Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev5 ?

[Dave Fisher]

> On Feb 6, 2024, at 2:00 PM, Pedro Lino  wrote:
> 
> Hi Dave, all
> 
>> On 02/04/2024 8:01 PM WET Dave Fisher  wrote:
>> 
>> 
>>> On Feb 3, 2024, at 5:24 PM, Pedro Lino  
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi all
>>> 
>>> While testing if Bug
>>> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127783
>>> was fixed (it isn't), I noticed that in the File Open dialog the File Type 
>>> filter does not include any MS XML files.
>>> I believe this needs to be added...
>>> 
>>> My question is: should I add it in Bug report
>>> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=67442
>>> which already includes some patches, or open a new bug number?
>> 
>> Do you plan on fixing it with the same PR, or with separate PRs?
> 
> Unfortunately I am not a programmer so I do not plan to fix it.
> I'm available for reporting and testing.
> 
> I hope someone else on this list has the time/interest to add those patches.

Since this is the case then Ann additional issue with links between the two 
will help a developer who picks up these issues.

Best,
Dave
> 
> Best,
> Pedro
> 
>>>> On 01/07/2024 12:36 PM WET Matthias Seidel  
>>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Hi All,
>>>> 
>>>> and a happy new year!
>>>> 
>>>> After successfully releasing AOO 4.1.15 in December we should now work 
>>>> towards a renewed Developer Edition 5 for AOO 4.2.0.
>>>> 
>>>> I am still in the massive process to clean up our Help files, so the 
>>>> whole translation process may be postponed to Dev 6.
>>>> 
>>>> Opinions?
>>>> 
>>>> Regards,
>>>> 
>>>>   Matthias
>>> 
>>> -
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org 
> <mailto:dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org>
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org 
> <mailto:dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org>

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev5 ?

[Pedro Lino]

Hi Dave, all

> On 02/04/2024 8:01 PM WET Dave Fisher  wrote:
> 
>  
> > On Feb 3, 2024, at 5:24 PM, Pedro Lino  
> > wrote:
> > 
> > Hi all
> > 
> > While testing if Bug
> > https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127783
> > was fixed (it isn't), I noticed that in the File Open dialog the File Type 
> > filter does not include any MS XML files.
> > I believe this needs to be added...
> > 
> > My question is: should I add it in Bug report
> > https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=67442
> > which already includes some patches, or open a new bug number?
> 
> Do you plan on fixing it with the same PR, or with separate PRs?

Unfortunately I am not a programmer so I do not plan to fix it.
I'm available for reporting and testing.

I hope someone else on this list has the time/interest to add those patches.

Best,
Pedro

> >> On 01/07/2024 12:36 PM WET Matthias Seidel  
> >> wrote:
> >> 
> >> 
> >> Hi All,
> >> 
> >> and a happy new year!
> >> 
> >> After successfully releasing AOO 4.1.15 in December we should now work 
> >> towards a renewed Developer Edition 5 for AOO 4.2.0.
> >> 
> >> I am still in the massive process to clean up our Help files, so the 
> >> whole translation process may be postponed to Dev 6.
> >> 
> >> Opinions?
> >> 
> >> Regards,
> >> 
> >>Matthias
> > 
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> > 
> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

AOO 4.2.0-Dev5 Community Builds Available for Testing and Fun

[Jim Jagielski]

We have community builds of AOO 4.2.0-Dev5 available for download and testing 
at:

https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.2.0-Dev5/

We encourage people to try these builds out and to provide feedback and PRs 
against them; These are NOT production ready! Heck, they aren't even BETA 
ready. These are simply a more formal snapshot of the 4.2.0 development branch, 
which leads to the official release of 4.2.0 at some future point. Early 
testing helps the development process.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev5 ?

[Dave Fisher]

> On Feb 3, 2024, at 5:24 PM, Pedro Lino  wrote:
> 
> Hi all
> 
> While testing if Bug
> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127783
> was fixed (it isn't), I noticed that in the File Open dialog the File Type 
> filter does not include any MS XML files.
> I believe this needs to be added...
> 
> My question is: should I add it in Bug report
> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=67442
> which already includes some patches, or open a new bug number?

Do you plan on fixing it with the same PR, or with separate PRs?

Best,
Dave

> 
> Best,
> Pedro
> 
>> On 01/07/2024 12:36 PM WET Matthias Seidel  
>> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> Hi All,
>> 
>> and a happy new year!
>> 
>> After successfully releasing AOO 4.1.15 in December we should now work 
>> towards a renewed Developer Edition 5 for AOO 4.2.0.
>> 
>> I am still in the massive process to clean up our Help files, so the 
>> whole translation process may be postponed to Dev 6.
>> 
>> Opinions?
>> 
>> Regards,
>> 
>>Matthias
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev5 ?

[Pedro Lino]

Hi all

While testing if Bug
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127783
was fixed (it isn't), I noticed that in the File Open dialog the File Type 
filter does not include any MS XML files.
I believe this needs to be added...

My question is: should I add it in Bug report
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=67442
which already includes some patches, or open a new bug number?

Best,
Pedro

> On 01/07/2024 12:36 PM WET Matthias Seidel  wrote:
> 
>  
> Hi All,
> 
> and a happy new year!
> 
> After successfully releasing AOO 4.1.15 in December we should now work 
> towards a renewed Developer Edition 5 for AOO 4.2.0.
> 
> I am still in the massive process to clean up our Help files, so the 
> whole translation process may be postponed to Dev 6.
> 
> Opinions?
> 
> Regards,
> 
>     Matthias

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev5 ?

[Dave Fisher]

We should not announce dev builds outside of this mailing list. They are in no 
way official and the intention is help the dev community in development. And 
this is great because that is what you both are doing.


Thank you,
Dave

> On Feb 2, 2024, at 12:27 PM, Matthias Seidel  
> wrote:
> 
> Hi All,
> 
> Am 30.01.24 um 17:42 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>> 
>>> On Jan 30, 2024, at 7:53 AM, Jim Jagielski  wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
 On Jan 30, 2024, at 5:23 AM, Matthias Seidel  
 wrote:
 
 Hi Jim,
 
 Am 30.01.24 um 11:11 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> macOS and Linux64 have also been uploaded.
 Great!
>>> I'll start on Linux32 bit builds today.
>>> 
>> 
>> Those are now uploaded!
> 
> Great!
> 
> So what do we do with Dev5 now? Announce it?
> 
> Basically it is just a snapshot...
> 
> I would have liked to have more features, bugfixes and updated translations 
> included, but maybe we are able to add that for Dev6?
> 
> Regarding translation, I worked hard on the Help files and some parts of the 
> UI and the exported en-US.sdf is *much* cleaner now:
> 
> https://nightlies.apache.org/openoffice/install/linsnap-42x/?C=M;O=D 
> 
> 
> Additionally I put together the Help Authoring Tool (based on our current 
> code):
> 
> https://home.apache.org/~mseidel/HelpAuthoring.oxt 
> 
> 
> I was able to tweak AOO on Linux to open existing XHP files, but this tool 
> still needs a lot of attention from developers...
> 
> Regards,
> 
>Matthias
> 
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org 
>> 
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org 
>> 

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev5 ?

[Matthias Seidel]

Hi All,

Am 30.01.24 um 17:42 schrieb Jim Jagielski:



On Jan 30, 2024, at 7:53 AM, Jim Jagielski  wrote:




On Jan 30, 2024, at 5:23 AM, Matthias Seidel  wrote:

Hi Jim,

Am 30.01.24 um 11:11 schrieb Jim Jagielski:

macOS and Linux64 have also been uploaded.

Great!

I'll start on Linux32 bit builds today.



Those are now uploaded!


Great!

So what do we do with Dev5 now? Announce it?

Basically it is just a snapshot...

I would have liked to have more features, bugfixes and updated 
translations included, but maybe we are able to add that for Dev6?


Regarding translation, I worked hard on the Help files and some parts of 
the UI and the exported en-US.sdf is *much* cleaner now:


https://nightlies.apache.org/openoffice/install/linsnap-42x/?C=M;O=D

Additionally I put together the Help Authoring Tool (based on our 
current code):


https://home.apache.org/~mseidel/HelpAuthoring.oxt

I was able to tweak AOO on Linux to open existing XHP files, but this 
tool still needs a lot of attention from developers...


Regards,

   Matthias


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



smime.p7s
Description: Kryptografische S/MIME-Signatur

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev5 ?

[Jim Jagielski]

> On Jan 30, 2024, at 7:53 AM, Jim Jagielski  wrote:
> 
> 
> 
>> On Jan 30, 2024, at 5:23 AM, Matthias Seidel  
>> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi Jim,
>> 
>> Am 30.01.24 um 11:11 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>>> macOS and Linux64 have also been uploaded.
>> Great!
> 
> I'll start on Linux32 bit builds today.
> 


Those are now uploaded!
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev5 ?

[Jim Jagielski]

> On Jan 30, 2024, at 5:23 AM, Matthias Seidel  
> wrote:
> 
> Hi Jim,
> 
> Am 30.01.24 um 11:11 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>> macOS and Linux64 have also been uploaded.
> Great!

I'll start on Linux32 bit builds today.

>> 
>> Since these are developer builds and not intended to be release candidates, 
>> do we still need to bump? I guess we should anyway since these are now out 
>> in the wild.
> I am not sure, but we did that with all dev builds before. And we tagged 
> them. They are kind of official somehow.
> 
> In fact I have already committed the changes... ;-)
> 

Make sense. Thanks!

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev5 ?

[Matthias Seidel]

Hi Jim,

Am 30.01.24 um 11:11 schrieb Jim Jagielski:

macOS and Linux64 have also been uploaded.

Great!


Since these are developer builds and not intended to be release candidates, do 
we still need to bump? I guess we should anyway since these are now out in the 
wild.
I am not sure, but we did that with all dev builds before. And we tagged 
them. They are kind of official somehow.


In fact I have already committed the changes... ;-)

Regards,

   Matthias




On Jan 27, 2024, at 4:38 AM, Matthias Seidel  wrote:

All Windows builds are uploaded.

@Jim: We need to bump up the version number number, don't we?

Am 26.01.24 um 19:05 schrieb Matthias Seidel:

My AOO4.2.0-Dev5 Windows builds of #c51e9806e6 were successful and I will 
upload then (incl. hashes, etc.) soon to:

https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.2.0-Dev5/

Regards,

Matthias

Am 24.01.24 um 18:32 schrieb Matthias Seidel:

Am 24.01.24 um 13:05 schrieb Jim Jagielski:

Are we ready for a Dev5 in any case?

I am ready as soon as we decide on a Git hash to build.

On Jan 15, 2024, at 10:02 AM, Matthias Seidel  
wrote:

Am 10.01.24 um 19:14 schrieb Matthias Seidel:

Am 10.01.24 um 15:01 schrieb Jim Jagielski:

Lets fold this in and build -Dev5 after it's committed

Committed it, didn't build on Linux Buildbot, reverted it.

I am out! If someone else is interested, please take over.

Matthias


+1

On Jan 9, 2024, at 6:18 AM, Matthias Seidel  wrote:

Hi Pedro,

Am 09.01.24 um 12:08 schrieb Pedro Lino:

Hi Matthias, all


On 01/09/2024 10:37 AM WET Matthias Seidel  wrote:
Unless someone else volunteers, I can do the Windows builds.

Please do ;)


Something we want to integrate?

How about this PR:

https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/194

Is this a Linux fix only? What does boost do? Improve calculation speed?

I already did a build for Windows, boost is part of our build system.

We need to check for macOS/Linux now.


In any case, +1 to updating libraries

That is the intention.

Regards,

  Matthias


Best,
Pedro


Am 08.01.24 um 14:06 schrieb Jim Jagielski:

I'm up for doing the dev tarballs for Linux and macOS


On Jan 7, 2024, at 5:55 PM, Keith N. McKenna  wrote:

Matthias Seidel wrote:

Hi All,
and a happy new year!
After successfully releasing AOO 4.1.15 in December we should now work towards 
a renewed Developer Edition 5 for AOO 4.2.0.
I am still in the massive process to clean up our Help files, so the whole 
translation process may be postponed to Dev 6.
Opinions?
Regards,
   Matthias

I think concentrating on a dev 5 would be a very good thing. We need to see 
movement on 4.2.0.

Regards
Keith



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



smime.p7s
Description: Kryptografische S/MIME-Signatur

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev5 ?

[Jim Jagielski]

macOS and Linux64 have also been uploaded.

Since these are developer builds and not intended to be release candidates, do 
we still need to bump? I guess we should anyway since these are now out in the 
wild.

> On Jan 27, 2024, at 4:38 AM, Matthias Seidel  
> wrote:
> 
> All Windows builds are uploaded.
> 
> @Jim: We need to bump up the version number number, don't we?
> 
> Am 26.01.24 um 19:05 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>> My AOO4.2.0-Dev5 Windows builds of #c51e9806e6 were successful and I will 
>> upload then (incl. hashes, etc.) soon to:
>> 
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.2.0-Dev5/
>> 
>> Regards,
>> 
>>Matthias
>> 
>> Am 24.01.24 um 18:32 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>>> Am 24.01.24 um 13:05 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>>>> Are we ready for a Dev5 in any case?
>>> I am ready as soon as we decide on a Git hash to build.
>>>> 
>>>>> On Jan 15, 2024, at 10:02 AM, Matthias Seidel 
>>>>>  wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Am 10.01.24 um 19:14 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>>>>>> Am 10.01.24 um 15:01 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>>>>>>> Lets fold this in and build -Dev5 after it's committed
>>>>> Committed it, didn't build on Linux Buildbot, reverted it.
>>>>> 
>>>>> I am out! If someone else is interested, please take over.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Matthias
>>>>> 
>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>> On Jan 9, 2024, at 6:18 AM, Matthias Seidel 
>>>>>>>>  wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Hi Pedro,
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Am 09.01.24 um 12:08 schrieb Pedro Lino:
>>>>>>>>> Hi Matthias, all
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> On 01/09/2024 10:37 AM WET Matthias Seidel 
>>>>>>>>>>  wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>Unless someone else volunteers, I can do the Windows builds.
>>>>>>>>> Please do ;)
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Something we want to integrate?
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> How about this PR:
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/194
>>>>>>>>> Is this a Linux fix only? What does boost do? Improve calculation 
>>>>>>>>> speed?
>>>>>>>> I already did a build for Windows, boost is part of our build system.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> We need to check for macOS/Linux now.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> In any case, +1 to updating libraries
>>>>>>>> That is the intention.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>  Matthias
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>>> Pedro
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Am 08.01.24 um 14:06 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>>>>>>>>>>> I'm up for doing the dev tarballs for Linux and macOS
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jan 7, 2024, at 5:55 PM, Keith N. McKenna 
>>>>>>>>>>>>  wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Matthias Seidel wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> and a happy new year!
>>>>>>>>>>>>> After successfully releasing AOO 4.1.15 in December we should now 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> work towards a renewed Developer Edition 5 for AOO 4.2.0.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am still in the massive process to clean up our Help files, so 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the whole translation process may be postponed to Dev 6.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Opinions?
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>   Matthias
>>>>>>>>>>>> I think concentrating on a dev 5 would be a very good thing. We 
>>>>>>>>>>>> need to see movement on 4.2.0.
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>>>>> Keith
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> - 
>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>>>> 
>>>> -
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>>>> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev5 ?

[Matthias Seidel]

All Windows builds are uploaded.

@Jim: We need to bump up the version number number, don't we?

Am 26.01.24 um 19:05 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
My AOO4.2.0-Dev5 Windows builds of #c51e9806e6 were successful and I 
will upload then (incl. hashes, etc.) soon to:


https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.2.0-Dev5/

Regards,

   Matthias

Am 24.01.24 um 18:32 schrieb Matthias Seidel:

Am 24.01.24 um 13:05 schrieb Jim Jagielski:

Are we ready for a Dev5 in any case?

I am ready as soon as we decide on a Git hash to build.


On Jan 15, 2024, at 10:02 AM, Matthias Seidel 
 wrote:


Am 10.01.24 um 19:14 schrieb Matthias Seidel:

Am 10.01.24 um 15:01 schrieb Jim Jagielski:

Lets fold this in and build -Dev5 after it's committed

Committed it, didn't build on Linux Buildbot, reverted it.

I am out! If someone else is interested, please take over.

Matthias


+1
On Jan 9, 2024, at 6:18 AM, Matthias Seidel 
 wrote:


Hi Pedro,

Am 09.01.24 um 12:08 schrieb Pedro Lino:

Hi Matthias, all

On 01/09/2024 10:37 AM WET Matthias Seidel 
 wrote:

   Unless someone else volunteers, I can do the Windows builds.

Please do ;)


Something we want to integrate?

How about this PR:

https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/194
Is this a Linux fix only? What does boost do? Improve 
calculation speed?
I already did a build for Windows, boost is part of our build 
system.


We need to check for macOS/Linux now.


In any case, +1 to updating libraries

That is the intention.

Regards,

 Matthias


Best,
Pedro


Am 08.01.24 um 14:06 schrieb Jim Jagielski:

I'm up for doing the dev tarballs for Linux and macOS

On Jan 7, 2024, at 5:55 PM, Keith N. McKenna 
 wrote:


Matthias Seidel wrote:

Hi All,
and a happy new year!
After successfully releasing AOO 4.1.15 in December we 
should now work towards a renewed Developer Edition 5 for 
AOO 4.2.0.
I am still in the massive process to clean up our Help 
files, so the whole translation process may be postponed to 
Dev 6.

Opinions?
Regards,
  Matthias
I think concentrating on a dev 5 would be a very good thing. 
We need to see movement on 4.2.0.


Regards
Keith



- 


To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

- 


To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

- 


To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



smime.p7s
Description: Kryptografische S/MIME-Signatur

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev5 ?

[Matthias Seidel]

My AOO4.2.0-Dev5 Windows builds of #c51e9806e6 were successful and I 
will upload then (incl. hashes, etc.) soon to:


https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.2.0-Dev5/

Regards,

   Matthias

Am 24.01.24 um 18:32 schrieb Matthias Seidel:

Am 24.01.24 um 13:05 schrieb Jim Jagielski:

Are we ready for a Dev5 in any case?

I am ready as soon as we decide on a Git hash to build.


On Jan 15, 2024, at 10:02 AM, Matthias Seidel 
 wrote:


Am 10.01.24 um 19:14 schrieb Matthias Seidel:

Am 10.01.24 um 15:01 schrieb Jim Jagielski:

Lets fold this in and build -Dev5 after it's committed

Committed it, didn't build on Linux Buildbot, reverted it.

I am out! If someone else is interested, please take over.

Matthias


+1
On Jan 9, 2024, at 6:18 AM, Matthias Seidel 
 wrote:


Hi Pedro,

Am 09.01.24 um 12:08 schrieb Pedro Lino:

Hi Matthias, all

On 01/09/2024 10:37 AM WET Matthias Seidel 
 wrote:

   Unless someone else volunteers, I can do the Windows builds.

Please do ;)


Something we want to integrate?

How about this PR:

https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/194
Is this a Linux fix only? What does boost do? Improve 
calculation speed?
I already did a build for Windows, boost is part of our build 
system.


We need to check for macOS/Linux now.


In any case, +1 to updating libraries

That is the intention.

Regards,

 Matthias


Best,
Pedro


Am 08.01.24 um 14:06 schrieb Jim Jagielski:

I'm up for doing the dev tarballs for Linux and macOS

On Jan 7, 2024, at 5:55 PM, Keith N. McKenna 
 wrote:


Matthias Seidel wrote:

Hi All,
and a happy new year!
After successfully releasing AOO 4.1.15 in December we 
should now work towards a renewed Developer Edition 5 for 
AOO 4.2.0.
I am still in the massive process to clean up our Help 
files, so the whole translation process may be postponed to 
Dev 6.

Opinions?
Regards,
  Matthias
I think concentrating on a dev 5 would be a very good thing. 
We need to see movement on 4.2.0.


Regards
Keith



- 


To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

- 


To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

- 


To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



smime.p7s
Description: Kryptografische S/MIME-Signatur

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev5 ?

[Matthias Seidel]

Am 26.01.24 um 00:29 schrieb Jim Jagielski:

Current on AOO42X is c51e9806. Should we start there?

I would say so... ;-)



On Jan 24, 2024, at 12:32 PM, Matthias Seidel  
wrote:

Am 24.01.24 um 13:05 schrieb Jim Jagielski:

Are we ready for a Dev5 in any case?

I am ready as soon as we decide on a Git hash to build.

On Jan 15, 2024, at 10:02 AM, Matthias Seidel  
wrote:

Am 10.01.24 um 19:14 schrieb Matthias Seidel:

Am 10.01.24 um 15:01 schrieb Jim Jagielski:

Lets fold this in and build -Dev5 after it's committed

Committed it, didn't build on Linux Buildbot, reverted it.

I am out! If someone else is interested, please take over.

Matthias


+1

On Jan 9, 2024, at 6:18 AM, Matthias Seidel  wrote:

Hi Pedro,

Am 09.01.24 um 12:08 schrieb Pedro Lino:

Hi Matthias, all


On 01/09/2024 10:37 AM WET Matthias Seidel  wrote:
   Unless someone else volunteers, I can do the Windows builds.

Please do ;)


Something we want to integrate?

How about this PR:

https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/194

Is this a Linux fix only? What does boost do? Improve calculation speed?

I already did a build for Windows, boost is part of our build system.

We need to check for macOS/Linux now.


In any case, +1 to updating libraries

That is the intention.

Regards,

 Matthias


Best,
Pedro


Am 08.01.24 um 14:06 schrieb Jim Jagielski:

I'm up for doing the dev tarballs for Linux and macOS


On Jan 7, 2024, at 5:55 PM, Keith N. McKenna  wrote:

Matthias Seidel wrote:

Hi All,
and a happy new year!
After successfully releasing AOO 4.1.15 in December we should now work towards 
a renewed Developer Edition 5 for AOO 4.2.0.
I am still in the massive process to clean up our Help files, so the whole 
translation process may be postponed to Dev 6.
Opinions?
Regards,
  Matthias

I think concentrating on a dev 5 would be a very good thing. We need to see 
movement on 4.2.0.

Regards
Keith



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



smime.p7s
Description: Kryptografische S/MIME-Signatur

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev5 ?

[Jim Jagielski]

Current on AOO42X is c51e9806. Should we start there?

> On Jan 24, 2024, at 12:32 PM, Matthias Seidel  
> wrote:
> 
> Am 24.01.24 um 13:05 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>> Are we ready for a Dev5 in any case?
> I am ready as soon as we decide on a Git hash to build.
>> 
>>> On Jan 15, 2024, at 10:02 AM, Matthias Seidel  
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Am 10.01.24 um 19:14 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>>>> Am 10.01.24 um 15:01 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>>>>> Lets fold this in and build -Dev5 after it's committed
>>> Committed it, didn't build on Linux Buildbot, reverted it.
>>> 
>>> I am out! If someone else is interested, please take over.
>>> 
>>> Matthias
>>> 
>>>> +1
>>>>>> On Jan 9, 2024, at 6:18 AM, Matthias Seidel  
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Hi Pedro,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Am 09.01.24 um 12:08 schrieb Pedro Lino:
>>>>>>> Hi Matthias, all
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On 01/09/2024 10:37 AM WET Matthias Seidel 
>>>>>>>>  wrote:
>>>>>>>>   Unless someone else volunteers, I can do the Windows builds.
>>>>>>> Please do ;)
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Something we want to integrate?
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> How about this PR:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/194
>>>>>>> Is this a Linux fix only? What does boost do? Improve calculation speed?
>>>>>> I already did a build for Windows, boost is part of our build system.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> We need to check for macOS/Linux now.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> In any case, +1 to updating libraries
>>>>>> That is the intention.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Matthias
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>> Pedro
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Am 08.01.24 um 14:06 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>>>>>>>>> I'm up for doing the dev tarballs for Linux and macOS
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> On Jan 7, 2024, at 5:55 PM, Keith N. McKenna 
>>>>>>>>>>  wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Matthias Seidel wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>>>>>>>> and a happy new year!
>>>>>>>>>>> After successfully releasing AOO 4.1.15 in December we should now 
>>>>>>>>>>> work towards a renewed Developer Edition 5 for AOO 4.2.0.
>>>>>>>>>>> I am still in the massive process to clean up our Help files, so 
>>>>>>>>>>> the whole translation process may be postponed to Dev 6.
>>>>>>>>>>> Opinions?
>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>  Matthias
>>>>>>>>>> I think concentrating on a dev 5 would be a very good thing. We need 
>>>>>>>>>> to see movement on 4.2.0.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>>> Keith
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>> 
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev5 ?

[Matthias Seidel]

Am 24.01.24 um 13:05 schrieb Jim Jagielski:

Are we ready for a Dev5 in any case?

I am ready as soon as we decide on a Git hash to build.



On Jan 15, 2024, at 10:02 AM, Matthias Seidel  
wrote:

Am 10.01.24 um 19:14 schrieb Matthias Seidel:

Am 10.01.24 um 15:01 schrieb Jim Jagielski:

Lets fold this in and build -Dev5 after it's committed

Committed it, didn't build on Linux Buildbot, reverted it.

I am out! If someone else is interested, please take over.

Matthias


+1

On Jan 9, 2024, at 6:18 AM, Matthias Seidel  wrote:

Hi Pedro,

Am 09.01.24 um 12:08 schrieb Pedro Lino:

Hi Matthias, all


On 01/09/2024 10:37 AM WET Matthias Seidel  wrote:
   Unless someone else volunteers, I can do the Windows builds.

Please do ;)


Something we want to integrate?

How about this PR:

https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/194

Is this a Linux fix only? What does boost do? Improve calculation speed?

I already did a build for Windows, boost is part of our build system.

We need to check for macOS/Linux now.


In any case, +1 to updating libraries

That is the intention.

Regards,

 Matthias


Best,
Pedro


Am 08.01.24 um 14:06 schrieb Jim Jagielski:

I'm up for doing the dev tarballs for Linux and macOS


On Jan 7, 2024, at 5:55 PM, Keith N. McKenna  wrote:

Matthias Seidel wrote:

Hi All,
and a happy new year!
After successfully releasing AOO 4.1.15 in December we should now work towards 
a renewed Developer Edition 5 for AOO 4.2.0.
I am still in the massive process to clean up our Help files, so the whole 
translation process may be postponed to Dev 6.
Opinions?
Regards,
  Matthias

I think concentrating on a dev 5 would be a very good thing. We need to see 
movement on 4.2.0.

Regards
Keith



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



smime.p7s
Description: Kryptografische S/MIME-Signatur

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev5 ?

[Jim Jagielski]

Are we ready for a Dev5 in any case?

> On Jan 15, 2024, at 10:02 AM, Matthias Seidel  
> wrote:
> 
> Am 10.01.24 um 19:14 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>> Am 10.01.24 um 15:01 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>>> Lets fold this in and build -Dev5 after it's committed
> 
> Committed it, didn't build on Linux Buildbot, reverted it.
> 
> I am out! If someone else is interested, please take over.
> 
> Matthias
> 
>> +1
>>> 
>>>> On Jan 9, 2024, at 6:18 AM, Matthias Seidel  
>>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Hi Pedro,
>>>> 
>>>> Am 09.01.24 um 12:08 schrieb Pedro Lino:
>>>>> Hi Matthias, all
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On 01/09/2024 10:37 AM WET Matthias Seidel  
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>   Unless someone else volunteers, I can do the Windows builds.
>>>>> Please do ;)
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Something we want to integrate?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> How about this PR:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/194
>>>>> Is this a Linux fix only? What does boost do? Improve calculation speed?
>>>> I already did a build for Windows, boost is part of our build system.
>>>> 
>>>> We need to check for macOS/Linux now.
>>>> 
>>>>> In any case, +1 to updating libraries
>>>> That is the intention.
>>>> 
>>>> Regards,
>>>> 
>>>> Matthias
>>>> 
>>>>> Best,
>>>>> Pedro
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Am 08.01.24 um 14:06 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>>>>>>> I'm up for doing the dev tarballs for Linux and macOS
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On Jan 7, 2024, at 5:55 PM, Keith N. McKenna 
>>>>>>>>  wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Matthias Seidel wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>>>>>> and a happy new year!
>>>>>>>>> After successfully releasing AOO 4.1.15 in December we should now 
>>>>>>>>> work towards a renewed Developer Edition 5 for AOO 4.2.0.
>>>>>>>>> I am still in the massive process to clean up our Help files, so the 
>>>>>>>>> whole translation process may be postponed to Dev 6.
>>>>>>>>> Opinions?
>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>  Matthias
>>>>>>>> I think concentrating on a dev 5 would be a very good thing. We need 
>>>>>>>> to see movement on 4.2.0.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>> Keith
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> - 
>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> - 
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>>>>>>> 
>>>>> -
>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>>> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev5 ?

[Matthias Seidel]

Am 10.01.24 um 19:14 schrieb Matthias Seidel:

Am 10.01.24 um 15:01 schrieb Jim Jagielski:

Lets fold this in and build -Dev5 after it's committed


Committed it, didn't build on Linux Buildbot, reverted it.

I am out! If someone else is interested, please take over.

Matthias


+1


On Jan 9, 2024, at 6:18 AM, Matthias Seidel 
 wrote:


Hi Pedro,

Am 09.01.24 um 12:08 schrieb Pedro Lino:

Hi Matthias, all

On 01/09/2024 10:37 AM WET Matthias Seidel 
 wrote:

  Unless someone else volunteers, I can do the Windows builds.

Please do ;)


Something we want to integrate?

How about this PR:

https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/194
Is this a Linux fix only? What does boost do? Improve calculation 
speed?

I already did a build for Windows, boost is part of our build system.

We need to check for macOS/Linux now.


In any case, +1 to updating libraries

That is the intention.

Regards,

    Matthias


Best,
Pedro


Am 08.01.24 um 14:06 schrieb Jim Jagielski:

I'm up for doing the dev tarballs for Linux and macOS

On Jan 7, 2024, at 5:55 PM, Keith N. McKenna 
 wrote:


Matthias Seidel wrote:

Hi All,
and a happy new year!
After successfully releasing AOO 4.1.15 in December we should 
now work towards a renewed Developer Edition 5 for AOO 4.2.0.
I am still in the massive process to clean up our Help files, 
so the whole translation process may be postponed to Dev 6.

Opinions?
Regards,
 Matthias
I think concentrating on a dev 5 would be a very good thing. We 
need to see movement on 4.2.0.


Regards
Keith



- 


To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

- 


To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org




smime.p7s
Description: Kryptografische S/MIME-Signatur

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev5 ?

[Matthias Seidel]

Am 10.01.24 um 15:01 schrieb Jim Jagielski:

Lets fold this in and build -Dev5 after it's committed

+1



On Jan 9, 2024, at 6:18 AM, Matthias Seidel  wrote:

Hi Pedro,

Am 09.01.24 um 12:08 schrieb Pedro Lino:

Hi Matthias, all


On 01/09/2024 10:37 AM WET Matthias Seidel  wrote:
  Unless someone else volunteers, I can do the Windows builds.

Please do ;)


Something we want to integrate?

How about this PR:

https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/194

Is this a Linux fix only? What does boost do? Improve calculation speed?

I already did a build for Windows, boost is part of our build system.

We need to check for macOS/Linux now.


In any case, +1 to updating libraries

That is the intention.

Regards,

Matthias


Best,
Pedro


Am 08.01.24 um 14:06 schrieb Jim Jagielski:

I'm up for doing the dev tarballs for Linux and macOS


On Jan 7, 2024, at 5:55 PM, Keith N. McKenna  wrote:

Matthias Seidel wrote:

Hi All,
and a happy new year!
After successfully releasing AOO 4.1.15 in December we should now work towards 
a renewed Developer Edition 5 for AOO 4.2.0.
I am still in the massive process to clean up our Help files, so the whole 
translation process may be postponed to Dev 6.
Opinions?
Regards,
 Matthias

I think concentrating on a dev 5 would be a very good thing. We need to see 
movement on 4.2.0.

Regards
Keith



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org




smime.p7s
Description: Kryptografische S/MIME-Signatur

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev5 ?

[Jim Jagielski]

Lets fold this in and build -Dev5 after it's committed

> On Jan 9, 2024, at 6:18 AM, Matthias Seidel  
> wrote:
> 
> Hi Pedro,
> 
> Am 09.01.24 um 12:08 schrieb Pedro Lino:
>> Hi Matthias, all
>> 
>>> On 01/09/2024 10:37 AM WET Matthias Seidel  
>>> wrote:
>>>  Unless someone else volunteers, I can do the Windows builds.
>> Please do ;)
>> 
>>> Something we want to integrate?
>>> 
>>> How about this PR:
>>> 
>>> https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/194
>> Is this a Linux fix only? What does boost do? Improve calculation speed?
> 
> I already did a build for Windows, boost is part of our build system.
> 
> We need to check for macOS/Linux now.
> 
>> 
>> In any case, +1 to updating libraries
> 
> That is the intention.
> 
> Regards,
> 
>Matthias
> 
>> 
>> Best,
>> Pedro
>> 
>>> Am 08.01.24 um 14:06 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>>>> I'm up for doing the dev tarballs for Linux and macOS
>>>> 
>>>>> On Jan 7, 2024, at 5:55 PM, Keith N. McKenna  
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Matthias Seidel wrote:
>>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>>> and a happy new year!
>>>>>> After successfully releasing AOO 4.1.15 in December we should now work 
>>>>>> towards a renewed Developer Edition 5 for AOO 4.2.0.
>>>>>> I am still in the massive process to clean up our Help files, so the 
>>>>>> whole translation process may be postponed to Dev 6.
>>>>>> Opinions?
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>> Matthias
>>>>> I think concentrating on a dev 5 would be a very good thing. We need to 
>>>>> see movement on 4.2.0.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Regards
>>>>> Keith
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> -
>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>>>>> 
>>>> -
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>>>> 
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev5 ?

[Matthias Seidel]

Hi Pedro,

Am 09.01.24 um 12:08 schrieb Pedro Lino:

Hi Matthias, all


On 01/09/2024 10:37 AM WET Matthias Seidel  wrote:
  
Unless someone else volunteers, I can do the Windows builds.

Please do ;)


Something we want to integrate?

How about this PR:

https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/194

Is this a Linux fix only? What does boost do? Improve calculation speed?


I already did a build for Windows, boost is part of our build system.

We need to check for macOS/Linux now.



In any case, +1 to updating libraries


That is the intention.

Regards,

   Matthias



Best,
Pedro


Am 08.01.24 um 14:06 schrieb Jim Jagielski:

I'm up for doing the dev tarballs for Linux and macOS


On Jan 7, 2024, at 5:55 PM, Keith N. McKenna  wrote:

Matthias Seidel wrote:

Hi All,
and a happy new year!
After successfully releasing AOO 4.1.15 in December we should now work towards 
a renewed Developer Edition 5 for AOO 4.2.0.
I am still in the massive process to clean up our Help files, so the whole 
translation process may be postponed to Dev 6.
Opinions?
Regards,
 Matthias

I think concentrating on a dev 5 would be a very good thing. We need to see 
movement on 4.2.0.

Regards
Keith



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



smime.p7s
Description: Kryptografische S/MIME-Signatur

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev5 ?

[Pedro Lino]

Hi Matthias, all

> On 01/09/2024 10:37 AM WET Matthias Seidel  wrote:
>  
> Unless someone else volunteers, I can do the Windows builds.

Please do ;)

> Something we want to integrate?
> 
> How about this PR:
> 
> https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/194

Is this a Linux fix only? What does boost do? Improve calculation speed?

In any case, +1 to updating libraries

Best,
Pedro

> Am 08.01.24 um 14:06 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> > I'm up for doing the dev tarballs for Linux and macOS
> >
> >> On Jan 7, 2024, at 5:55 PM, Keith N. McKenna  
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> Matthias Seidel wrote:
> >>> Hi All,
> >>> and a happy new year!
> >>> After successfully releasing AOO 4.1.15 in December we should now work 
> >>> towards a renewed Developer Edition 5 for AOO 4.2.0.
> >>> I am still in the massive process to clean up our Help files, so the 
> >>> whole translation process may be postponed to Dev 6.
> >>> Opinions?
> >>> Regards,
> >>> Matthias
> >> I think concentrating on a dev 5 would be a very good thing. We need to 
> >> see movement on 4.2.0.
> >>
> >> Regards
> >> Keith
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> -
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> >>
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> >

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev5 ?

[Matthias Seidel]

Unless someone else volunteers, I can do the Windows builds.

Something we want to integrate?

How about this PR:

https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/194

Regards,

   Matthias

Am 08.01.24 um 14:06 schrieb Jim Jagielski:

I'm up for doing the dev tarballs for Linux and macOS


On Jan 7, 2024, at 5:55 PM, Keith N. McKenna  wrote:

Matthias Seidel wrote:

Hi All,
and a happy new year!
After successfully releasing AOO 4.1.15 in December we should now work towards 
a renewed Developer Edition 5 for AOO 4.2.0.
I am still in the massive process to clean up our Help files, so the whole 
translation process may be postponed to Dev 6.
Opinions?
Regards,
Matthias

I think concentrating on a dev 5 would be a very good thing. We need to see 
movement on 4.2.0.

Regards
Keith



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



smime.p7s
Description: Kryptografische S/MIME-Signatur

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev5 ?

[Jim Jagielski]

I'm up for doing the dev tarballs for Linux and macOS

> On Jan 7, 2024, at 5:55 PM, Keith N. McKenna  
> wrote:
> 
> Matthias Seidel wrote:
>> Hi All,
>> and a happy new year!
>> After successfully releasing AOO 4.1.15 in December we should now work 
>> towards a renewed Developer Edition 5 for AOO 4.2.0.
>> I am still in the massive process to clean up our Help files, so the whole 
>> translation process may be postponed to Dev 6.
>> Opinions?
>> Regards,
>>Matthias
> I think concentrating on a dev 5 would be a very good thing. We need to see 
> movement on 4.2.0.
> 
> Regards
> Keith
> 
> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev5 ?

[Keith N. McKenna]

Matthias Seidel wrote:

Hi All,

and a happy new year!

After successfully releasing AOO 4.1.15 in December we should now work 
towards a renewed Developer Edition 5 for AOO 4.2.0.


I am still in the massive process to clean up our Help files, so the 
whole translation process may be postponed to Dev 6.


Opinions?

Regards,

    Matthias

I think concentrating on a dev 5 would be a very good thing. We need to 
see movement on 4.2.0.


Regards
Keith



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

AOO 4.2.0-Dev5 ?

[Matthias Seidel]

Hi All,

and a happy new year!

After successfully releasing AOO 4.1.15 in December we should now work 
towards a renewed Developer Edition 5 for AOO 4.2.0.


I am still in the massive process to clean up our Help files, so the 
whole translation process may be postponed to Dev 6.


Opinions?

Regards,

   Matthias



smime.p7s
Description: Kryptografische S/MIME-Signatur

Re: Time for AOO 4.2.0 Dev 4?

[Matthias Seidel]

Hi Jim,

Feel free to do so... ;-)

But I am not sure if Twitter is the right "audience" for a Developer Build.
(BTW: I canceled my account there recently)

Regards,

   Matthias

Am 27.12.22 um 12:44 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> Should we post something on Twitter about Dev4 availability?
>
>> On Dec 25, 2022, at 4:03 AM, Matthias Seidel  
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Jim, All,
>>
>> Merry Christmas to all around here!
>>
>> Windows binaries are now updated and uploaded...
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>>Matthias
>>
>> Am 23.12.22 um 14:47 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>>> Great!
>>>
>>> I am rebuilding now for Windows.
>>>
>>> Technically my "old" binaries should not be different, but to keep
>>> everything at #18ec844f88.
>>>
>>> Can you please tag "AOO420-Dev4-m4"? I will update the version in AOO42X
>>> then.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>>Matthias
>>>
>>> Am 23.12.22 um 13:59 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
 Yep! Just finished building and uploading!

> On Dec 23, 2022, at 4:48 AM, Matthias Seidel  
> wrote:
>
> Hi Jim,
>
> it looks like your builds based on #18ec844f88 were successful?
>
> I will then rebuild for Windows and update the binaries on dist/dev.
>
> Regards,
>
>   Matthias
>
> Am 22.12.22 um 18:42 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>> My guess is that 18ec844f on AOO42X will be the hash for Dev4... the 
>> changes are in configure.ac and affect only the macOS/Darwin path.
>>
>>> On Dec 22, 2022, at 9:45 AM, Matthias Seidel 
>>>  wrote:
>>>
>>> OK, should I leave the Windows binaries on dist/dev until we know if
>>> code changes are needed?
>>>
>>> Am 22.12.22 um 15:36 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
 Just a FYI that I do expect some delay, and likely changes, required 
 to get AOO42X building on macOS. As such, let's delay on Dev4 until I 
 can resolve these issues.
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>>
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: Time for AOO 4.2.0 Dev 4?

[Jim Jagielski]

Should we post something on Twitter about Dev4 availability?

> On Dec 25, 2022, at 4:03 AM, Matthias Seidel  
> wrote:
> 
> Hi Jim, All,
> 
> Merry Christmas to all around here!
> 
> Windows binaries are now updated and uploaded...
> 
> Regards,
> 
>Matthias
> 
> Am 23.12.22 um 14:47 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>> Great!
>> 
>> I am rebuilding now for Windows.
>> 
>> Technically my "old" binaries should not be different, but to keep
>> everything at #18ec844f88.
>> 
>> Can you please tag "AOO420-Dev4-m4"? I will update the version in AOO42X
>> then.
>> 
>> Regards,
>> 
>>Matthias
>> 
>> Am 23.12.22 um 13:59 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>>> Yep! Just finished building and uploading!
>>> 
 On Dec 23, 2022, at 4:48 AM, Matthias Seidel  
 wrote:
 
 Hi Jim,
 
 it looks like your builds based on #18ec844f88 were successful?
 
 I will then rebuild for Windows and update the binaries on dist/dev.
 
 Regards,
 
   Matthias
 
 Am 22.12.22 um 18:42 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> My guess is that 18ec844f on AOO42X will be the hash for Dev4... the 
> changes are in configure.ac and affect only the macOS/Darwin path.
> 
>> On Dec 22, 2022, at 9:45 AM, Matthias Seidel 
>>  wrote:
>> 
>> OK, should I leave the Windows binaries on dist/dev until we know if
>> code changes are needed?
>> 
>> Am 22.12.22 um 15:36 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>>> Just a FYI that I do expect some delay, and likely changes, required to 
>>> get AOO42X building on macOS. As such, let's delay on Dev4 until I can 
>>> resolve these issues.
>>> -
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>>> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> 
>>> -
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>>> 
> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Time for AOO 4.2.0 Dev 4?

[Matthias Seidel]

Hi Jim, All,

Merry Christmas to all around here!

Windows binaries are now updated and uploaded...

Regards,

   Matthias

Am 23.12.22 um 14:47 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
> Great!
>
> I am rebuilding now for Windows.
>
> Technically my "old" binaries should not be different, but to keep
> everything at #18ec844f88.
>
> Can you please tag "AOO420-Dev4-m4"? I will update the version in AOO42X
> then.
>
> Regards,
>
>    Matthias
>
> Am 23.12.22 um 13:59 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>> Yep! Just finished building and uploading!
>>
>>> On Dec 23, 2022, at 4:48 AM, Matthias Seidel  
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Jim,
>>>
>>> it looks like your builds based on #18ec844f88 were successful?
>>>
>>> I will then rebuild for Windows and update the binaries on dist/dev.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>>Matthias
>>>
>>> Am 22.12.22 um 18:42 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
 My guess is that 18ec844f on AOO42X will be the hash for Dev4... the 
 changes are in configure.ac and affect only the macOS/Darwin path.

> On Dec 22, 2022, at 9:45 AM, Matthias Seidel  
> wrote:
>
> OK, should I leave the Windows binaries on dist/dev until we know if
> code changes are needed?
>
> Am 22.12.22 um 15:36 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>> Just a FYI that I do expect some delay, and likely changes, required to 
>> get AOO42X building on macOS. As such, let's delay on Dev4 until I can 
>> resolve these issues.
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>>
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>>



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: Time for AOO 4.2.0 Dev 4?

[Matthias Seidel]

Great!

I am rebuilding now for Windows.

Technically my "old" binaries should not be different, but to keep
everything at #18ec844f88.

Can you please tag "AOO420-Dev4-m4"? I will update the version in AOO42X
then.

Regards,

   Matthias

Am 23.12.22 um 13:59 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> Yep! Just finished building and uploading!
>
>> On Dec 23, 2022, at 4:48 AM, Matthias Seidel  
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Jim,
>>
>> it looks like your builds based on #18ec844f88 were successful?
>>
>> I will then rebuild for Windows and update the binaries on dist/dev.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>>Matthias
>>
>> Am 22.12.22 um 18:42 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>>> My guess is that 18ec844f on AOO42X will be the hash for Dev4... the 
>>> changes are in configure.ac and affect only the macOS/Darwin path.
>>>
 On Dec 22, 2022, at 9:45 AM, Matthias Seidel  
 wrote:

 OK, should I leave the Windows binaries on dist/dev until we know if
 code changes are needed?

 Am 22.12.22 um 15:36 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> Just a FYI that I do expect some delay, and likely changes, required to 
> get AOO42X building on macOS. As such, let's delay on Dev4 until I can 
> resolve these issues.
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>
>>> -
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>>>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: Time for AOO 4.2.0 Dev 4?

[Jim Jagielski]

Yep! Just finished building and uploading!

> On Dec 23, 2022, at 4:48 AM, Matthias Seidel  
> wrote:
> 
> Hi Jim,
> 
> it looks like your builds based on #18ec844f88 were successful?
> 
> I will then rebuild for Windows and update the binaries on dist/dev.
> 
> Regards,
> 
>Matthias
> 
> Am 22.12.22 um 18:42 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>> My guess is that 18ec844f on AOO42X will be the hash for Dev4... the changes 
>> are in configure.ac and affect only the macOS/Darwin path.
>> 
>>> On Dec 22, 2022, at 9:45 AM, Matthias Seidel  
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> OK, should I leave the Windows binaries on dist/dev until we know if
>>> code changes are needed?
>>> 
>>> Am 22.12.22 um 15:36 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
 Just a FYI that I do expect some delay, and likely changes, required to 
 get AOO42X building on macOS. As such, let's delay on Dev4 until I can 
 resolve these issues.
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
 
>> 
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>> 
> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Time for AOO 4.2.0 Dev 4?

[Matthias Seidel]

Hi Jim,

it looks like your builds based on #18ec844f88 were successful?

I will then rebuild for Windows and update the binaries on dist/dev.

Regards,

   Matthias

Am 22.12.22 um 18:42 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> My guess is that 18ec844f on AOO42X will be the hash for Dev4... the changes 
> are in configure.ac and affect only the macOS/Darwin path.
>
>> On Dec 22, 2022, at 9:45 AM, Matthias Seidel  
>> wrote:
>>
>> OK, should I leave the Windows binaries on dist/dev until we know if
>> code changes are needed?
>>
>> Am 22.12.22 um 15:36 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>>> Just a FYI that I do expect some delay, and likely changes, required to get 
>>> AOO42X building on macOS. As such, let's delay on Dev4 until I can resolve 
>>> these issues.
>>> -
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>>>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: Time for AOO 4.2.0 Dev 4?

[Jim Jagielski]

My guess is that 18ec844f on AOO42X will be the hash for Dev4... the changes 
are in configure.ac and affect only the macOS/Darwin path.

> On Dec 22, 2022, at 9:45 AM, Matthias Seidel  
> wrote:
> 
> OK, should I leave the Windows binaries on dist/dev until we know if
> code changes are needed?
> 
> Am 22.12.22 um 15:36 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>> Just a FYI that I do expect some delay, and likely changes, required to get 
>> AOO42X building on macOS. As such, let's delay on Dev4 until I can resolve 
>> these issues.
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>> 
> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Time for AOO 4.2.0 Dev 4?

[Matthias Seidel]

OK, should I leave the Windows binaries on dist/dev until we know if
code changes are needed?

Am 22.12.22 um 15:36 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> Just a FYI that I do expect some delay, and likely changes, required to get 
> AOO42X building on macOS. As such, let's delay on Dev4 until I can resolve 
> these issues.
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: Time for AOO 4.2.0 Dev 4?

[Jim Jagielski]

Just a FYI that I do expect some delay, and likely changes, required to get 
AOO42X building on macOS. As such, let's delay on Dev4 until I can resolve 
these issues.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Time for AOO 4.2.0 Dev 4?

[Jim Jagielski]

My macOS Catalina build server VM is very unreliable... working on getting it 
back in shape.

> On Dec 21, 2022, at 8:11 AM, Matthias Seidel  
> wrote:
> 
> Am 21.12.22 um 13:50 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>> OK. I'll rebuild all from a46cde238
> 
> Thanks, my Windows build takes 36 hours. So you will probably upload
> before me! ;-)
> 
> I think we should also hash the builds as we have done for Dev3, since
> they are semi-official.
> 
> Regards,
> 
>Matthias
> 
>> 
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>> 
> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Time for AOO 4.2.0 Dev 4?

[Matthias Seidel]

Windows builds (a46cde238b) are uploaded now:

https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.2.0-Dev4/binaries/

Regards,

   Matthias

Am 21.12.22 um 14:11 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
> Am 21.12.22 um 13:50 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>> OK. I'll rebuild all from a46cde238
> Thanks, my Windows build takes 36 hours. So you will probably upload
> before me! ;-)
>
> I think we should also hash the builds as we have done for Dev3, since
> they are semi-official.
>
> Regards,
>
>    Matthias
>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>>



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: Time for AOO 4.2.0 Dev 4?

[Matthias Seidel]

Am 21.12.22 um 13:50 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> OK. I'll rebuild all from a46cde238

Thanks, my Windows build takes 36 hours. So you will probably upload
before me! ;-)

I think we should also hash the builds as we have done for Dev3, since
they are semi-official.

Regards,

   Matthias

>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: Time for AOO 4.2.0 Dev 4?

[Jim Jagielski]

OK. I'll rebuild all from a46cde238

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Time for AOO 4.2.0 Dev 4?

[Matthias Seidel]

Hi jim,

Am 21.12.22 um 12:36 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> No changes to the Linux or Windows builds, so the small change in hash# isn't 
> an issue since this is an informal Dev4 test

So how do we tag it?

Uploads go here:

https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.2.0-Dev4/binaries/

I will take care of updating the version info then...

Regards,

   Matthias

>
>> On Dec 20, 2022, at 8:39 AM, Matthias Seidel  
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Jim,
>>
>> I saw that you needed another commit for macOS, so that shifts
>> AOO420-Dev4 to #9b873c1694 ?
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>>Matthias
>>
>> Am 20.12.22 um 14:19 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>>> The Linux build for 4.2.0-Dev4 (test) are available:
>>>
>>>https://home.apache.org/~jim/AOO-builds/4.2.0-Dev4/ 
>>> 
>>>
>>> macOS builds are on-going
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: Time for AOO 4.2.0 Dev 4?

[Jim Jagielski]

No changes to the Linux or Windows builds, so the small change in hash# isn't 
an issue since this is an informal Dev4 test

> On Dec 20, 2022, at 8:39 AM, Matthias Seidel  
> wrote:
> 
> Hi Jim,
> 
> I saw that you needed another commit for macOS, so that shifts
> AOO420-Dev4 to #9b873c1694 ?
> 
> Regards,
> 
>Matthias
> 
> Am 20.12.22 um 14:19 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>> The Linux build for 4.2.0-Dev4 (test) are available:
>> 
>>https://home.apache.org/~jim/AOO-builds/4.2.0-Dev4/ 
>> 
>> 
>> macOS builds are on-going
> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Time for AOO 4.2.0 Dev 4?

[Matthias Seidel]

Am 20.12.22 um 14:39 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
> Hi Jim,
>
> I saw that you needed another commit for macOS, so that shifts
> AOO420-Dev4 to #9b873c1694 ?

Should have done git pull first... ;-)

#a46cde238b

Matthias

>
> Regards,
>
>    Matthias
>
> Am 20.12.22 um 14:19 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>> The Linux build for 4.2.0-Dev4 (test) are available:
>>
>> https://home.apache.org/~jim/AOO-builds/4.2.0-Dev4/ 
>> 
>>
>> macOS builds are on-going



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: Time for AOO 4.2.0 Dev 4?

[Matthias Seidel]

Hi Jim,

I saw that you needed another commit for macOS, so that shifts
AOO420-Dev4 to #9b873c1694 ?

Regards,

   Matthias

Am 20.12.22 um 14:19 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> The Linux build for 4.2.0-Dev4 (test) are available:
>
> https://home.apache.org/~jim/AOO-builds/4.2.0-Dev4/ 
> 
>
> macOS builds are on-going



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: Time for AOO 4.2.0 Dev 4?

[Jim Jagielski]

The Linux build for 4.2.0-Dev4 (test) are available:

https://home.apache.org/~jim/AOO-builds/4.2.0-Dev4/ 


macOS builds are on-going

Re: Time for AOO 4.2.0 Dev 4?

[Jim Jagielski]

Had to reboot the VM...

> On Dec 19, 2022, at 7:40 AM, Jim Jagielski  wrote:
> 
> failed to download 
> https://sourceforge.net/projects/aoo-extensions/files/1429/11/da_dk-2.7.001.oxt/download
>  at /home/jim/src/asf/aoo-git/main/solenv/bin/modules/ExtensionsLst.pm line 
> 519.
> 
> Hmmm
> 
>> On Dec 19, 2022, at 7:19 AM, Jim Jagielski  wrote:
>> 
>> Perfect. I'll start some dev builds this week
>> 
>>> On Dec 17, 2022, at 6:37 PM, Matthias Seidel  
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Am 18.12.22 um 00:35 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
 Hi Jim,
 
 Am 08.11.22 um 14:43 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> Let me know when we are ready for a Dev4 then and I'll kick off the 
> builds.
 I have some free time next week.
 
 How about doing Dev4 based on e548f13f48 ?
>>> 
>>> Sorry, since we want to build AOO42X it would be 9b873c1694.
>>> 
>>> Regards,
>>> 
>>>  Matthias
>>> 
 
 Regards,
 
  Matthias
 
>> On Nov 8, 2022, at 5:32 AM, Matthias Seidel  
>> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi Jim, all,
>> 
>> Am 07.11.22 um 13:11 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>>> That works for me. I can do the same w/ the macOS and Linux builds.
>> I will use these two graphics for "branding" located here:
>> 
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/devtools/build-scripts/4.2.0-Dev4/wntmsci/
>>  
>> 
>> 
>>> Is HEAD of AOO42X in a suitable state, or are there additional fixes to 
>>> be added before we build?
>> It is usable, but some main blockers are not fixed.
>> 
>> And of course the translations need to be updated.
>> 
>> Regards,
>> 
>> Matthias
>> 
 On Nov 6, 2022, at 4:37 AM, Matthias Seidel 
  wrote:
 
 Hi all,
 
 We released our last Developer version some time ago.
 Maybe we can start a Dev4 now?
 
 Regarding Windows, I would like to do a "normal" build, just branded as
 a "Developer Version".
 This way we are much closer to a production build.
 
 Additionally, I would like to build AOO with Adoptiums OpenJDK now.
 
 How about removing (at least) Dev2?
 
 https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/
 
 Regards,
 
 Matthias
 
 
>>> -
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org 
>>> 
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>> 
> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Time for AOO 4.2.0 Dev 4?

[Jim Jagielski]

failed to download 
https://sourceforge.net/projects/aoo-extensions/files/1429/11/da_dk-2.7.001.oxt/download
 at /home/jim/src/asf/aoo-git/main/solenv/bin/modules/ExtensionsLst.pm line 519.

Hmmm

> On Dec 19, 2022, at 7:19 AM, Jim Jagielski  wrote:
> 
> Perfect. I'll start some dev builds this week
> 
>> On Dec 17, 2022, at 6:37 PM, Matthias Seidel  
>> wrote:
>> 
>> Am 18.12.22 um 00:35 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>>> Hi Jim,
>>> 
>>> Am 08.11.22 um 14:43 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
 Let me know when we are ready for a Dev4 then and I'll kick off the builds.
>>> I have some free time next week.
>>> 
>>> How about doing Dev4 based on e548f13f48 ?
>> 
>> Sorry, since we want to build AOO42X it would be 9b873c1694.
>> 
>> Regards,
>> 
>>   Matthias
>> 
>>> 
>>> Regards,
>>> 
>>>   Matthias
>>> 
> On Nov 8, 2022, at 5:32 AM, Matthias Seidel  
> wrote:
> 
> Hi Jim, all,
> 
> Am 07.11.22 um 13:11 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>> That works for me. I can do the same w/ the macOS and Linux builds.
> I will use these two graphics for "branding" located here:
> 
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/devtools/build-scripts/4.2.0-Dev4/wntmsci/
>  
> 
> 
>> Is HEAD of AOO42X in a suitable state, or are there additional fixes to 
>> be added before we build?
> It is usable, but some main blockers are not fixed.
> 
> And of course the translations need to be updated.
> 
> Regards,
> 
>  Matthias
> 
>>> On Nov 6, 2022, at 4:37 AM, Matthias Seidel 
>>>  wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi all,
>>> 
>>> We released our last Developer version some time ago.
>>> Maybe we can start a Dev4 now?
>>> 
>>> Regarding Windows, I would like to do a "normal" build, just branded as
>>> a "Developer Version".
>>> This way we are much closer to a production build.
>>> 
>>> Additionally, I would like to build AOO with Adoptiums OpenJDK now.
>>> 
>>> How about removing (at least) Dev2?
>>> 
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/
>>> 
>>> Regards,
>>> 
>>> Matthias
>>> 
>>> 
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org 
>> 
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org 
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> 

Re: Time for AOO 4.2.0 Dev 4?

[Jim Jagielski]

Perfect. I'll start some dev builds this week

> On Dec 17, 2022, at 6:37 PM, Matthias Seidel  
> wrote:
> 
> Am 18.12.22 um 00:35 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>> Hi Jim,
>> 
>> Am 08.11.22 um 14:43 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>>> Let me know when we are ready for a Dev4 then and I'll kick off the builds.
>> I have some free time next week.
>> 
>> How about doing Dev4 based on e548f13f48 ?
> 
> Sorry, since we want to build AOO42X it would be 9b873c1694.
> 
> Regards,
> 
>Matthias
> 
>> 
>> Regards,
>> 
>>Matthias
>> 
 On Nov 8, 2022, at 5:32 AM, Matthias Seidel  
 wrote:
 
 Hi Jim, all,
 
 Am 07.11.22 um 13:11 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> That works for me. I can do the same w/ the macOS and Linux builds.
 I will use these two graphics for "branding" located here:
 
 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/devtools/build-scripts/4.2.0-Dev4/wntmsci/
  
 
 
> Is HEAD of AOO42X in a suitable state, or are there additional fixes to 
> be added before we build?
 It is usable, but some main blockers are not fixed.
 
 And of course the translations need to be updated.
 
 Regards,
 
   Matthias
 
>> On Nov 6, 2022, at 4:37 AM, Matthias Seidel  
>> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi all,
>> 
>> We released our last Developer version some time ago.
>> Maybe we can start a Dev4 now?
>> 
>> Regarding Windows, I would like to do a "normal" build, just branded as
>> a "Developer Version".
>> This way we are much closer to a production build.
>> 
>> Additionally, I would like to build AOO with Adoptiums OpenJDK now.
>> 
>> How about removing (at least) Dev2?
>> 
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/
>> 
>> Regards,
>> 
>>  Matthias
>> 
>> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org 
> 
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org 
> 
> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Time for AOO 4.2.0 Dev 4?

[Matthias Seidel]

Am 18.12.22 um 00:35 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
> Hi Jim,
>
> Am 08.11.22 um 14:43 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>> Let me know when we are ready for a Dev4 then and I'll kick off the builds.
> I have some free time next week.
>
> How about doing Dev4 based on e548f13f48 ?

Sorry, since we want to build AOO42X it would be 9b873c1694.

Regards,

   Matthias

>
> Regards,
>
>    Matthias
>
>>> On Nov 8, 2022, at 5:32 AM, Matthias Seidel  
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Jim, all,
>>>
>>> Am 07.11.22 um 13:11 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
 That works for me. I can do the same w/ the macOS and Linux builds.
>>> I will use these two graphics for "branding" located here:
>>>
>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/devtools/build-scripts/4.2.0-Dev4/wntmsci/
>>>  
>>> 
>>>
 Is HEAD of AOO42X in a suitable state, or are there additional fixes to be 
 added before we build?
>>> It is usable, but some main blockers are not fixed.
>>>
>>> And of course the translations need to be updated.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>>Matthias
>>>
> On Nov 6, 2022, at 4:37 AM, Matthias Seidel  
> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> We released our last Developer version some time ago.
> Maybe we can start a Dev4 now?
>
> Regarding Windows, I would like to do a "normal" build, just branded as
> a "Developer Version".
> This way we are much closer to a production build.
>
> Additionally, I would like to build AOO with Adoptiums OpenJDK now.
>
> How about removing (at least) Dev2?
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/
>
> Regards,
>
>   Matthias
>
>
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org 
 
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org 
 



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: Time for AOO 4.2.0 Dev 4?

[Matthias Seidel]

Hi Jim,

Am 08.11.22 um 14:43 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> Let me know when we are ready for a Dev4 then and I'll kick off the builds.
I have some free time next week.

How about doing Dev4 based on e548f13f48 ?

Regards,

   Matthias

>
>> On Nov 8, 2022, at 5:32 AM, Matthias Seidel  
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Jim, all,
>>
>> Am 07.11.22 um 13:11 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>>> That works for me. I can do the same w/ the macOS and Linux builds.
>> I will use these two graphics for "branding" located here:
>>
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/devtools/build-scripts/4.2.0-Dev4/wntmsci/
>>  
>> 
>>
>>> Is HEAD of AOO42X in a suitable state, or are there additional fixes to be 
>>> added before we build?
>> It is usable, but some main blockers are not fixed.
>>
>> And of course the translations need to be updated.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>>Matthias
>>
 On Nov 6, 2022, at 4:37 AM, Matthias Seidel  
 wrote:

 Hi all,

 We released our last Developer version some time ago.
 Maybe we can start a Dev4 now?

 Regarding Windows, I would like to do a "normal" build, just branded as
 a "Developer Version".
 This way we are much closer to a production build.

 Additionally, I would like to build AOO with Adoptiums OpenJDK now.

 How about removing (at least) Dev2?

 https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/

 Regards,

   Matthias


>>> -
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org 
>>> 
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org 
>>> 



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: Time for AOO 4.2.0 Dev 4?

[Pedro Lino]

I can't get 4.2.X to build in Ubuntu 18.04.6 x64

I'm using
./configure --with-build-version="$(date +"%Y-%m-%d %H:%M") - `uname -sm`" 
--with-dmake-url=https://github.com/jimjag/dmake/archive/v4.13.1/dmake-4.13.1.tar.gz
 --with-epm-url=https://github.com/jimjag/epm/archive/v5.0.0/epm-5.0.0.tar.gz 
--enable-opengl --disable-odk --enable-category-b --enable-bundled-dictionaries

but get

dmake:  Error: -- 
`./unxlngx6.pro/misc/8ce02a315807bd406b5de85ccf63e7fb-epm-5.0.0.unpack' not 
found, and can't be made

1 module(s): 
epm
need(s) to be rebuilt

Reason(s):

ERROR: error 65280 occurred while making /source/openoffice/main/epm

When you have fixed the errors in that module you can resume the build by 
running:

build --from epm


Any ideas?

Thanks!

> On 11/08/2022 1:43 PM WET Jim Jagielski  wrote:
> 
>  
> Let me know when we are ready for a Dev4 then and I'll kick off the builds.
> 
> > On Nov 8, 2022, at 5:32 AM, Matthias Seidel  
> > wrote:
> > 
> > Hi Jim, all,
> > 
> > Am 07.11.22 um 13:11 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> >> That works for me. I can do the same w/ the macOS and Linux builds.
> > 
> > I will use these two graphics for "branding" located here:
> > 
> > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/devtools/build-scripts/4.2.0-Dev4/wntmsci/
> >  
> > 
> > 
> >> Is HEAD of AOO42X in a suitable state, or are there additional fixes to be 
> >> added before we build?
> > 
> > It is usable, but some main blockers are not fixed.
> > 
> > And of course the translations need to be updated.
> > 
> > Regards,
> > 
> >Matthias
> > 
> >>> On Nov 6, 2022, at 4:37 AM, Matthias Seidel  
> >>> wrote:
> >>> 
> >>> Hi all,
> >>> 
> >>> We released our last Developer version some time ago.
> >>> Maybe we can start a Dev4 now?
> >>> 
> >>> Regarding Windows, I would like to do a "normal" build, just branded as
> >>> a "Developer Version".
> >>> This way we are much closer to a production build.
> >>> 
> >>> Additionally, I would like to build AOO with Adoptiums OpenJDK now.
> >>> 
> >>> How about removing (at least) Dev2?
> >>> 
> >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/
> >>> 
> >>> Regards,
> >>> 
> >>>   Matthias
> >>> 
> >>> 
> >> -
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org 
> >> 
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org 
> >> 

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Time for AOO 4.2.0 Dev 4?

[Pedro Lino]

Hi Matthias

So, at that time we build from the source contained in the archive (aka tag)?
That makes sense!

Thanks!
Pedro


> On 11/08/2022 9:32 PM WET Matthias Seidel  wrote:
> 
>  
> Hi Pedro,
> 
> Am 08.11.22 um 22:17 schrieb Pedro Lino:
> > Hi Matthias
> >
> >> On 11/08/2022 8:23 PM WET Matthias Seidel  
> >> wrote:
> >>> I would like to try to build the Linux version under Ubuntu 20.04.
> >> No need to wait, you can always build your own version.
> > Yes, I know I can do a 42x build at any point (using the right settings). 
> > But the idea was to do the same build you and Jim are doing.
> > How can I make sure that I'm doing the same Rev?
> 
> We will announce the Git hash at that time and we can make a tag of it
> like for Dev3:
> 
> https://github.com/apache/openoffice/releases/tag/AOO420-Dev3-m3
> 
> Regards,
> 
>    Matthias
> 
> >
> > Regards,
> > Pedro
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> >

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Time for AOO 4.2.0 Dev 4?

[Matthias Seidel]

Hi Pedro,

Am 08.11.22 um 22:17 schrieb Pedro Lino:
> Hi Matthias
>
>> On 11/08/2022 8:23 PM WET Matthias Seidel  wrote:
>>> I would like to try to build the Linux version under Ubuntu 20.04.
>> No need to wait, you can always build your own version.
> Yes, I know I can do a 42x build at any point (using the right settings). But 
> the idea was to do the same build you and Jim are doing.
> How can I make sure that I'm doing the same Rev?

We will announce the Git hash at that time and we can make a tag of it
like for Dev3:

https://github.com/apache/openoffice/releases/tag/AOO420-Dev3-m3

Regards,

   Matthias

>
> Regards,
> Pedro
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: Time for AOO 4.2.0 Dev 4?

[Pedro Lino]

Hi Matthias

> On 11/08/2022 8:23 PM WET Matthias Seidel  wrote:

> > I would like to try to build the Linux version under Ubuntu 20.04.
> 
> No need to wait, you can always build your own version.

Yes, I know I can do a 42x build at any point (using the right settings). But 
the idea was to do the same build you and Jim are doing.
How can I make sure that I'm doing the same Rev?

Regards,
Pedro

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Time for AOO 4.2.0 Dev 4?

[Matthias Seidel]

Hi Pedro,

Am 07.11.22 um 15:30 schrieb Pedro Lino:
> Hi Matthias, all
>
> +1
> I would like to try to build the Linux version under Ubuntu 20.04.

No need to wait, you can always build your own version.

Regards,

   Matthias

>
> Best,
> Pedro
>
>> On 11/06/2022 9:37 AM WET Matthias Seidel  wrote:
>>
>>  
>> Hi all,
>>
>> We released our last Developer version some time ago.
>> Maybe we can start a Dev4 now?
>>
>> Regarding Windows, I would like to do a "normal" build, just branded as
>> a "Developer Version".
>> This way we are much closer to a production build.
>>
>> Additionally, I would like to build AOO with Adoptiums OpenJDK now.
>>
>> How about removing (at least) Dev2?
>>
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>>    Matthias
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: Time for AOO 4.2.0 Dev 4?

[Matthias Seidel]

Am 08.11.22 um 14:43 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> Let me know when we are ready for a Dev4 then and I'll kick off the builds.

I hope that others have something to contribute. Otherwise Dev4 will be
just "another" snapshot.

But even then, we can prepare Dev5 afterwards. Step by step to the 4.2.0
release... ;-)

Regards,

   Matthias

>
>> On Nov 8, 2022, at 5:32 AM, Matthias Seidel  
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Jim, all,
>>
>> Am 07.11.22 um 13:11 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>>> That works for me. I can do the same w/ the macOS and Linux builds.
>> I will use these two graphics for "branding" located here:
>>
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/devtools/build-scripts/4.2.0-Dev4/wntmsci/
>>  
>> 
>>
>>> Is HEAD of AOO42X in a suitable state, or are there additional fixes to be 
>>> added before we build?
>> It is usable, but some main blockers are not fixed.
>>
>> And of course the translations need to be updated.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>>Matthias
>>
 On Nov 6, 2022, at 4:37 AM, Matthias Seidel  
 wrote:

 Hi all,

 We released our last Developer version some time ago.
 Maybe we can start a Dev4 now?

 Regarding Windows, I would like to do a "normal" build, just branded as
 a "Developer Version".
 This way we are much closer to a production build.

 Additionally, I would like to build AOO with Adoptiums OpenJDK now.

 How about removing (at least) Dev2?

 https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/

 Regards,

   Matthias


>>> -
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org 
>>> 
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org 
>>> 



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: Time for AOO 4.2.0 Dev 4?

[Jim Jagielski]

Let me know when we are ready for a Dev4 then and I'll kick off the builds.

> On Nov 8, 2022, at 5:32 AM, Matthias Seidel  
> wrote:
> 
> Hi Jim, all,
> 
> Am 07.11.22 um 13:11 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>> That works for me. I can do the same w/ the macOS and Linux builds.
> 
> I will use these two graphics for "branding" located here:
> 
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/devtools/build-scripts/4.2.0-Dev4/wntmsci/
>  
> 
> 
>> Is HEAD of AOO42X in a suitable state, or are there additional fixes to be 
>> added before we build?
> 
> It is usable, but some main blockers are not fixed.
> 
> And of course the translations need to be updated.
> 
> Regards,
> 
>Matthias
> 
>>> On Nov 6, 2022, at 4:37 AM, Matthias Seidel  
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi all,
>>> 
>>> We released our last Developer version some time ago.
>>> Maybe we can start a Dev4 now?
>>> 
>>> Regarding Windows, I would like to do a "normal" build, just branded as
>>> a "Developer Version".
>>> This way we are much closer to a production build.
>>> 
>>> Additionally, I would like to build AOO with Adoptiums OpenJDK now.
>>> 
>>> How about removing (at least) Dev2?
>>> 
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/
>>> 
>>> Regards,
>>> 
>>>   Matthias
>>> 
>>> 
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org 
>> 
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org 
>> 

Re: Time for AOO 4.2.0 Dev 4?

[Matthias Seidel]

Hi Jim, all,

Am 07.11.22 um 13:11 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> That works for me. I can do the same w/ the macOS and Linux builds.

I will use these two graphics for "branding" located here:

https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/devtools/build-scripts/4.2.0-Dev4/wntmsci/

> Is HEAD of AOO42X in a suitable state, or are there additional fixes to be 
> added before we build?

It is usable, but some main blockers are not fixed.

And of course the translations need to be updated.

Regards,

   Matthias

>> On Nov 6, 2022, at 4:37 AM, Matthias Seidel  
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> We released our last Developer version some time ago.
>> Maybe we can start a Dev4 now?
>>
>> Regarding Windows, I would like to do a "normal" build, just branded as
>> a "Developer Version".
>> This way we are much closer to a production build.
>>
>> Additionally, I would like to build AOO with Adoptiums OpenJDK now.
>>
>> How about removing (at least) Dev2?
>>
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>>Matthias
>>
>>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: Time for AOO 4.2.0 Dev 4?

[Pedro Lino]

Hi Matthias, all

+1
I would like to try to build the Linux version under Ubuntu 20.04.

Best,
Pedro

> On 11/06/2022 9:37 AM WET Matthias Seidel  wrote:
> 
>  
> Hi all,
> 
> We released our last Developer version some time ago.
> Maybe we can start a Dev4 now?
> 
> Regarding Windows, I would like to do a "normal" build, just branded as
> a "Developer Version".
> This way we are much closer to a production build.
> 
> Additionally, I would like to build AOO with Adoptiums OpenJDK now.
> 
> How about removing (at least) Dev2?
> 
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/
> 
> Regards,
> 
>    Matthias

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Time for AOO 4.2.0 Dev 4?

[Jim Jagielski]

That works for me. I can do the same w/ the macOS and Linux builds.

Is HEAD of AOO42X in a suitable state, or are there additional fixes to be 
added before we build?

> On Nov 6, 2022, at 4:37 AM, Matthias Seidel  
> wrote:
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> We released our last Developer version some time ago.
> Maybe we can start a Dev4 now?
> 
> Regarding Windows, I would like to do a "normal" build, just branded as
> a "Developer Version".
> This way we are much closer to a production build.
> 
> Additionally, I would like to build AOO with Adoptiums OpenJDK now.
> 
> How about removing (at least) Dev2?
> 
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/
> 
> Regards,
> 
>Matthias
> 
> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Time for AOO 4.2.0 Dev 4?

[Keith N. McKenna]

Matthias Seidel wrote:

Hi all,

We released our last Developer version some time ago.
Maybe we can start a Dev4 now?

Regarding Windows, I would like to do a "normal" build, just branded as
a "Developer Version".
This way we are much closer to a production build.

Additionally, I would like to build AOO with Adoptiums OpenJDK now.

How about removing (at least) Dev2?

https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/

Regards,

    Matthias




That sounds like a very good idea Matthias.

Regards
Keith


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Time for AOO 4.2.0 Dev 4?

[Keith N. McKenna]

Matthias Seidel wrote:

Hi all,

We released our last Developer version some time ago.
Maybe we can start a Dev4 now?

Regarding Windows, I would like to do a "normal" build, just branded as
a "Developer Version".
This way we are much closer to a production build.

Additionally, I would like to build AOO with Adoptiums OpenJDK now.

How about removing (at least) Dev2?

https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/

Regards,

    Matthias



That sounds like a very good idea Matthias.

Regards
Keith



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Time for AOO 4.2.0 Dev 4?

[Matthias Seidel]

Hi all,

We released our last Developer version some time ago.
Maybe we can start a Dev4 now?

Regarding Windows, I would like to do a "normal" build, just branded as
a "Developer Version".
This way we are much closer to a production build.

Additionally, I would like to build AOO with Adoptiums OpenJDK now.

How about removing (at least) Dev2?

https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/

Regards,

   Matthias




smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev3-m3 in Debian 9

[Delio Orozco Gonzalez]

Hello Matthias:

I use IceWM 2.6.0 and Budgie 10.5.2

Regards, Delio.

- Mensaje original -
De: "Matthias Seidel" 
Para: "dev" 
Enviados: Sábado, 14 de Agosto 2021 17:52:15
Asunto: Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev3-m3 in Debian 9

Hi Delio,

Which Desktop Environment are you using with Debian?

Regards,

   Matthias

Am 14.08.21 um 17:23 schrieb Delio Orozco Gonzalez:
> Hi all, 
>
> I installed 4.2.0-Dev3-m3 in Debian 9 and until the moment there are not bug 
> . 
>
> Regards, Delio. 
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev3-m3 in Debian 9

[Matthias Seidel]

Hi Delio,

Which Desktop Environment are you using with Debian?

Regards,

   Matthias

Am 14.08.21 um 17:23 schrieb Delio Orozco Gonzalez:
> Hi all, 
>
> I installed 4.2.0-Dev3-m3 in Debian 9 and until the moment there are not bug 
> . 
>
> Regards, Delio. 
>



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

AOO 4.2.0-Dev3-m3 in Debian 9

[Delio Orozco Gonzalez]

Hi all, 

I installed 4.2.0-Dev3-m3 in Debian 9 and until the moment there are not bug . 

Regards, Delio. 

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev2 (was: macOS and AOO42X)

[Don Lewis]

On 19 May, Matthias Seidel wrote:
> Hi Don,
> 
> Am 19.05.20 um 19:44 schrieb Don Lewis:
>> On 19 May, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>>> Hi Don, all,
>>>
>>> Am 18.05.20 um 23:23 schrieb Don Lewis:
 On 18 May, Matthias Seidel wrote:
> Hi Don,
>
> Am 18.05.20 um 10:13 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>> Hi Don,
>>
>> Am 18.05.20 um 01:26 schrieb Don Lewis:
>>> Looks like someone applied this patch to the FreeBSD port:
>>>
>>> --- solenv/gbuild/Tempfile.mk.orig  2019-09-17 22:55:21 UTC
>>> +++ solenv/gbuild/Tempfile.mk
>>> @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ $(strip $(1)
>>>  $(eval gb_var2file_helpervar := $$(shell printf "%s" "" > $(1) ))\
>>>  $(foreach item,$(3),$(eval gb_var2file_curblock += $(item)
>>>  ifeq ($$(words $$(gb_var2file_curblock)),$(2)) 
>>> -gb_var2file_helpervar := $$(shell printf "%s" 
>>> "$$(gb_var2file_curblock)" >> $(1) )
>>> +gb_var2file_helpervar := $$(shell printf " %s" 
>>> "$$(gb_var2file_curblock)" >> $(1) )
>>>  gb_var2file_curblock :=
>>>  endif
>>>  ))\
>>>
>> Whatever that additional space does, I am doing a Windows build right
>> now with make 4.3.
>>
>> Let's see if that is successful! ;-)
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>>    Matthias
> My Windows build with above patch applied and make 4.3 was successful!
> I will now downgrade make again and do a new build to ensure that this
> doesn't break backward compatibility.
>>> That again was successful!
> Any idea why "someone" did not commit this to trunk? ;-)
 I think the patch to the FreeBSD port was committed by the person who
 upgraded gmake to 4.3 to unbreak 4.1.7, and the -dev snapshot.
>>> I have no idea who that would be, but it would have saved us a lot of
>>> time if it would have been committed to trunk instead of a branch.
>> The author, Tijl Coosemans  is probably not an Apache
>> committer.
>>
>> FreeBSD ports can contain a collection of patches that they apply to the
>> official source tarball that are needed to build the ports on FreeBSD.
>>
>> When Tijl was doing the work to upgrade the FreeBSD gmake port to 4.3,
>> he found that it broke a number of other ports and generated patches to
>> those ports to fix the breakage.  Here is the commit:
>> https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports?view=revision&revision=534792
> 
> Thanks for the clarification!
> Maybe we should have a closer look on that branch in the future! ;-)

I maintain the AOO FreeBSD ports, but other committers are allowed to
tweak things to avoid breakage.  When I find problems, I generally try
to upstream the patches, but this one flew under my radar.  The patch
files for 4.1.7 are named patch-* here:
https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports/head/editors/openoffice-4/files/
and for AOO420 here:
https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports/head/editors/openoffice-devel/files/


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev2 (was: macOS and AOO42X)

[Matthias Seidel]

Hi Don,

Am 19.05.20 um 19:44 schrieb Don Lewis:
> On 19 May, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>> Hi Don, all,
>>
>> Am 18.05.20 um 23:23 schrieb Don Lewis:
>>> On 18 May, Matthias Seidel wrote:
 Hi Don,

 Am 18.05.20 um 10:13 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
> Hi Don,
>
> Am 18.05.20 um 01:26 schrieb Don Lewis:
>> Looks like someone applied this patch to the FreeBSD port:
>>
>> --- solenv/gbuild/Tempfile.mk.orig  2019-09-17 22:55:21 UTC
>> +++ solenv/gbuild/Tempfile.mk
>> @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ $(strip $(1)
>>  $(eval gb_var2file_helpervar := $$(shell printf "%s" "" > $(1) ))\
>>  $(foreach item,$(3),$(eval gb_var2file_curblock += $(item)
>>  ifeq ($$(words $$(gb_var2file_curblock)),$(2)) 
>> -gb_var2file_helpervar := $$(shell printf "%s" 
>> "$$(gb_var2file_curblock)" >> $(1) )
>> +gb_var2file_helpervar := $$(shell printf " %s" 
>> "$$(gb_var2file_curblock)" >> $(1) )
>>  gb_var2file_curblock :=
>>  endif
>>  ))\
>>
> Whatever that additional space does, I am doing a Windows build right
> now with make 4.3.
>
> Let's see if that is successful! ;-)
>
> Regards,
>
>    Matthias
 My Windows build with above patch applied and make 4.3 was successful!
 I will now downgrade make again and do a new build to ensure that this
 doesn't break backward compatibility.
>> That again was successful!
 Any idea why "someone" did not commit this to trunk? ;-)
>>> I think the patch to the FreeBSD port was committed by the person who
>>> upgraded gmake to 4.3 to unbreak 4.1.7, and the -dev snapshot.
>> I have no idea who that would be, but it would have saved us a lot of
>> time if it would have been committed to trunk instead of a branch.
> The author, Tijl Coosemans  is probably not an Apache
> committer.
>
> FreeBSD ports can contain a collection of patches that they apply to the
> official source tarball that are needed to build the ports on FreeBSD.
>
> When Tijl was doing the work to upgrade the FreeBSD gmake port to 4.3,
> he found that it broke a number of other ports and generated patches to
> those ports to fix the breakage.  Here is the commit:
> https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports?view=revision&revision=534792

Thanks for the clarification!
Maybe we should have a closer look on that branch in the future! ;-)

The fix is already committed, Jim will take back his configure check soon.

Regards,

   Matthias

>  
>> From my POV this small patch can be applied, but I'd like to have that
>> confirmed on Linux and macOS.
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev2 (was: macOS and AOO42X)

[Don Lewis]

On 19 May, Matthias Seidel wrote:
> Hi Don, all,
> 
> Am 18.05.20 um 23:23 schrieb Don Lewis:
>> On 18 May, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>>> Hi Don,
>>>
>>> Am 18.05.20 um 10:13 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
 Hi Don,

 Am 18.05.20 um 01:26 schrieb Don Lewis:
> Looks like someone applied this patch to the FreeBSD port:
>
> --- solenv/gbuild/Tempfile.mk.orig  2019-09-17 22:55:21 UTC
> +++ solenv/gbuild/Tempfile.mk
> @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ $(strip $(1)
>  $(eval gb_var2file_helpervar := $$(shell printf "%s" "" > $(1) ))\
>  $(foreach item,$(3),$(eval gb_var2file_curblock += $(item)
>  ifeq ($$(words $$(gb_var2file_curblock)),$(2)) 
> -gb_var2file_helpervar := $$(shell printf "%s" 
> "$$(gb_var2file_curblock)" >> $(1) )
> +gb_var2file_helpervar := $$(shell printf " %s" 
> "$$(gb_var2file_curblock)" >> $(1) )
>  gb_var2file_curblock :=
>  endif
>  ))\
>
 Whatever that additional space does, I am doing a Windows build right
 now with make 4.3.

 Let's see if that is successful! ;-)

 Regards,

    Matthias
>>> My Windows build with above patch applied and make 4.3 was successful!
>>> I will now downgrade make again and do a new build to ensure that this
>>> doesn't break backward compatibility.
> That again was successful!
>>>
>>> Any idea why "someone" did not commit this to trunk? ;-)
>> I think the patch to the FreeBSD port was committed by the person who
>> upgraded gmake to 4.3 to unbreak 4.1.7, and the -dev snapshot.
> 
> I have no idea who that would be, but it would have saved us a lot of
> time if it would have been committed to trunk instead of a branch.

The author, Tijl Coosemans  is probably not an Apache
committer.

FreeBSD ports can contain a collection of patches that they apply to the
official source tarball that are needed to build the ports on FreeBSD.

When Tijl was doing the work to upgrade the FreeBSD gmake port to 4.3,
he found that it broke a number of other ports and generated patches to
those ports to fix the breakage.  Here is the commit:
https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports?view=revision&revision=534792
 
> From my POV this small patch can be applied, but I'd like to have that
> confirmed on Linux and macOS.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev2 (was: macOS and AOO42X)

[Matthias Seidel]

Hi Don, all,

Am 18.05.20 um 23:23 schrieb Don Lewis:
> On 18 May, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>> Hi Don,
>>
>> Am 18.05.20 um 10:13 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>>> Hi Don,
>>>
>>> Am 18.05.20 um 01:26 schrieb Don Lewis:
 Looks like someone applied this patch to the FreeBSD port:

 --- solenv/gbuild/Tempfile.mk.orig  2019-09-17 22:55:21 UTC
 +++ solenv/gbuild/Tempfile.mk
 @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ $(strip $(1)
  $(eval gb_var2file_helpervar := $$(shell printf "%s" "" > $(1) ))\
  $(foreach item,$(3),$(eval gb_var2file_curblock += $(item)
  ifeq ($$(words $$(gb_var2file_curblock)),$(2)) 
 -gb_var2file_helpervar := $$(shell printf "%s" 
 "$$(gb_var2file_curblock)" >> $(1) )
 +gb_var2file_helpervar := $$(shell printf " %s" 
 "$$(gb_var2file_curblock)" >> $(1) )
  gb_var2file_curblock :=
  endif
  ))\

>>> Whatever that additional space does, I am doing a Windows build right
>>> now with make 4.3.
>>>
>>> Let's see if that is successful! ;-)
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>>    Matthias
>> My Windows build with above patch applied and make 4.3 was successful!
>> I will now downgrade make again and do a new build to ensure that this
>> doesn't break backward compatibility.
That again was successful!
>>
>> Any idea why "someone" did not commit this to trunk? ;-)
> I think the patch to the FreeBSD port was committed by the person who
> upgraded gmake to 4.3 to unbreak 4.1.7, and the -dev snapshot.

I have no idea who that would be, but it would have saved us a lot of
time if it would have been committed to trunk instead of a branch.

From my POV this small patch can be applied, but I'd like to have that
confirmed on Linux and macOS.

Regards,

   Matthias

>
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev2 (was: macOS and AOO42X)

[Don Lewis]

On 18 May, Matthias Seidel wrote:
> Hi Don,
> 
> Am 18.05.20 um 10:13 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>> Hi Don,
>>
>> Am 18.05.20 um 01:26 schrieb Don Lewis:
>>> Looks like someone applied this patch to the FreeBSD port:
>>>
>>> --- solenv/gbuild/Tempfile.mk.orig  2019-09-17 22:55:21 UTC
>>> +++ solenv/gbuild/Tempfile.mk
>>> @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ $(strip $(1)
>>>  $(eval gb_var2file_helpervar := $$(shell printf "%s" "" > $(1) ))\
>>>  $(foreach item,$(3),$(eval gb_var2file_curblock += $(item)
>>>  ifeq ($$(words $$(gb_var2file_curblock)),$(2)) 
>>> -gb_var2file_helpervar := $$(shell printf "%s" 
>>> "$$(gb_var2file_curblock)" >> $(1) )
>>> +gb_var2file_helpervar := $$(shell printf " %s" 
>>> "$$(gb_var2file_curblock)" >> $(1) )
>>>  gb_var2file_curblock :=
>>>  endif
>>>  ))\
>>>
>> Whatever that additional space does, I am doing a Windows build right
>> now with make 4.3.
>>
>> Let's see if that is successful! ;-)
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>>    Matthias
> 
> My Windows build with above patch applied and make 4.3 was successful!
> I will now downgrade make again and do a new build to ensure that this
> doesn't break backward compatibility.
> 
> Any idea why "someone" did not commit this to trunk? ;-)

I think the patch to the FreeBSD port was committed by the person who
upgraded gmake to 4.3 to unbreak 4.1.7, and the -dev snapshot.



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev2 (was: macOS and AOO42X)

[Matthias Seidel]

Hi Don,

Am 18.05.20 um 10:13 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
> Hi Don,
>
> Am 18.05.20 um 01:26 schrieb Don Lewis:
>> Looks like someone applied this patch to the FreeBSD port:
>>
>> --- solenv/gbuild/Tempfile.mk.orig  2019-09-17 22:55:21 UTC
>> +++ solenv/gbuild/Tempfile.mk
>> @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ $(strip $(1)
>>  $(eval gb_var2file_helpervar := $$(shell printf "%s" "" > $(1) ))\
>>  $(foreach item,$(3),$(eval gb_var2file_curblock += $(item)
>>  ifeq ($$(words $$(gb_var2file_curblock)),$(2)) 
>> -gb_var2file_helpervar := $$(shell printf "%s" 
>> "$$(gb_var2file_curblock)" >> $(1) )
>> +gb_var2file_helpervar := $$(shell printf " %s" 
>> "$$(gb_var2file_curblock)" >> $(1) )
>>  gb_var2file_curblock :=
>>  endif
>>  ))\
>>
> Whatever that additional space does, I am doing a Windows build right
> now with make 4.3.
>
> Let's see if that is successful! ;-)
>
> Regards,
>
>    Matthias

My Windows build with above patch applied and make 4.3 was successful!
I will now downgrade make again and do a new build to ensure that this
doesn't break backward compatibility.

Any idea why "someone" did not commit this to trunk? ;-)

Regards,

   Matthias

>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>>



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev2 (was: macOS and AOO42X)

[Matthias Seidel]

Hi Don,

Am 18.05.20 um 01:26 schrieb Don Lewis:
>
> Looks like someone applied this patch to the FreeBSD port:
>
> --- solenv/gbuild/Tempfile.mk.orig  2019-09-17 22:55:21 UTC
> +++ solenv/gbuild/Tempfile.mk
> @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ $(strip $(1)
>  $(eval gb_var2file_helpervar := $$(shell printf "%s" "" > $(1) ))\
>  $(foreach item,$(3),$(eval gb_var2file_curblock += $(item)
>  ifeq ($$(words $$(gb_var2file_curblock)),$(2)) 
> -gb_var2file_helpervar := $$(shell printf "%s" 
> "$$(gb_var2file_curblock)" >> $(1) )
> +gb_var2file_helpervar := $$(shell printf " %s" 
> "$$(gb_var2file_curblock)" >> $(1) )
>  gb_var2file_curblock :=
>  endif
>  ))\
>
Whatever that additional space does, I am doing a Windows build right
now with make 4.3.

Let's see if that is successful! ;-)

Regards,

   Matthias

>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev2 (was: macOS and AOO42X)

[Don Lewis]

On 16 May, Matthias Seidel wrote:
> Hi Don,
> 
> Am 15.05.20 um 21:30 schrieb Don Lewis:
>>
>> Nope.  I am able to build AOO420 git revision d12e928220 from late
>> January using gmake 4.3.
> 
> Have there been significant changes to the build system in the past 4 month?
> Maybe you could try it with a more recent revision...

Looks like someone applied this patch to the FreeBSD port:

--- solenv/gbuild/Tempfile.mk.orig  2019-09-17 22:55:21 UTC
+++ solenv/gbuild/Tempfile.mk
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ $(strip $(1)
 $(eval gb_var2file_helpervar := $$(shell printf "%s" "" > $(1) ))\
 $(foreach item,$(3),$(eval gb_var2file_curblock += $(item)
 ifeq ($$(words $$(gb_var2file_curblock)),$(2)) 
-gb_var2file_helpervar := $$(shell printf "%s" 
"$$(gb_var2file_curblock)" >> $(1) )
+gb_var2file_helpervar := $$(shell printf " %s" 
"$$(gb_var2file_curblock)" >> $(1) )
 gb_var2file_curblock :=
 endif
 ))\



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev2 (was: macOS and AOO42X)

[Matthias Seidel]

Hi Don,

Am 15.05.20 um 21:30 schrieb Don Lewis:
>
> Nope.  I am able to build AOO420 git revision d12e928220 from late
> January using gmake 4.3.

Have there been significant changes to the build system in the past 4 month?
Maybe you could try it with a more recent revision...

Regards,

   Matthias

>
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev2 (was: macOS and AOO42X)

[Don Lewis]

On 15 May, Matthias Seidel wrote:
> Hi Don,
> 
> Am 15.05.20 um 17:14 schrieb Don Lewis:
>> On 15 May, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>>> Hi Don,
>>>
>>> Am 15.05.20 um 09:40 schrieb Don Lewis:
 On 11 May, Matthias Seidel wrote:
> Am 11.05.20 um 23:56 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>> In the meantime, I've changed configure.ac to balk if gmake is 4.3 (or 
>> later)
> Thanks, I think we need it for AOO418, too.
>
> At least I had to downgrade in Cygwin...
 gmake 4.3 isn't broken everywhere.  FreeBSD recently upgraded to gmake
 4.3 and I am still able to build AOO417 and a somewhat aged snapshot of
 AOO420.
>>> That's interesting, do you build with SDK?
>> Not normally, but I can give it a try.
> 
> Bingo. I bet you get the error too... ;-)

Nope.  I am able to build AOO420 git revision d12e928220 from late
January using gmake 4.3.



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev2 (was: macOS and AOO42X)

[Matthias Seidel]

Hi Don,

Am 15.05.20 um 17:14 schrieb Don Lewis:
> On 15 May, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>> Hi Don,
>>
>> Am 15.05.20 um 09:40 schrieb Don Lewis:
>>> On 11 May, Matthias Seidel wrote:
 Am 11.05.20 um 23:56 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> In the meantime, I've changed configure.ac to balk if gmake is 4.3 (or 
> later)
 Thanks, I think we need it for AOO418, too.

 At least I had to downgrade in Cygwin...
>>> gmake 4.3 isn't broken everywhere.  FreeBSD recently upgraded to gmake
>>> 4.3 and I am still able to build AOO417 and a somewhat aged snapshot of
>>> AOO420.
>> That's interesting, do you build with SDK?
> Not normally, but I can give it a try.

Bingo. I bet you get the error too... ;-)

Matthias

>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev2 (was: macOS and AOO42X)

[Don Lewis]

On 15 May, Matthias Seidel wrote:
> Hi Don,
> 
> Am 15.05.20 um 09:40 schrieb Don Lewis:
>> On 11 May, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>>> Am 11.05.20 um 23:56 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
 In the meantime, I've changed configure.ac to balk if gmake is 4.3 (or 
 later)
>>> Thanks, I think we need it for AOO418, too.
>>>
>>> At least I had to downgrade in Cygwin...
>> gmake 4.3 isn't broken everywhere.  FreeBSD recently upgraded to gmake
>> 4.3 and I am still able to build AOO417 and a somewhat aged snapshot of
>> AOO420.
> 
> That's interesting, do you build with SDK?

Not normally, but I can give it a try.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev2 (was: macOS and AOO42X)

[Matthias Seidel]

Hi Don,

Am 15.05.20 um 09:40 schrieb Don Lewis:
> On 11 May, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>> Am 11.05.20 um 23:56 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>>> In the meantime, I've changed configure.ac to balk if gmake is 4.3 (or 
>>> later)
>> Thanks, I think we need it for AOO418, too.
>>
>> At least I had to downgrade in Cygwin...
> gmake 4.3 isn't broken everywhere.  FreeBSD recently upgraded to gmake
> 4.3 and I am still able to build AOO417 and a somewhat aged snapshot of
> AOO420.

That's interesting, do you build with SDK?

Regards,

   Matthias

>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev2 (was: macOS and AOO42X)

[Don Lewis]

On 11 May, Matthias Seidel wrote:
> Am 11.05.20 um 23:56 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>> In the meantime, I've changed configure.ac to balk if gmake is 4.3 (or later)
> 
> Thanks, I think we need it for AOO418, too.
> 
> At least I had to downgrade in Cygwin...

gmake 4.3 isn't broken everywhere.  FreeBSD recently upgraded to gmake
4.3 and I am still able to build AOO417 and a somewhat aged snapshot of
AOO420.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev2 (was: macOS and AOO42X)

[Matthias Seidel]

Hi Jim, I think we are complete?

Am 13.05.20 um 19:24 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> From what I can see, builds are starting to to fill in...
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev2 (was: macOS and AOO42X)

[Jim Jagielski]

From what I can see, builds are starting to to fill in...
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev2 (was: macOS and AOO42X)

[Jim Jagielski]

Gotcha... before I do it I'll try w/ 4.3.0 and see if there are any diffs 
between the makefiles

> On May 11, 2020, at 5:58 PM, Matthias Seidel  
> wrote:
> 
> Am 11.05.20 um 23:56 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>> In the meantime, I've changed configure.ac to balk if gmake is 4.3 (or later)
> 
> Thanks, I think we need it for AOO418, too.
> 
> At least I had to downgrade in Cygwin...
> 
>> 
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>> 
> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev2 (was: macOS and AOO42X)

[Matthias Seidel]

Am 11.05.20 um 23:56 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> In the meantime, I've changed configure.ac to balk if gmake is 4.3 (or later)

Thanks, I think we need it for AOO418, too.

At least I had to downgrade in Cygwin...

>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev2 (was: macOS and AOO42X)

[Jim Jagielski]

In the meantime, I've changed configure.ac to balk if gmake is 4.3 (or later)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev2 (was: macOS and AOO42X)

[Jim Jagielski]

According to the gmake 4.3 release docs:

* WARNING: Backward-incompatibility!
  Number signs (#) appearing inside a macro reference or function invocation
  no longer introduce comments and should not be escaped with backslashes:
  thus a call such as:
foo := $(shell echo '#')
  is legal.  Previously the number sign needed to be escaped, for example:
foo := $(shell echo '\#')
  Now this latter will resolve to "\#".  If you want to write makefiles
  portable to both versions, assign the number sign to a variable:
H := \#
foo := $(shell echo '$H')
  This was claimed to be fixed in 3.81, but wasn't, for some reason.
  To detect this change search for 'nocomment' in the .FEATURES variable.

* WARNING: Backward-incompatibility!
  Previously appending using '+=' to an empty variable would result in a value
  starting with a space.  Now the initial space is only added if the variable
  already contains some value.  Similarly, appending an empty string does not
  add a trailing space.

Not sure if any of the above are a factor

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev2 (was: macOS and AOO42X)

[Jim Jagielski]

Thanks I see https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=128373 
 now.

this needs to be fixed before our next release :/

> On May 11, 2020, at 4:04 PM, Matthias Seidel  
> wrote:
> 
> Am 11.05.20 um 22:01 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>> It is, yes.
> 
> Downgrade to 4.2. That should fix it.
> 
> The same on Linux and Windows (Cygwin)
> I am telling it to this list for weeks now... ;-)
> 
>> 
>>> On May 11, 2020, at 3:55 PM, Matthias Seidel  
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Let me guess...
>>> 
>>> make is updated to 4.3?
>>> 
>>> Am 11.05.20 um 21:53 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
 Ok, something happened between now and like 1 week ago, because I get (on 
 macOS):
 
 =
 Building module offapi
 =
 
 Entering /Users/jim/src/asf/aoo-git/main/offapi/prj
 
 cd .. && make -s -r -j6   && make -s -r deliverlog
 [ build RDB ] offapi
 [ build HPP ] offapi
 [ build CHK ] loaded modules: offapi
 cppumaker ERROR: cannot dump Type 'com/sun/star/rendering/XBitmapCanvas'
 make: *** 
 [/Users/jim/src/asf/aoo-git/main/solenv/gbuild/UnoApiTarget.mk:199: 
 /Users/jim/src/asf/aoo-git/main/solver/420/unxmaccx.pro/workdir/UnoApiTarget/offapi.rdb]
  Error 99
 make: *** Deleting file 
 '/Users/jim/src/asf/aoo-git/main/solver/420/unxmaccx.pro/workdir/UnoApiTarget/offapi.rdb'
 dmake:  Error code 2, while making 'all'
 
 
> On May 11, 2020, at 2:46 PM, Jim Jagielski  wrote:
> 
> Tag is done:
> 
>  420-Dev2-m2
> 
> Kicking off builds
> 
>> On May 11, 2020, at 10:26 AM, Jim Jagielski  wrote:
>> 
>> 420-Dev2-m2
>> 
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org 
>> 
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org 
>> 

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev2

[Peter Kovacs]

Am 11.05.20 um 22:04 schrieb Matthias Seidel:

Am 11.05.20 um 22:01 schrieb Jim Jagielski:

It is, yes.

Downgrade to 4.2. That should fix it.

The same on Linux and Windows (Cygwin)
I am telling it to this list for weeks now... ;-)


Nobody knows the trouble I have seen.

cppumaker does create some magic hpp files from the IDL specification.
I would guess the generated makefile is not that good anymore.

But that is only a wild guess.
You know nothing, John Snow. :P




On May 11, 2020, at 3:55 PM, Matthias Seidel  wrote:

Let me guess...

make is updated to 4.3?

Am 11.05.20 um 21:53 schrieb Jim Jagielski:

Ok, something happened between now and like 1 week ago, because I get (on 
macOS):

=
Building module offapi
=

Entering /Users/jim/src/asf/aoo-git/main/offapi/prj

cd .. && make -s -r -j6   && make -s -r deliverlog
[ build RDB ] offapi
[ build HPP ] offapi
[ build CHK ] loaded modules: offapi
cppumaker ERROR: cannot dump Type 'com/sun/star/rendering/XBitmapCanvas'
make: *** [/Users/jim/src/asf/aoo-git/main/solenv/gbuild/UnoApiTarget.mk:199: 
/Users/jim/src/asf/aoo-git/main/solver/420/unxmaccx.pro/workdir/UnoApiTarget/offapi.rdb]
 Error 99
make: *** Deleting file 
'/Users/jim/src/asf/aoo-git/main/solver/420/unxmaccx.pro/workdir/UnoApiTarget/offapi.rdb'
dmake:  Error code 2, while making 'all'



On May 11, 2020, at 2:46 PM, Jim Jagielski  wrote:

Tag is done:

   420-Dev2-m2

Kicking off builds


On May 11, 2020, at 10:26 AM, Jim Jagielski  wrote:

420-Dev2-m2

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev2 (was: macOS and AOO42X)

[Matthias Seidel]

Am 11.05.20 um 22:01 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> It is, yes.

Downgrade to 4.2. That should fix it.

The same on Linux and Windows (Cygwin)
I am telling it to this list for weeks now... ;-)

>
>> On May 11, 2020, at 3:55 PM, Matthias Seidel  
>> wrote:
>>
>> Let me guess...
>>
>> make is updated to 4.3?
>>
>> Am 11.05.20 um 21:53 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>>> Ok, something happened between now and like 1 week ago, because I get (on 
>>> macOS):
>>>
>>> =
>>> Building module offapi
>>> =
>>>
>>> Entering /Users/jim/src/asf/aoo-git/main/offapi/prj
>>>
>>> cd .. && make -s -r -j6   && make -s -r deliverlog
>>> [ build RDB ] offapi
>>> [ build HPP ] offapi
>>> [ build CHK ] loaded modules: offapi
>>> cppumaker ERROR: cannot dump Type 'com/sun/star/rendering/XBitmapCanvas'
>>> make: *** 
>>> [/Users/jim/src/asf/aoo-git/main/solenv/gbuild/UnoApiTarget.mk:199: 
>>> /Users/jim/src/asf/aoo-git/main/solver/420/unxmaccx.pro/workdir/UnoApiTarget/offapi.rdb]
>>>  Error 99
>>> make: *** Deleting file 
>>> '/Users/jim/src/asf/aoo-git/main/solver/420/unxmaccx.pro/workdir/UnoApiTarget/offapi.rdb'
>>> dmake:  Error code 2, while making 'all'
>>>
>>>
 On May 11, 2020, at 2:46 PM, Jim Jagielski  wrote:

 Tag is done:

   420-Dev2-m2

 Kicking off builds

> On May 11, 2020, at 10:26 AM, Jim Jagielski  wrote:
>
> 420-Dev2-m2
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev2 (was: macOS and AOO42X)

[Jim Jagielski]

It is, yes.

> On May 11, 2020, at 3:55 PM, Matthias Seidel  
> wrote:
> 
> Let me guess...
> 
> make is updated to 4.3?
> 
> Am 11.05.20 um 21:53 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>> Ok, something happened between now and like 1 week ago, because I get (on 
>> macOS):
>> 
>> =
>> Building module offapi
>> =
>> 
>> Entering /Users/jim/src/asf/aoo-git/main/offapi/prj
>> 
>> cd .. && make -s -r -j6   && make -s -r deliverlog
>> [ build RDB ] offapi
>> [ build HPP ] offapi
>> [ build CHK ] loaded modules: offapi
>> cppumaker ERROR: cannot dump Type 'com/sun/star/rendering/XBitmapCanvas'
>> make: *** 
>> [/Users/jim/src/asf/aoo-git/main/solenv/gbuild/UnoApiTarget.mk:199: 
>> /Users/jim/src/asf/aoo-git/main/solver/420/unxmaccx.pro/workdir/UnoApiTarget/offapi.rdb]
>>  Error 99
>> make: *** Deleting file 
>> '/Users/jim/src/asf/aoo-git/main/solver/420/unxmaccx.pro/workdir/UnoApiTarget/offapi.rdb'
>> dmake:  Error code 2, while making 'all'
>> 
>> 
>>> On May 11, 2020, at 2:46 PM, Jim Jagielski  wrote:
>>> 
>>> Tag is done:
>>> 
>>>   420-Dev2-m2
>>> 
>>> Kicking off builds
>>> 
 On May 11, 2020, at 10:26 AM, Jim Jagielski  wrote:
 
 420-Dev2-m2
>> 
> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev2 (was: macOS and AOO42X)

[Matthias Seidel]

Let me guess...

make is updated to 4.3?

Am 11.05.20 um 21:53 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> Ok, something happened between now and like 1 week ago, because I get (on 
> macOS):
>
> =
> Building module offapi
> =
>
> Entering /Users/jim/src/asf/aoo-git/main/offapi/prj
>
> cd .. && make -s -r -j6   && make -s -r deliverlog
> [ build RDB ] offapi
> [ build HPP ] offapi
> [ build CHK ] loaded modules: offapi
> cppumaker ERROR: cannot dump Type 'com/sun/star/rendering/XBitmapCanvas'
> make: *** [/Users/jim/src/asf/aoo-git/main/solenv/gbuild/UnoApiTarget.mk:199: 
> /Users/jim/src/asf/aoo-git/main/solver/420/unxmaccx.pro/workdir/UnoApiTarget/offapi.rdb]
>  Error 99
> make: *** Deleting file 
> '/Users/jim/src/asf/aoo-git/main/solver/420/unxmaccx.pro/workdir/UnoApiTarget/offapi.rdb'
> dmake:  Error code 2, while making 'all'
>
>
>> On May 11, 2020, at 2:46 PM, Jim Jagielski  wrote:
>>
>> Tag is done:
>>
>>420-Dev2-m2
>>
>> Kicking off builds
>>
>>> On May 11, 2020, at 10:26 AM, Jim Jagielski  wrote:
>>>
>>> 420-Dev2-m2
>



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev2 (was: macOS and AOO42X)

[Jim Jagielski]

Ok, something happened between now and like 1 week ago, because I get (on 
macOS):

=
Building module offapi
=

Entering /Users/jim/src/asf/aoo-git/main/offapi/prj

cd .. && make -s -r -j6   && make -s -r deliverlog
[ build RDB ] offapi
[ build HPP ] offapi
[ build CHK ] loaded modules: offapi
cppumaker ERROR: cannot dump Type 'com/sun/star/rendering/XBitmapCanvas'
make: *** [/Users/jim/src/asf/aoo-git/main/solenv/gbuild/UnoApiTarget.mk:199: 
/Users/jim/src/asf/aoo-git/main/solver/420/unxmaccx.pro/workdir/UnoApiTarget/offapi.rdb]
 Error 99
make: *** Deleting file 
'/Users/jim/src/asf/aoo-git/main/solver/420/unxmaccx.pro/workdir/UnoApiTarget/offapi.rdb'
dmake:  Error code 2, while making 'all'


> On May 11, 2020, at 2:46 PM, Jim Jagielski  wrote:
> 
> Tag is done:
> 
>420-Dev2-m2
> 
> Kicking off builds
> 
>> On May 11, 2020, at 10:26 AM, Jim Jagielski  wrote:
>> 
>> 420-Dev2-m2
> 

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev2 (was: macOS and AOO42X)

[Matthias Seidel]

Am 11.05.20 um 20:46 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> Tag is done:
>
> 420-Dev2-m2
>
> Kicking off builds

Great!

Do you build the 5 additional languages?

>
>> On May 11, 2020, at 10:26 AM, Jim Jagielski  wrote:
>>
>> 420-Dev2-m2
>



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev2 (was: macOS and AOO42X)

[Jim Jagielski]

Tag is done:

420-Dev2-m2

Kicking off builds

> On May 11, 2020, at 10:26 AM, Jim Jagielski  wrote:
> 
> 420-Dev2-m2

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev2 (was: macOS and AOO42X)

[Matthias Seidel]

Hi Jim,

Am 11.05.20 um 16:26 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> With the somewhat successful tests, I will tag HEAD/trunk of the 42X branch 
> as 420-Dev2-m2 (420m2) sometime today or tomorrow and start on the Linux 
> 32&64 and macOS builds.
I am on standby for the Windows builds... ;-)
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev2 (was: macOS and AOO42X)

[Jim Jagielski]

With the somewhat successful tests, I will tag HEAD/trunk of the 42X branch as 
420-Dev2-m2 (420m2) sometime today or tomorrow and start on the Linux 32&64 and 
macOS builds.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

AOO 4.2.0-Dev2 (was: macOS and AOO42X)

[Matthias Seidel]

Hi Mechtilde, Jim,

@Mechtilde: French help seems to make some problems (spaces in XML
tags). We must check that again.

@Jim: I would like to do a complete dev build on Windows to see if all
languages are OK.

Regards,

   Matthias

Am 03.05.20 um 22:02 schrieb Mechtilde:
> +1
>
> Am 03.05.20 um 19:58 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>> Hi Jim,
>>
>> Am 29.04.20 um 20:43 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>>> OK, so I have available a handful of Lang builds for Linux 64bit and macOS 
>>> available at
>>>
>>>o http://home.apache.org/~jim/AOO-builds/
>>>
>>> These are of HEAD of AOO42X and were built as developer releases... these 
>>> are not the "official" Dev2m2 releases however, although they are in a 
>>> directory that implies otherwise.
>>>
>>> Once people give these a quick A-OK, I can go ahead and do the *real* and 
>>> *official* Dev2/4.2.0-m2 builds
>> All needed languages (including the 5 new ones) are now updated in trunk
>> and cherry-picked for AOO42X.
>>
>> How do we proceed? Create a tag for Dev2?
>> I have seen no objections so far, assuming that everyone is OK with it...
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>>    Matthias
>>
>>> -
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>>>



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: Building AOO 4.2.0 for Windows with AdoptOpenJDK

[Matthias Seidel]

(Bumping up th topic again)

Hi all,

One thing I noticed while building with AdoptOpenJDK are numerous
warnings regarding Javadoc.
Maybe someone with some understanding can have a look at it?

Otherwise, I have no problems when using AOO on a daily base, even with
different JREs configured.

Regards,

   Matthias

Am 01.10.19 um 20:39 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
> Hi Marcus,
>
> Am 01.10.19 um 20:20 schrieb Marcus:
>> Am 01.10.19 um 10:33 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>>> Am 01.10.19 um 01:23 schrieb Marcus:
>>>> Am 30.09.19 um 22:59 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>>>>> Am 30.09.19 um 22:35 schrieb Peter Kovacs:
>>>>>> We had constant 7 votes on 4.1.7 and 4.1.6 release. However only 3
>>>>>> volunteers voted in both releases.
>>>>>> These numbers are low in general. Maybe we need to organize test
>>>>>> phases in order to raize the numbers. This will still not raise test
>>>>>> attendance for a single feature.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> How about we schedule a test release every quarter? These releases
>>>>>> do not necessary lead to a release and are announced as unstable.
>>>>>> But it would give people a better time frame to plan and we can
>>>>>> advertise for tester.
>>>>> I build new versions about every second week.
>>>>> For sure, people are downloading these builds and use them on a daily
>>>>> base. Still no feedback!
>>>>>
>>>>> The problem isn't about the builds...
>>>> to make it a bit more comfortable for you: What about to build only
>>>> when it is worth it (e.g., after some commits or bigger/important
>>>> commits and not with a fixed time schedule?
>>> I am not uncomfortable with building AOO. In fact I build even more
>>> often to test my changes before I commit.
>>> I only upload once a week or two. ;-)
>>>
>>> And don't forget that we have no working buildbots anymore!
>> sure, I just want to show you a way to reduce your builds. Especially
>> when the commit rate is very low at the moment.
> I do only build (for my personal use) when I did a commit. This way I
> can monitor if something is broken.
> Constant QA is something missing from this project for way too long...
>
> Matthias
>
>> Marcus
>>
>>
>>
>>>>>> Am 30. September 2019 21:13:52 MESZ schrieb Matthias Seidel
>>>>>> :
>>>>>>> Hi Dave,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Am 30.09.19 um 18:53 schrieb Dave Fisher:
>>>>>>>> Hi Matthias,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I think that it is likely people were focused on 4.1.7 testing.
>>>>>>> Where have all these people been when we voted for release? ;-)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> My personal opinion is that if switching does not require users to
>>>>>>> switch and they can use the Oracle JRE if that is what they have
>>>>>>> then
>>>>>>> the change make sense.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The user is still free to choose whatever JRE he/she wants (and is
>>>>>>> detected by AOO).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I build with AdoptOpenJDK for some weeks now [1] and have found no
>>>>>>> problems. But that *really* needs more testing...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  Matthias
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [1] https://home.apache.org/~mseidel/AOO-builds/AOO-420-Test/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>> Dave
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Sep 30, 2019, at 8:31 AM, Matthias Seidel
>>>>>>>  wrote:
>>>>>>>>> No feedback=No interest?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Maybe I should stop providing test builds.
>>>>>>>>> That would save me a lot of my spare time...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>  Matthias
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Am 05.09.19 um 12:58 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>>>>>>>>>> Hi Keith, all,
>&

Re: Building AOO 4.2.0 for Windows with AdoptOpenJDK

[Matthias Seidel]

Hi Marcus,

Am 01.10.19 um 20:20 schrieb Marcus:
> Am 01.10.19 um 10:33 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>> Am 01.10.19 um 01:23 schrieb Marcus:
>>> Am 30.09.19 um 22:59 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>>>> Am 30.09.19 um 22:35 schrieb Peter Kovacs:
>>>>> We had constant 7 votes on 4.1.7 and 4.1.6 release. However only 3
>>>>> volunteers voted in both releases.
>>>>> These numbers are low in general. Maybe we need to organize test
>>>>> phases in order to raize the numbers. This will still not raise test
>>>>> attendance for a single feature.
>>>>>
>>>>> How about we schedule a test release every quarter? These releases
>>>>> do not necessary lead to a release and are announced as unstable.
>>>>> But it would give people a better time frame to plan and we can
>>>>> advertise for tester.
>>>>
>>>> I build new versions about every second week.
>>>> For sure, people are downloading these builds and use them on a daily
>>>> base. Still no feedback!
>>>>
>>>> The problem isn't about the builds...
>>>
>>> to make it a bit more comfortable for you: What about to build only
>>> when it is worth it (e.g., after some commits or bigger/important
>>> commits and not with a fixed time schedule?
>>
>> I am not uncomfortable with building AOO. In fact I build even more
>> often to test my changes before I commit.
>> I only upload once a week or two. ;-)
>>
>> And don't forget that we have no working buildbots anymore!
>
> sure, I just want to show you a way to reduce your builds. Especially
> when the commit rate is very low at the moment.

I do only build (for my personal use) when I did a commit. This way I
can monitor if something is broken.
Constant QA is something missing from this project for way too long...

Matthias

>
> Marcus
>
>
>
>>>>> Am 30. September 2019 21:13:52 MESZ schrieb Matthias Seidel
>>>>> :
>>>>>> Hi Dave,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Am 30.09.19 um 18:53 schrieb Dave Fisher:
>>>>>>> Hi Matthias,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I think that it is likely people were focused on 4.1.7 testing.
>>>>>> Where have all these people been when we voted for release? ;-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> My personal opinion is that if switching does not require users to
>>>>>> switch and they can use the Oracle JRE if that is what they have
>>>>>> then
>>>>>> the change make sense.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The user is still free to choose whatever JRE he/she wants (and is
>>>>>> detected by AOO).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I build with AdoptOpenJDK for some weeks now [1] and have found no
>>>>>> problems. But that *really* needs more testing...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  Matthias
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [1] https://home.apache.org/~mseidel/AOO-builds/AOO-420-Test/
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>> Dave
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Sep 30, 2019, at 8:31 AM, Matthias Seidel
>>>>>>  wrote:
>>>>>>>> No feedback=No interest?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Maybe I should stop providing test builds.
>>>>>>>> That would save me a lot of my spare time...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>  Matthias
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Am 05.09.19 um 12:58 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>>>>>>>>> Hi Keith, all,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Did you have time to test?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Feedback is always welcome... ;-)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>  Matthias
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Am 01.09.19 um 18:23 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>>>>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Am 31.08.19 um 18:45 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>>>>>&

Re: Building AOO 4.2.0 for Windows with AdoptOpenJDK

[Marcus]

Am 01.10.19 um 10:33 schrieb Matthias Seidel:

Am 01.10.19 um 01:23 schrieb Marcus:

Am 30.09.19 um 22:59 schrieb Matthias Seidel:

Am 30.09.19 um 22:35 schrieb Peter Kovacs:

We had constant 7 votes on 4.1.7 and 4.1.6 release. However only 3
volunteers voted in both releases.
These numbers are low in general. Maybe we need to organize test
phases in order to raize the numbers. This will still not raise test
attendance for a single feature.

How about we schedule a test release every quarter? These releases
do not necessary lead to a release and are announced as unstable.
But it would give people a better time frame to plan and we can
advertise for tester.


I build new versions about every second week.
For sure, people are downloading these builds and use them on a daily
base. Still no feedback!

The problem isn't about the builds...


to make it a bit more comfortable for you: What about to build only
when it is worth it (e.g., after some commits or bigger/important
commits and not with a fixed time schedule?


I am not uncomfortable with building AOO. In fact I build even more
often to test my changes before I commit.
I only upload once a week or two. ;-)

And don't forget that we have no working buildbots anymore!


sure, I just want to show you a way to reduce your builds. Especially 
when the commit rate is very low at the moment.


Marcus




Am 30. September 2019 21:13:52 MESZ schrieb Matthias Seidel
:

Hi Dave,

Am 30.09.19 um 18:53 schrieb Dave Fisher:

Hi Matthias,

I think that it is likely people were focused on 4.1.7 testing.

Where have all these people been when we voted for release? ;-)


My personal opinion is that if switching does not require users to

switch and they can use the Oracle JRE if that is what they have then
the change make sense.

The user is still free to choose whatever JRE he/she wants (and is
detected by AOO).

I build with AdoptOpenJDK for some weeks now [1] and have found no
problems. But that *really* needs more testing...

Regards,

     Matthias

[1] https://home.apache.org/~mseidel/AOO-builds/AOO-420-Test/


Regards,
Dave


On Sep 30, 2019, at 8:31 AM, Matthias Seidel

 wrote:

No feedback=No interest?

Maybe I should stop providing test builds.
That would save me a lot of my spare time...

Regards,

     Matthias


Am 05.09.19 um 12:58 schrieb Matthias Seidel:

Hi Keith, all,

Did you have time to test?

Feedback is always welcome... ;-)

Regards,

     Matthias

Am 01.09.19 um 18:23 schrieb Matthias Seidel:

Hi all,

Am 31.08.19 um 18:45 schrieb Matthias Seidel:

Hi Keith,

Am 31.08.19 um 15:37 schrieb Keith N. McKenna:

On 8/31/2019 4:23 AM, Matthias Seidel wrote:

Hi all,

At the moment I am doing my test builds (trunk and 42X) for

Windows with

the latest Oracle JDK (8u221).
I am still able to download, but Oracle changed its licensing.

I am not

a lawyer and would prefer to move away from it.

Damjan recently introduced some patches, so AOO can now work

with

AdoptOpenJDK.
It is available in 32 bit, which is still needed for Windows

[1].

I am just doing a build for AOO 4.2.0 with AdaptOpenJDK (8u222)

and it

looks good so far...

What do you think?

Regards,

     Matthias

[1]


https://adoptopenjdk.net/releases.html?variant=openjdk8&jvmVariant=hotspot#x32_win




Mathias;

This sounds like it has great potential as it appears to gives

us a

potential path beyond version 8 as a cursory reading of the

AdoptOpenJDK

web site shows that it supports version 11 and 12 for both both

Windows

32 and 64 bit systems.

I look forward to testing your new version 4.2.0 build with the
AdoptOpenJDK.

You will find them at the usual place:
https://home.apache.org/~mseidel/AOO-builds/AOO-420-Test/

They should be up tomorrow.

Builds are online!

Please test, especially everything related to Java. ;-)



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Building AOO 4.2.0 for Windows with AdoptOpenJDK

[Matthias Seidel]

Hi Marcus,

Am 01.10.19 um 01:20 schrieb Marcus:
> Am 30.09.19 um 17:31 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>> No feedback=No interest?
>>
>> Maybe I should stop providing test builds.
>> That would save me a lot of my spare time...
>
> sorry for being silent for this topic. However, Java is not really my
> favorite thing. ;-)

Just do normal tests with everything that is related to Java:

 - Search in online help
 - (some) wizards
 - database
 - ...

The only "special" thing to test would be if the SDK is complete
regarding JavaDoc. But I doubt that anyone had a look at the SDK in the
past years... ;-)

Matthias

>
> Marcus
>
>
>
>> Am 05.09.19 um 12:58 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>>> Hi Keith, all,
>>>
>>> Did you have time to test?
>>>
>>> Feedback is always welcome... ;-)
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>>     Matthias
>>>
>>> Am 01.09.19 um 18:23 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> Am 31.08.19 um 18:45 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>>>>> Hi Keith,
>>>>>
>>>>> Am 31.08.19 um 15:37 schrieb Keith N. McKenna:
>>>>>> On 8/31/2019 4:23 AM, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> At the moment I am doing my test builds (trunk and 42X) for
>>>>>>> Windows with
>>>>>>> the latest Oracle JDK (8u221).
>>>>>>> I am still able to download, but Oracle changed its licensing. I
>>>>>>> am not
>>>>>>> a lawyer and would prefer to move away from it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Damjan recently introduced some patches, so AOO can now work with
>>>>>>> AdoptOpenJDK.
>>>>>>> It is available in 32 bit, which is still needed for Windows [1].
>>>>>>> I am just doing a build for AOO 4.2.0 with AdaptOpenJDK (8u222)
>>>>>>> and it
>>>>>>> looks good so far...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What do you think?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     Matthias
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>> https://adoptopenjdk.net/releases.html?variant=openjdk8&jvmVariant=hotspot#x32_win
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Mathias;
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This sounds like it has great potential as it appears to gives us a
>>>>>> potential path beyond version 8 as a cursory reading of the
>>>>>> AdoptOpenJDK
>>>>>> web site shows that it supports version 11 and 12 for both both
>>>>>> Windows
>>>>>> 32 and 64 bit systems.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I look forward to testing your new version 4.2.0 build with the
>>>>>> AdoptOpenJDK.
>>>>> You will find them at the usual place:
>>>>> https://home.apache.org/~mseidel/AOO-builds/AOO-420-Test/
>>>>>
>>>>> They should be up tomorrow.
>>>> Builds are online!
>>>>
>>>> Please test, especially everything related to Java. ;-)
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature