> -Original Message-
> From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2013 8:54 PM
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Can somebody please commit the update of the de-websites
>
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 1:23 AM, Andrea Pescetti
&
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 1:23 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> On 23/06/2013 Jörg Schmidt wrote:
>>
>> At the moment a question:
>> Would there be problems if we did our work, mainly in German, coordinate?
>
>
> This wouldn't be particularly problematic (we already have German-only
> lists), provided t
On 23/06/2013 Jörg Schmidt wrote:
At the moment a question:
Would there be problems if we did our work, mainly in German, coordinate?
This wouldn't be particularly problematic (we already have German-only
lists), provided that there is regular interaction with this list too,
since in that cas
On 23/06/2013 Detlef Nannen wrote:
Am 22.06.2013 22:57, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
> > 1) A description of PrOOoBox (two lines in English) from the PrOOoBox
> > volunteers; send it in any form you wish, even here by e-mail, and it
> > will be added to the "Available now" section of
> > http://w
Hello Rob,
And something optional, if you think this would be useful. I can
write up a blog post interview with the creators of PrOOoBox, where
you can tell the story of this software collection. I'd do the
interview in English, of course, but we could also include a German
translation in th
On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 9:53 AM, Detlef Nannen
wrote:
> Hallo,
>
> Am 22.06.2013 22:57, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
>
> Thank you for this clear next steps.
>
>
>> > So in concrete, what we need to implement Dave's proposal is:
>> >
>> > 1) A description of PrOOoBox (two lines in English) from the Pr
Hallo,
Am 22.06.2013 22:57, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
Thank you for this clear next steps.
> > So in concrete, what we need to implement Dave's proposal is:
> >
> > 1) A description of PrOOoBox (two lines in English) from the PrOOoBox
> > volunteers; send it in any form you wish, even here by e-
Hallo,
Am 22.06.2013 22:57, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
Thank you for this clear next steps.
> > So in concrete, what we need to implement Dave's proposal is:
> >
> > 1) A description of PrOOoBox (two lines in English) from the PrOOoBox
> > volunteers; send it in any form you wish, even here by e-
> -Original Message-
> From: Dave Fisher [mailto:dave2w...@comcast.net]
> Sent: Saturday, June 22, 2013 8:01 PM
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: [DISCUSS] Contributing Existing Works [Was: Re: Can
> somebody please commit the update of the de-websites]
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 12:40 PM, Dr. Michael Stehmann
wrote:
> Am 21.06.2013 17:06, schrieb Rob Weir:
>> On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 10:56 AM, RA Stehmann
>> wrote:
>>> Hi Rob,
>>>
>>> I can understand your concerns, but they aren't drasticly.
>>>
>>> I'm with you, that we have to make clear, the Bo
> -Original Message-
> From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org]
> If it was developed, approved and released as an Apache OpenOffice
> product, then many things are possible. For example, we could
> transfer the domain name prooo-box.org to Apache and host the website
> here. We co
On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 7:54 AM, Jörg Schmidt wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org]
>
>
>> It is not clear to me if you do not understand what was said, or
>> whether you disagree with what was said. Or maybe a combination of
>> both?
>
> My questi
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrea Pescetti [mailto:pesce...@apache.org]
> So in concrete, what we need to implement Dave's proposal is:
>
> 1) A description of PrOOoBox (two lines in English) from the PrOOoBox
> volunteers; send it in any form you wish, even here by e-mail, and it
> -Original Message-
> From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org]
> It is not clear to me if you do not understand what was said, or
> whether you disagree with what was said. Or maybe a combination of
> both?
My question is whether the outcome of the vote (Dave wrote: "Do we all
a
On 22/06/2013 Rob Weir wrote:
It might help if you stated, in your own words, what you think should
be done. Make a mini-proposal: what pages will be added, etc.
I think Dave's proposal in http://markmail.org/thread/6ozfpfo5xcigyw6j
is now moving things forward in the most reasonable way.
On Jun 21, 2013, at 7:21 AM, Peter Junge wrote:
> On 6/21/2013 9:59 PM, Jörg Schmidt wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>>> From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org]
>>
What is the problem?
>>>
>>> The CD is not from the Apache OpenOffice project. It was not reviewed
>>> and approved for release
On Jun 22, 2013, at 9:09 AM, Kay Schenk wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 9:57 AM, Dave Fisher wrote:
>
>>
>> On Jun 21, 2013, at 9:40 AM, Dr. Michael Stehmann wrote:
>>
>>> Am 21.06.2013 17:06, schrieb Rob Weir:
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 10:56 AM, RA Stehmann
wrote:
> Hi Rob,
>>>
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 9:57 AM, Dave Fisher wrote:
>
> On Jun 21, 2013, at 9:40 AM, Dr. Michael Stehmann wrote:
>
> > Am 21.06.2013 17:06, schrieb Rob Weir:
> >> On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 10:56 AM, RA Stehmann
> >> wrote:
> >>> Hi Rob,
> >>>
> >>> I can understand your concerns, but they aren't d
On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 6:27 AM, Jörg Schmidt wrote:
>> From: RGB ES [mailto:rgb.m...@gmail.com]
>
>> I think that that was suggested since the beginning by Rob...
>> so yes, an
>> "oo.o/de/porting" site or similar is possible.
>
> All right, then I had not understood correctly.
>
>
> But please s
> From: RGB ES [mailto:rgb.m...@gmail.com]
> I think that that was suggested since the beginning by Rob...
> so yes, an
> "oo.o/de/porting" site or similar is possible.
All right, then I had not understood correctly.
But please specifically, because *I* do not know exactly what to do currentl
2013/6/22 Jörg Schmidt
> > From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org]
>
>
> > In my very first post on the topic, I wrote:
>
> > [...]
>
> yes, that's right. I had read that.
>
> > That was true then. That is true now.
>
> This is not quite correct.
>
> The point is that Dave has suggested that
> From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org]
> In my very first post on the topic, I wrote:
> [...]
yes, that's right. I had read that.
> That was true then. That is true now.
This is not quite correct.
The point is that Dave has suggested that there should be language-specific
pages.
Am 22.06.2013 00:04, schrieb Rob Weir:
>
> In my very first post on the topic, I wrote:
>
> "So one solution discussed was to do similar to what we do with the
> main English pages with winPenPack. We have a general page for 3rd
> party ports and distributions:
>
> http://www.openoffice.org/po
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 2:38 PM, Jörg Schmidt wrote:
>
>
>> From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org]
>
>
>> I assume for #4 that you mean the news feed points to the ASF-hosted
>> page that lists 3rd party distributions, but not to the 3rd party page
>> directly. That is my understanding, at l
> From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org]
> I assume for #4 that you mean the news feed points to the ASF-hosted
> page that lists 3rd party distributions, but not to the 3rd party page
> directly. That is my understanding, at least.
>
> It could say, for example, "PrOOo Box now release
> From: Dave Fisher [mailto:dave2w...@comcast.net]
> My recollection of the discussion was.
>
> (1) Have a 3rd party page.
>
> (2) Each language may have their own 3rd party page.
>
> (3) Each language can have their own news feed.
>
> (4) Each news item may link to a 3rd party page.
>
> C
> From: Dr. Michael Stehmann [mailto:anw...@rechtsanwalt-stehmann.de]
> Someone is responsible for the box and it semms to me, it's
> not the ASF.
> So we have to make clear, who's the legal entity distributing the box
> (even it's a gift).
The legal entity is, in this case, formally an group
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 12:57 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
>
> On Jun 21, 2013, at 9:40 AM, Dr. Michael Stehmann wrote:
>
>> Am 21.06.2013 17:06, schrieb Rob Weir:
>>> On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 10:56 AM, RA Stehmann
>>> wrote:
Hi Rob,
I can understand your concerns, but they aren't drastic
On Jun 21, 2013, at 9:40 AM, Dr. Michael Stehmann wrote:
> Am 21.06.2013 17:06, schrieb Rob Weir:
>> On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 10:56 AM, RA Stehmann
>> wrote:
>>> Hi Rob,
>>>
>>> I can understand your concerns, but they aren't drasticly.
>>>
>>> I'm with you, that we have to make clear, the Box
Am 21.06.2013 17:35, schrieb Jörg Schmidt:
>> From: RA Stehmann [mailto:anw...@rechtsanwalt-stehmann.de]
>
>> I can understand your concerns, but they aren't drasticly.
>>
>> I'm with you, that we have to make clear, the Box isn't a
>> product of the
>> ASF but distributed by the "Verein Freies
Am 21.06.2013 17:06, schrieb Rob Weir:
> On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 10:56 AM, RA Stehmann
> wrote:
>> Hi Rob,
>>
>> I can understand your concerns, but they aren't drasticly.
>>
>> I'm with you, that we have to make clear, the Box isn't a product of the
>> ASF but distributed by the "Verein Freies Of
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 11:28 AM, Jörg Schmidt wrote:
>> From: Peter Junge [mailto:peter.ju...@gmx.org]
>
>> > *We would be pleased if the Apache paid. Apache wants to do that?*
>>
>> As far as I understand the Apache way: Apache products must
>> be hosted by
>> Apache infrastructure(*),
>
> If th
> From: RA Stehmann [mailto:anw...@rechtsanwalt-stehmann.de]
> I can understand your concerns, but they aren't drasticly.
>
> I'm with you, that we have to make clear, the Box isn't a
> product of the
> ASF but distributed by the "Verein Freies Office Deutschland e.V..".
No, that's not right!
> From: Peter Junge [mailto:peter.ju...@gmx.org]
> > *We would be pleased if the Apache paid. Apache wants to do that?*
>
> As far as I understand the Apache way: Apache products must
> be hosted by
> Apache infrastructure(*),
If the Apache to want that's OK.
But please check it out my prob
2013/6/21 Rob Weir
> On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 10:56 AM, RA Stehmann
> wrote:
> > Hi Rob,
> >
> > I can understand your concerns, but they aren't drasticly.
> >
> > I'm with you, that we have to make clear, the Box isn't a product of the
> > ASF but distributed by the "Verein Freies Office Deutsch
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 10:56 AM, RA Stehmann
wrote:
> Hi Rob,
>
> I can understand your concerns, but they aren't drasticly.
>
> I'm with you, that we have to make clear, the Box isn't a product of the
> ASF but distributed by the "Verein Freies Office Deutschland e.V..".
>
> But on the other han
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 10:21 AM, Peter Junge wrote:
> On 6/21/2013 9:59 PM, Jörg Schmidt wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>>> From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org]
>>
>>
What is the problem?
>>>
>>> The CD is not from the Apache OpenOffice project. It was not reviewed
>>> and approved for r
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 9:59 AM, Jörg Schmidt wrote:
> Hello,
>
>> From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org]
>
>> > What is the problem?
>> >
>>
>> The CD is not from the Apache OpenOffice project. It was not reviewed
>> and approved for release by the project. It is a 3rd party product.
>> The
Hi Rob,
I can understand your concerns, but they aren't drasticly.
I'm with you, that we have to make clear, the Box isn't a product of the
ASF but distributed by the "Verein Freies Office Deutschland e.V..".
But on the other hand the "Verein Freies Office Deutschland e.V.." isn't
any old third
On 6/21/2013 9:59 PM, Jörg Schmidt wrote:
Hello,
From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org]
What is the problem?
The CD is not from the Apache OpenOffice project. It was not reviewed
and approved for release by the project. It is a 3rd party product.
The website says it is from "Verein
Hello,
> From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org]
> > What is the problem?
> >
>
> The CD is not from the Apache OpenOffice project. It was not reviewed
> and approved for release by the project. It is a 3rd party product.
> The website says it is from "Verein Freies Office Deutschland e.V.
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 3:34 AM, Jörg Schmidt wrote:
> Hello Rob,
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org]
>> Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2013 7:28 PM
>> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org; Jörg Schmidt
>> Subject: Re: Can somebod
Hello Rob,
> -Original Message-
> From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org]
> Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2013 7:28 PM
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org; Jörg Schmidt
> Subject: Re: Can somebody please commit the update of the de-websites
>
> On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 2:41 AM, Jörg Schmidt wrote:
> Hello,
>
> So far we had no one who takes care of updating the web pages in the German
> community.
> Meanwhile, a new volunteer has, with Piotr, found that makes this work.
> However, Piotr needs help commit himself so far that he is not a
Hello,
So far we had no one who takes care of updating the web pages in the German
community.
Meanwhile, a new volunteer has, with Piotr, found that makes this work.
However, Piotr needs help commit himself so far that he is not a committer.
Rob had already commits recently
(http://mail-archiv
45 matches
Mail list logo
