Bernd Eilers wrote:
...
There´s also a quick alternative way to get that kind of information:
...
Nice--thanks.
I see now that both the EIS and the issuelinks pages are available
from any issue page under the Project Tools heading. Sorry I missed
that before.
Thanks again for the
I would dearly love to see OOo's regexp support get a solid foundation.
The current implementation is based on a GNU regexp library from 1999,
modified for OOo. This library is generally adequate but suffers from
many glitches in syntax and semantics.
In poking around a bit this week, I found
Bernd Eilers wrote:
...
I pretty much doubt that it would be possible to use just calls to these
classes. This is because I would expect them to work on Srings and our
Documents are just well a little bit more complex thing than just plain
Strings. ...
Sure.
I'm still trying to work
$ ls -l OOo-Dev_SRC680_m212_LinuxIntel_install.tar.gz
-rw-rw-r-- 1 jes jes 130406906 May 19 21:11
OOo-Dev_SRC680_m212_LinuxIntel_install.tar.gz
$ md5sum OOo-Dev_SRC680_m212_LinuxIntel_install.tar.gz
72485f2c51a654e850719b3aaedefe47
OOo-Dev_SRC680_m212_LinuxIntel_install.tar.gz
--- from
Joe Smith wrote:
... Same result with files from two different mirrors.
Sorry, it does actually install and run.
# rpm -ivh --prefix /home/openoffice.orgSRC680_m212 *.rpm
Preparing... ### [100%]
1:ooo-dev-core08
Ingrid Halama wrote:
...
You are welcome to download the latest developer snapshot containing the
new chart for evaluation and testing purposes:
...
Great news--congratulations! I've been waiting to give it a test drive;
I'm sure a lot of other users have as well.
Two questions:
1) What
Testing OOF680_m213 (pre 2.3) on Fedora Linux.
Insert Special Character doesn't work at all for me--I just get a
blank dialog window.
Can anyone confirm this? It seems a little too obvious.
Joe
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Starts OK; registration finishes, but using the app (almost any action)
for more than a few seconds triggers a crash with a recovery dialog.
Please tell me if there's something else I can try.
Joe
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Oliver Braun wrote:
...
Try disabling online update check (Tools - Options - OpenOffice.org -
Online Update).
Yep, that's consistently where it poops out:
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
[Switching to Thread -1231799408 (LWP 21348)]
0x07e04829 in ?? () from
Joe Smith wrote:
Oliver Braun wrote:
...
Try disabling online update check (Tools - Options - OpenOffice.org -
Online Update).
Yep, that's consistently where it poops out:
...
Seems stable now--thanks!
Joe
Thullner, Robert wrote:
Hello
I have a problem with fields in OOo. I use OpenOffice to convert MS Word
files to PDF format. The word files contain field functions(lastSaved,
lastPrinted, savedBy, PageNumbers...). These field functions are
automatically updated when I open the MS Word files
I'm looking at cws impress122 and I want to know if it has been
integrated in the OOG680_mX builds. How can I do that?
According to EIS, impress122 was integrated in m218 for 2.3:
http://eis.services.openoffice.org/EIS2/cws.ShowCWS?Path=SRC680%2Fimpress122
but that's a different branch
Eike Rathke wrote:
I remember seeing somewhere a page that would list all cws integrated in
a specific release, but now I can't find that page.
That's in EIS under Child workspaces - Search, list box Release.
Choose one, e.g. 'OOo 2.3', and from the Status list box select
'integrated', then
I've started to see these messages on the features announce list (via
Gmane). This seems like a good thing, but I have some questions:
1) Is there any mechanism for feedback on these features?
None seem to have any issue number; are they supposed to be tracked
through the CWS name? If so, is
Mathias Bauer wrote:
Joe Smith wrote:
I've started to see these messages on the features announce list (via
Gmane). This seems like a good thing, but I have some questions:
1) Is there any mechanism for feedback on these features?
None seem to have any issue number; are they supposed
Frank Schönheit - Sun Microsystems Germany wrote:
...
I like this idea. ...
Cool!
Of course now there are some replies appearing on
[EMAIL PROTECTED], so maybe that's the simplest thing.
I read the list through Gmane, where it appears as
..OO.announce.features, so I assumed it would not be
Uwe Fischer wrote:
...
there is a Spec Doc at
http://specs.openoffice.org/impress/sd.insertbackground.odt
In that doc, the issue number is given as:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=82911
I assume we use this mailing list for feedback
...
Ahh, of course. I should've
Mathias Bauer wrote:
...
I think your suggestion to allow for more and earlier feedback is valid
and good. But getting involved should be a duty of those wanting to get
involved, there shouldn't be a duty for iTeams to wait for input upfront.
...
Just to be perfectly clear, I agree with you
The option for Automatic file name extension is to be removed from all
file save dialogs as of OOo 2.4:
http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=73876
As far as I can see, that will also remove any capability to save a file
with an arbitrary user-specified extension. Before this change,
Frank Schönheit - Sun Microsystems Germany wrote:
Hi Mathias,
Sounds like the decision to remove the box was perhaps ... premature?
No, just the way it was done is wrong. We should do it the following
way: if the file name contains something that looks like an extension,
leave it alone. If it
Jonathan Kamens wrote:
For years, I've been waiting for the Enter key to become smart ...
...
To the developer who finally implemented this bit of functionality, I
want to say thank you, and keep up the good work!
There is quite a number of significant enhancements in the snapshots
now,
Martin Hollmichel wrote:
since the efforts for supporting Windows98 and WindowsME are reasonable
high and makes maintainability of the code quite hard, I would like to
propose to drop Windows 98/ME support with the release of OOo 3.0.
...
(Briefly) what is it about supporting Win98 that
NoOp wrote:
...
OOo_2.4.0rc1_20080211_LinuxIntel_install_en-US_deb.tar.gz
from: http://mirrors.isc.org/pub/openoffice/contrib/rc/2.4.0rc1/
and installed as usual: sudo dpkg -i *.deb etc.
This version is seriously broken; ...
I've been running rc1 (Writer, Calc, Draw) all afternoon with
I'm trying to install the latest snapshot on a Fedora Linux system.
Normally, I can use rpm to install the packages in the LinuxIntel tarball.
However the latest snapshot has no RPMs:
$ tar tzf OOo-Dev_DEV300_m29_LinuxIntel_install_en-US.tar.gz | grep -i rpm
Christian Lohmaier wrote:
It was planned to only provide cws-builds in that form, and keep with
packages for the regular Milestone builds. m30 will have RPMs again.
Cool. Thanks for the clue.
I did get m29 to run. It turns out there are some files with
too-restrictive permissions:
# find
Jean-Baptiste Faure wrote:
...
There is a workaround in
http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=92405
Merci!
It works fine unpacked run under my home directory.
Joe
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For
26 matches
Mail list logo
