[jira] [Created] (PHOENIX-6385) Not to use Scan#setSmall for HBase 2.x versions

Anoop Sam John created PHOENIX-6385: --- Summary: Not to use Scan#setSmall for HBase 2.x versions Key: PHOENIX-6385 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-6385 Project: Phoenix Iss

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-6355) Index rebuild command prints wrong warning TableNotFoundException for parent table when command used for first time on a new client session

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-6355?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Anoop Sam John updated PHOENIX-6355: Description: sqlline version 1.2.0 {code} 0: jdbc:phoenix:> ALTER INDEX IF EXISTS on RE

[jira] [Created] (PHOENIX-6355) Index rebuild command prints wrong warning TableNotFoundException for parent table when command used for first time on a new client session

Anoop Sam John created PHOENIX-6355: --- Summary: Index rebuild command prints wrong warning TableNotFoundException for parent table when command used for first time on a new client session Key: PHOENIX-6355 URL:

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-4459) Region assignments are failing for the test cases with extended clocks to support SCN

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4459?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16309157#comment-16309157 ] Anoop Sam John commented on PHOENIX-4459: - bq.we create a region with the curren

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-4467) Scans with filter returning all the versions

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4467?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16304447#comment-16304447 ] Anoop Sam John commented on PHOENIX-4467: - When the Filter returned INCLUDE_AND_

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-4399) Remove explicit abort on RegionServerServices

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4399?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16304281#comment-16304281 ] Anoop Sam John commented on PHOENIX-4399: - Changing IndexBuildingFailureExceptio

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-4441) Reflect changes that were made recently in HBase branch-2

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4441?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16281636#comment-16281636 ] Anoop Sam John commented on PHOENIX-4441: - bq. so we need to find out a way to s

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-4399) Remove explicit abort on RegionServerServices

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4399?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16264203#comment-16264203 ] Anoop Sam John commented on PHOENIX-4399: - When AC find un authorized access, it

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-4399) Remove explicit abort on RegionServerServices

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4399?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16264156#comment-16264156 ] Anoop Sam John commented on PHOENIX-4399: - Based on the HBase side decision only

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-4399) Remove explicit abort on RegionServerServices

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4399?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16264153#comment-16264153 ] Anoop Sam John commented on PHOENIX-4399: - When we set the abort on exception to

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-4041) CoprocessorHConnectionTableFactory should not open a new HConnection when shutting down

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4041?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16254740#comment-16254740 ] Anoop Sam John commented on PHOENIX-4041: - On CoprocessorHConnectionTableFactory

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-4318) Fix IndexHalfStoreFileReader and related classes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4318?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16249943#comment-16249943 ] Anoop Sam John commented on PHOENIX-4318: - bq. There is no public constructor to

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-4357) IndexRegionSplitPolicy extends the private-audience class IncreasingToUpperBoundRegionSplitPolicy

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4357?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16243268#comment-16243268 ] Anoop Sam John commented on PHOENIX-4357: - HBase should expose IncreasingToUpper

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-4350) Replace deprecated or changed Region methods with new APIs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4350?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16241721#comment-16241721 ] Anoop Sam John commented on PHOENIX-4350: - No. The sleep is when seeing the Regi

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-4350) Replace deprecated or changed Region methods with new APIs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4350?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16240177#comment-16240177 ] Anoop Sam John commented on PHOENIX-4350: - So this patch is against Alpha-4? In

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-3507) HBase secure wal log cash with Phoenix secondary index

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3507?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15693043#comment-15693043 ] Anoop Sam John commented on PHOENIX-3507: - Copied from HBase issue "I believe I

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-2880) Switch to the new RegionObserver#preStoreScannerOpen() method which accepts read point parameter

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2880?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15273657#comment-15273657 ] Anoop Sam John commented on PHOENIX-2880: - Oh sorry my bad.. This is phoenix..

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-2880) Switch to the new RegionObserver#preStoreScannerOpen() method which accepts read point parameter

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2880?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15273656#comment-15273656 ] Anoop Sam John commented on PHOENIX-2880: - Can we fix this issue in HBASE-15759

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-2865) We should not use GuidePosts when we are running query in serial

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2865?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15263532#comment-15263532 ] Anoop Sam John commented on PHOENIX-2865: - That sounds reasonable. > We should

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-2774) MemStoreScanner and KeyValueStore should not be aware of KeyValueScanner

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2774?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15196827#comment-15196827 ] Anoop Sam John commented on PHOENIX-2774: - Any way it was NonLazyKeyValueScanner

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-2742) Add new batchmutate APIs in HRegion without mvcc and region level locks

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2742?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15184722#comment-15184722 ] Anoop Sam John commented on PHOENIX-2742: - Index cells RK will be different.. Ya

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-2742) Add new batchmutate APIs in HRegion without mvcc and region level locks

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2742?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15179721#comment-15179721 ] Anoop Sam John commented on PHOENIX-2742: - When it is cells to be written to sam

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-2742) Add new batchmutate APIs in HRegion without mvcc and region level locks

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2742?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15179314#comment-15179314 ] Anoop Sam John commented on PHOENIX-2742: - bq. cannot write mutations to same ta

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-2575) Prevent LocalIndexIT from hanging indefinitely

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2575?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15177360#comment-15177360 ] Anoop Sam John commented on PHOENIX-2575: - Instead of throwing Exception from th

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-2676) Cannot support join operations in scans with limit

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2676?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15148185#comment-15148185 ] Anoop Sam John commented on PHOENIX-2676: - Patch looks good. {code} if (hasBatch

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-2672) OutOfOrderScannerNextException in SELECT DISTINCT query over tenant connection

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2672?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15142280#comment-15142280 ] Anoop Sam John commented on PHOENIX-2672: - This exception from HBase comes when

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-2477) ClassCastException in IndexedWALEditCodec after HBASE-14501 (possible dataloss)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2477?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15035914#comment-15035914 ] Anoop Sam John commented on PHOENIX-2477: - Looks good. Ya in Phoenix also, we ne

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-1734) Local index improvements

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1734?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14980308#comment-14980308 ] Anoop Sam John commented on PHOENIX-1734: - bq. But one part not able to remove i

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-2344) Implement partial stream aggregate

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2344?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14970532#comment-14970532 ] Anoop Sam John commented on PHOENIX-2344: - Nice one. > Implement partial stream

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-2052) Division Bug In Group By SQL The result turn to NULL

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2052?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14627604#comment-14627604 ] Anoop Sam John commented on PHOENIX-2052: - bq."b/2" was wrong At the time of a

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-1996) Use BytesStringer instead of ZeroCopyByteString

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1996?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14554535#comment-14554535 ] Anoop Sam John commented on PHOENIX-1996: - +1 > Use BytesStringer instead of Ze

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-1634) LocalIndexSplitter prevents region from auto split

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1634?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14304700#comment-14304700 ] Anoop Sam John commented on PHOENIX-1634: - Any idea what breaks the locality? A

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-1593) Use protobuf for all client/server data interchange in next major release

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1593?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14281246#comment-14281246 ] Anoop Sam John commented on PHOENIX-1593: - +1 We can make this an umbrella iss

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-1560) Join between global index and data table if INDEX hint used

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1560?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14258883#comment-14258883 ] Anoop Sam John commented on PHOENIX-1560: - I see.. In HIndex it was seek + scan

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-1560) Join between global index and data table if INDEX hint used

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1560?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14258566#comment-14258566 ] Anoop Sam John commented on PHOENIX-1560: - bq.This is always possible, as we alw

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-1509) Investigate changing default encoding to PREFIX_encoding instead of FAST_DIFF

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1509?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14241458#comment-14241458 ] Anoop Sam John commented on PHOENIX-1509: - This issue says abt changing to PREFI

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-1035) Performance test local indexing against global indexing

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1035?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14238861#comment-14238861 ] Anoop Sam John commented on PHOENIX-1035: - Any chance to test when only one inde

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-1453) Collect row counts per region in stats table

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1453?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14233908#comment-14233908 ] Anoop Sam John commented on PHOENIX-1453: - +1 for the above suggestion. > Colle

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-1453) Collect row counts per region in stats table

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1453?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14232998#comment-14232998 ] Anoop Sam John commented on PHOENIX-1453: - Not read the code.. But, in compacti

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-1455) Replace org.xerial.snappy with org.iq80.snappy pure Java snappy implementation

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1455?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14215608#comment-14215608 ] Anoop Sam John commented on PHOENIX-1455: - +1 for commit this. Test we can add a

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-1455) Replace org.xerial.snappy with org.iq80.snappy pure Java snappy implementation

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1455?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14214781#comment-14214781 ] Anoop Sam John commented on PHOENIX-1455: - Yes the threshold value by default is

[jira] [Issue Comment Deleted] (PHOENIX-1431) DELETE using Subqueries

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1431?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Anoop Sam John updated PHOENIX-1431: Comment: was deleted (was: I got like the bug is it is ignoring the condition on select.

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-1431) DELETE using Subqueries

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1431?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14206173#comment-14206173 ] Anoop Sam John commented on PHOENIX-1431: - I got like the bug is it is ignoring

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-1431) DELETE using Subqueries

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1431?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14206170#comment-14206170 ] Anoop Sam John commented on PHOENIX-1431: - I got like the bug is it is ignoring

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-1410) Avoid contacting all the local index table regions if possible when query has condition on first leading primary key column

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1410?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14198334#comment-14198334 ] Anoop Sam John commented on PHOENIX-1410: - When query has condition on leading p

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-910) Filter should override hasFilterRow() when filterRow() is overridden

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-910?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14182345#comment-14182345 ] Anoop Sam John commented on PHOENIX-910: I will commit James. > Filter should ov

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-1318) Tables with Put coprocessor cannot use HRegion.mutateRowsWithLocks()

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1318?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14159798#comment-14159798 ] Anoop Sam John commented on PHOENIX-1318: - You mean the pre/postBatchMutate hook

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-167) Support semi/anti-joins

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-167?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14159009#comment-14159009 ] Anoop Sam John commented on PHOENIX-167: Great work [~maryannxue]. Are we docume

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-1282) Remove usage of KeyValueUtil.ensureKeyValue

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1282?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14144423#comment-14144423 ] Anoop Sam John commented on PHOENIX-1282: - Thanks for filing Lars. HBASE-11871 a

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-1280) ColumnProjectionFilter makes too many ImmutableBytesPtrs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1280?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14144377#comment-14144377 ] Anoop Sam John commented on PHOENIX-1280: - bq.What should we call it? BytesPtrTo

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-1280) ColumnProjectionFilter makes too many ImmutableBytesPtrs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1280?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14144375#comment-14144375 ] Anoop Sam John commented on PHOENIX-1280: - bq.It cracks me up the *Immutable*Byt

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-1280) ColumnProjectionFilter makes too many ImmutableBytesPtrs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1280?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14144366#comment-14144366 ] Anoop Sam John commented on PHOENIX-1280: - Else there can be single ImmutableByt

[jira] [Assigned] (PHOENIX-1280) ColumnProjectionFilter makes too many ImmutableBytesPtrs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1280?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Anoop Sam John reassigned PHOENIX-1280: --- Assignee: Anoop Sam John > ColumnProjectionFilter makes too many ImmutableBytesPtrs

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-1278) Performance degradation for salted tables with guideposts

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1278?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14144363#comment-14144363 ] Anoop Sam John commented on PHOENIX-1278: - Np Ram. Pls take it. > Performance

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-1278) Performance degradation for salted tables with guideposts

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1278?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14144346#comment-14144346 ] Anoop Sam John commented on PHOENIX-1278: - Can I take this [~ram_krish]? > Perf

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-1278) Performance degradation for salted tables with guideposts

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1278?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Anoop Sam John updated PHOENIX-1278: Description: When a table is salted, we're seeing a degradation in performance using our n

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-1278) Performance degradation for salted tables with guideposts

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1278?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14144306#comment-14144306 ] Anoop Sam John commented on PHOENIX-1278: - bq.We should group the scans we're do

[jira] [Resolved] (PHOENIX-1245) Remove usage of empty KeyValue object BATCH_MARKER from Indexer

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1245?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Anoop Sam John resolved PHOENIX-1245. - Resolution: Fixed Pushed to master and 4.0 branches. Thanks James for the review. > Rem

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-1245) Remove usage of empty KeyValue object BATCH_MARKER from Indexer

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1245?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Anoop Sam John updated PHOENIX-1245: Attachment: PHOENIX-1245.patch On running the IT tests got one issue which was not analyze

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-1245) Remove usage of empty KeyValue object BATCH_MARKER from Indexer

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1245?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14129523#comment-14129523 ] Anoop Sam John commented on PHOENIX-1245: - bq.Please do a "mvn install" to run a

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-1245) Remove usage of empty KeyValue object BATCH_MARKER from Indexer

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1245?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Anoop Sam John updated PHOENIX-1245: Attachment: PHOENIX-1245.patch Patch for master. Removes some code. Seeing this we can say

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-1245) Remove usage of empty KeyValue object BATCH_MARKER from Indexer

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1245?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14128021#comment-14128021 ] Anoop Sam John commented on PHOENIX-1245: - bq.If we remove usage of empty KeyVal

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-1245) Remove usage of empty KeyValue object BATCH_MARKER from Indexer

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1245?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Anoop Sam John updated PHOENIX-1245: Issue Type: Improvement (was: Bug) > Remove usage of empty KeyValue object BATCH_MARKER f

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-1245) Remove usage of empty KeyValue object BATCH_MARKER from Indexer

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1245?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Anoop Sam John updated PHOENIX-1245: Priority: Critical (was: Major) > Remove usage of empty KeyValue object BATCH_MARKER from

[jira] [Created] (PHOENIX-1245) Remove usage of empty KeyValue object BATCH_MARKER from Indexer

Anoop Sam John created PHOENIX-1245: --- Summary: Remove usage of empty KeyValue object BATCH_MARKER from Indexer Key: PHOENIX-1245 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1245 Project: Phoe

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-1203) Uable to work for count (distinct col) queries via phoenix table with secondary indexes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1203?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Anoop Sam John updated PHOENIX-1203: Affects Version/s: (was: 4.1) (was: 4.0.0)

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-1203) Uable to work for count (distinct col) queries via phoenix table with secondary indexes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1203?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Anoop Sam John updated PHOENIX-1203: Attachment: PHOENIX-1203.patch The function name for the DistinctCount function was still

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-1203) Uable to work for count (distinct col) queries via phoenix table with secondary indexes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1203?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14116853#comment-14116853 ] Anoop Sam John commented on PHOENIX-1203: - Got the issue. Patch coming in short

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-1203) Uable to work for count (distinct col) queries via phoenix table with secondary indexes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1203?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14111874#comment-14111874 ] Anoop Sam John commented on PHOENIX-1203: - Yes. I believe I can reproduce the is

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-1203) Uable to work for count (distinct col) queries via phoenix table with secondary indexes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1203?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14111831#comment-14111831 ] Anoop Sam John commented on PHOENIX-1203: - Sure NP... > Uable to work for count

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-1203) Uable to work for count (distinct col) queries via phoenix table with secondary indexes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1203?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14111817#comment-14111817 ] Anoop Sam John commented on PHOENIX-1203: - Is it possible to put the test into a

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-1203) Uable to work for count (distinct col) queries via phoenix table with secondary indexes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1203?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14108853#comment-14108853 ] Anoop Sam John commented on PHOENIX-1203: - {quote} 1. count (distinct col) query

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-1166) Avoid HTable creation in coprocessors to write into local index table

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1166?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14098175#comment-14098175 ] Anoop Sam John commented on PHOENIX-1166: - Agree with Jeffrey. The call on HTab

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-1169) Support joins between two large tables

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1169?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14097044#comment-14097044 ] Anoop Sam John commented on PHOENIX-1169: - Will the client will be that much cap

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-1169) Support joins between two large tables

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1169?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14096557#comment-14096557 ] Anoop Sam John commented on PHOENIX-1169: - Put the appropriate minor version num

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-1169) Support joins between two large tables

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1169?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Anoop Sam John updated PHOENIX-1169: Fix Version/s: (was: 4.0.0) (was: 3.0.0) > Support joins betwe

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-1169) Support joins between two large tables

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1169?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14096555#comment-14096555 ] Anoop Sam John commented on PHOENIX-1169: - Some thing which I am very earger to

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-1166) Avoid HTable creation in coprocessors to write into local index table

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1166?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14095970#comment-14095970 ] Anoop Sam John commented on PHOENIX-1166: - Those figures looks good and cosidera

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-1126) Make local index updates transactional with the data updates

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1126?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14075889#comment-14075889 ] Anoop Sam John commented on PHOENIX-1126: - In HIndex we had done the transaction

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-1107) Support mutable indexes over replication

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1107?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14073996#comment-14073996 ] Anoop Sam John commented on PHOENIX-1107: - In 0.98+ versions, a Codec can be spe

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-1107) Support mutable indexes over replication

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1107?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14073995#comment-14073995 ] Anoop Sam John commented on PHOENIX-1107: - bq.what APIs does the replay go throu

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-1110) Fix flappy MultiCfQueryExecIT

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1110?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Anoop Sam John updated PHOENIX-1110: Assignee: James Taylor (was: Anoop Sam John) > Fix flappy MultiCfQueryExecIT > -

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-1110) Fix flappy MultiCfQueryExecIT

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1110?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14073970#comment-14073970 ] Anoop Sam John commented on PHOENIX-1110: - bq.This was caused by a new test that

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-1102) Query Finds No Rows When Using Multiple Column Families in where clause

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1102?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Anoop Sam John updated PHOENIX-1102: Attachment: PHOENIX-1102_3.0.patch What I applied to 3.0 branch > Query Finds No Rows Wh

[jira] [Resolved] (PHOENIX-1102) Query Finds No Rows When Using Multiple Column Families in where clause

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1102?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Anoop Sam John resolved PHOENIX-1102. - Resolution: Fixed Pushed to all branches. Thanks for the review James. > Query Finds N

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-1102) Query Finds No Rows When Using Multiple Column Families in where clause

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1102?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Anoop Sam John updated PHOENIX-1102: Attachment: PHOENIX-1102_V3.patch > Query Finds No Rows When Using Multiple Column Famili

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-1102) Query Finds No Rows When Using Multiple Column Families in where clause

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1102?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Anoop Sam John updated PHOENIX-1102: Summary: Query Finds No Rows When Using Multiple Column Families in where clause (was: Q

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-1102) Query Finds No Rows When Using Multiple Column Families in where clause

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1102?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Anoop Sam John updated PHOENIX-1102: Attachment: PHOENIX-1102_V2.patch > Query Finds No Rows When Using Multiple Column Famili

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-1102) Query Finds No Rows When Using Multiple Column Families

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1102?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Anoop Sam John updated PHOENIX-1102: Priority: Critical (was: Major) > Query Finds No Rows When Using Multiple Column Familie

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-1102) Query Finds No Rows When Using Multiple Column Families

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1102?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14068180#comment-14068180 ] Anoop Sam John commented on PHOENIX-1102: - I see... Then let me try for the ch

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-1102) Query Finds No Rows When Using Multiple Column Families

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1102?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Anoop Sam John updated PHOENIX-1102: Fix Version/s: 4.1 3.1 5.0.0 > Query Finds No Rows

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-1102) Query Finds No Rows When Using Multiple Column Families

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1102?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14067769#comment-14067769 ] Anoop Sam John commented on PHOENIX-1102: - With the above javadoc in methods, I

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-1102) Query Finds No Rows When Using Multiple Column Families

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1102?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Anoop Sam John updated PHOENIX-1102: Attachment: PHOENIX-1102.patch How about this patch? The javadoc of MultiCQKeyValueCompa

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-933) Local index support to Phoenix

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-933?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14064596#comment-14064596 ] Anoop Sam John commented on PHOENIX-933: Addendum 2 committed to 4.0 and master.

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-933) Local index support to Phoenix

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-933?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14064594#comment-14064594 ] Anoop Sam John commented on PHOENIX-933: Committing this now. > Local index sup

[jira] [Resolved] (PHOENIX-1002) Add support for % operator

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1002?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Anoop Sam John resolved PHOENIX-1002. - Resolution: Fixed Committed to 3.0, 4.0 and master braches. Thanks for the patch Kyle B

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-1002) Add support for % operator

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1002?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14060899#comment-14060899 ] Anoop Sam John commented on PHOENIX-1002: - Thanks. Going to commit now.. > Add

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-1002) Add support for % operator

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1002?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Anoop Sam John updated PHOENIX-1002: Fix Version/s: 4.1 3.1 5.0.0 > Add support for % op

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-1002) Add support for % operator

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1002?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14060001#comment-14060001 ] Anoop Sam John commented on PHOENIX-1002: - This should go into all branches? Th

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-1002) Add support for % operator

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1002?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Anoop Sam John updated PHOENIX-1002: Assignee: Kyle Buzsaki > Add support for % operator > -- > >

  1   2   >