Hi Dennis,
Dennis E. Hamilton schrieb:
-Original Message-
From: Jürgen Schmidt [mailto:jogischm...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2015 10:04
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] [VOTE] Release 4.1.2-RC3 as OpenOffice 4.1.2
On 27/10/15 17:45, Regina Henschel wrote
> -Original Message-
> From: Jürgen Schmidt [mailto:jogischm...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2015 10:04
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] [VOTE] Release 4.1.2-RC3 as OpenOffice 4.1.2
>
> On 27/10/15 17:45, Regina Henschel
On 27/10/15 17:45, Regina Henschel wrote:
> Hi Jürgen,
>
> Jürgen Schmidt schrieb:
>>
>> checked the build in the morning and en-US built was successful. Besides
>> the fact that we have some issues on newer Linux distros (we ever had)
>> the src package is fine.
>>
>> @Regina, I still have no ide
Hi Jürgen,
Jürgen Schmidt schrieb:
checked the build in the morning and en-US built was successful. Besides
the fact that we have some issues on newer Linux distros (we ever had)
the src package is fine.
@Regina, I still have no ideas what the problem is in your env but maybe
you can give one
On 26/10/15 15:05, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> On 26/10/15 12:17, Regina Henschel wrote:
>> Hi Jürgen,
>>
>> Jürgen Schmidt schrieb:
>>> On 26/10/15 09:31, Regina Henschel wrote:
[x] 0 Abstain
It is still not clear, whether the fact, that I cannot build the
delivered source on Windo
On 23/10/2015 Andrea Pescetti wrote:
We have been in the Release Candidate stage for three weeks and it is
now time to start a VOTE for releasing OpenOffice 4.1.2. ...
I'm initially keeping the VOTE just a bit longer than the minimum 72
hours: please vote by Monday 26 October, 14:00 UTC. ...
So p
On 26/10/15 12:17, Regina Henschel wrote:
> Hi Jürgen,
>
> Jürgen Schmidt schrieb:
>> On 26/10/15 09:31, Regina Henschel wrote:
>>> [x] 0 Abstain
>>>
>>> It is still not clear, whether the fact, that I cannot build the
>>> delivered source on Windows 7 is a problem in my build environment or a
>>>
Niltze, all!
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 4:17 AM, Regina Henschel
wrote:
> Hi Jürgen,
>
> Jürgen Schmidt schrieb:
>>
>> On 26/10/15 09:31, Regina Henschel wrote:
>>>
>>> [x] 0 Abstain
>>>
>>> It is still not clear, whether the fact, that I cannot build the
>>> delivered source on Windows 7 is a pro
Hi Jürgen,
Jürgen Schmidt schrieb:
On 26/10/15 09:31, Regina Henschel wrote:
[x] 0 Abstain
It is still not clear, whether the fact, that I cannot build the
delivered source on Windows 7 is a problem in my build environment or a
bug in the source.
Regina I don't know why it doesn't build on y
So please VOTE on releasing RC3 (as defined above) as OpenOffice 4.1.2:
[ X ] +1 Approve
[ ] 0 Abstain
[ ] -1 Disapprove, with explanation
Regards,
Andrea.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache
On 23/10/15 13:50, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> We have been in the Release Candidate stage for three weeks and it is
> now time to start a VOTE for releasing OpenOffice 4.1.2.
>
> Source and binary packages for RC3 are available at
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/
> and the refere
On 26/10/15 09:31, Regina Henschel wrote:
> [x] 0 Abstain
>
> It is still not clear, whether the fact, that I cannot build the
> delivered source on Windows 7 is a problem in my build environment or a
> bug in the source.
Regina I don't know why it doesn't build on your machine but I
successfully
+1 Approve
Andrea Pescetti 於 2015年10月26日 08:06 寫道:
> On 23/10/2015 Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>> So please VOTE on releasing RC3 (as defined above) as OpenOffice 4.1.2:
>> [ ] +1 Approve
>> [ ] 0 Abstain
>> [ ] -1 Disapprove, with explanation
>
> +1 Approve
>
> Verified signatures, checksums, li
[x] 0 Abstain
It is still not clear, whether the fact, that I cannot build the
delivered source on Windows 7 is a problem in my build environment or a
bug in the source.
Kind regards
Regina
Andrea Pescetti schrieb:
We have been in the Release Candidate stage for three weeks and it is
now ti
On 23.10.2015 13:50, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> So please VOTE on releasing RC3 (as defined above) as OpenOffice 4.1.2:
> [ ] +1 Approve
> [ ] 0 Abstain
> [ ] -1 Disapprove, with explanation
>
+1 Approve
de-deb 32 bit
Regards
Michael
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 10/25/2015 04:24 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
>> Ok, I am changing my vote to:
>> [0] Abstain
>
> Thanks for your understanding.
>
>> I suppose since the file is generated, unused, and was present in
>> previous
>> releases, it shouldn't stop this release. ...
>> since
On 23/10/2015 Andrea Pescetti wrote:
So please VOTE on releasing RC3 (as defined above) as OpenOffice 4.1.2:
[ ] +1 Approve
[ ] 0 Abstain
[ ] -1 Disapprove, with explanation
+1 Approve
Verified signatures, checksums, licenses, built from scratch on Linux,
tested Italian localization, test
Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
Ok, I am changing my vote to:
[0] Abstain
Thanks for your understanding.
I suppose since the file is generated, unused, and was present in previous
releases, it shouldn't stop this release. ...
since the file is a generated file and not a source file, that may not
appl
On 10/23/2015 04:50 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> We have been in the Release Candidate stage for three weeks and it
> is now time to start a VOTE for releasing OpenOffice 4.1.2.
>
> Source and binary packages for RC3 are available at
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/
> and the
I don't see the "...Env.Set.sh" file as code file and therefore the
rules don't apply here. But to be super-sure just delete the generated
file(s) from the source tar balls and rebuild only these new.
And +1 for extending the release notes with the other issues that affect
the binaries.
Marc
+1
Tested on Windows 8.1 64-Bit
Marcus
Am 10/23/2015 01:50 PM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
We have been in the Release Candidate stage for three weeks and it is
now time to start a VOTE for releasing OpenOffice 4.1.2.
Source and binary packages for RC3 are available at
https://dist.apache.org/
Ok, I am changing my vote to:
[0] Abstain
See below for details.
On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 10:10 AM, Andrea Pescetti
wrote:
> Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
>
>> [-1] Disapprove
>>
>
> That's bad! Let's see if we can manage to explain it and at least get a 0,
> since I don't see anything really blocking
Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
[-1] Disapprove
That's bad! Let's see if we can manage to explain it and at least get a
0, since I don't see anything really blocking in your reports (I mean,
we do not require that the release has no issues at all, and we agree
that what we are releasing is better th
[-1] Disapprove
The deal breakers:
1. The source tarball (tar.bz2 at least) contains main/MacOSXX64Env.Set and
main/MacOSXX64Env.Set.sh. I don't believe they belong in there (they're not
in trunk), and if they do, they're missing ASLv2 licenses and cause
unapproved license errors in the RAT report
[+1] +1 Approve
Installed OK on Xubuntu 15.10.
--
Rory O'Farrell
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
[+1] Approve
De-Debs 64 bit tested
Am 23.10.2015 um 13:50 schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
> We have been in the Release Candidate stage for three weeks and it
> is now time to start a VOTE for releasing OpenOffice 4.1.2.
>
> Source and binary packages fo
We have been in the Release Candidate stage for three weeks and it is
now time to start a VOTE for releasing OpenOffice 4.1.2.
Source and binary packages for RC3 are available at
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/
and the reference revision is r1709696. Many people helped in maki
27 matches
Mail list logo
