-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Volker Quetschke wrote:
Windows builders are *unaffected*.
See $SUBJECT.
[...] !Windows [...]
/me repeats this to prevent some confusion that Windows builds now require
mingw.
I didn't say anything else.
Actually the configure message should
hi i am trying to build Openoffice 2.0.3 under windows xp using the article
at openoffice.org
the requirements all are fulfied and the configuration is also done but i am
encountering this error while i am compliing it..
i get the error under boost/
saying that
Xiuzhi,
xiuzhicheng wrote:
hi all
I am Xiuzhi Cheng ,RedFlag Chinese 2000 Software Co. A OpenSource
Technology Department has been established this week and i am the manger of
it.The aim of this department is to contribute towards openoffice.org. The
original plan to set up our
On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 09:32:39AM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
Volker Quetschke wrote:
Windows builders are *unaffected*.
[...]
Actually the configure message should mention the download/copy part.
No. (Had that discussion already on IRC...)
Well, the discussion on IRC basically was
Christian Lohmaier wrote:
On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 09:32:39AM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
Volker Quetschke wrote:
Windows builders are *unaffected*.
[...]
Actually the configure message should mention the download/copy part.
No. (Had that discussion already on IRC...)
Not with me. Where is
Am Montag, 7. August 2006 14:09 schrieb Christian Lohmaier:
On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 09:32:39AM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
Volker Quetschke wrote:
Windows builders are *unaffected*.
[...]
Actually the configure message should mention the download/copy part.
No. (Had that
Hi Rene,
On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 02:13:43PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
Am Montag, 7. August 2006 14:09 schrieb Christian Lohmaier:
On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 09:32:39AM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
Volker Quetschke wrote:
Windows builders are *unaffected*.
[...]
Actually the
Hi folks,
while trying to get basebmp and vigra warning free, I've been bitten
by the following two msvc warnings:
-
Compiler Warning (level 3) C4686
'user-defined type' : possible change in behavior, change in UDT
return
Could someone give pointers to the roots of this whole issue?
Why were we checking in a win32 dll into CVS and why do *nix builders
have to care?
Kai
On 8/7/06, Christian Lohmaier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Rene,
On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 02:13:43PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
Am Montag,
Hi Kirill,
On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 22:45:49 +0400, Kirill S. Palagin wrote:
I have found reference to Error Report Tool in help, but I do not see
option to turn reporting on or off. Also double-clicking crashrep.exe
is not producing any visible effect.
Invoking the crash reporter manually
Hi Kirill,
On Sun, Aug 06, 2006 at 21:10:21 +0400, Kirill S. Palagin wrote:
I am getting OOo installer from openoffice.org (actually from official
mirrors). How do I enable crash-reporting (on Windows platform) and how
do I report 100% CPU cases?
Please see my last mail.
Eike
--
Hi Palisoc,
On Sat, Aug 05, 2006 at 23:20:21 -0700, Palisoc Micah Justin wrote:
Note: forwarded message attached.
This may be of help:
http://udk.openoffice.org/java/man/index.html
Other answers may be available on the [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list, I didn't
check yet. Please refrain from
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kai Backman wrote:
Could someone give pointers to the roots of this whole issue?
Why were we checking in a win32 dll into CVS and why do *nix builders
The SDK contains unowinreg.dll, a JNI library needed for deploying
Java programs developed with
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Rene Engelhard wrote:
Hi,
Volker Quetschke wrote:
Well, the discussion on IRC basically was you stating: I did not add
the URL on purpose and don't want to add it (paraphrased)
That's a thorough discussion! Because your (debians)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Volker Quetschke wrote:
Rene Engelhard wrote:
Hi,
with integration of cws unowinregcross (and therefore in m181) we have a
new build requirement: mingw32. See issue 49178.
This is not completely true, since m181 and only for non-Windows
Moin!
Rene Engelhard wrote:
Rene Engelhard wrote:
Hi,
Volker Quetschke wrote:
Well, the discussion on IRC basically was you stating: I did not add
the URL on purpose and don't want to add it (paraphrased)
That's a thorough discussion! Because your (debians) opinion is against
this all
Rene Engelhard wrote:
Volker Quetschke wrote:
Rene Engelhard wrote:
Hi,
with integration of cws unowinregcross (and therefore in m181) we have a
new build requirement: mingw32. See issue 49178.
This is not completely true, since m181 and only for non-Windows targets
there is the
I'm doing research on software packaging systems. I know that
openoffice.org can be a difficult piece of software to package and was
curious how many people devote most or part of their time to packaging.
The DomainDeveloper page on the wiki lists a few, but I'm sure there are
more. I'd also be
18 matches
Mail list logo
