[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-2940) Remove STATS RPCs from rowlock

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2940?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15339800#comment-15339800 ] James Taylor commented on PHOENIX-2940: --- Looks good, [~elserj]. Let's commit this so it can make

[jira] [Reopened] (PHOENIX-2952) array_length return negative value

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2952?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] ramkrishna.s.vasudevan reopened PHOENIX-2952: - > array_length return negative value > -- >

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-2952) array_length return negative value

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2952?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15339068#comment-15339068 ] Joseph Sun commented on PHOENIX-2952: - I think I can't modify PArrayDataType.getArrayLength()

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-2952) array_length return negative value

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2952?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15339051#comment-15339051 ] ramkrishna.s.vasudevan commented on PHOENIX-2952: - correcting the failed test case. >

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-2952) array_length return negative value

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2952?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15339069#comment-15339069 ] Joseph Sun commented on PHOENIX-2952: - yes,you are right. > array_length return negative value >

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-2952) array_length return negative value

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2952?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15339074#comment-15339074 ] Joseph Sun commented on PHOENIX-2952: - I modify ArrayLengthFunction and force push. > array_length

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-3007) Long-lasting writes suspends JDBC client forever.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3007?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Krzysztof Bień updated PHOENIX-3007: Environment: client jdk7 windows / linux Server: Linux Ubuntu 14.0.4 hbase 1.1.4

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-3007) Long-lasting writes suspends JDBC client forever.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3007?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Krzysztof Bień updated PHOENIX-3007: Environment: Client: jdk7 windows / linux Server: Linux Ubuntu 14.0.4 hbase 1.1.4

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-3007) Long-lasting writes suspends JDBC client forever.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3007?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Krzysztof Bień updated PHOENIX-3007: Environment: Client: jdk7 windows / linux Server: Linux Ubuntu 14.0.4 hbase 1.1.4

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-2952) array_length return negative value

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2952?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15339393#comment-15339393 ] Hudson commented on PHOENIX-2952: - FAILURE: Integrated in Phoenix-master #1270 (See

[jira] [Created] (PHOENIX-3007) Long-lasting writes suspends JDBC client forever.

Krzysztof Bień created PHOENIX-3007: --- Summary: Long-lasting writes suspends JDBC client forever. Key: PHOENIX-3007 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3007 Project: Phoenix

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-3007) Long-lasting writes suspends JDBC client forever.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3007?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Krzysztof Bień updated PHOENIX-3007: Description: When try to write too many rows in one commit the client suspends forever.

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-3007) Long-lasting writes suspends JDBC client forever.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3007?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Krzysztof Bień updated PHOENIX-3007: Description: When try to write too many rows in one commit the client suspends forever.

[jira] [Resolved] (PHOENIX-2950) Implement CRON job to start async index builds and restart failed jobs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2950?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] James Taylor resolved PHOENIX-2950. --- Resolution: Fixed > Implement CRON job to start async index builds and restart failed jobs

[jira] [Resolved] (PHOENIX-2998) Add test for setting RPC timeout for a connection

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2998?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] James Taylor resolved PHOENIX-2998. --- Resolution: Fixed Assignee: James Taylor Fix Version/s: 4.8.0 > Add test

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-3010) Allow optional rolling restart for major release

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3010?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15340289#comment-15340289 ] James Taylor commented on PHOENIX-3010: --- No, server would be upgrade, say to 5.0 first. Then older

[DISCUSS] name next release 5.0 or 4.8?

We're just about ready to roll an RC for our next release. There's been some great work to get local indexes on top of public HBase APIs which is awesome. However, local indexes created before this release will not be maintained correctly when the server has been upgraded to 4.8 while the client

Re: [DISCUSS] name next release 5.0 or 4.8?

Breaking backwards compatibility seems like a 5.0 type of change. On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 2:10 PM, James Taylor wrote: > We're just about ready to roll an RC for our next release. There's been > some great work to get local indexes on top of public HBase APIs which is >

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-2950) Implement CRON job to start async index builds and restart failed jobs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2950?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15340346#comment-15340346 ] Hudson commented on PHOENIX-2950: - FAILURE: Integrated in Phoenix-master #1272 (See

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-3008) Prevent upgrade of existing multi-tenant table to map to namespace until we support it correctly

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3008?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15340345#comment-15340345 ] Hudson commented on PHOENIX-3008: - FAILURE: Integrated in Phoenix-master #1272 (See

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-2940) Remove STATS RPCs from rowlock

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2940?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15340344#comment-15340344 ] Hudson commented on PHOENIX-2940: - FAILURE: Integrated in Phoenix-master #1272 (See

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-3010) Allow optional rolling restart for major release

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3010?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15340363#comment-15340363 ] Samarth Jain commented on PHOENIX-3010: --- {code} // TODO pass through if major version mismatch

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-3009) Estimated Size for PTable is ~20% greater than actual size

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3009?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] James Taylor updated PHOENIX-3009: -- Attachment: PHOENIX-3009.patch Here's a patch that adjusts the size calculations with some

Re: RC on Monday

Fixes for both PHOENIX-3001 and PHOENIX-2940 have been checked in (thanks - nice work!). Looks like the only two outstanding are PHOENIX-3002 and PHOENIX-2209. Anything else missing? Can we get an RC up tomorrow (Tuesday)? Thanks, James On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 1:06 PM, Ankit Singhal

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-3012) DistinctPrefixFilter logic fails with local indexes and salted tables

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3012?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15341130#comment-15341130 ] Lars Hofhansl commented on PHOENIX-3012: That was just for testing... With it switched off...

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-3012) DistinctPrefixFilter logic fails with local indexes and salted tables

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3012?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15341132#comment-15341132 ] Lars Hofhansl commented on PHOENIX-3012: Which commit? One of mine? > DistinctPrefixFilter

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-3012) DistinctPrefixFilter logic fails with local indexes and salted tables

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3012?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15341143#comment-15341143 ] Lars Hofhansl commented on PHOENIX-3012: Looks like it's off by exactly the number of

[jira] [Comment Edited] (PHOENIX-3012) DistinctPrefixFilter logic fails with local indexes and salted tables

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3012?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15341147#comment-15341147 ] Lars Hofhansl edited comment on PHOENIX-3012 at 6/21/16 5:44 AM: -

[jira] [Comment Edited] (PHOENIX-3012) DistinctPrefixFilter logic fails with local indexes and salted tables

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3012?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15341147#comment-15341147 ] Lars Hofhansl edited comment on PHOENIX-3012 at 6/21/16 5:46 AM: -

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-2993) Tephra: Prune invalid transaction set once all data for a given invalid transaction has been dropped

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2993?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15341159#comment-15341159 ] James Taylor commented on PHOENIX-2993: --- Thanks for the excellent design doc, [~poornachandra].

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-3012) DistinctPrefixFilter logic fails with local indexes and salted tables

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3012?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15341163#comment-15341163 ] James Taylor commented on PHOENIX-3012: --- Touch base with Mujtaba tomorrow - it might not be

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-3012) DistinctPrefixFilter logic fails with local indexes and salted tables

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3012?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15341129#comment-15341129 ] Lars Hofhansl commented on PHOENIX-3012: Aaann It turns out this is wrong with or

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-3012) DistinctPrefixFilter logic fails with local indexes and salted tables

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3012?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15341139#comment-15341139 ] James Taylor commented on PHOENIX-3012: --- Mujtaba wasn't sure which commit yet. >

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-3012) DistinctPrefixFilter logic fails with local indexes and salted tables

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3012?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15341169#comment-15341169 ] James Taylor commented on PHOENIX-3012: --- And sorry for the bugs - as you've witnessed firsthand,

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-3010) Allow optional rolling restart for major release

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3010?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15340405#comment-15340405 ] James Taylor commented on PHOENIX-3010: --- Ah, yes, you're right. We'd need to do this on the server

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-2999) Upgrading Multi-tenant table to map with namespace using upgradeUtil

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2999?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15340424#comment-15340424 ] Ankit Singhal commented on PHOENIX-2999: bq. So in this scenario: B.P (physical table in schema

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-3010) Allow optional rolling restart for major release

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3010?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15340263#comment-15340263 ] Samarth Jain commented on PHOENIX-3010: --- [~jamestaylor] - where will add this config? Client

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-2999) Upgrading Multi-tenant table to map with namespace using upgradeUtil

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2999?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15340159#comment-15340159 ] James Taylor commented on PHOENIX-2999: --- Only the physical table would have a namespace associated

[jira] [Created] (PHOENIX-3010) Allow optional rolling restart for major release

James Taylor created PHOENIX-3010: - Summary: Allow optional rolling restart for major release Key: PHOENIX-3010 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3010 Project: Phoenix

[jira] [Created] (PHOENIX-3008) Prevent upgrade of existing multi-tenant table to map to namespace until we support it correctly

Ankit Singhal created PHOENIX-3008: -- Summary: Prevent upgrade of existing multi-tenant table to map to namespace until we support it correctly Key: PHOENIX-3008 URL:

[jira] [Resolved] (PHOENIX-3008) Prevent upgrade of existing multi-tenant table to map to namespace until we support it correctly

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3008?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ankit Singhal resolved PHOENIX-3008. Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 4.8.0 > Prevent upgrade of existing multi-tenant

[jira] [Created] (PHOENIX-3009) Estimated Size for PTable is ~20% greater than actual size

Mujtaba Chohan created PHOENIX-3009: --- Summary: Estimated Size for PTable is ~20% greater than actual size Key: PHOENIX-3009 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3009 Project: Phoenix

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-3009) Estimated Size for PTable is ~20% greater than actual size

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3009?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15340168#comment-15340168 ] Mujtaba Chohan commented on PHOENIX-3009: - Example. Retained size for SYSTEM.CATALOG PTable is

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-3010) Allow optional rolling restart for major release

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3010?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15340275#comment-15340275 ] James Taylor commented on PHOENIX-3010: --- It would be a client-side config that simply prevents the

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-2999) Upgrading Multi-tenant table to map with namespace using upgradeUtil

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2999?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15340158#comment-15340158 ] Samarth Jain commented on PHOENIX-2999: --- [~an...@apache.org] - mind posting the workaround here so

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-3009) Estimated Size for PTable is ~20% greater than actual size

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3009?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mujtaba Chohan updated PHOENIX-3009: Attachment: ptable_retained.png > Estimated Size for PTable is ~20% greater than actual

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-2999) Upgrading Multi-tenant table to map with namespace using upgradeUtil

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2999?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15340203#comment-15340203 ] Ankit Singhal commented on PHOENIX-2999: [~samarthjain], sure,I'll update the workaround after

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-2999) Upgrading Multi-tenant table to map with namespace using upgradeUtil

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2999?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15340214#comment-15340214 ] James Taylor commented on PHOENIX-2999: --- So in this scenario: B.P (physical table in schema B),

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-2998) Add test for setting RPC timeout for a connection

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2998?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15340207#comment-15340207 ] Hudson commented on PHOENIX-2998: - SUCCESS: Integrated in Phoenix-master #1271 (See

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-3010) Allow optional rolling restart for major release

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3010?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15340282#comment-15340282 ] Samarth Jain commented on PHOENIX-3010: --- But our general contract is that we upgrade the server

Re: [DISCUSS] name next release 5.0 or 4.8?

I think it is fine to name this 4.8 as long as the release notes contain sufficient explanation. Enis On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 1:19 PM, Cody Marcel wrote: > Breaking backwards compatibility seems like a 5.0 type of change. > > On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 2:10 PM, James

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-1304) Auto-detect if we should pass the NO_CACHE hint

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1304?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15340811#comment-15340811 ] Lars Hofhansl commented on PHOENIX-1304: Maybe I'm missing something in the patch. It looks like

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-1304) Auto-detect if we should pass the NO_CACHE hint

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1304?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15340835#comment-15340835 ] Samarth Jain commented on PHOENIX-1304: --- Yes, your reading is correct, [~lhofhansl]. Let me rebase

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-2995) Write performance severely degrades with large number of views

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2995?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15340838#comment-15340838 ] James Taylor commented on PHOENIX-2995: --- FYI, stats are now cached outside of PTable, so we should

Re: RC on Monday

I just realized I still have PHOENIX-2792 outstanding (was waiting on Avatica 1.8.0 and then forgot about it). I will put that in tonight so you can do the RC first thing tmrw morning, Ankit. Sorry for causing more delay. rajeshb...@apache.org wrote: I can commit both PHOENIX-3002 and

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-3001) Dropping local index and recreation it with following split may cause RS failure

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3001?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15341020#comment-15341020 ] Hudson commented on PHOENIX-3001: - SUCCESS: Integrated in Phoenix-master #1275 (See

[jira] [Created] (PHOENIX-3013) TO_CHAR fails to handle indexed null value

Junegunn Choi created PHOENIX-3013: -- Summary: TO_CHAR fails to handle indexed null value Key: PHOENIX-3013 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3013 Project: Phoenix Issue

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-3013) TO_CHAR fails to handle indexed null value

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3013?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Junegunn Choi updated PHOENIX-3013: --- Attachment: PHOENIX-3013.patch > TO_CHAR fails to handle indexed null value >

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-3012) DistinctPrefixFilter logic fails with local indexes and salted tables

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3012?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15341041#comment-15341041 ] Lars Hofhansl commented on PHOENIX-3012: Thanks [~giacomotaylor] > DistinctPrefixFilter logic

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-3012) DistinctPrefixFilter logic fails with local indexes and salted tables

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3012?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15341059#comment-15341059 ] James Taylor commented on PHOENIX-3012: --- The caller of {{ScanUtil.setRowKeyOffset()}} will pass

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-3013) TO_CHAR fails to handle indexed null value

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3013?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15341060#comment-15341060 ] James Taylor commented on PHOENIX-3013: --- +1. Would you mind getting this into 4.8 too,

[jira] [Resolved] (PHOENIX-2792) Enable Kerberos auth over SPNEGO for QueryServer

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2792?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Josh Elser resolved PHOENIX-2792. - Resolution: Fixed Thanks for the review, James. Pseudo-distributed test with Kerberos came

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-3012) DistinctPrefixFilter logic fails with local indexes and salted tables

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3012?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Lars Hofhansl updated PHOENIX-3012: --- Attachment: 3012-does.not.work.txt This does not work, yet. Just parking it here for later.

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-3012) DistinctPrefixFilter logic fails with local indexes and salted tables

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3012?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15341038#comment-15341038 ] Lars Hofhansl commented on PHOENIX-3012: Seems this is only an issue with local indexes *and*

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-3012) DistinctPrefixFilter logic fails with local indexes and salted tables

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3012?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Lars Hofhansl updated PHOENIX-3012: --- Summary: DistinctPrefixFilter logic fails with local indexes and salted tables (was:

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-3013) TO_CHAR fails to handle indexed null value

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3013?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] James Taylor updated PHOENIX-3013: -- Fix Version/s: 4.8.0 > TO_CHAR fails to handle indexed null value >

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-3004) Allow users to configure allowed Kerberos realms for PQS

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3004?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Josh Elser updated PHOENIX-3004: Attachment: PHOENIX-3004.001.patch .001 Parking an initial patch that uses some of the new API

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-3013) TO_CHAR fails to handle indexed null value

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3013?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15341074#comment-15341074 ] James Taylor commented on PHOENIX-3013: --- [~samarthjain] - would you mind reviewing/committing

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-3012) DistinctPrefixFilter logic fails with local indexes and salted tables

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3012?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15341104#comment-15341104 ] Lars Hofhansl commented on PHOENIX-3012: And ORDER BY key-prefix DESC is also not correct when

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-3012) DistinctPrefixFilter logic fails with local indexes and salted tables

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3012?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15341122#comment-15341122 ] James Taylor commented on PHOENIX-3012: --- Not sure if you meant to do this rather than initialize

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-2995) Write performance severely degrades with large number of views

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2995?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] James Taylor updated PHOENIX-2995: -- Assignee: Thomas D'Silva (was: James Taylor) > Write performance severely degrades with

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-2995) Write performance severely degrades with large number of views

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2995?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] James Taylor updated PHOENIX-2995: -- Fix Version/s: 4.9.0 > Write performance severely degrades with large number of views >

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-3002) Upgrading to 4.8 doesn't recreate local indexes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3002?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15340872#comment-15340872 ] Rajeshbabu Chintaguntla commented on PHOENIX-3002: -- The upgrade skip check is not

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-3009) Estimated Size for PTable is ~20% greater than actual size

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3009?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15340919#comment-15340919 ] Enis Soztutar commented on PHOENIX-3009: Did you see HBASE-15950? CompressedOops makes a huge

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-2995) Write performance severely degrades with large number of views

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2995?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15340957#comment-15340957 ] James Taylor commented on PHOENIX-2995: --- One other pretty easy thing to do would be to call

Re: [DISCUSS] name next release 5.0 or 4.8?

I agree with this as well, keeping with the 4.8 name. On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 5:05 PM, Enis Söztutar wrote: > I think it is fine to name this 4.8 as long as the release notes contain > sufficient explanation. > > Enis > > On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 1:19 PM, Cody Marcel

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-3002) Upgrading to 4.8 doesn't recreate local indexes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3002?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Rajeshbabu Chintaguntla updated PHOENIX-3002: - Attachment: PHOENIX-3002_v1.patch Patch have both offline and online

Re: RC on Monday

I can commit both PHOENIX-3002 and PHOENIX-2209 by today. It would be better to make RC tomorrow. Thanks, Rajeshbabu. On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 7:24 AM, James Taylor wrote: > Fixes for both PHOENIX-3001 and PHOENIX-2940 have been checked in (thanks - > nice work!). Looks

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-3012) DistinctPrefixFilter logic fails with local indexes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3012?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15340939#comment-15340939 ] Lars Hofhansl commented on PHOENIX-3012: [~giacomotaylor] > DistinctPrefixFilter logic fails

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-2792) Enable Kerberos auth over SPNEGO for QueryServer

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2792?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15340995#comment-15340995 ] Josh Elser commented on PHOENIX-2792: - Thanks, James. bq. assuming you did manual testing against

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-1304) Auto-detect if we should pass the NO_CACHE hint

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1304?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15340816#comment-15340816 ] Lars Hofhansl commented on PHOENIX-1304: I guess we have a scan per GuidePost so that would be

[jira] [Created] (PHOENIX-3012) DistinctPrefixFilter logic fails with local indexes

Lars Hofhansl created PHOENIX-3012: -- Summary: DistinctPrefixFilter logic fails with local indexes Key: PHOENIX-3012 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3012 Project: Phoenix

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-3011) Fix missing apache licenses

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3011?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15340931#comment-15340931 ] Hudson commented on PHOENIX-3011: - SUCCESS: Integrated in Phoenix-master #1274 (See

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-3012) DistinctPrefixFilter logic fails with local indexes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3012?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15340951#comment-15340951 ] James Taylor commented on PHOENIX-3012: --- To take into account local indexes, see

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-3002) Upgrading to 4.8 doesn't recreate local indexes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3002?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15341001#comment-15341001 ] James Taylor commented on PHOENIX-3002: --- Minor nit, no need for the null check here: {code} +

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-2952) array_length return negative value

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2952?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15339156#comment-15339156 ] ramkrishna.s.vasudevan commented on PHOENIX-2952: - Pushed once again with the change.

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-2999) Upgrading Multi-tenant table to map with namespace using upgradeUtil

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2999?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15340440#comment-15340440 ] James Taylor commented on PHOENIX-2999: --- No problem, [~an...@apache.org]. So do we not need the

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-3002) Upgrading to 4.8 doesn't recreate local indexes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3002?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Rajeshbabu Chintaguntla updated PHOENIX-3002: - Fix Version/s: 4.8.0 > Upgrading to 4.8 doesn't recreate local indexes

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-3002) Upgrading to 4.8 doesn't recreate local indexes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3002?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Rajeshbabu Chintaguntla updated PHOENIX-3002: - Attachment: PHOENIX-3002_v0.patch > Upgrading to 4.8 doesn't recreate

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-2996) Process name of PQS should indicate its role

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2996?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ted Yu updated PHOENIX-2996: Description: Currently we have: {code} * A query server for Phoenix over Calcite's Avatica. */ public

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-3002) Upgrading to 4.8 doesn't recreate local indexes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3002?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Rajeshbabu Chintaguntla updated PHOENIX-3002: - Attachment: PHOENIX-3002.patch [~samarthjain] [~jamestaylor] Here is

[jira] [Comment Edited] (PHOENIX-3002) Upgrading to 4.8 doesn't recreate local indexes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3002?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15340561#comment-15340561 ] Rajeshbabu Chintaguntla edited comment on PHOENIX-3002 at 6/20/16 10:31 PM:

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-3002) Upgrading to 4.8 doesn't recreate local indexes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3002?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15340561#comment-15340561 ] Rajeshbabu Chintaguntla commented on PHOENIX-3002: -- Thanks for review [~samarthjain]

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-3002) Upgrading to 4.8 doesn't recreate local indexes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3002?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15340567#comment-15340567 ] Samarth Jain commented on PHOENIX-3002: --- UpgradeUtil is generally the place where we keep upgrade

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-3002) Upgrading to 4.8 doesn't recreate local indexes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3002?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15340599#comment-15340599 ] Rajeshbabu Chintaguntla commented on PHOENIX-3002: -- [~samarthjain] bq. I realize that I

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-3011) Fix missing apache licenses

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3011?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ankit Singhal updated PHOENIX-3011: --- Summary: Fix missing apache licenses (was: Fix missing licenses) > Fix missing apache

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-3011) Fix missing apache licenses

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3011?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ankit Singhal updated PHOENIX-3011: --- Attachment: PHOENIX-3011.patch > Fix missing apache licenses > ---

[jira] [Created] (PHOENIX-3011) Fix missing licenses

Ankit Singhal created PHOENIX-3011: -- Summary: Fix missing licenses Key: PHOENIX-3011 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3011 Project: Phoenix Issue Type: Bug

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-3011) Fix missing apache licenses

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3011?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15340629#comment-15340629 ] James Taylor commented on PHOENIX-3011: --- +1 > Fix missing apache licenses >

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-3002) Upgrading to 4.8 doesn't recreate local indexes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3002?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15340643#comment-15340643 ] Rajeshbabu Chintaguntla commented on PHOENIX-3002: -- [~samarthjain] bq. You can force

  1   2   >