On 14.06.2010 23:32, Andrew Douglas Pitonyak wrote:
On 06/14/2010 07:05 AM, Bartosz wrote:
I thought I had a patch somewhere to do some of the conversion, but I
can't find it now. I remember that I didn't go ahead with it at the time
because my first cut at it left OOo larger than it was before
On 06/17/10 15:46, Bartosz wrote:
2010/6/16 Eike Rathke wrote:
Hi Bartosz,
On Tuesday, 2010-06-15 09:06:19 +0200, Bartosz wrote:
After replace svArrays by STL containers, in some cases I observed boost of
performance.
For example:
for (USHORT i = 0; i aEntries.size(); ++i)
Please
Hi Bartosz,
On Tuesday, 2010-06-15 09:06:19 +0200, Bartosz wrote:
After replace svArrays by STL containers, in some cases I observed boost of
performance.
For example:
for (USHORT i = 0; i aEntries.size(); ++i)
Please ensure to adapt also all types where necessary, in this case
Great success!
I have successfully removed the SvArray of objects macro (SV_DECL_OBJARR and
SV_IMPL_OBJARR macros).
Please feel free to check and test it.
Patch is available at (replace_svarray3.patch):
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=112395
2010/6/15 Bjoern Michaelsen:
Getting rid of SvArray might not be enough alone to fix this, but it
would be a big step in the right direction. Please also have a look at
the work in cws new_itemsets which tries to get rid of the old
SfxItemSet implementation and replace it with stl container-based stuff
whereever
On 2010-06-15 09:06, Bartosz wrote:
By the way.
After replace svArrays by STL containers, in some cases I observed boost of
performance.
For example:
for (USHORT i = 0; i aEntries.size(); ++i)
{
if (aEntries.at(i).aFntFmt == rFntFmt)
{
aRes =
On 06/15/10 09:06, Bartosz wrote:
Getting rid of SvArray might not be enough alone to fix this, but it
would be a big step in the right direction. Please also have a look at
the work in cws new_itemsets which tries to get rid of the old
SfxItemSet implementation and replace it with stl
Am Tue, 15 Jun 2010 09:18:45 +0200
schrieb Jan Holst Jensen j...@biochemfusion.com:
On 2010-06-15 09:06, Bartosz wrote:
By the way.
After replace svArrays by STL containers, in some cases I observed
boost of performance.
For example:
for (USHORT i = 0; i aEntries.size();
On 14.06.2010 12:01, Caolán McNamara wrote:
On Mon, 2010-06-14 at 11:22 +0200, Michael Stahl wrote:
the SvArrays should be replaced by appropriate STL types (mostly vector, i
guess, but probably in some cases stacks or deques or something else).
deques I think was the best option in general
On 2010-06-15 10:44, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
Am Tue, 15 Jun 2010 09:18:45 +0200
schrieb Jan Holst Jensenj...@biochemfusion.com:
On 2010-06-15 09:06, Bartosz wrote:
By the way.
After replace svArrays by STL containers, in some cases I observed
boost of performance.
For example:
On 06/15/2010 02:55 AM, Mathias Bauer wrote:
On 14.06.2010 12:01, Caolán McNamara wrote:
A code replacement like this creates the question what shall be the goal:
- reduce memory footprint
- improve performance
- remove code duplication
- improve code quality
My primary interest is in code
On 13/06/2010 22:36, Bartosz Kosiorek wrote:
Hi.
hi Bartosz,
In the
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/To-Dos#Replace_code_with_3rd_party
there is section about Replace self made containers with STL containers.
SvPointerArray, BigPointerArray
But in higher section there is Remove
On Mon, 2010-06-14 at 11:22 +0200, Michael Stahl wrote:
the SvArrays should be replaced by appropriate STL types (mostly vector, i
guess, but probably in some cases stacks or deques or something else).
deques I think was the best option in general the last time I looked at
this. Probably best
I thought I had a patch somewhere to do some of the conversion, but I
can't find it now. I remember that I didn't go ahead with it at the time
because my first cut at it left OOo larger than it was before hand,
which was an annoying result.
Great. If you could find this patch, it will be very
On 14/06/2010 13:05, Bartosz wrote:
I thought I had a patch somewhere to do some of the conversion, but I
can't find it now. I remember that I didn't go ahead with it at the time
because my first cut at it left OOo larger than it was before hand,
which was an annoying result.
Great. If you
On 06/14/2010 07:05 AM, Bartosz wrote:
I thought I had a patch somewhere to do some of the conversion, but I
can't find it now. I remember that I didn't go ahead with it at the time
because my first cut at it left OOo larger than it was before hand,
which was an annoying result.
Great. If
Am Mon, 14 Jun 2010 17:32:27 -0400
schrieb Andrew Douglas Pitonyak and...@pitonyak.org:
Changing out SvArray, will fix this long standing bug, which will
bring great joy and happiness to my life.
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=84159
Getting rid of SvArray might not be
17 matches
Mail list logo
