Re: [dev] RestrictedPath working under Windows?
Hi Allen, I'm trying to get RestrictedPath working, as described under Declaring the Permitted Folders in http://ui.openoffice.org/specification/FileDialog_RestrictedPaths.sxw I'm using OOo v2.0.3 under WinXP. Do you use system dialogs, or OOo's own dialogs? The feature only works with the latter ... Ciao Frank -- - Frank Schönheit, Software Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED] - - Sun Microsystems http://www.sun.com/staroffice - - OpenOffice.org Database http://dba.openoffice.org - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [dev] Warning free code: the missing modules
Hi Stephan, Opinions, anyone? sounds good, except that I would not give complete M2, M3, M4 to one person each. Those are huge tasks, and touch code where you sometimes better know what you're doing, so I suggest to do like before: Let everybody fix his/her own code here. Ciao Frank -- - Frank Schönheit, Software Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED] - - Sun Microsystems http://www.sun.com/staroffice - - OpenOffice.org Database http://dba.openoffice.org - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [dev] RestrictedPath working under Windows?
I'm trying to get RestrictedPath working, as described under Declaring the Permitted Folders in http://ui.openoffice.org/specification/FileDialog_RestrictedPaths.sxw I'm using OOo v2.0.3 under WinXP. Do you use system dialogs, or OOo's own dialogs? The feature only works with the latter ... Hello Frank, I'm using what is compiled into the OOo Windows binary distribution and configured by default, which I'm guessing is the system dialogs. Is there a way to select OOo's dialogs, either at run-time or build-time? Thanks. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [dev] RestrictedPath working under Windows?
Hi Allen, I'm using what is compiled into the OOo Windows binary distribution and configured by default, which I'm guessing is the system dialogs. Is there a way to select OOo's dialogs, either at run-time or build-time? At runtime, Tools|Options|OpenOffice.org|General|[X] Use OpenOffice.org dialogs is the place to control this. For build time, I'm not sure whether there is a pre-configured way to disable this. The implementation for the Windows file picker is in fpicker/source/win32. You'll need to disable the build there. And/Or you'd need to disable the packaging of the respective libraries (fop.dll, fps.dll, and fpicker.uno.dll, I assume (!)) in the scp2 module. Ciao Frank -- - Frank Schönheit, Software Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED] - - Sun Microsystems http://www.sun.com/staroffice - - OpenOffice.org Database http://dba.openoffice.org - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [dev] Set default posSize for new created Windows
Christoph Lutz wrote: Hi, please assueme one creates a new OOo document, moves the window of the document using the mouse and closes the document again. If you now create a new document, it will be placed to the position of the previous document. How can I modify this default-position in a programmatic way? Hi Christoph, I am not sure if this can really be done, it depends on the current implementation. I will describe a way you can try out. OpenOffice.org stores the default position of every document type in the configuration file Setup.xcu. You can find the file here: User folder/registry/data/org/openoffice/Setup.xcu. The user folder is normally located under Unix in your home directory. Under Windows normally in System Drive:/Documents and Settings/username/Application Data. I copied the following snippet from my Office installation: ?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8? oor:component-data xmlns:oor=http://openoffice.org/2001/registry; xmlns:xs=http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema; oor:name=Setup oor:package=org.openoffice node oor:name=L10N prop oor:name=ooLocale oor:type=xs:string valueen-US/value /prop /node node oor:name=Office prop oor:name=ooSetupInstCompleted oor:type=xs:boolean valuetrue/value /prop prop oor:name=LicenseAcceptDate oor:type=xs:string value2006-07-14T08:05:09/value /prop prop oor:name=FirstStartWizardCompleted oor:type=xs:boolean valuetrue/value /prop node oor:name=Factories node oor:name=com.sun.star.frame.StartModule prop oor:name=ooSetupFactoryWindowAttributes oor:type=xs:string value114,175,952,711;1;0,0,0,0;/value /prop /node node oor:name=com.sun.star.text.TextDocument prop oor:name=ooSetupFactoryWindowAttributes oor:type=xs:string value99,113,1179,908;1;0,0,0,0;/value /prop /node /node /node /oor:component-data You can see that the configuration set Factories contains nodes for every appplication module, in the example com.sun.star.frame.StartModule and com.sun.star.text.TextDocument. The property called ooSetupFactoryWindowAttributes stores the left,top position and the width and height in pixel. You can use the configuration API to change these values programmatically. I am not sure if the current implementation reads the values for every new window or if it just uses internal values. So it's possible that the values are only read once from the configuration at startup time. Be aware that these values will be overwritten when a user changes the position or size of an application window. Regards, Carsten - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [dev] RestrictedPath working under Windows?
Is there a way to select OOo's dialogs, either at run-time or build-time? At runtime, Tools|Options|OpenOffice.org|General|[X] Use OpenOffice.org dialogs is the place to control this. That and the corresponding configuration option (org.openoffice.Office.Common/Misc/UseSystemFileDialog = false) both worked to switch to OOo's dialogs. With that setting, RestrictedPath mostly worked. With only one directory in the RestrictedPath, the behavior was not quite what I expected. It allowed me to navigate up to the parent directories, all the way to the root (c:\). It didn't allow me to save there, but it was unexpected I was able navigate there since this was above the restricted directory. When I had more than one directory in RestrictedPath, it made more sense. By allowing me to navigate up the parents all the way to the root (c:\), I was able to get from one directory to the other. So it mostly worked, but the behavior was not what I expected when I had only one directory in the RestrictedPath. Thank you for the assistance. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [dev] Warning free code: the missing modules
Christian Lohmaier wrote: On Thu, Jul 13, 2006 at 06:04:41PM +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote: Now that CWS warnings01 is integrated and most of the OOo modules are C/C++ warning free for the standard platforms (unxlngi6, unxsoli4, unxsols4, wntmsci10), only for specific compiler versions. gcc 4.0.[23] at least cannot compile OOo without disabling the warnings for quite a lot of dirs. Please wait until CWS warningfixes02 is integrated, or manually apply the patch from http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=66577. With those changes integrated, OOo should compile fine at least with GCC 4.1.1. I encountered spurious warnings with GCC 4.0.2 that I would consider errors of GCC, and which disappeared for GCC 4.1.1. This might rule out GCC 4.0.2 as an appropriate compiler for OOo. [...] Which modules are missing? As of SRC680m176, the situation is as follows: m175 and m176 don't compile here either because typesizes.h is not generated/ typesconfig is not built and not run. (but build walked through the directory) - not sure why But that's another story anyway. You mean, unrelated to the warnings are errors thing? (Otherwise, I would be interested in an issue id.) Opinions, anyone? I'd like to have a statement of what compiler versions will be/are still supported by OOo. The official Sun Hamburg builds are done with GCC 3.4.1 (plus a visibility patch and one other minor tweak, I think). Other versions are also known to work, either by chance, or after some people put in enough effort to make it work. Other versions are known not to work, either due to errors in GCC or in OOo (wasn't that the case for GCC 4.0.0? I'm always bad at remembering such details). I personally would love to see as many versions of GCC supported as possible, but there are certainly practical limits to this. Thus, in short: If you are looking for a hassle-free build, go with GCC 3.4.1 for now. If you want something else, be prepared that there might be problems lurking in every single build (from trivial to show-stopper), but also be assured that the rest of the OOo community is eager to remove those problems, too. -Stephan ciao Christian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[dev] How can I find the property returned from method?(Basic Script)
Hello,every here, I'm a beginner of OO development. I hava a question when I read the Programmer's Tutorial.pdf(Page32) on the following script: Sub style_init Dim mNoArgs() REM Empty Sequence Dim sMyText As String Dim sUrl As String oDesktop = createUnoService(com.sun.star.frame.Desktop) sUrl = private:factory/swriter oDocument = oDesktop.LoadComponentFromURL(sUrl,_blank,0,mNoArgs) oText = oDocument.Text sMyText = A very short paragraph for illustration only oCursor = oText.createTextCursor() oText.insertString(oCursor,Headline,FALSE) oText.insertControlCharacter(oCursor,_ com.sun.star.text.ControlCharacter.PARAGRAPH_BREAK,FALSE) oText.insertString(oCursor,sMyText, FALSE) End Sub --- oText = oDocument.Text I don't konw how can I check out the Text property of oText from the API reference. And oCursor = oText.createTextCursor() why oText have a creatTextCursor() method? I just want to how can I check out these properties from OpenOffice's SDK(API reference) Thanks In Advance! Applepwc - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [dev] Set default posSize for new created Windows
Hi Carsten, thanks for the detailed explanation! I will have a try and give you feedback if this worked! You can see that the configuration set Factories contains nodes for every appplication module, in the example com.sun.star.frame.StartModule and com.sun.star.text.TextDocument. The property called ooSetupFactoryWindowAttributes stores the left,top position and the width and height in pixel. You can use the configuration API to change these values programmatically. regards, Christoph - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [dev] RestrictedPath working under Windows?
Hi Allen, With that setting, RestrictedPath mostly worked. With only one directory in the RestrictedPath, the behavior was not quite what I expected. It allowed me to navigate up to the parent directories, all the way to the root (c:\). It didn't allow me to save there, but it was unexpected I was able navigate there since this was above the restricted directory. Hmm. For multiple paths, as you found, it is useful to be able to travel above the paths. But for one path, it might make sense to let this single path be the virtual root in the file picker. Are you interesting in fixing this? Ciao Frank -- - Frank Schönheit, Software Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED] - - Sun Microsystems http://www.sun.com/staroffice - - OpenOffice.org Database http://dba.openoffice.org - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [dev] RestrictedPath working under Windows?
With that setting, RestrictedPath mostly worked. With only one directory in the RestrictedPath, the behavior was not quite what I expected. It allowed me to navigate up to the parent directories, all the way to the root (c:\). It didn't allow me to save there, but it was unexpected I was able navigate there since this was above the restricted directory. Hmm. For multiple paths, as you found, it is useful to be able to travel above the paths. But for one path, it might make sense to let this single path be the virtual root in the file picker. Are you interesting in fixing this? Hello Frank, The answer is yes, but. I would be interested in fixing it, but I'm not sure when I would be able to get to it. I do have a potential customer who is interested in this feature, and if that is an issue for him then I will fix it. I would also be interested in changing RestrictedPath from an environmental variable to a configuration (.xcs/.xcu) setting. Is there a specific reason an environment variable was chosen over a configuration setting? How could changing to a configuration setting be done without adversely affecting existing users -- use the configuration value if it is set, otherwise look to the environment variable? Allen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [dev] RestrictedPath working under Windows?
Hi Allen, The answer is yes, but. I would be interested in fixing it, but I'm not sure when I would be able to get to it. I do have a potential customer who is interested in this feature, and if that is an issue for him then I will fix it. Ah, I'm looking forward to when you come asking *where* in the code to fix it :) I would also be interested in changing RestrictedPath from an environmental variable to a configuration (.xcs/.xcu) setting. Is there a specific reason an environment variable was chosen over a configuration setting? The idea was to have a feature which prevents users from changing the respective setting. Nowadays, where the configuration supports locking settings into readonly state, probably nothing is to say against making this a configuration setting. How could changing to a configuration setting be done without adversely affecting existing users -- use the configuration value if it is set, otherwise look to the environment variable? The order probably doesn't matter, but something like this, yes. Ciao Frank -- - Frank Schönheit, Software Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED] - - Sun Microsystems http://www.sun.com/staroffice - - OpenOffice.org Database http://dba.openoffice.org - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [dev] Warning free code: the missing modules
Stephan Bergmann wrote: [...] M7 basctl, chart2, extensions, filter, lingu, xmlsecurity, starmath, sc, sd, slideshow, sw, writerperfect. All depending on svx; additionally, sd is depending on slideshow and the canvas stuff above, and sw is depending on writerperfect. What I forgot to mention: sc, sd, sw also depend on two headers delivered from sch, sch/memchrt.hxx and sch/schdll.hxx. A quick check with testhxx shows that sch/memchrt.hxx needs to be made warning-free on wntmsci10[.pro]. [...] -Stephan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [dev] Warning free code: the missing modules
Hi Stephan, M8 sch. Depending on svx. Do we want to make it warning clean, or do we want to wait for chart2? IMO making sch warning free is a complete waste of time, as it will be replaced. All time we invest there is missing for developing chart2. As you also mentioned the delivered headers memchrt.hxx and schdll.hxx, those probably must be made warning-free to avoid warnings in the projects that include them. I think schdll.hxx is not very complex and similar to scdll.hxx, sddll.hxx etc., so fixing this might be no problem (you never know, though ;-) ) For memchrt.hxx the question remains how much effort it would be to make it warning-free. It contains a lot of inline-code. I suppose there is no option to ignore warnings for a single file (like preprocessor directives)? Regards, Bjoern - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [dev] RestrictedPath working under Windows?
Ah, I'm looking forward to when you come asking *where* in the code to fix it :) That's easy to find. There are only about a dozen matches in the source code for RestrictedPath and RestrictedPaths ;-) The idea was to have a feature which prevents users from changing the respective setting. Nowadays, where the configuration supports locking settings into readonly state, probably nothing is to say against making this a configuration setting. That was my concern, too, which is why I didn't understand the choice of a environment variable. On Windows XP, you have both system variables and user variables. If both values are set, the user value overrides the system value. In fact, I just tried this, setting two different values for RestrictedPath, one in a system variable in the other in a user variable, and OOo used the user value. Is there something I'm missing? Allen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [dev] RestrictedPath working under Windows?
Hi, Frank Schönheit - Sun Microsystems Germany schrieb: I would also be interested in changing RestrictedPath from an environmental variable to a configuration (.xcs/.xcu) setting. Is there a specific reason an environment variable was chosen over a configuration setting? The idea was to have a feature which prevents users from changing the respective setting. Nowadays, where the configuration supports locking settings into readonly state, probably nothing is to say against making this a configuration setting. So how was that supposed to be used? I assume that would be by editing the soffice script to set that variable before invoking soffice.bin? (Otherwise a user could always overwrite an environment variable just as easily.) Not well suited for Windows use then, where there is no existing script How could changing to a configuration setting be done without adversely affecting existing users -- use the configuration value if it is set, otherwise look to the environment variable? The order probably doesn't matter, but something like this, yes. The most correct would be to use a configuration value with no default, which means you get a NIL value (a VOID Any in UNO) when reading. Then you could have VOID - look at environment Non NIL - Use the value If the setting is a list of pathes or URLs, the best value type would be string-list (Sequence String in UNO) . Note that an empty string-list is distinct from NIL. The one thing this doesn't permit, is using an empty string-list to signify NO allowed folders. HTH, Jörg - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [dev] RestrictedPath working under Windows?
The most correct would be to use a configuration value with no default, which means you get a NIL value (a VOID Any in UNO) when reading. Then you could have VOID - look at environment Non NIL - Use the value IMHO, that is overkill. It is true that would allow an empty RestrictedPath to be set in the .xcu file that could not be overridden by a user environmental variable, but what is the benefit? If the user overrides an empty RestrictedPath, I don't see the harm. It would be less complex and therefore less prone to system administrator and programmer error to just treat a nil and empty string the same. I suggest: if .xcu value not empty: use it else: look to environment - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [dev] Warning free code: the missing modules
Bjoern Milcke wrote: Hi Stephan, M8 sch. Depending on svx. Do we want to make it warning clean, or do we want to wait for chart2? IMO making sch warning free is a complete waste of time, as it will be replaced. All time we invest there is missing for developing chart2. I can add EXTERNAL_WARNINGS_NOT_ERRORS=TRUE to every makefile.mk in sch on CWS sb58 to effectively exempt it from warning-freedom, just as I did for binfilter. As you also mentioned the delivered headers memchrt.hxx and schdll.hxx, those probably must be made warning-free to avoid warnings in the projects that include them. I think schdll.hxx is not very complex and similar to scdll.hxx, sddll.hxx etc., so fixing this might be no problem (you never know, though ;-) ) For memchrt.hxx the question remains how much effort it would be to make it warning-free. It contains a lot of inline-code. I suppose there is no option to ignore warnings for a single file (like preprocessor directives)? testhxx only found (very few) problems in memchrt.hxx, and only on wntmsci10[.pro], so getting those headers into shape so that they do not break sc/sd/sw is hopefully no big deal (and can probably done in one of the CWS for sc/sd/sw?). -Stephan Regards, Bjoern - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [dev] Warning free code: the missing modules
Hi Stephan, I can add EXTERNAL_WARNINGS_NOT_ERRORS=TRUE to every makefile.mk in sch on CWS sb58 to effectively exempt it from warning-freedom, just as I did for binfilter. Yes, please. testhxx only found (very few) problems in memchrt.hxx, and only on wntmsci10[.pro], so getting those headers into shape so that they do not break sc/sd/sw is hopefully no big deal (and can probably done in one of the CWS for sc/sd/sw?). That sounds good. The CWS to fix this in could be the same where the variables in makefile.mk are added, so we have only one warnings-CWS that contains sch. -Bjoern - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[dev] Scheduled Maintenance: 2006-07-14 23:30 UTC
All, OpenOffice.org will be offline for about 1 hour commencing 23:30 UTC on 2006-07-14, today, for scheduled maintenance. CVS, SVN, mail lists, IssueZilla will all be unavailable. Anoncvs, the developer wiki, and the download servers will not be affected. We regret the inconvenience. Best, Louis Suarez-Potts Community Manager CollabNet - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
