RE: soltools need(s) to be rebuilt

2013-12-11 Thread Απόστολος Συρόπουλος
Many of those projects have RTTI or C++ exceptions disabled, so problems with typeinfo visibility may not show up there. I have figured out that I need to use GCC with the Solaris linker to avoid all these problems. BTW, the GCC people suggest people who use their compiler on Solaris to

Re: soltools need(s) to be rebuilt

2013-12-08 Thread Herbert Duerr
γειά σου Απόστολος, I have to admit that I have no clue about libxmlsec's detailed configure requirements, so I'm afraid I can't help here much. But with the knowledge that licrypto comes from openssl, with libxmlsec complaining about the one openssl is providing maybe some changed linker or

RE: soltools need(s) to be rebuilt

2013-12-07 Thread Απόστολος Συρόπουλος
Dear Herbert, I have to admit that I have no clue about libxmlsec's detailed configure requirements, so I'm afraid I can't help here much. But with the knowledge that licrypto comes from openssl, with libxmlsec complaining about the one openssl is providing maybe some changed linker or

Re: soltools need(s) to be rebuilt

2013-12-05 Thread Herbert Duerr
Hi Απόστολος, On 04.12.2013 21:28, Απόστολος Συρόπουλος wrote: I am still struggling... Now I was trying to build libxmlsec and the configuration parameters did not give the expected result. I had to enter manually the following command ./configure ADDCFLAGS= CPPFLAGS= --with-pic

RE: soltools need(s) to be rebuilt

2013-12-05 Thread Απόστολος Συρόπουλος
Hello Herbert, Did it build with these configure options? Except for the minor nit that --with-openssl is set twice, it looks good to me. The option has been set as no and as /usr, but AFAIK the no should win. The problem is that when configuring without the /usr value, the configure

RE: soltools need(s) to be rebuilt

2013-12-04 Thread Απόστολος Συρόπουλος
Hello, I am still struggling... Now I was trying to build libxmlsec and the configuration parameters did not give the expected result. I had to enter manually the following command ./configure ADDCFLAGS= CPPFLAGS= --with-pic --disable-shared --disable-crypto-dl --with-libxslt=no

Re: soltools need(s) to be rebuilt

2013-12-02 Thread Herbert Duerr
On 01.12.2013 20:26, Απόστολος Συρόπουλος wrote: After reading the reply by jan I. I decided to try again with GCC. Now, compilation proceeds with no stupid problems as before. BTW, main/soltools/adjustvisibility/adjustvisibility.c does not compile with g++ but it compiles with CC so this is

RE: soltools need(s) to be rebuilt

2013-12-01 Thread Απόστολος Συρόπουλος
Hello again, I have downloaded the source code and I have reconfigured etc. What I have observed so far is that there are a number of utilities that consist of C and C++ source files. In all these cases, the build script uses the C compile and so obviously it fails to build the object files. For

Re: soltools need(s) to be rebuilt

2013-12-01 Thread jan i
On 1 December 2013 15:44, Απόστολος Συρόπουλος asyropoulos...@hotmail.comwrote: Hello again, I have downloaded the source code and I have reconfigured etc. What I have observed so far is that there are a number of utilities that consist of C and C++ source files. In all these cases, the

RE: soltools need(s) to be rebuilt

2013-12-01 Thread Απόστολος Συρόπουλος
After reading the reply by jan I. I decided to try again with GCC. Now, compilation proceeds with no stupid problems as before. BTW, main/soltools/adjustvisibility/adjustvisibility.c does not compile with g++ but it compiles with CC so this is the only thing I had to do manually. However, now

Re: soltools need(s) to be rebuilt

2013-11-29 Thread Herbert Duerr
On 28.11.2013 18:31, Απόστολος Συρόπουλος wrote: [...] I am proceeding slowly now since many things fail and I have to do them manually. For example, the following fails configure: configuring in CoinUtils configure: running /bin/sh './configure'

RE: soltools need(s) to be rebuilt

2013-11-29 Thread Απόστολος Συρόπουλος
The quoted -features=rvalueref compiler option is probably caused by the ARCH_FLAGS define in main/solenv/inc/unxsoli4.mk I suggest to unquote it. But why did it work for others? Did dmake unquote automatically at one time? I have no idea :-( However, I have managed to go further and now

Re: soltools need(s) to be rebuilt

2013-11-29 Thread Kay Schenk
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 11:41 AM, Απόστολος Συρόπουλος asyropoulos...@hotmail.com wrote: The quoted -features=rvalueref compiler option is probably caused by the ARCH_FLAGS define in main/solenv/inc/unxsoli4.mk I suggest to unquote it. But why did it work for others? Did dmake unquote

RE: soltools need(s) to be rebuilt

2013-11-28 Thread Απόστολος Συρόπουλος
I dont know how you managed to get that directory. I was manually building inside this folder... the build system never add files or changes in the source directories. When I look in main/soltools/mkdepend on my system (after a complete build): cd mkdepend/ ls collectdircontent.cxx

Re: soltools need(s) to be rebuilt

2013-11-28 Thread jan i
On 28 November 2013 18:31, Απόστολος Συρόπουλος asyropoulos...@hotmail.comwrote: I dont know how you managed to get that directory. I was manually building inside this folder... the build system never add files or changes in the source directories. When I look in

Re: soltools need(s) to be rebuilt

2013-11-27 Thread jan i
On 27 November 2013 19:40, Απόστολος Συρόπουλος asyropoulos...@hotmail.comwrote: Hello, I have come to the conclusion that OpenOffice cannot be configured (at least easily) to compile with GNU g++ under Solaris. So I have tried Solaris Studio. Now I am getting the following error message:

RE: soltools need(s) to be rebuilt

2013-11-27 Thread Απόστολος Συρόπουλος
As with any makefile, the whole chain is checked, and when you are in soltools/mkdepend it check the object files against the source, and the exe against the object files. I work on changing the build system, and I often cheat the make system by doing touch obj file, that way its not