal QA for the library updates. Quality should be a priority. Regards -- Ariel Constenla-Haile signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: [VOTE] Recommend Marcus Lange (marcus) as the New Vice President for Apache OpenOffice
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 08:35:49AM -0700, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: > [BCC to PMC] > > RESOLUTION: That Marcus Lange (marcus) be recommended to the > Apache Software Foundation Board to serve as Vice President for > Apache OpenOffice. > > The Vice President for Apache OpenOffice serves in accordance with and > subject to the direction of the Board of Directors and the Bylaws of > the Foundation. The Vice President for Apache OpenOffice is the Chair > of the OpenOffice Project Management Committee. > > Please vote by reply to this dev@-list thread on approval of the > resolution. > [x] +1 Approve [ ] 0 Abstain [ ] -1 Disapprove, with explanation Regards -- Ariel Constenla-Haile La Plata, Argentina signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: dmake
Hi Jim, On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 10:13:08AM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote: > It looks like most of the epm patch is not related to OSX (except for > some minor things)... last time I tried on Linux some years ago with the latest upstream, it had several bugs; looking at the release notes, it seems they fixed several Linux bugs. https://www.msweet.org/projects.php?Z2 > The reliance on PackageMaker is a major > hurdle and one which will only get worse as things go on. > > epm 4.3 may not be feasible for non-OSX but so far it's been a > major boon for the Mac. The build system seems to do some weird things, checking if epm is patched by AOO: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/openoffice/trunk/main/solenv/bin/modules/installer/epmfile.pm?revision=1591062&view=markup#l849 I guess unpatched epm breaks somewhere. Note that we could also update the AOO patch to make epm get rid of the PackageMaker, the patch already fixes the path: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/openoffice/trunk/main/epm/epm-3.7.patch?revision=1413471&view=markup#l381 We could change that system call. > Has anyone been in contact w/ Michael Sweet to get our required > patches into his distro?? It seems that Sun developers didn't care about upstreamming their fixes, I tried now to look at the 4.3 bug fixes, and it required an account... https://www.msweet.org/login.php?PAGE=bugs.php%3FU497%2BP0%2BS-2%2BI0%2BE0%2BZ-1%2BQ Regards -- Ariel Constenla-Haile La Plata, Argentina signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Releasing OpenOffice 4.1.3 (reopening the AOO410 branch)
On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 12:40:48AM +0200, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > Recent events make it clear we will have to release OpenOffice 4.1.3 sooner > or later, with some duplication of work with respect to 4.1.2-patch1 but > with more clarity for those who couldn't see that we made a release last > month. > > I'll thus consider the AOO410 branch to be open again for the needed > structural fixes, like version numbering and similar. And I can take care of > fixing version numbers as I already did for 4.1.2. I'd suggest we create a AOO413 branch, as suggested on private@. Also, if the procedure didn't change, we should stick to the rule that only code with a bug and release blocker flag approved by the Release Manager can be checked in that branch; that is: if you want to include changes in the AOO413 branch: 1) open a bug 2) request releaser blocker status 3) only once the release manager approves the release blocker status, commit your changes Regards -- Ariel Constenla-Haile signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: [4.1.3 Release] Bugzilla admin tasks
Hi Patricia, On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 12:38:50PM -0700, Patricia Shanahan wrote: > >@Patricia: do you have a bugzilla account? https://bz.apache.org/ooo/ > >You should be added to the relman group, so that you can grant/deny the > >release blocker status on bugs. > > Yes, I have an account with user name p...@acm.org. What do I have to do to > get added to the relman group? A bugzilla admin can add you to this user group, I think I already did it, please check with the few release blockers we already have ;) This one is uncontroversial: https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127103 You should see a field named Flags, with the flag 4.1.3_release_blocker and a question mark, which means that this flag has been requested. If you belong to the RelMan group, you can grant/deny the flag, in the list box you should see a - sign (deny) and a + sign (grant). Regards -- Ariel Constenla-Haile signature.asc Description: Digital signature
[4.1.3 Release] Bugzilla admin tasks
Hi *, as part of the preparation for the 4.1.3 Release, Bugzilla has now: - 4.1.3 target milestone, to be set on bugs targeted to this release - 4.1.3 release blocker flag, request this flag on bugs you consider that should be included in the release. The Release Manager will grant/deny release blocker status @Patricia: do you have a bugzilla account? https://bz.apache.org/ooo/ You should be added to the relman group, so that you can grant/deny the release blocker status on bugs. Regards -- Ariel Constenla-Haile signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: What would OpenOffice NON-retirement involve?
Hi Jim, On Sat, Sep 03, 2016 at 05:20:08PM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote: > I had an issue w/ epm and PackageMaker, which is hardcoded in > configure to live in /Developer/ Also some other nits... For epm you have two options: - use --with-epm-url pointing to a tarball - build you own epm based on that very same version and with AOO patches applied, then use --with-epm These are my configure options: ./configure \ --with-build-version="$(date +"%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S (%a, %d %b %Y)")" \ --enable-verbose \ --enable-crashdump=yes \ --enable-wiki-publisher \ --with-dmake-url=http://sourceforge.net/projects/oooextras.mirror/files/dmake-4.12.tar.bz2 \ --with-epm-url=http://www.msweet.org/files/project2/epm-3.7-source.tar.gz \ --enable-category-b \ --enable-bundled-dictionaries \ --with-package-format="installed dmg" \ --with-jdk-home=/Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/jdk1.7.0_80.jdk/Contents/Home \ --with-ant-home=$HOME/aoo/build/apache-ant-1.9.7 \ --with-perl-home=/usr/local/ActivePerl-5.24 \ --disable-systray \ --without-junit My OS X El Capitan is a clean environment, no marcports nor homebrew, thus no headers in /usr/local nor /opt nor elsewhere (this is needed in order to reproduce the missing OpenSSL system headers bug). I don't even update nor install Perl modules, I just installed Perl from ActivePerl, that comes with everything out of the box. Regards -- Ariel Constenla-Haile signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: What would OpenOffice NON-retirement involve?
On Sat, Sep 03, 2016 at 03:17:01PM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote: > Cool... We should get rid of that old page or put DEPRECATED in big letters. > > So have people built w/ 10.11 and Xcode 7.2.1 ? I've just built branch AOO410 with the latest and greatest, you need to apply http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1714089 because 10.11 isn't detected, but see https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127099 @Pedro: is your commit linked to a bug report? Regards -- Ariel Constenla-Haile signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: [VOTE] Release apache-openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 Source
On Tue, Aug 02, 2016 at 07:48:12PM -0700, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: > Please vote by reply to this dev@-list thread on the approval of the > candidate for release. > > [ ] +1 Approve, with description > [ ] 0 Abstain > [ ] -1 Disapprove, with explanation +1 I've checked the signatures and the patch, which is the same I've applied to build the MacOSX and Linux binaries. Regards -- Ariel Constenla-Haile signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Mac buildbot [was: Re: CentOS build box.]
Hi jan, * On Mon, Jun 01, 2015 at 09:09:30AM +0200, jan i wrote: > Looking at other threads, it seems our Mac buildbots are in the process of > being > configured, does anybody have a planned ETA ? I have now access to the machine (thanks a lot to Gavin!), but cannot give you an ETA, though I'll try to do my best this weekend, at least starting with a simple setup. Regards -- Ariel Constenla-Haile La Plata, Argentina signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Controller class for documents/textView classes in Open Office (NSDocument like?)
Hello Anthony, On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 03:48:19PM -0400, ANTHONY CRUZ wrote: > Ideally, I’d like to work with the Open Office source code for the > main app on OS X. I was attempting to set up a working Xcode project > (which I prefer over Eclipse and I’m interested in the Aqua build), so > I’d be able to run and debug the application like a typical Cocoa app > but there isn’t an obvious way to set up an project since there is > quite a bit of source code and the class documentation is a bit hard > to find (for me, navigating the Wiki to find relevant info was not > easy). I never tried to use Xcode as an IDE with OpenOffice source code, so I can't tell; you should see if it can create a project from existing sources using an external build system. > Piecing it all together by looking through the source code with no > knowledge of a project of this size is going to be quite time > consuming so I was hoping someone could point me in the right > direction. Is there only a thin native Cocoa layer in the main app? Is > the textview used for documents native (does it use NSTextView?) OpenOffice is a multi-platform project, so the system-dependent parts are plugged-in and not used directly through the whole source code; there is a system abstraction layer in the VCL module, these classes are used all over the source code, the system dependent part is confined in plugins and not exposed to the applications; the following documentation is rather outdated, but it explains the concept of VCL plugins: http://www.openoffice.org/gsl/ http://www.openoffice.org/gsl/vcl/plugins/index.html Regards -- Ariel Constenla-Haile La Plata, Argentina signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Controller class for documents/textView classes in Open Office (NSDocument like?)
Hello Anthony, On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 06:35:00PM -0400, ANTHONY CRUZ wrote: > I’ve been digging through the source code in the Aqua build. I’m > mainly and ObjC developer. I’d love to be able to set up an Xcode > project and contribute to the project. > > After looking for a really long time for an app delegate (not loaded > from Interface Builder) I was able to find vclapp.mm. What are the > primary view classes in Apache open office for displaying the > documents? I’ve been looking for the class responsible for displaying > the contents of files (like a word document). I was hoping to find > a controller for a document that has a NSTextView property but I can’t > seem to find it. > > The Developer’s guide mostly has Java examples and when I search > I keep finding pages in the Wiki that are possibly out of date. Is the > document controller/text view done in Java? Or is there C++ or > Objective-C API for opening document windows? I know I can turn off > the Java runtime in Open Office preferences so i was hoping I could > avoid Java. > > Is there a C++ class for opening document files (analogous to an > NSDocument subclass, in a pure Objective-C app). I’d love to write an > Objective-C wrapper around it. I don't understand if you want to work OpenOffice source code, or just with its API. If the later, documents are loaded using the Desktop service, which implements the interface css.frame.XComponentLoader http://www.openoffice.org/api/docs/common/ref/com/sun/star/frame/Desktop.html http://www.openoffice.org/api/docs/common/ref/com/sun/star/frame/XComponentLoader.html The API is the same, you just have to implement the Java examples from the SDK in C++; look for example at http://markmail.org/message/llhnser4nmvb7jfx http://markmail.org/message/cl356hyng5utkuif You need to set up the SDK environment in order to build that examples (but you don't need to build nor study OpenOffice source code if you are just working with the API). Regards -- Ariel Constenla-Haile La Plata, Argentina signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: [OO_SDK] [linux] [Makefile] Errors while compiling examples in sdk
Hello Abhinav, On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 11:21:04AM +0530, Abhinav Tripathi wrote: > I tried to compile the examples again and i found that if i run > setsdkenv_unix from /opt/openoffice4/sdk then everything runs fine and the > examples compile. > But if i run setsdkenv_unix.sh from ~/openoffice4.1_sdk/ubuntu then errors > still arise. After a little digging, i found that it is because of the > current shell being closed as the sh script closes. so i used opened a new > shell and then ran it using : > bash > . ~/openoffice4.1_sdk/ubuntu/setsdkenv_unix.sh > now as long as i dont close the current shell using 'exit' i am able to > build the exmples. > . > I just wanted to ask if it is meant like this to always run the > setsdkenv_unix from sdk folder or if opening a new shell and running from > home directory is mandatory? You need to open a terminal and source ~/openoffice4.1_sdk/ubuntu/setsdkenv_unix.sh source ~/openoffice4.1_sdk/ubuntu/setsdkenv_unix.sh and make the examples inside this terminal with the SDK env. set by the script. Running from /opt/openoffice4/sdk/setsdkenv_unix is also fine; just read the script, you'll see that if you don't pass --force-configure and the already configured script exists in your home, it will source it. Regards -- Ariel Constenla-Haile La Plata, Argentina signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: [OO_SDK] [linux] [Makefile] Errors while compiling examples in sdk
Hello, On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 01:01:30AM -0700, Abhinav Tripathi wrote: > Hello! > I downloaded The OpenOffice deb files and Sdk deb file... > I used dpkg from command line to install all the deb files.. They got > installed in /opt/openoffice4 and Sdk in /opt/openoffice4/sdk > . > I had to use deb files from the website because i could download it from > the apt-get... > I am Using Ubuntu 14.10! > When i tried to compile any example in > /opt/openoffice4/sdk/examples/DevelopersGuide/ProfUNO/ i got many errors.. > . > To overcome some of these i did : > 1. copied all files from sdk/bin/ to my root folder /bin/ because the error > said /bin/cppumaker : command not found [...] You need to set up the SDK environment, you don't need to copy anything. Please read /opt/openoffice4/sdk/docs/install.html You need to execute /opt/openoffice4/sdk/setsdkenv_unix as a normal user, not root; provide all the information it will ask you. This will generate a script in your home directory that you must source every time you want to build an SDK example. The script takes care of setting the required environment variables, there is no need to copy anything from /opt to your home. Regards -- Ariel Constenla-Haile La Plata, Argentina signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Need help with strings
Hello Regina, On Wed, Apr 08, 2015 at 09:02:06PM +0200, Regina Henschel wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm going to improve the MathML type detection. Currently there exist files, > that can be opened or imported fine, when the type detection would allow it. > https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=126230 > > I have attached a C++ file to show what I want to do. > The problem is, that MathML does not need to be encoded in utf-8 but can > have any other encoding. For example MS Windows "Math Input Control" exports > formulas in utf-16. > > So my question is, which kind of string can I use, that is able to > detect/use utf-16 and has the needed methods similar to C++ string methods > find, rfind, insert, substring, clear, erase? Does AOO has such kind of > string? You can use OpenOffice's rtl string and string buffer classes, together with the lower lever text conversion from https://www.openoffice.org/api/docs/cpp/ref/names/o-textcvt.h.html > It is possible to get the encoding from the MathML file or set default > utf-8, in case that information is needed for to instantiate a string > object. If the file has no information about its encoding, you will have to perform some kind of encoding detection, see Writer's ASCII filter for example: bool SwIoSystem::IsDetectableText main/sw/source/filter/basflt/iodetect.cxx used in sal_uLong SwASCIIParser::ReadChars() main/sw/source/filter/ascii/parasc.cxx Searching rtl_convertTextToUnicode in OpenGrok might give other useful hints. Regards -- Ariel Constenla-Haile La Plata, Argentina signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Windows buildbot failures -- can you help?
On Wed, Apr 08, 2015 at 04:49:36PM +0100, Gavin McDonald wrote: > > Yes, it seems that someone must open a JIRA ticket and request access to > > the buildbot. > > Ok so the win7 build machine is maintained by Infra; and no accounts are > issued. > > feel free to open a BUILDS jira and I’ll take a look. > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BUILDS Thanks for the hint. Done at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BUILDS-70 Regards -- Ariel Constenla-Haile La Plata, Argentina signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: [Issue 54923] No obvious way to quickly increase/decrease font-size from the keyboard
On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 08:46:10AM -0400, Patrick Lynn wrote: > --- oldAccelerators.xcu 2015-03-31 11:23:58.838929202 -0400 > +++ Accelerators.xcu 2015-04-06 17:53:01.142849021 -0400 > @@ -4480,6 +4480,11 @@ >.uno:RepeatSearch > > > + > + I10N > SHORTCUTS - NO TRANSLATE > + .uno:Shrink > + > + > > I10N > SHORTCUTS - NO TRANSLATE >.uno:RepeatSearch > @@ -4566,6 +4571,11 @@ >.uno:WordLeftSel > > > + > + I10N > SHORTCUTS - NO TRANSLATE > + .uno:Shrink > + > + > > I10N > SHORTCUTS - NO TRANSLATE >.uno:LeftPara a) You are using the same command, .uno:Shrink. You should use two different commands, ".uno:Shrink" and ".uno:Grow" b) and these commands should be bound to different key strokes. In my keyboard layout both GREATER_SHIFT_MOD1 and LESS_SHIFT_MOD1 are the same, see Regina's answer. In my keyboard, < is next to SHIFT, and > is on the same key as < but has to be accessed with SHIFT. That's why in the demo extension I used LESS_MOD1 and GREATER_SHIFT_MOD1. Regards -- Ariel Constenla-Haile La Plata, Argentina signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Windows buildbot failures -- can you help?
On Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 09:12:15AM -0700, Kay Schenk wrote: > I saw these errors but since I am not on Windows, I didn't know how to > interpret them. Are you saying that AOO will not compile with this > version of MSPDBBD.DLL or, is something now wrong with this DLL? > > In any case, I do not have root level access to the win7 buildbot. So, > either someone that does can check this out, or, request this type of > access from infra. Yes, it seems that someone must open a JIRA ticket and request access to the buildbot. Regards -- Ariel Constenla-Haile La Plata, Argentina signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Windows buildbot failures -- can you help?
Hello Oliver, On Sat, Apr 04, 2015 at 10:13:10AM +0200, Oliver Brinzing wrote: > Hi, > > >>> If you've been building with Windows, we could use some assistance with > >>> tracking down our Windows buildbot problem. See our buildbot results > >>> page -- http://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/ > > yesterday i build an aoo debug version with source from > https://github.com/apache/openoffice > on a win 7 64bit vm. finally it worked (the vm crashed 2 times with a BSOD > and i had to clean > and restart...). > > I used same build setting as for my aoo 4.1.1 debug build 3 months ago: > > SourceMain=/cygdrive/c/build_tmp/aoo-src/main > cd $SourceMain > autoconf [...] > Can you tell me the build settings for an official build please? See comments in-line. > ./configure \ > --with-build-version="$(date +"%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S %z (%a, %d %b %Y)")" \ > --with-vendor="AOO Debug Build" \ > --with-dmake-url="http://dmake.apache-extras.org.codespot.com/files/dmake-4.12.tar.bz2"; > \ > --with-ant-home="/cygdrive/c/build/ant" \ > --with-mozilla-build="/cygdrive/c/build/mozilla-build" \ > --with-frame-home="/cygdrive/c/Program Files/Microsoft SDKs/Windows/v7.0" \ > --with-psdk-home="/cygdrive/c/Program Files/Microsoft SDKs/Windows/v7.0" \ > --with-midl-path="/cygdrive/c/Program Files/Microsoft SDKs/Windows/v7.0/bin" \ > --with-cl-home="/cygdrive/c/Program Files (x86)/Microsoft Visual Studio > 9.0/VC" \ > --with-mspdb-path="/cygdrive/c/Program Files (x86)/Microsoft Visual Studio > 9.0/Common7/IDE" \ > --with-asm-home="/cygdrive/c/Program Files (x86)/Microsoft Visual Studio > 9.0/VC/bin" \ > --with-csc-path="/cygdrive/c/Windows/Microsoft.NET/Framework/v3.5" \ > --with-jdk-home="/cygdrive/c/Program Files (x86)/Java/jdk1.7.0" \ > --with-nsis-path="/cygdrive/c/Program Files (x86)/NSIS/Unicode" \ > --with-directx-home="/cygdrive/c/Program Files (x86)/Microsoft DirectX SDK > (June 2010)" \ > --with-atl-include-dir="/cygdrive/c/WinDDK/7600.16385.1/inc/atl71" \ > --with-atl-lib-dir="/cygdrive/c/WinDDK/7600.16385.1/lib/ATL/i386" \ > --with-mfc-include-dir="/cygdrive/c/WinDDK/7600.16385.1/inc/mfc42" \ > --with-mfc-lib-dir="/cygdrive/c/WinDDK/7600.16385.1/lib/Mfc/i386" \ > --enable-pch \ > --with-package-format="installed msi" \ > --enable-win-x64-shellext \ > --enable-category-b \ > --enable-bundled-dictionaries \ > --with-lang="de" \ > --without-stlport \ > --without-junit \ Remove these: > --without-fonts \ > --disable-online-update \ > --disable-odk \ > --disable-strip-solver \ > --enable-symbols \ > --enable-dbgutil \ > --enable-crashdump \ > --enable-debug \ This one can be kept. It only affect the build environment. > --enable-verbose \ > > ./bootstrap > source winenv.set.sh > cd instsetoo_native > build --all -P2 -- -P2 --html will give you something like this: http://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/buildlogs/linux64/log/unxlngx6.pro.build.html Regards -- Ariel Constenla-Haile La Plata, Argentina signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Proposal: Bump CentOS reference distribution from 5 to 6
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 08:03:04AM +0100, jan i wrote: > To be fair, even has pretty much given up on AOO and buildbots, we can get > VMs if we want to and manage them ourself. That sound interesting. Can you outline the procedure to get one, or point to the respective documentation? Regards -- Ariel Constenla-Haile La Plata, Argentina signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Mac buildbot?
On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 05:08:08PM +0100, jan i wrote: > hi > > when I look at http://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/ > I cannot see the Mac buildbots we got last year, can someone tell me what > hte status is? > > I need this info for our upcomming board report where I try to make a > project status as new chair. According to https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-4902 "Mac mini setup at OSU colo, creds handed off to Andrew Rist", this may translate as: the Mac mini is in some University and the credentials are in the hands of arist. I'd like to have access to that machine, do you know who/where should ask for it? Regards -- Ariel Constenla-Haile La Plata, Argentina signature.asc Description: Digital signature
