[jira] [Created] (PHOENIX-6385) Not to use Scan#setSmall for HBase 2.x versions

Anoop Sam John created PHOENIX-6385: --- Summary: Not to use Scan#setSmall for HBase 2.x versions Key: PHOENIX-6385 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-6385 Project: Phoenix

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-6355) Index rebuild command prints wrong warning TableNotFoundException for parent table when command used for first time on a new client session

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-6355?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Anoop Sam John updated PHOENIX-6355: Description: sqlline version 1.2.0 {code} 0: jdbc:phoenix:> ALTER INDEX IF EXISTS on

[jira] [Created] (PHOENIX-6355) Index rebuild command prints wrong warning TableNotFoundException for parent table when command used for first time on a new client session

Anoop Sam John created PHOENIX-6355: --- Summary: Index rebuild command prints wrong warning TableNotFoundException for parent table when command used for first time on a new client session Key: PHOENIX-6355 URL:

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-4459) Region assignments are failing for the test cases with extended clocks to support SCN

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4459?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16309157#comment-16309157 ] Anoop Sam John commented on PHOENIX-4459: - bq.we create a region with the current clock 1000, to

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-4467) Scans with filter returning all the versions

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4467?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16304447#comment-16304447 ] Anoop Sam John commented on PHOENIX-4467: - When the Filter returned INCLUDE_AND_NEXT_COL, we

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-4399) Remove explicit abort on RegionServerServices

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4399?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16304281#comment-16304281 ] Anoop Sam John commented on PHOENIX-4399: - Changing IndexBuildingFailureException to be a RTE

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-4441) Reflect changes that were made recently in HBase branch-2

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4441?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16281636#comment-16281636 ] Anoop Sam John commented on PHOENIX-4441: - bq. so we need to find out a way to set index failure

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-4399) Remove explicit abort on RegionServerServices

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4399?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16264156#comment-16264156 ] Anoop Sam John commented on PHOENIX-4399: - Based on the HBase side decision only, commit this

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-4399) Remove explicit abort on RegionServerServices

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4399?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16264153#comment-16264153 ] Anoop Sam John commented on PHOENIX-4399: - When we set the abort on exception to true( This is

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-4041) CoprocessorHConnectionTableFactory should not open a new HConnection when shutting down

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4041?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16254740#comment-16254740 ] Anoop Sam John commented on PHOENIX-4041: - On CoprocessorHConnectionTableFactory - Need new impl

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-4318) Fix IndexHalfStoreFileReader and related classes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4318?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16249943#comment-16249943 ] Anoop Sam John commented on PHOENIX-4318: - bq. There is no public constructor to create

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-4357) IndexRegionSplitPolicy extends the private-audience class IncreasingToUpperBoundRegionSplitPolicy

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4357?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16243268#comment-16243268 ] Anoop Sam John commented on PHOENIX-4357: - HBase should expose

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-4350) Replace deprecated or changed Region methods with new APIs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4350?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16241721#comment-16241721 ] Anoop Sam John commented on PHOENIX-4350: - No. The sleep is when seeing the Region memstore size

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-4350) Replace deprecated or changed Region methods with new APIs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4350?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16240177#comment-16240177 ] Anoop Sam John commented on PHOENIX-4350: - So this patch is against Alpha-4? In

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-3507) HBase secure wal log cash with Phoenix secondary index

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3507?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15693043#comment-15693043 ] Anoop Sam John commented on PHOENIX-3507: - Copied from HBase issue "I believe I got what is the

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-2880) Switch to the new RegionObserver#preStoreScannerOpen() method which accepts read point parameter

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2880?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15273657#comment-15273657 ] Anoop Sam John commented on PHOENIX-2880: - Oh sorry my bad.. This is phoenix.. Sorry.. >

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-2880) Switch to the new RegionObserver#preStoreScannerOpen() method which accepts read point parameter

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2880?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15273656#comment-15273656 ] Anoop Sam John commented on PHOENIX-2880: - Can we fix this issue in HBASE-15759 itself.. That is

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-2865) We should not use GuidePosts when we are running query in serial

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2865?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15263532#comment-15263532 ] Anoop Sam John commented on PHOENIX-2865: - That sounds reasonable. > We should not use

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-2774) MemStoreScanner and KeyValueStore should not be aware of KeyValueScanner

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2774?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15196827#comment-15196827 ] Anoop Sam John commented on PHOENIX-2774: - Any way it was NonLazyKeyValueScanner means no lazy

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-2742) Add new batchmutate APIs in HRegion without mvcc and region level locks

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2742?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15184722#comment-15184722 ] Anoop Sam John commented on PHOENIX-2742: - Index cells RK will be different.. Ya.. I did not

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-2742) Add new batchmutate APIs in HRegion without mvcc and region level locks

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2742?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15179721#comment-15179721 ] Anoop Sam John commented on PHOENIX-2742: - When it is cells to be written to same region

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-2742) Add new batchmutate APIs in HRegion without mvcc and region level locks

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2742?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15179314#comment-15179314 ] Anoop Sam John commented on PHOENIX-2742: - bq. cannot write mutations to same table in

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-2575) Prevent LocalIndexIT from hanging indefinitely

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2575?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15177360#comment-15177360 ] Anoop Sam John commented on PHOENIX-2575: - Instead of throwing Exception from these half store

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-2676) Cannot support join operations in scans with limit

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2676?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15148185#comment-15148185 ] Anoop Sam John commented on PHOENIX-2676: - Patch looks good. {code} if (hasBatchLimit)

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-2672) OutOfOrderScannerNextException in SELECT DISTINCT query over tenant connection

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2672?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15142280#comment-15142280 ] Anoop Sam John commented on PHOENIX-2672: - This exception from HBase comes when one scan request

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-2477) ClassCastException in IndexedWALEditCodec after HBASE-14501 (possible dataloss)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2477?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15035914#comment-15035914 ] Anoop Sam John commented on PHOENIX-2477: - Looks good. Ya in Phoenix also, we need to change KV

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-1734) Local index improvements

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1734?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14980308#comment-14980308 ] Anoop Sam John commented on PHOENIX-1734: - bq. But one part not able to remove is

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-2344) Implement partial stream aggregate

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2344?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14970532#comment-14970532 ] Anoop Sam John commented on PHOENIX-2344: - Nice one. > Implement partial stream aggregate >

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-2052) Division Bug In Group By SQL The result turn to NULL

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2052?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14627604#comment-14627604 ] Anoop Sam John commented on PHOENIX-2052: - bq.b/2 was wrong At the time of

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-1996) Use BytesStringer instead of ZeroCopyByteString

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1996?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14554535#comment-14554535 ] Anoop Sam John commented on PHOENIX-1996: - +1 Use BytesStringer instead of

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-1634) LocalIndexSplitter prevents region from auto split

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1634?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14304700#comment-14304700 ] Anoop Sam John commented on PHOENIX-1634: - Any idea what breaks the locality?

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-1593) Use protobuf for all client/server data interchange in next major release

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1593?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14281246#comment-14281246 ] Anoop Sam John commented on PHOENIX-1593: - +1 We can make this an umbrella

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-1560) Join between global index and data table if INDEX hint used

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1560?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14258883#comment-14258883 ] Anoop Sam John commented on PHOENIX-1560: - I see.. In HIndex it was seek +

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-1560) Join between global index and data table if INDEX hint used

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1560?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14258566#comment-14258566 ] Anoop Sam John commented on PHOENIX-1560: - bq.This is always possible, as we

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-1509) Investigate changing default encoding to PREFIX_encoding instead of FAST_DIFF

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1509?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14241458#comment-14241458 ] Anoop Sam John commented on PHOENIX-1509: - This issue says abt changing to

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-1035) Performance test local indexing against global indexing

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1035?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14238861#comment-14238861 ] Anoop Sam John commented on PHOENIX-1035: - Any chance to test when only one

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-1453) Collect row counts per region in stats table

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1453?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14232998#comment-14232998 ] Anoop Sam John commented on PHOENIX-1453: - Not read the code.. But, in

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-1455) Replace org.xerial.snappy with org.iq80.snappy pure Java snappy implementation

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1455?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14214781#comment-14214781 ] Anoop Sam John commented on PHOENIX-1455: - Yes the threshold value by default is

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-1455) Replace org.xerial.snappy with org.iq80.snappy pure Java snappy implementation

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1455?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14215608#comment-14215608 ] Anoop Sam John commented on PHOENIX-1455: - +1 for commit this. Test we can add

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-1431) DELETE using Subqueries

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1431?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14206170#comment-14206170 ] Anoop Sam John commented on PHOENIX-1431: - I got like the bug is it is ignoring

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-1431) DELETE using Subqueries

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1431?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14206173#comment-14206173 ] Anoop Sam John commented on PHOENIX-1431: - I got like the bug is it is ignoring

[jira] [Issue Comment Deleted] (PHOENIX-1431) DELETE using Subqueries

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1431?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Anoop Sam John updated PHOENIX-1431: Comment: was deleted (was: I got like the bug is it is ignoring the condition on select.

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-1410) Avoid contacting all the local index table regions if possible when query has condition on first leading primary key column

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1410?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14198334#comment-14198334 ] Anoop Sam John commented on PHOENIX-1410: - When query has condition on leading

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-910) Filter should override hasFilterRow() when filterRow() is overridden

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-910?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14182345#comment-14182345 ] Anoop Sam John commented on PHOENIX-910: I will commit James. Filter should

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-167) Support semi/anti-joins

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-167?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14159009#comment-14159009 ] Anoop Sam John commented on PHOENIX-167: Great work [~maryannxue]. Are we

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-1282) Remove usage of KeyValueUtil.ensureKeyValue

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1282?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14144423#comment-14144423 ] Anoop Sam John commented on PHOENIX-1282: - Thanks for filing Lars. HBASE-11871

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-1278) Performance degradation for salted tables with guideposts

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1278?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Anoop Sam John updated PHOENIX-1278: Description: When a table is salted, we're seeing a degradation in performance using our

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-1278) Performance degradation for salted tables with guideposts

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1278?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14144346#comment-14144346 ] Anoop Sam John commented on PHOENIX-1278: - Can I take this [~ram_krish]?

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-1278) Performance degradation for salted tables with guideposts

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1278?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14144363#comment-14144363 ] Anoop Sam John commented on PHOENIX-1278: - Np Ram. Pls take it. Performance

[jira] [Assigned] (PHOENIX-1280) ColumnProjectionFilter makes too many ImmutableBytesPtrs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1280?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Anoop Sam John reassigned PHOENIX-1280: --- Assignee: Anoop Sam John ColumnProjectionFilter makes too many ImmutableBytesPtrs

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-1280) ColumnProjectionFilter makes too many ImmutableBytesPtrs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1280?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14144366#comment-14144366 ] Anoop Sam John commented on PHOENIX-1280: - Else there can be single

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-1280) ColumnProjectionFilter makes too many ImmutableBytesPtrs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1280?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14144375#comment-14144375 ] Anoop Sam John commented on PHOENIX-1280: - bq.It cracks me up the

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-1280) ColumnProjectionFilter makes too many ImmutableBytesPtrs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1280?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14144377#comment-14144377 ] Anoop Sam John commented on PHOENIX-1280: - bq.What should we call it?

[jira] [Resolved] (PHOENIX-1245) Remove usage of empty KeyValue object BATCH_MARKER from Indexer

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1245?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Anoop Sam John resolved PHOENIX-1245. - Resolution: Fixed Pushed to master and 4.0 branches. Thanks James for the review.

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-1245) Remove usage of empty KeyValue object BATCH_MARKER from Indexer

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1245?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Anoop Sam John updated PHOENIX-1245: Attachment: PHOENIX-1245.patch On running the IT tests got one issue which was not

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-1245) Remove usage of empty KeyValue object BATCH_MARKER from Indexer

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1245?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Anoop Sam John updated PHOENIX-1245: Attachment: PHOENIX-1245.patch Patch for master. Removes some code. Seeing this we can

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-1245) Remove usage of empty KeyValue object BATCH_MARKER from Indexer

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1245?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Anoop Sam John updated PHOENIX-1245: Issue Type: Improvement (was: Bug) Remove usage of empty KeyValue object BATCH_MARKER

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-1245) Remove usage of empty KeyValue object BATCH_MARKER from Indexer

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1245?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Anoop Sam John updated PHOENIX-1245: Priority: Critical (was: Major) Remove usage of empty KeyValue object BATCH_MARKER from

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-1203) Uable to work for count (distinct col) queries via phoenix table with secondary indexes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1203?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14116853#comment-14116853 ] Anoop Sam John commented on PHOENIX-1203: - Got the issue. Patch coming in

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-1203) Uable to work for count (distinct col) queries via phoenix table with secondary indexes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1203?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Anoop Sam John updated PHOENIX-1203: Attachment: PHOENIX-1203.patch The function name for the DistinctCount function was still

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-1203) Uable to work for count (distinct col) queries via phoenix table with secondary indexes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1203?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Anoop Sam John updated PHOENIX-1203: Affects Version/s: (was: 4.1) (was: 4.0.0)

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-1203) Uable to work for count (distinct col) queries via phoenix table with secondary indexes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1203?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14111817#comment-14111817 ] Anoop Sam John commented on PHOENIX-1203: - Is it possible to put the test into a

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-1203) Uable to work for count (distinct col) queries via phoenix table with secondary indexes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1203?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14111831#comment-14111831 ] Anoop Sam John commented on PHOENIX-1203: - Sure NP... Uable to work for count

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-1203) Uable to work for count (distinct col) queries via phoenix table with secondary indexes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1203?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14108853#comment-14108853 ] Anoop Sam John commented on PHOENIX-1203: - {quote} 1. count (distinct col) query

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-1169) Support joins between two large tables

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1169?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14097044#comment-14097044 ] Anoop Sam John commented on PHOENIX-1169: - Will the client will be that much

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-1166) Avoid HTable creation in coprocessors to write into local index table

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1166?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14098175#comment-14098175 ] Anoop Sam John commented on PHOENIX-1166: - Agree with Jeffrey. The call on

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-1169) Support joins between two large tables

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1169?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Anoop Sam John updated PHOENIX-1169: Fix Version/s: (was: 4.0.0) (was: 3.0.0) Support joins

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-1169) Support joins between two large tables

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1169?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14096555#comment-14096555 ] Anoop Sam John commented on PHOENIX-1169: - Some thing which I am very earger to

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-1169) Support joins between two large tables

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1169?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14096557#comment-14096557 ] Anoop Sam John commented on PHOENIX-1169: - Put the appropriate minor version

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-1110) Fix flappy MultiCfQueryExecIT

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1110?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14073970#comment-14073970 ] Anoop Sam John commented on PHOENIX-1110: - bq.This was caused by a new test that

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-1107) Support mutable indexes over replication

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1107?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14073995#comment-14073995 ] Anoop Sam John commented on PHOENIX-1107: - bq.what APIs does the replay go

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-1102) Query Finds No Rows When Using Multiple Column Families in where clause

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1102?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Anoop Sam John updated PHOENIX-1102: Attachment: PHOENIX-1102_V3.patch Query Finds No Rows When Using Multiple Column

[jira] [Resolved] (PHOENIX-1102) Query Finds No Rows When Using Multiple Column Families in where clause

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1102?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Anoop Sam John resolved PHOENIX-1102. - Resolution: Fixed Pushed to all branches. Thanks for the review James. Query Finds

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-1102) Query Finds No Rows When Using Multiple Column Families in where clause

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1102?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Anoop Sam John updated PHOENIX-1102: Attachment: PHOENIX-1102_3.0.patch What I applied to 3.0 branch Query Finds No Rows

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-1102) Query Finds No Rows When Using Multiple Column Families in where clause

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1102?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Anoop Sam John updated PHOENIX-1102: Attachment: PHOENIX-1102_V2.patch Query Finds No Rows When Using Multiple Column

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-1102) Query Finds No Rows When Using Multiple Column Families in where clause

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1102?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Anoop Sam John updated PHOENIX-1102: Summary: Query Finds No Rows When Using Multiple Column Families in where clause (was:

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-1102) Query Finds No Rows When Using Multiple Column Families

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1102?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Anoop Sam John updated PHOENIX-1102: Fix Version/s: 4.1 3.1 5.0.0 Query Finds No Rows

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-1102) Query Finds No Rows When Using Multiple Column Families

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1102?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Anoop Sam John updated PHOENIX-1102: Priority: Critical (was: Major) Query Finds No Rows When Using Multiple Column

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-1102) Query Finds No Rows When Using Multiple Column Families

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1102?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Anoop Sam John updated PHOENIX-1102: Attachment: PHOENIX-1102.patch How about this patch? The javadoc of

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-1102) Query Finds No Rows When Using Multiple Column Families

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1102?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14067769#comment-14067769 ] Anoop Sam John commented on PHOENIX-1102: - With the above javadoc in methods, I

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-933) Local index support to Phoenix

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-933?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14064594#comment-14064594 ] Anoop Sam John commented on PHOENIX-933: Committing this now. Local index

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-933) Local index support to Phoenix

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-933?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14064596#comment-14064596 ] Anoop Sam John commented on PHOENIX-933: Addendum 2 committed to 4.0 and master.

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-1002) Add support for % operator

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1002?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14060899#comment-14060899 ] Anoop Sam John commented on PHOENIX-1002: - Thanks. Going to commit now.. Add

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-1002) Add support for % operator

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1002?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14060001#comment-14060001 ] Anoop Sam John commented on PHOENIX-1002: - This should go into all branches?

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-1002) Add support for % operator

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1002?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Anoop Sam John updated PHOENIX-1002: Assignee: Kyle Buzsaki Add support for % operator --

[jira] [Resolved] (PHOENIX-1079) ConnectionQueryServicesImpl : Close HTable after use

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1079?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Anoop Sam John resolved PHOENIX-1079. - Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: (was: 4.0.0) (was:

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-1000) Support FIRST_VALUE, LAST_VALUE, and NTH_VALUE aggregate functions

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1000?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Anoop Sam John updated PHOENIX-1000: Attachment: PHOENIX-1000-master-addendum_2.patch Master addendum needed a rebase again

[jira] [Resolved] (PHOENIX-1000) Support FIRST_VALUE, LAST_VALUE, and NTH_VALUE aggregate functions

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1000?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Anoop Sam John resolved PHOENIX-1000. - Resolution: Fixed Addendum pushed to all branches. Support FIRST_VALUE, LAST_VALUE,

[jira] [Reopened] (PHOENIX-1000) Support FIRST_VALUE, LAST_VALUE, and NTH_VALUE aggregate functions

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1000?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Anoop Sam John reopened PHOENIX-1000: - In point release we need client server version interchange compatibility. Like use 4.0

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-1000) Support FIRST_VALUE, LAST_VALUE, and NTH_VALUE aggregate functions

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1000?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Anoop Sam John updated PHOENIX-1000: Attachment: PHOENIX-1000-master-addendum_2.patch

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-1000) Support FIRST_VALUE, LAST_VALUE, and NTH_VALUE aggregate functions

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1000?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14049724#comment-14049724 ] Anoop Sam John commented on PHOENIX-1000: - Sorry for the delay James. Got very

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-1000) Support FIRST_VALUE, LAST_VALUE, and NTH_VALUE aggregate functions

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1000?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14049934#comment-14049934 ] Anoop Sam John commented on PHOENIX-1000: - I have committed this to 3.0 and 5.0

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-1000) Support FIRST_VALUE, LAST_VALUE, and NTH_VALUE aggregate functions

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1000?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Anoop Sam John updated PHOENIX-1000: Attachment: PHOENIX-1000-master-addendum.patch This addendum is applied to master so as

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-1000) Support FIRST_VALUE, LAST_VALUE, and NTH_VALUE aggregate functions

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1000?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14047090#comment-14047090 ] Anoop Sam John commented on PHOENIX-1000: - We want this to be committed in all 3

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-1007) Replace getNextKeyHint(KeyValue kv) with getNextCellHint(Cell kv) in Filters

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1007?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14041697#comment-14041697 ] Anoop Sam John commented on PHOENIX-1007: - bq.In your IDE just set the number of