Re: about Scripts.txt

expect any real improvement, just a up to date version of the scripts file Andreas Tilman On 31.03.2024 14:01, Andreas Lehmkühler wrote: Hi, thanks for the pointer. AFAIU unicodes this should be just an update with additional values, so that IMHO there isn't any reason not to update the file

Re: about Scripts.txt

Hi, thanks for the pointer. AFAIU unicodes this should be just an update with additional values, so that IMHO there isn't any reason not to update the file. WDYT? Andreas Am 25.03.24 um 19:38 schrieb Dieter von Holten: hi there while browsing through the sources i came across

Re: 2.0.30 vs 2.0.31 reloaded

Cool! @Tilman thanks again Am 27.03.24 um 20:47 schrieb Tilman Hausherr: During the tika regression tests it turned out that there is a longer PDF list, so I ran the tests again with that longer list. The good news is that all is perfect, no new exceptions, and no loss of content. Tilman

Re: NVD update hangs during release build

Looks like they solved their issue. I've reactivated the plugin. Andreas Am 21.03.24 um 18:55 schrieb Andreas Lehmkühler: I've simply deactivated the plugin as proposed, so that we can do the release. I don't like the Idea to go back to an old version. I'm pretty sure someone will fix

[ANNOUNCE] Apache PDFBox 2.0.31 released

The Apache PDFBox community is pleased to announce the release of Apache PDFBox version 2.0.31 The release is available for download at: https://pdfbox.apache.org/download.html See the full release notes below for details about this release. Release Notes -- Apache PDFBox -- Version 2.0.31

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache PDFBox 2.0.31

Am 21.03.24 um 18:51 schrieb Andreas Lehmkühler: Please vote on releasing this package as Apache PDFBox 2.0.31. +1 Tilman Hausherr +1 Maruan Sahyoun +1 Timo Allison +1 Andreas Lehmkühler Thanks for your support and help!! I'm going to push the release out. Andreas

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PDFBox 2.0.31

Am 22.03.24 um 08:29 schrieb Tilman Hausherr: On 22.03.2024 06:53, Andreas Lehmkühler wrote: Is this a showstopper, shall I cancel the release? No Or do we just live with another/the last release with that issue? I prefer it to be fixed Of course. I was referring to the former

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PDFBox 2.0.31

s this a showstopper, shall I cancel the release? Or do we just live with another/the last release with that issue? [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-5699 On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 1:53 PM Andreas Lehmkühler wrote: Hi, a candidate for the PDFBox 2.0.31 release is avaia

Re: NVD update hangs during release build

true to the part. Something isn't ok with NVD, maybe it got worse since then: https://blog.fefe.de/?ts=9b0740e0 https://www.heise.de/news/Sicherheitsforscher-genervt-Luecken-Datenbank-NVD-seit-Wochen-unvollstaendig-9656574.html Tilman On 20.03.2024 22:05, Andreas Lehmkühler wrote: Am 20.03.24 um

[VOTE] Release Apache PDFBox 2.0.31

Hi, a candidate for the PDFBox 2.0.31 release is avaiable at: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/pdfbox/2.0.31/ The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/pdfbox/tags/2.0.31/ The SHA-512 checksum of the archive is

Re: NVD update hangs during release build

suecomment-2009879851 it also hangs on my local machine now, I don't have an API key. Tilman On 20.03.2024 20:57, Andreas Lehmkühler wrote: Hi, I'm trying to cut the 2.0.31 release but it always hangs when the build tries to update the NVD data. Last week when I built the 3.0.2 release I had

NVD update hangs during release build

Hi, I'm trying to cut the 2.0.31 release but it always hangs when the build tries to update the NVD data. Last week when I built the 3.0.2 release I had a similar effect. The update was very slow but in the end it came to an end worked. Now, nothing happens, the last words are [INFO]

Re: PDFBox 2.0.31 release

improvements. Tilman On 14.03.2024 22:06, Andreas Lehmkühler wrote: Hi, now that 3.0.2 is out of the door I'd like to continue with a new 2.0 release. How about cutting a 2.0.31 release next Wednesday? Any objections or is there something we should add/fix first? Andreas

PDFBox 2.0.31 release

Hi, now that 3.0.2 is out of the door I'd like to continue with a new 2.0 release. How about cutting a 2.0.31 release next Wednesday? Any objections or is there something we should add/fix first? Andreas - To unsubscribe,

[ANNOUNCE] Apache PDFBox 3.0.2 released

The Apache PDFBox community is pleased to announce the release of Apache PDFBox version 3.0.2. The release is available for download at: https://pdfbox.apache.org/download.html See the full release notes below for details about this release. Release Notes -- Apache PDFBox -- Version 3.0.2

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PDFBox 3.0.2

Am 11.03.24 um 20:24 schrieb Andreas Lehmkühler: Please vote on releasing this package as Apache PDFBox 3.0.2. +1 Tilman Hausherr +1 Maruan Sahyoun +1 Timo Boehme +1 Andreas Lehmkühler Thanks for your support and help!! I'm going to push the release out. Andreas

[VOTE] Release Apache PDFBox 3.0.2

Hi, a candidate for the PDFBox 3.0.2 release is available at: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/pdfbox/3.0.2/ The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/pdfbox/tags/3.0.2/ The SHA-512 checksum of the archive is

Re: PDFBox 3.0.2 release?

Hi, as there aren't any objection I'm going to cut the release tomorrow or the day after tomorrow. Andreas Am 04.03.24 um 07:54 schrieb Andreas Lehmkühler: Hi, the import content issue seems to be solved, see PDFBOX-5752 and PDFBOX-5775. How about cutting a 3.0.2 release in a week from

Re: PDFBox 3.0.2 release?

Am 08.03.24 um 13:34 schrieb Tilman Hausherr: On 08.03.2024 07:13, Tilman Hausherr wrote: regression test result: https://home.snafu.de/tilman/tmp/reports_pdfbox_3.0.1_vs_3.0.2.tar.xz Thanks for running the regression tests. Re exceptions: - The OOM can't be reproduced - The two others

PDFBox 3.0.2 release?

Hi, the import content issue seems to be solved, see PDFBOX-5752 and PDFBOX-5775. How about cutting a 3.0.2 release in a week from now? Any objections or is there something we should add/fix first? Andreas - To

Re: PDFBox 3.0.1 / RandomAccessReadBuffer bug?

Done, I've fixed the issue. @David thanks for the report Andreas Am 08.02.24 um 07:58 schrieb Andreas Lehmkühler: Hi David, thanks for the bug report. You are right and the proposed solution seems to be a valid fix. I've created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-5764 to handle

Re: PDFBox 3.0.1 / RandomAccessReadBuffer bug?

Hi David, thanks for the bug report. You are right and the proposed solution seems to be a valid fix. I've created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-5764 to handle it. Andreas Am 08.02.24 um 00:00 schrieb david.kl...@atlas.cz: Hello I think that this is not correct in some

Re: About https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-5704

I've fixed the issue in the trun k and the 3.0-branch. The fix is limited to incorrect CID font definitions. Let us know if there are any other cases and provide a sample. Andreas Am 21.01.24 um 11:23 schrieb Andreas Lehmkühler: I had a look and found s solution based on the pdf.js

Re: About https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-5704

19.01.24 um 08:03 schrieb Andreas Lehmkühler: Hi, I'm not sure if both issues are similar. However, your proposal is an interesting idea and I guess it shouldn't be that hard to implement it. Thanks for the input, I'm going to have a look. Andreas Am 19.01.24 um 04:49 schrieb Mike Li

Re: About https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-5704

Hi, I'm not sure if both issues are similar. However, your proposal is an interesting idea and I guess it shouldn't be that hard to implement it. Thanks for the input, I'm going to have a look. Andreas Am 19.01.24 um 04:49 schrieb Mike Li: Hello team, I recently encountered the problem

Re: Apache PDFBox Board Report January 2024 due

I've submitted the report as is. Thanks for the reviews. Andreas Am 08.01.24 um 08:14 schrieb Andreas Lehmkühler: Hi, find attached a quick draft of the board report we're expected to submit this month. It's based upon the report wizard template which can be found at [1] Any comments

Apache PDFBox Board Report January 2024 due

Hi, find attached a quick draft of the board report we're expected to submit this month. It's based upon the report wizard template which can be found at [1] Any comments or additions are appreciated ... ## Description: The mission of PDFBox is the creation and maintenance of software

[ANNOUNCE] Apache PDFBox 3.0.1 released

The Apache PDFBox community is pleased to announce the release of Apache PDFBox version 3.0.1. The release is available for download at: https://pdfbox.apache.org/download.html See the full release notes below for details about this release. Release Notes -- Apache PDFBox -- Version 3.0.1

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache PDFBox 3.0.1

Am 27.11.23 um 17:46 schrieb Andreas Lehmkühler: Please vote on releasing this package as Apache PDFBox 3.0.1. +1 Tilman Hausherr +1 Maruan Sahyoun +1 Timo Boehme +1 Tim Allison +1 Andreas Lehmkühler Thanks for your support and help!! I'm going to push the release out

[VOTE] Release Apache PDFBox 3.0.1

Hi, a candidate for the PDFBox 3.0.1 release is available at: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/pdfbox/3.0.1/ The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/pdfbox/tags/3.0.1/ The SHA-512 checksum of the archive is

Re: PDFBox 3.0.1 release?

/reports_pdfbox_3.0.0_vs_3.0.1.tar.xz Tilman On 22.11.2023 08:08, Andreas Lehmkühler wrote: Hi, after fixing the latest regressions I'd like to cut the 3.0.1 release next Monday/Tuesday. WDYT? @Tim, @Tilman do you have the time to run the extraction tests 3.0.0 vs 3.0.1 ? Andreas

PDFBox 3.0.1 release?

Hi, after fixing the latest regressions I'd like to cut the 3.0.1 release next Monday/Tuesday. WDYT? @Tim, @Tilman do you have the time to run the extraction tests 3.0.0 vs 3.0.1 ? Andreas - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: Converting obfuscate PDFs to PS and back to PDF

Am 03.11.23 um 17:24 schrieb Tilman Hausherr: https://www.danisch.de/blog/2023/10/31/aktennotiz-zu-pdftotext-bei-vermurksten-zeichensaetzen/ The text is in german but what he says that he was able to extract text from obfuscated PDFs by converting them to PostScript and then back to PDF. I

[ANNOUNCE] Apache PDFBox 2.0.30 released

The Apache PDFBox community is pleased to announce the release of Apache PDFBox version 2.0.30. The release is available for download at: https://pdfbox.apache.org/download.html See the full release notes below for details about this release. Release Notes -- Apache PDFBox -- Version 2.0.30

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache PDFBox 2.0.30

Am 01.11.23 um 20:23 schrieb Andreas Lehmkühler: Please vote on releasing this package as Apache PDFBox 2.0.30. +1 Tilman Hausherr +1 Maruan Sahyoun +1 Andreas Lehmkühler Thanks for your support and help!! I'm going to push the release out. Andreas

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PDFBox 2.0.30

Hi, just a friendly reminder, the vote ends in about 12 hours from now. Andreas Am 01.11.23 um 20:23 schrieb Andreas Lehmkühler: Hi, a candidate for the PDFBox 2.0.30 release is available at:     https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/pdfbox/2.0.30/ The release candidate is a zip archive

Re: 2.0.30 build issues

port those changes to th 3.0 branch and the trunk version as well, but no today ... Sorry for the svn noise. Andreas Am 01.11.23 um 14:32 schrieb Andreas Lehmkühler: I've fixed an issue due to a major update of the maven-antrun-plugin and ran into the next one :-( Stay tuned ... Am 01.11.23

[VOTE] Release Apache PDFBox 2.0.30

Hi, a candidate for the PDFBox 2.0.30 release is available at: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/pdfbox/2.0.30/ The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/pdfbox/tags/2.0.30/ The SHA-512 checksum of the archive is

Re: 2.0.30 build issues

I've fixed an issue due to a major update of the maven-antrun-plugin and ran into the next one :-( Stay tuned ... Am 01.11.23 um 13:32 schrieb Andreas Lehmkühler: Hi, I've solved the build issue and restarted the release process. It looks good ... The changes from PDFBOX-5699 introduced

Re: 2.0.30 build issues

Andreas Lehmkühler: Hi, I've experiencing some issues with the release build for 2.0.30. I have an idea on how to fix it, but it will take some time, so that I'm going to postpone the release for a couple of days. Sorry for the svn noise. Cheers Andreas

2.0.30 build issues

Hi, I've experiencing some issues with the release build for 2.0.30. I have an idea on how to fix it, but it will take some time, so that I'm going to postpone the release for a couple of days. Sorry for the svn noise. Cheers Andreas

Re: PDFBox 2.0.30/3.0.1 release?

Tilman On 28.10.2023 17:02, Andreas Lehmkühler wrote: Am 28.10.23 um 13:12 schrieb Tilman Hausherr: https://home.snafu.de/tilman/tmp/reports_pdfbox_2.0.29_vs_3.0.0.tar.xz Thanks for running the test, but I'm a little bit puzzled about the file name. According to the stacktraces in A and B I

Re: PDFBox 2.0.30/3.0.1 release?

of Korean documents. Tilman On 22.10.2023 19:37, Andreas Lehmkühler wrote: Hi, I'd like to cut the 2.0.30 release in a week from now, on Monday or Tuesday. A week later I'd like to go for the first 3.0 bugfix release 3.0.1 WDYT? @Tim, @Tilman do you have the time to run the extraction

Re: PDFBox 2.0.30/3.0.1 release?

with the extraction of Korean documents. Tilman On 22.10.2023 19:37, Andreas Lehmkühler wrote: Hi, I'd like to cut the 2.0.30 release in a week from now, on Monday or Tuesday. A week later I'd like to go for the first 3.0 bugfix release 3.0.1 WDYT? @Tim, @Tilman do you have the time to run

PDFBox 2.0.30/3.0.1 release?

Hi, I'd like to cut the 2.0.30 release in a week from now, on Monday or Tuesday. A week later I'd like to go for the first 3.0 bugfix release 3.0.1 WDYT? @Tim, @Tilman do you have the time to run the extraction tests? Andreas

Re: log4j2 revert

t work with another software of mine. @Axel the "Files differ" lines are not a problem, this always happens. I check these manually or with a modified code and my own "expected" files. Tilman On 20.10.2023 07:55, Andreas Lehmkühler wrote: Am 20.10.23 um 07:17 schrieb axh: Hm… I

Re: log4j2 revert

Am 20.10.23 um 07:17 schrieb axh: Hm… I just did a clean checkout of trunk and did mvn clean verify and everything passes, both with log4j2.version set to 2.20.0 and 2.21.0. I can however see file differences reported in the log like this: The buidl itself works fine after the update. The

Re: PDFBox 4.0 and development plans

@Maruan, thanks for starting this initative :-) Am 11.10.23 um 07:53 schrieb sahy...@fileaffairs.de: Dear colleagues, with 3.0 being released and 4.0 being started I'd like to start discussing what the major plans are for 4.0. And maybe in a way that the release can be made faster than

Re: PDFBox 4.0 and development plans

Am 13.10.23 um 04:40 schrieb axh: Hi, I suggest to also revisit logging. Last week I opened an issue for that (PDFBOX-5695 ), but it seems everybody is tired by this subject and no none even looked at it. Nonetheless, please take a look.

Re: Apache PDFBox Board Report October 2023 due

more than "minor" because these are so weird and surprising. Tilman On 08.10.2023 18:53, Andreas Lehmkühler wrote: Hi, find attached a quick draft of the board report we're expected to submit this month. It's based upon the report wizard template which can be found at [1] Any c

Recent build failures

Hi, I've downgraded the version of the download-maven-plugin in the trunk to see if it is related to the recent build failures. I can't reproduce the issue at home. The expected sha512 hash is still correct so that I assume an issue with the plugin itself. Andreas

Re: Multithreading PDFRenderer

Am 18.09.23 um 14:00 schrieb Arno Dietsche: Hi, We are using pdfbox 3.0.0 as part of our project which aims at finding discrepancies between two similar documents created by external services. One thing we use it for is to render the pages of those documents to images and compare the

Re: CipherInputStream may not be closed

Am 08.09.23 um 17:32 schrieb axh: Hi Anna-Katharina, what version are you using? In the current 3.0, the stream is closed (implicitly) by using the try-with-resources syntax (https://docs.oracle.com/javase/tutorial/essential/exceptions/tryResourceClose.html): try (CipherInputStream cis =

[ANNOUNCE] Apache PDFBox 1.8.x End-Of-Life (EOL) Announcement

The Apache PDFBox Team would like to inform you that PDFBox 1.8.17 is the last release of the 1.8 branch, which has reached its end of life and won't be longer officially supported. The current community mainly maintains the 2.0.x branch and the brand new 3.0.x branch. We recommend everyone

[ANNOUNCE] Apache PDFBox 3.0.0 released

The Apache PDFBox community is pleased to announce the release of Apache PDFBox 3.0.0. It is available for download at: https://pdfbox.apache.org/download.html The Apache PDFBox library is an open source Java tool for working with PDF documents. This is the new major release 3.0.0 of

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache PDFBox 3.0.0

Am 14.08.23 um 20:29 schrieb Andreas Lehmkühler: Please vote on releasing this package as Apache PDFBox 3.0.0. +1 Tilman Hausherr +1 Maruan Sahyoun +1 Timo Boehme +1 Andreas Lehmkühler Thanks for your support and help!! I'm going to push the release out. Andreas

Re: New PDFBox 3.0 branch

Thanks for thje hint. The benchmark package isn't part of the reactor build and wasn't updated. I've fixed that Andreas Am 15.08.23 um 20:00 schrieb Tilman Hausherr: One small thing re trunk: the benchmark package still has the old version. Tilman

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PDFBox 3.0.0

added the missing piece to the dist area including the signature and hash. Saying that, the vote is still open unless someone objects to my conclusion. Andreas Am 14.08.23 um 20:29 schrieb Andreas Lehmkühler: Hi, a candidate for the PDFBox 3.0.0 release is available at:     https

New PDFBox 3.0 branch

Hi, due to the preparations for the final release of PDFBox 3.0.0 I've created a new branch "3.0" in svn [1]. I've created a job in jenkins to build that branch as well [2] Andreas [1] https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/pdfbox/branches/3.0/ [2]

Re: PDFBox 3.0.0 rebuild

sorry for the noise, I've struggled with the scm connection. There were two and I changed the one which wasn't used . However, finally I've build the release and the vote is open. Thanks for your patience Andreas Am 14.08.23 um 19:28 schrieb Andreas Lehmkühler: Hi, something totally

[VOTE] Release Apache PDFBox 3.0.0

Hi, a candidate for the PDFBox 3.0.0 release is available at: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/pdfbox/3.0.0/ The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/pdfbox/tags/3.0.0/ The SHA-512 checksum of the archive is

PDFBox 3.0.0 rebuild

Hi, something totally went wrong when building the final release. I ended up in a 4.0.0-SNAPSHOT release ?!?!? I have no idea what went wrong. However, I'm going to rollback the release and rebuild the whole thing Stay tuned ;-) Andreas

Re: PDFBox 3.0.0 final release

bug or some issue with the code. However, IMHO those issues aren't show stoppers for the planned final 3.0 release :-) Andreas Am 13.08.23 um 13:19 schrieb Andreas Lehmkühler: @Tilman thanks for running the regression tests I had a look at the new exceptions. 6 out of 10 files were

Re: PDFBox 3.0.0 final release

@Tilman thanks for running the regression tests I had a look at the new exceptions. 6 out of 10 files were throwing the same NoSuchElementException in PDFXrefStreamParser. It's a regression and both 2.x and 3.x were affected. I've applied a fix, see [1] I'm going to have a look at the

Re: TimeZone + Calendar

Hi, see inline Am 08.08.23 um 19:30 schrieb Daniel Gredler: Hi, I think I've said this before, but thanks again for such a great library! I'm thinking about submitting a patch to improve PDFBox, but wanted to get the team's thoughts first. What I've seen is that sometimes under very heavy

Re: PDFBox 3.0.0 final release

, that would mean 5 weeks total, and most people don't go on vacation for more than 3 weeks. +1 Tilman On 24.07.2023 19:22, Andreas Lehmkühler wrote: Hi, the first beta of PDFBox 3.0.0 is out of the door and I'm wondering when to do the final release. I'm in favor of doing the final release soon

PDFBox 3.0.0 final release

Hi, the first beta of PDFBox 3.0.0 is out of the door and I'm wondering when to do the final release. I'm in favor of doing the final release soon, let's say in 3 weeks from now. Or should we wait a little bit longer for some feedback on the beta version. Is there maybe anything you want to

[ANNOUNCE] Apache PDFBox 3.0.0-beta1 released

The Apache PDFBox community is pleased to announce the release of the first beta release for Apache PDFBox 3.0.0. It is available for download at: https://pdfbox.apache.org/download.html The Apache PDFBox library is an open source Java tool for working with PDF documents. This is the first

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache PDFBox 3.0.0-beta1

Am 11.07.23 um 07:55 schrieb Andreas Lehmkühler: Please vote on releasing this package as Apache PDFBox 3.0.0-beta1. +1 Tilman Hausherr +1 Maruan Sahyoun +1 Andreas Lehmkühler Thanks for your support and help!! I'm going to push the release out. Andreas

Re: Apache PDFBox Board Report July 2023 due

Hi, I've submitted the report as proposed, thanks for the reviews Andreas Am 11.07.23 um 08:16 schrieb Andreas Lehmkühler: Hi, find attached a quick draft of the board report we're expected to submit this month. It's based upon the report wizard template which can be found at [1] Any

[VOTE] Release Apache PDFBox 3.0.0-beta1

Hi, a candidate for the PDFBox 3.0.0-beta1 release is available at: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/pdfbox/3.0.0-beta1/ The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/pdfbox/tags/3.0.0-beta1/ The SHA-512 checksum of the archive is

Re: PDFBOx 3.0.0-beta1 release, next attempt

Hi, I've some issues with my build enviroment, the signing doesn't work, and I don't have any why. It worked fine the other day when building 2.0.29. I've to investigate first and therefore postpone the release for another day. Andreas Am 06.07.23 um 19:56 schrieb Andreas Lehmkühler: Hi

PDFBOx 3.0.0-beta1 release, next attempt

Hi, now that the 2.0.29 is out I'd like to cut the first beta of 3.0.0. How about next Monday? Or is there anything we have to do first and maybe wait another week or two? WDYT? Andreas - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

[ANNOUNCE] Apache PDFBox 2.0.29 released

The Apache PDFBox community is pleased to announce the release of Apache PDFBox version 2.0.29. The release is available for download at: https://pdfbox.apache.org/download.html See the full release notes below for details about this release. Release Notes -- Apache PDFBox -- Version 2.0.29

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache PDFBox 2.0.29

Am 28.06.23 um 18:54 schrieb Andreas Lehmkühler: Please vote on releasing this package as Apache PDFBox 2.0.29.    +1 Tilman Hausherr    +1 Maruan Sahyoun    +1 Andreas Lehmkühler Thanks for your support and help!! I'm going to push the release out. Andreas

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PDFBox 2.0.29

Hi, is there anybody else who is able to spend some cycles on looking into this release? There is at least one vote missing and about 24 hours to go ... Thanks in advance Andreas Am 28.06.23 um 18:54 schrieb Andreas Lehmkühler: Hi, a candidate for the PDFBox 2.0.29 release is available

[VOTE] Release Apache PDFBox 2.0.29

Hi, a candidate for the PDFBox 2.0.29 release is available at:     https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/pdfbox/2.0.29/ The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in:     https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/pdfbox/tags/2.0.29/ The SHA-512 checksum of the archive is

Re: PDFBox 2.0.29 release?

OK, I'm planning to cut the release next Wednesday, in 3 days from now, if nobody objects. Andreas Am 25.06.23 um 19:05 schrieb Tilman Hausherr: No need to IMHO Tilman --- Original-Nachricht --- Von: Andreas Lehmkühler Betreff: Re: PDFBox 2.0.29 release? Datum: 25. Juni 2023, 15:16

Re: PDFBox 2.0.29 release?

@Tilman thanks for fixing this Should we run another test before cutting the release? Andreas Am 03.06.23 um 05:53 schrieb Tilman Hausherr: Thank you. This is related to PDFBOX-5606. parseNextToken() is closing the content stream if an error occurs, but it sometimes calls itself. Because of

Re: 2.0.26 release

Yes, please Thanks in advance Andreas 07.04.2022 11:44:38 Tim Allison : > Sounds great! Should I rerun the regression tests today? > > On Thu, Apr 7, 2022 at 1:41 AM Andreas Lehmkuehler wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> sorry for the delay.  I'm planning to cut the 2.0.26 release next >> Saturday, the

Re: 2.0.19?

I'm planning to cut the release next Monday. @Tim please run the regression tests if possible Thanks in advance Andreas Am 7. Februar 2020 01:22:34 MEZ schrieb Tim Allison : >If you’re up for it, that’d be great! Let me know when I should run the >regression tests. > >Thank you! > >On Thu, Feb

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache PDFBox JBIG2 ImageIO 3.0.3

Am 14.12.19 um 15:53 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler: > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache PDFBox JBIG2 ImageIO 3.0.3. +1 Tilman Hausherr +1 Maruan Sahyoun +1 Timo Böhme +1 Andreas Lehmkühler Thanks for your support and help!! I'm going to push the release out. Andr

Fwd: Apache in 2018 - By The Digits

Hi, Sally prepared some digits for 2018 and I was surprised to see one of our fellow PDFBox committers among the Top 5 committers as we are a small community compared to other ASF projects. Thanks Tilman for your ongoing efforts to improve PDFBox in the last year, the time before that and

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PDFBox JBIG2 ImageIO 3.0.0

The vote passed successfully. I am going to push the release out when I am back home on Monday Andreas Am 21. Februar 2018 22:22:42 MEZ schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler : >Hi, > >a candidate for the PDFBox JBIG2 ImageIO 3.0.0 release is available at: > >

Re: JBIG2 ImageIO Plugin Release

Hi, I am planning to do a release this month if my colleagues are ok with that. Andreas Am 5. Januar 2018 13:47:35 MEZ schrieb "Petr Slabý" : >Hi, >are there any plans to release the JBIG2 ImageIO Plugin (PDFBOX-3906) ? > >Personally, I would like to see that happen as soon as

Re: build problems of today

Hi, it looks like at least one of the maven plugins does not work with java7. Maybe that is related to the recent Jenkins updates? I can not check that as I am still on vacation. Switching to java8 as build environment should be ok. Andreas Am 4. Januar 2018 21:20:51 MEZ schrieb Tilman

Re: 2.0.8?

Done Am 27. Oktober 2017 17:14:04 MESZ schrieb Tilman Hausherr : >Am 26.10.2017 um 19:12 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler: >> I'm planing to cut my second attempt next monday, if no one objects. > > >Hi, >could you please set up a 2.0.9 target in JIRA ? >Thanks >Tilman > >

Re: 2.0.8?

lison, Timothy B.: > >>> I hope there aren't any new regressions. > >> > >> Happy to help find them! :) > >> > >> On a related note, do we have a sense of the schedule for PDFBox 2.0.8? > >> I'd > >> like to include it in Tika's last Java 7 release...e

Re: Contributing the JBig2 ImageIO Plugin to PDFBox

> Andreas Lehmkuehler hat am 28. August 2017 um 20:28 > geschrieben: > > > Am 23.08.2017 um 18:29 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler: > > readded dev@pdfbox > > > > Am 23.08.2017 um 17:23 schrieb Jörg Henne: > >> Am 19.08.2017 um 17:07 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler: > >>> > >>>

Re: Contributing the JBig2 ImageIO Plugin to PDFBox

That was fast. I had a quick look and the non-commercial restriction seems problematic. We have to double check with legal first as these files are just testfiles and won't be redistributed. Andreas Am 25. August 2017 16:09:23 MESZ schrieb "Jörg Henne" : >Am 24.08.2017 um

Re: Contributing the JBig2 ImageIO Plugin to PDFBox

I'll check the docs after the weekend when I'm back. I don't see any issue with the different signers. Andreas Am 24. August 2017 13:53:10 MESZ schrieb "Jörg Henne" : >Am 23.08.2017 um 21:35 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler: > >> The CCLA is on file >The software-grant and another

Re: Contributing the JBig2 ImageIO Plugin to PDFBox

> Jörg Henne hat am 24. August 2017 um 10:08 geschrieben: > > > > Am 23.08.2017 um 18:40 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler: > > readded dev@pdfbox > > > > Am 22.08.2017 um 19:14 schrieb Jörg Henne: > >> Am 19.08.2017 um 17:07 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler: > >> > >>> The following

Re: Contributing the JBig2 ImageIO Plugin to PDFBox

> Jörg Henne hat am 22. August 2017 um 13:20 geschrieben: > > > Am 19.08.2017 um 19:59 schrieb Tilman Hausherr: > > Am 19.08.2017 um 18:09 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler: > >>> > >> +1, there is one superfluous "pdfbox". Besides some other minor > >> things to be adjusted we

Re: PDFBox and PDF 2.0

> Maruan Sahyoun hat am 11. August 2017 um 18:36 > geschrieben: > > > > > Am 11.08.2017 um 18:24 schrieb Tilman Hausherr : > > > > Am 11.08.2017 um 10:07 schrieb Maruan Sahyoun: > >> Hi, > >> > >> with PDF 2.0 being available it might be time

Re: OWASP dependency-check

> Tilman Hausherr hat am 8. Juli 2017 um 15:40 > geschrieben: > > > https://github.com/jeremylong/dependency-check-gradle#current-release > > Tim Allison pointed us to this on twitter... Should we use it (maybe > just in "pedantic" mode, because it needs 400MB in the

Re: Contributing the JBig2 ImageIO Plugin to PDFBox

Hi Jörg, > Jörg Henne hat am 26. Juni 2017 um 15:36 geschrieben: > > > Hi all, > > > Apache PDFBox currently uses the JBig2 ImageIO-Plugin at > https://github.com/levigo/jbig2-imageio as an optional component and > recommends the use of it at

RE: 2.0.6 release ?

> "Allison, Timothy B." hat am 10. Mai 2017 um 11:42 > geschrieben: > > > Haven't had a chance to look. Reports are here: > http://162.242.228.174/reports/reports_pdfbox_2_0_6_20170510.tar.gz Thanks again for running the report again I had a quick look and there are 2 new

2.0.6 release ?

Hi, I'm planning to cut a 2.0.6 release in about 1 or 2 weeks from now, any objections? Andreas - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pdfbox.apache.org

Re: Problems updating the website

> Maruan Sahyoun <sahy...@fileaffairs.de> hat am 17. März 2017 um 12:13 > geschrieben: > > > Hi, > > > Am 17.03.2017 um 12:09 schrieb Maruan Sahyoun <sahy...@fileaffairs.de>: > > > > Hi, > > > >> Am 17.03.2017 um 11:24 schrieb

Re: Problems updating the website

> Maruan Sahyoun hat am 17. März 2017 um 11:06 > geschrieben: > > > Hi, > > > Am 17.03.2017 um 07:59 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler : > > > > Hi, > > > > I've updated the download section due to the new release. After running the > > mvn command to

  1   2   3   4   >