I guess it shouldn't make a big difference for anyone whether he uses
bash or tcsh for building OOo, so killing tcsh support is fine, IMO.
Malte.
Michael Stahl wrote, On 05.04.2011 13:04:
hi all,
currently configure generates 2 shell scripts for the environment,
one for Bourne shell and
You are kidding, aren't you?
vaishnav kumarT.C wrote, On 02/14/11 14:48:
hi everyone,
i m currently doing a project in OPENOFFICE WRITER 3.2, i
m in need of the old word processor 'WORDSTAR' s *source code.* Do anyone
know where can i get the wordstar source code? i am very
Hi Lakmal,
I didn't try the extension yet, but the demo video indeed looks
promising! :)
Malte.
lakmal padmakumara wrote, On 01/17/11 16:55:
Hi all ,
I'm engaging in developing an extension for OO writer which allows users to
* Re-size/Zoom images with different
Hi Knut,
actually, it should work out of the box when doing a regular OOo
installation, as that would install the runtimes automatically.
I just verified with OOo 3.3 RC on a plain Windows XP system, where I
didn't install anything Except vanilla XP.
How did you install OOo? (And which version
customer
have paid a lot of money to patch a broken installation. A lot of
registry settings was also incorrect.
On 26 November 2010 13:59, Malte Timmermann malte.timmerm...@oracle.com
wrote:
Hi Knut,
actually, it should work out of the box when doing a regular OOo
installation
Hi Camille,
seems the configurations have been very different, so comparing didn't
help much.
But I just tried to set all existing file and printer sharing rules to
block, which did the trick. (While adding a new rule for blocking it
didn't help - seems the firewall simply stops processing rules
Hi Camille,
I would like to look at that, but need help reproducing it.
See my comments in the issue...
Malte.
MOULIN Camille wrote, On 10/13/10 15:12:
Dear OOo Dev,
I'd like to have your opinion on the issue 105283.
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=105283
In a
3.2.1.4 sounds like ooo-build, not vanilla OOo, so please use the
ooo-build mailing list for such questions...
Malte.
Soohong Min wrote, On 08.09.10 21:09:
Hello,
After building Openoffice 3.2.1.4, I tried to operate Openoffice by
some scripts.
I got error message as follows:
Missing
Will be handled by the OOo Security Team.
http://www.openoffice.org/security/
Malte / OOo Security Team.
Kálmán „KAMI” Szalai wrote, On 08/06/10 12:10:
Hi Developers,
Today I got a mail about this documentation about two OpenOffice.org bug
in the latest version (3.2.1):
+1 for removing this ancient thing.
Not for memory reasons (I doubt it would really make a difference), but
for code cleanup reasons.
I don't know how risky this is when it comes to the binfilter module.
If the old binary filters simply stream FASTBOOL variables, the document
format would
Mathias Bauer wrote, On 06/16/10 10:11:
On 15.06.2010 11:47, Björn Michaelsen wrote:
Well, the implementation in new_itemsets only checks for the which id
being 0 and never checks for the type being an SfxVoidItem (outside
assertions). So an disabled item is consistently defined as any
below in other places.
Malte.
Malte Timmermann wrote, On 06/16/10 11:07:
Mathias Bauer wrote, On 06/16/10 10:11:
On 15.06.2010 11:47, Björn Michaelsen wrote:
Well, the implementation in new_itemsets only checks for the which id
being 0 and never checks for the type being an SfxVoidItem
Hi Bjoern,
Björn Michaelsen wrote, On 06/14/10 13:34:
Hi all,
while testing the new SfxItemSets in cws new_itemsets I came across a
few interesting uses of itemsets which I had considered to be illegal
(but I might be wrong there). I assumed:
- non-void items should only be put at the same
Björn Michaelsen wrote, On 06/14/10 16:09:
Am Mon, 14 Jun 2010 15:11:57 +0200
schrieb Malte Timmermann malte.timmerm...@sun.com:
Hi Bjoern,
Björn Michaelsen wrote, On 06/14/10 13:34:
Hi all,
while testing the new SfxItemSets in cws new_itemsets I came across
a few interesting uses
Tor is right, see
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/SellingOOo#FAQ:_Is_it_Legal_to_sell_OpenOffice.org_Software.3F
Malte.
Tor Lillqvist wrote, On 04/14/10 11:40:
Is somebody trying to earn money by distributing Openoffice without the
consentment of SunMicrosystems?
Nothing in the
Christian Lippka wrote, On 02/12/10 12:34:
Assertions are the first, cheapest and easiest way of defense in the
fight for software quality.
My 2c, assertions must not abort, developer must use non pro builds,
assertions should be used in every new peace of code.
I fully agree.
-1 for
Cool :)
I guess you should visit the OOo Security Project, and subscribe to that
mailing list:
http://security.openoffice.org
Malte.
Ravipriya Thushara wrote, On 10/21/09 06:26:
Hi,
Im developing a File format fuzzer for Open Office.org. So It'll be easier
to find vulnerabilities
using it.
Hi zhiyong xue,
for the first question: You are right that there shouldn't be too many
SdrObject::RecalcBoundRect.
I guess calls to RecalcBoundRect are not avoidable, because the ODF file
only contains the object size, which doesn't have to be the same like
the real text area.
But it should
Hi Tomas,
thanks for this - IIRC I already saw similar effects with other ID cards.
May I ask you to file an issues for this, and attach the patch (which
was cut off by the mailing list anyway)?
The owner would be jl.
Thanks and best regards,
Malte.
PS: You might want to look at our new
Mechtilde wrote, On 06/12/09 10:48:
What happens with the system dialogs under Windows 7?
Do we expect the similar problems as with Vista?
We expected, and people are already working on this.
At least on the file picker, not sure about other dialogs.
Malte.
Jens-Heiner Rechtien wrote, On 06/12/09 15:33:
Gi Eric,
eric.bachard wrote:
Hi,
FYI, we had a nice ClassRoom, about git introduction, made by Jérémie
Laval (from UTBM).
As usual the log is available at :
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Education_ClassRoom/Previous_Logs/git
Well, Rene is right, but I also agree that it should be easy for people
to delete the list.
Instead of some config item in a dialog, which nobody will find, an
extra menu item at the end of the list (with a separator above) would be
nice: Clear list
Or introduce some config in the dialog
Rail Aliev wrote, On 04/16/09 11:00:
On Thursday 16 April 2009 12:28:04 Malte Timmermann wrote:
Well, Rene is right, but I also agree that it should be easy for people
to delete the list.
BTW, there is History Manager extension [1] where you can tweak your recently
used document count
When reading the announcement, I also though that Qt would be a valid
option now :)
The reason that I didn't post it here was that I didn't want to discuss
it when nobody would work on a VCL replacement now.
Sun Team in Hamburg not working on it of course doesn't mean that not
somebody else
of Qt's IAccessible2
implementation on Windows - which then would also mean that all OOo UAA
implementations would need to be bridged to IA2 then, instead of to Java
Accessibility APIs.
Without Accessibility issues solved/solvable, every toolkit change is a
no-go.
Malte.
Malte Timmermann wrote, On 01
Hi,
it's been a while (6 years) that I had created an OOo BoundsChecker
How-To, and I had to figure out that it was not 100% up to date anymore ;)
Some changes had been necessary to reflect 3-Layer-Office and new Memory
Manager.
Instead of updating the html file in the tools project, I decided
Alan Lord wrote, On 11/20/08 02:51 PM:
Jan Holesovsky wrote:
snip /
The ongoing work is internally called 'Layout', and Michael Meeks had a
presenatation about that on this year's OOoCon (unfortunately the slides are
not uploaded yet).
They are now.
In short: Can we please add the platform-dependent output tree names
as svn:ignore property to all modules?
+1
Malte.
Frank Schönheit - Sun Microsystems Germany wrote, On 10/16/08 10:53 AM:
Hi,
now that we start working with SVN-based CWSes, those module output
trees (common[.pro],
to do so, it
would be a PITA - so why should we do?
Malte.
Jens-Heiner Rechtien wrote, On 10/16/08 12:34 PM:
bjoern michaelsen - Sun Microsystems - Hamburg Germany wrote:
On 10/16/08 11:00, Malte Timmermann wrote:
In short: Can we please add the platform-dependent output tree names
as svn:ignore
Since it's 100% the same question you asked yesterday:
See my answer from yesterday, or rephrase.
Make sure to be subscribed to the list, otherwise per default you won't
get the answers...
Malte.
Ruchi Lohani wrote, On 02.07.08 18:07:
Hi,
Can anybody explain me how Open office uses the
not recommended to use those for other applications
also and applications should have their own copy of db. Any specific
reasons for the way why open office is doing it?
Thanks
-Ruchi
Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2008 12:14:16 +0200
From: Malte Timmermann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-type: text/plain
No copy - simply using your default/current mozilla profile.
Search order for profiles is thunderbird-mozilla-firefox
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Certificate_Detection
On Windows, the personal Windows key store is used, instead of Mozilla.
Malte.
Ruchi Lohani wrote, On 01.07.08
Jurgis,
multiple signatures already work, all are contained in the same
documentsignature.xml.
We already have on our list to offer fields for displaying signature
information, but IMHO no concrete plans to start such an implementation
because we also have many many other things to do.
Signing
Methods with very strange names, hard to speak ;)
No just kidding - it means that very likely (100%?) these methods are
never used/called from somewhere.
Malte.
Frank Schönheit - Sun Microsystems Germany wrote, On 06.05.08 09:51:
Hi Caolan,
See
My point of view:
Most people agree that OOo mustn't loose (meta) data when Java is not
available, but plug ins for working with meta data can rely on Java.
Changing OOo's Java base line from 1.4 to 1.5 is fine for most people then.
Malte.
Charles-H. Schulz wrote, On 03/06/08 18:02:
Hi,
Having a Plugin doing the signature verification is one thing.
The Plugin could even alert the user in case the signature is broken.
But right now there is no way to get that information into the OOo
framework, which then makes sure that the status occurs in the status
bar, and that the
Thorsten Behrens wrote, On 03/03/08 17:21:
On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 04:08:16PM +0100, Charles-H. Schulz wrote:
On Mon, 2008-03-03 at 15:37 +0100, Michael Stahl wrote:
what are your opinions on making java 1.5 a requirement for OOo 3.0?
Unfavorable.
(this is a personal opinion)
If -and only
Radheevar,
for which document types are you considering the Flash export?
Right now we have one for Presentations.
Not sure if people need one for Text documents or Spreadsheets.
I think there is some space for improvement in the export of
presentations, so if you like to work on that, it
Open the doc, choose tools / macros / digital signatures
Malte.
Oliver Brinzing wrote, On 01/16/08 09:46:
Hi,
i have a question about how to sign a document macro
(*only* the macro, *not* the document content).
For example a user should be able to edit the document
but not allowed
Then something is broken - file an issue please.
Malte.
Oliver Brinzing wrote, On 01/16/08 13:55:
Hi Malte,
Open the doc, choose tools / macros / digital signatures
that's exactly what i did. After signing i can reload the document
and execute the macros ... but if i edit the
If it's not implemented, I wonder if it wouldn't be better to remove the
menu item instead of disabling it...
Malte.
Mathias Bauer wrote, On 08/20/07 08:44:
KAMI wrote:
Hi!
Few minutes ago someone said on IRC channel the Record Macro menu
elements in the Tools are disabled in Impress
Andreas...
Andreas Martens wrote:
Hi Malte,
Malte Timmermann wrote:
IMHO there should be some notification, so the Layouts are simply
listeners and we don't need the parameter.
That's what I meant. My question was: why do we need this parameter in
SwDoc::DeleteSection(..)?
But I am
IMHO there should be some notification, so the Layouts are simply
listeners and we don't need the parameter.
But I am not sure - you are the expert ;)
So if a broadcast is used, no Layout access is needed.
But if the layouts have to be notified directly, you are right and we
might need a list
, On 07/16/07 08:31:
Malte Timmermann wrote:
Should work.
I didn't test latest devpartner suites, only boundschecker for C++.
Make sure your version supports native/unmanaged code.
For MLK detection, make sure to disable OOo memory manager.
See
http://tools.openoffice.org/files/documents
Hi,
I am not sure if all of you are aware of IAccessible2 (IA2,
http://www.linux-foundation.org/en/Accessibility/IAccessible2 ), and the
influence that it will have on Assistive Technology (AT) on Windows.
Right now, OOo is not well accessible (with screen readers) on Windows.
OOo itself has a
This information is only available for things rendered to the screen.
There you can use the Uno Accessibility API (XAccessibleText for char
glyphs)
But I don't know if you can query XAccessibleText from XShape directly.
See openoffice.org/access for details.
Malte.
Laurent Denoue wrote, On
The soft page break thing is also needed for DAISY export.
Therefor, after investigating into Accessibility related things in ODF,
optionally exporting soft page breaks is now defined in ODF 1.1.
See my OOo conference presentation
Armin Le Grand wrote, On 02/07/07 11:40:
Freeze means: Add all still missing and urgently necessary C++
dependencies methodically: Link without the standard modules and add
missing code. Yes, this might take a while and is not easy but might
have been done by one person
Based on the article In-depth analysis of the viral threats with
OpenOffice.org documents, published in Journal in Computer Virology,
I had some discussions on how OOo security can be further improved.
I have put some information here:
I don't have any current numbers, sorry.
A good profiler for Windows is Intel VTune, evals can be downloaded.
Does the Novell build contain more optimizations than the standard
build?
Is it compiled/linked differently?
Would you like to also measure the standard build on your machine?
Thanks,
You might be true about Apple (which is not in my personal focus - any
volunteers?), but some GNOME stuff doesn't help for people using KDE or
other things...
Malte.
Oliver Braun wrote, On 10/19/06 08:55:
Hi Malte,
Malte Timmermann wrote:
On other platforms there is no global key store
Cool :)
What's your main interest - core, components, helping on bug fixes?
If your answer is writing a helpful component for OOo from scratch, I
would suggest writing the Creative Commons component.
http://www.openoffice.org/servlets/ReadMsg?list=devmsgNo=17284
I think there is a lot of
on the specification and I can help out with hints
for design and implementation.
Best regards,
Malte.
--
Malte Timmermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Microsystems GmbH
Technical Architect Software Engineering Nagelsweg 55
http://blogs.sun.com/roller/page/malte 20097 Hamburg, Germany
Laurent,
thanks for offering mentoring on the OOo basics.
That might convince people to start working on an OOo component, who
otherwise feared the barrier of entrance :)
Malte.
Laurent Godard wrote, On 07/13/06 11:21:
Hi Malte
You are right, OOo build environment might not be an issue
Nathan,
I am also looking into this.
My feeling is that it should be in the standard office installation, not
an extension.
Reason: If I attach a license to my document, I want that everybody is
aware of that when opening the doc, not just people who have the extension.
License must be
I took a quick look into the MS solution:
They simply place some text and links into the document, that's all.
This, of course, can be done as a component, and people w/o that
component will also see the license.
Such a component shouldn't be to hard to implement - any volunteers? ;)
Malte.
at the custom document properties and see that they also embed the
information re: derivatives, commercial use, etc.
NRY
Malte Timmermann wrote:
I took a quick look into the MS solution:
They simply place some text and links into the document, that's all.
This, of course, can be done
Problem within OOo is that OOo currently only supports one security
environment.
As Jochen said, that should change soon.
If you want to see if your implementation will (probably) work with OOo,
you can use some of our test tools:
xmlsecurity/tools/demo = signdemo and verifydemo
There you can
through
After talking with Malte Timmermann from Sun, he mentioned I might want
to bring my ideas to this group. Is this the correct group for this idea?
Attached are two OOo files on how we can use both symmetric and
asymmetric encryption--WITHOUT using a Rights Management or Licensing
I don't understand the not look too safe example:
Class B will never be able to call a virtual method which is implemented
in C. Not within the CTOR.
And when talking about Dialogs:
Moving member initialization with 'this' to the body is not easily done.
You must change all Window members to
Hi,
I have introduced a new mailing list for Accessibility on
OpenOffice.org: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I wanted to have [EMAIL PROTECTED] (without ui.), but was
told that new mailing lists have to be assigned to a project :(
If you want some details about me and the list, you might have a look
into
wanting card-key
access
to a particular building...). If address length is an issue, 'a11y' is
becomming a common abbreviation, like 'i18n' is for
'internatinalization'. So
another choice would be [EMAIL PROTECTED].
Regards,
Peter Korn
Accessibility Architect,
Sun Microsystems, Inc.
Malte
We should talk about the LeakGuard when consolidating the debug macros,
as Frank suggested.
Please don't introduce before.
I also suggest to have a macro for it, which simply expands to nothing
in product builds.
If we do anything in this direction, I think it shouldn't be only leak
detection,
I like leak detection, but I think inheritance is not so useful here,
because you can't simply add leak detection to a class 'on demand',
without compiling all following modules.
We already have some leak detection in tools/debug.hxx:
DBG_CTOR and DBG_DTOR.
Together with DBG_CHECKTHIS, you can
was started...
Malte.
Caolan McNamara wrote:
On Thu, 2005-11-03 at 19:12 +0100, Malte Timmermann wrote:
http://tools.openoffice.org/performance/performance-activities-overview.html
If I missed something, please let me know and I will update the document.
I have some prelink data and custom
Also +1 for switching this warning off from within idlc-generated
headers only
Malte.
Tino Rachui - Sun Germany - Development - Software Engineer wrote:
Stephan Bergmann wrote:
Thus, we can either switch off -Wnon-virtual-dtor globally, or switch
off *all* warnings from within
might be finished soon.
Or perhaps someone identifies something that's not on the list, where he
would like to work on?
Best regards,
Malte.
Malte Timmermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Microsystems GmbH
Technical Architect
See them as redundant information.
Metafile for displaying content of OLE objects, without having to launch
the needed application, which might not be available on your system.
This is a general mechanism, which doesn't make any differene between
known and unknown document formats.
You
Coalan,
output of your tool looks nice, think I should have a look at that for
some code clean ups I want to do :)
Thanks,
Malte.
Caolan McNamara wrote:
I updated my callcatcher tool
(http://www.skynet.ie/~caolan/pub/callcatcher/callcatcher-1.0.1.tar.gz)
to be easier to use. It attempts to
69 matches
Mail list logo
