Ghazi TRIKI wrote
> To Andreas, I have run some tests for converting PPTX to PNG. The result
> should be in your private inbox :). I would say 95% of the cases work fine
I'll have a look at the files tonight, but the usual unsupported case are
charts in PPTX. Although there is some implementation
I've also created a howto page:
http://poi.apache.org/components/slideshow/ppt-wmf-emf-renderer.html
--
Sent from: http://apache-poi.1045710.n5.nabble.com/POI-Dev-f2312866.html
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
I saw a lot of @removal(4.2) and hence I've asked.
I would now update those to @removal(5.0).
My problem with cleaning up our technical debt is,
that this often affects also the API and needs to be
done on the major version change. In the other hand
we like to have a stable API for a longer
Hi Dominik,
I was struggling with some code changes this week, so I couldn't start
earlier. I'll check, if I can fix #63818 / #63812 and then prepare a
release this evening or tomorrow.
Andi
--
Sent from: http://apache-poi.1045710.n5.nabble.com/POI-Dev-f2312866.html
svnpubsub is used for publishing the files.
See https://www.apache.org/dev/project-site.html
So we can call "ant site" and copy/commit the contents of the subdir
"build/site" to the designated svn location.
Regarding the dependencies:
the dependencies are fetched inside the ant build.
The Gradle
svnpubsub is used for publishing the files.
See https://www.apache.org/dev/project-site.html
So we can call "ant site" and copy/commit the contents of the subdir
"build/site" to the designated svn location.
Regarding the dependencies:
the dependencies are fetched inside the ant build.
The Gradle
Hi,
please have a look at the FAQ entry "24. Can Apache POI be compiled/used
with Java 9 or Java 10?", i.e. Java 10 is not officially anymore supported.
Can you upgrade to OpenJdk 12 or higher? If yes, is it working for you?
Andi
--
Sent from:
Hi,
Maybe that's interesting to you, there's a new kind of excel exploit based
on Power Query:
https://www.mimecast.com/blog/2019/06/exploit-using-microsoft-excel-power-query-for-remote-dde-execution-discovered/
Have fun,
Andi
--
Sent from:
Hi Alain,
I've fixed the mkdir statement, but now it's failing with some JaCoCo
environment error further down the road.
I guess the PullRequests job never really worked, but I will have another
look onto it ... preferably it would be better, if someone more
Git(Hub)-affine would have a look at
Hi Greg,
probably my private mail didn't make it through.
I've updated the openpgp library - we also have a Jenkins job [1] for it.
Please update the openpgp link to [2]
Sorry for not updating the link earlier.
Andi
[1] https://builds.apache.org/job/POI-Commons-OpenPGP/
[2]
Hi Thomas,
the ooxml-security-1.1.jar is not compatible with poi-*-4.0.1.jar and this
is my fault, as I haven't updated the ooxml-security release. The original
reason are changes #60226 and #62355.
I assumed everything for encryption and signing should be provided by
poi-ooxml-schemas.
Which
Based on my experience, that setting system properties in web applications
involves discussions with the web admins, I don't like system properties at
all.
Although [1] says the opposite, I guess (but haven't tried) that
context-param aren't automatically set as system properties.
Is [1] true
Author: kiwiwings
Date: Fri Nov 23 01:50:34 2018
New Revision: 1847208
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1847208=rev
Log:
updated the site with the changelog for XmlBeans 3.0.2
Modified:
xmlbeans/site/build/site/status.html
xmlbeans/site/src/documentation/content/xdocs/status.xml
Author: kiwiwings
Date: Wed Oct 31 21:16:20 2018
New Revision: 1845387
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1845387=rev
Log:
updated the site
Modified:
xmlbeans/site/build/site/download/index.html
xmlbeans/site/build/site/linkmap.html
xmlbeans/site/build/site/news.html
Modified
+1 for rolling it out soon
I think the grace period is over and we can go on rolling the fixes out.
Also my (H)EMF implementation is giving promising results and although EMF+
is not yet implemented, I think the slideshow users, would benefit from it
... but I don't want to spoil the bugfix
Author: kiwiwings
Date: Mon Oct 29 17:22:15 2018
New Revision: 1845148
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1845148=rev
Log:
html entity fixes in the docs
Modified:
xmlbeans/site/build/site/download/index.html
xmlbeans/site/build/site/index.html
xmlbeans/site/build/site/news.html
I've removed it.
--
Sent from: http://apache-poi.1045710.n5.nabble.com/POI-Dev-f2312866.html
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@poi.apache.org
Please keep in mind that the compiler target version doesn't check for API
restrictions. So to play safe, I would prefer compiling it with the latest
JDK 6.
How about setting up a Jenkins build?
Andi
--
Sent from: http://apache-poi.1045710.n5.nabble.com/POI-Dev-f2312866.html
I'm +0, as I'm off (on holiday) this week without my development equipment.
The changes were small enough, so there shouldn't be a lot of surprises.
Andi
--
Sent from: http://apache-poi.1045710.n5.nabble.com/POI-Dev-f2312866.html
Hi Dave,
thank you for spreading the word - I've already noticed that the latest
released was noticed in China [1] :)
If I understand you correctly, you want to present some kind of history list
and
I guess the talk won't have so much interaction with the audience, right?
In case it would be
Github user kiwiwings closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/poi/pull/109
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@poi.apache.org
Author: kiwiwings
Date: Mon Aug 27 19:05:31 2018
New Revision: 1839364
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1839364=rev
Log:
replace auto-generated anchor names with stable strings
Modified:
xmlbeans/site/build/site/status.html
xmlbeans/site/src/documentation/resources/stylesheets
Author: kiwiwings
Date: Mon Aug 27 18:50:47 2018
New Revision: 1839363
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1839363=rev
Log:
Update website to 3.0.1
Modified:
xmlbeans/site/build/site/status.html
xmlbeans/site/src/documentation/content/xdocs/status.xml
Modified: xmlbeans/site/build
Author: kiwiwings
Date: Fri Aug 24 22:13:14 2018
New Revision: 1838977
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1838977=rev
Log:
Update website to 3.0.1
Modified:
xmlbeans/site/build.xml
xmlbeans/site/build/site/download/index.html
xmlbeans/site/build/site/index.html
xmlbeans/site
Author: kiwiwings
Date: Sun Aug 19 22:01:19 2018
New Revision: 1838403
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1838403=rev
Log:
Javadoc fixes
Modified:
xmlbeans/trunk/src/xmlpublic/org/apache/xmlbeans/BindingConfig.java
xmlbeans/trunk/src/xmlpublic/org/apache/xmlbeans/CDataBookmark.java
Author: kiwiwings
Date: Sun Aug 19 21:50:21 2018
New Revision: 1838402
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1838402=rev
Log:
add forbidden-apis-check
Modified:
xmlbeans/trunk/build.xml
Modified: xmlbeans/trunk/build.xml
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/xmlbeans/trunk/build.xml?rev
Author: kiwiwings
Date: Sun Aug 19 20:44:47 2018
New Revision: 1838399
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1838399=rev
Log:
add license headers
Modified:
xmlbeans/trunk/src/tools/org/apache/xmlbeans/impl/xpathgen/XPathGenerationException.java
xmlbeans/trunk/src/tools/org/apache
Author: kiwiwings
Date: Sun Aug 19 20:44:06 2018
New Revision: 1838398
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1838398=rev
Log:
don't include ant runtime in javac calls
Modified:
xmlbeans/trunk/build.xml
Modified: xmlbeans/trunk/build.xml
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/xmlbeans/trunk
Author: kiwiwings
Date: Sun Aug 19 19:57:16 2018
New Revision: 1838395
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1838395=rev
Log:
add rat-check
Modified:
xmlbeans/trunk/build.xml
Modified: xmlbeans/trunk/build.xml
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/xmlbeans/trunk/build.xml?rev=1838395=1838394
Hi,
I've checked with kwright about #62564 / TIKA-2693 and he signaled green
light for the release.
I'll prepare a RC tomorrow evening - including the fixed commons-compress
links ;)
Andi
--
Sent from: http://apache-poi.1045710.n5.nabble.com/POI-Dev-f2312866.html
Javen O'Neal-2 wrote
> How many lines of code can we delete by removing this class?
Quite a few ... The issue came to my mind, as I've had a look into #61677
and didn't want to (try to) fix it in two areas. I've started to remove the
OPOIFS* classes yesterday, but this is not so trivial as I
Author: kiwiwings
Date: Wed Jul 25 17:46:15 2018
New Revision: 1836650
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1836650=rev
Log:
Release XMLBeans 3.0.0
Added:
xmlbeans/tags/3.0.0/
- copied from r1834712, xmlbeans/trunk
Author: kiwiwings
Date: Sun Jul 8 11:22:05 2018
New Revision: 1835347
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1835347=rev
Log:
update verify section, change reference to KEYS file, so it's not referenced
anymore on SVN
Modified:
xmlbeans/site/build/site/download/index.html
xmlbeans/site
Author: kiwiwings
Date: Sun Jul 8 10:12:46 2018
New Revision: 1835346
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1835346=rev
Log:
converted Changes.txt to status page
removed TOC
Added:
xmlbeans/site/build/site/images/fix.png (with props)
xmlbeans/site/build/site/images/remove.png
Added: xmlbeans/site/src/documentation/resources/stylesheets/status2document.xsl
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/xmlbeans/site/src/documentation/resources/stylesheets/status2document.xsl?rev=1835346=auto
==
---
Added: xmlbeans/site/build/site/status.html
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/xmlbeans/site/build/site/status.html?rev=1835346=auto
==
--- xmlbeans/site/build/site/status.html (added)
+++
Author: kiwiwings
Date: Sat Jul 7 18:58:29 2018
New Revision: 1835330
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1835330=rev
Log:
add POI developer keys
Modified:
xmlbeans/trunk/KEYS
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr
Modified: xmlbeans/trunk/KEYS
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/xmlbeans/trunk/KEYS?rev=1835330=1835329=1835330=diff
==
--- xmlbeans/trunk/KEYS (original)
+++ xmlbeans/trunk/KEYS Sat Jul 7 18:58:29 2018
@@ -191,4
Modified: xmlbeans/site/src/documentation/content/xdocs/index.xml
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/xmlbeans/site/src/documentation/content/xdocs/index.xml?rev=1835325=1835324=1835325=diff
==
---
Modified: xmlbeans/site/build/site/news.html
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/xmlbeans/site/build/site/news.html?rev=1835325=1835324=1835325=diff
==
--- xmlbeans/site/build/site/news.html (original)
+++
Modified: xmlbeans/site/build/site/samples/SampleTemplate.html
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/xmlbeans/site/build/site/samples/SampleTemplate.html?rev=1835325=1835324=1835325=diff
==
---
Modified: xmlbeans/site/src/documentation/content/xdocs/site.xml
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/xmlbeans/site/src/documentation/content/xdocs/site.xml?rev=1835325=1835324=1835325=diff
==
---
Author: kiwiwings
Date: Sat Jul 7 18:22:12 2018
New Revision: 1835325
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1835325=rev
Log:
upgrade to Apache Forrest 0.9 / fix download page and others
Added:
xmlbeans/site/build/site/download/
- copied from r1835324, xmlbeans/site/build/site
Modified: xmlbeans/site/build/site/download/index.html
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/xmlbeans/site/build/site/download/index.html?rev=1835325=1835324=1835325=diff
==
--- xmlbeans/site/build/site/download/index.html
Modified: xmlbeans/site/src/documentation/content/xdocs/community/index.xml
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/xmlbeans/site/src/documentation/content/xdocs/community/index.xml?rev=1835325=1835324=1835325=diff
==
---
ot;svg62"
+ sodipodi:docname="pb-xmlbeans.svg"
+ inkscape:version="0.92.3 (2405546, 2018-03-11)"
+
inkscape:export-filename="/home/kiwiwings/project/xmlbeans/site/src/documentation/resources/images/pb-xmlbeans.svg.png"
+ inkscape:export-xdpi=&quo
Author: kiwiwings
Date: Tue Jul 3 23:02:10 2018
New Revision: 1835033
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1835033=rev
Log:
Fix copyright year and update feathers logo
Added:
xmlbeans/site/build/site/images/asf_logo.png (with props)
xmlbeans/site/build/site/images/pb-xmlbeans.png
Author: kiwiwings
Date: Tue Jul 3 21:21:11 2018
New Revision: 1835024
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1835024=rev
Log:
Fix 3.0.0 links
Removed:
xmlbeans/site/build/docs/
Modified:
xmlbeans/site/ (props changed)
xmlbeans/site/build/site/community/index.html
xmlbeans/site
Author: kiwiwings
Date: Mon Jul 2 22:34:55 2018
New Revision: 1834912
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1834912=rev
Log:
Add 3.0.0 javadocs / fix utf-8 files
[This commit notification would consist of 177 parts,
which exceeds the limit of 50 ones, so it was shortened to the summary
Author: kiwiwings
Date: Mon Jul 2 22:00:20 2018
New Revision: 1834909
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1834909=rev
Log:
Remove Attic stamp
Modified:
xmlbeans/site/build/site/skin/basic.css
Modified: xmlbeans/site/build/site/skin/basic.css
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/xmlbeans
Author: kiwiwings
Date: Mon Jul 2 21:56:34 2018
New Revision: 1834906
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1834906=rev
Log:
Announce XMLBeans 3.0.0
Modified:
xmlbeans/site/build/site/index.html
xmlbeans/site/forrest.properties
xmlbeans/site/src/documentation/content/xdocs/index.xml
GitHub user kiwiwings opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/poi/pull/109
XDDF merge test with #62092
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/cuali/poi xddf-text
Alternatively you can review and apply
FYI - a while back we had already a discussion about format specific
packaging:
http://apache-poi.1045710.n5.nabble.com/Switch-to-maven-td5722213.html
Andi
--
Sent from: http://apache-poi.1045710.n5.nabble.com/POI-Dev-f2312866.html
Javen O'Neal-2 wrote
> How many releases into the 4.x series will we allow for API breaks? If we
> need to make all of our API changes by the time 4.0 final releases, then
> we
> might have a few more 4.0 betas than other releases (and probably wouldn't
> be ready for 4.0 final until Q2 2018).
I
Hi Alain,
I have this issue on my todo-/watchlist, but I currently haven't got much
time for POI.
So if no-one else jumps in, you can ping me.
We haven't yet started with the preparations for 3.17 final/4.0 - so I
think, we'll get that one in before.
Best wishes,
Andi
--
View this message in
It has been a while that we've discussed this topic ... or at least I
couldn't find another more recent/decent thread ... [1]
How about switching to Java 7 now?
If we'd do, will we change to version 4 then?
Andi
[1] http://apache-poi.1045710.n5.nabble.com/Java-6-support-td5721373.html
--
The errors don't look like blockers to me, so I try to fix the Extractor
errors
tonight - if they are no-brainers - and build the release candidate
afterwards.
If they involve more substantial rework, I guess it's ok to release (the
candidate) without the fix.
Andi
--
View this message in
jeevan86 wrote
> By the way, any probable date decided on 3.16 FINAL release ?
We will usually have 2 betas before a final and try to release often, which
is currently every 2-3 month. I would expect the final to be announced by
end of April.
--
View this message in context:
Hi,
we have this policies here too [in my $dayjob], about not using those evil
beta releases.
In my point of view there's not so much difference between a beta and a
final release.
Before releasing we crunch through a big corpus of office files and do some
validations/verifications with our own
Hi,
I've just noticed, that that Javens 3.16-beta2 vote mail was somehow buried
in an old thread -
and this happened to me too once in a while ...
Please be aware, that using an old response as a template for a new thread
leads to a continuation
of the old thread (because of some header fields)
Hi,
how about storing those external jars in our svn?
findbugs and the extracted ooxml schemas xsds (zip) are good candidates.
Maybe the JDK6 with full security instead of the latest could work too.
This would also have the benefit, that a few more - currently ignored -
testcases would be
Thank you Javen for rolling this release - it seemed to be quite smooth :)
Andi
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-poi.1045710.n5.nabble.com/VOTE-Apache-POI-3-16-beta1-release-RC1-tp5725616p5725696.html
Sent from the POI - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
I'm not sure if this is something we should start, but looking at SonarCube,
we could at least fix those new critical and major issues since last
release:
David North wrote
> * I could do with input from those who use HSLF about whether to hold up
> another RC for the issue below.
I've already patched the HSLF issue yesterday, based on the placeholder
being a metroblob shape,
but I wanted to think about it, if this is really a good idea or if a
In the meantime, there was some discussion on the legal list [1]
There was no definitely DO nor DON'T, but it looks like a Moxy fork would be
the way to go.
It would be nice if you read through that thread and post your two pence
here or there ...
If there's a lazy consensus, I'll continue my
Hi Armin,
just some random thoughts on this:
- the zip format is not deterministic, so don't compare zip streams
(google for "zip stream deterministic", e.g. [1])
- xml is not deterministic, you would need to use a canonical form - look at
the xml signature mechanism
- we try to preserve the
I've opened a ticket for it:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-264
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-poi.1045710.n5.nabble.com/xmlbeans-successor-tp5722870p5724030.html
Sent from the POI - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi,
rendering tables in XSLF is not yet supported (see [1]) ... that's one of
the issues I'm still carrying around with me
As you've already mentioned, tables in HSLF are actual just a group of boxes
and lines,
therefore the groupshape rendering takes place there ...
Andi
[1]
Hi,
I've just checked the SonarQube Jenkins instance [1] and don't find our POI
job anymore.
Does anyone know about its whereabouts?
(i.e. yesterday it was still there ... and I guess no-one of us has the
rights to modify
this SonarQube instance, right?)
Andi
[1]
Hi All,
Is it ok, to create RC2 from the trunk?
If not, I'll apply Tims changes to the 3.15-beta1 tag.
Andi
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-poi.1045710.n5.nabble.com/VOTE-Apache-POI-3-15-beta1-release-RC1-tp5722647p5722677.html
Sent from the POI - Dev mailing list archive at
Allison, Timothy B. wrote
> ZipPackage is fixed in r 1738251.
>
> I'm going to try to run regular regression tests with rc1 as it is now.
>
>
>
> B CB
> [ X ܚX KK[XZ[ ] ][ X ܚX P K \X K ܙ B ܈Y][ۘ[
Nick Burch-8 wrote
> Maybe annotate the release guide this time with anything that's tedious /
> needs lots of
> manual work / etc, and for beta 2 hopefully someone can go through and
> improve those bits? :)
I've already changed the naming of the maven artifacts (now without the
timestamp),
Nick Burch-8 wrote
> What do people think about doing a beta release in a few weeks time ...?
Last time it took ages between the thread start and the actual release.
As the general consensus is anyway having short release cycles,
I'll simply start the releasing trip on the next weekend (Friday
Hi,
FYI ... I'm just wondering why Jenkins didn't notice my commits of last
night, e.g. [1]
Although the working copy has been updated, the changes aren't mentioned in
"recent changes" nor was the svn update check triggered.
So if you commit, have an eye on it.
Andi.
[1]
Something similar happened in #1168 on windows2, where ant is not available.
Depending on their response, I'll follow up with that.
I have pinned both builds now in Jenkins, otherwise referring to failed
builds won't work for to long ...
Btw. the Jenkins slave labels are case-sensitive, therefore
Javen O'Neal wrote
> This was an insignificant change to POI, so I would omit it from the
> release notes.
Is there something which I should highlight instead?
I haven't reviewed those many changes and only use the assigned component in
bugzilla
to find out where a patch was finally applied to
Hi Kai,
I'm working on it ... or at least fiddling around with JAXB in the
unimportant parts of POI
like the xml signature classes.
My plan is to evaluate how JAXB binder vs. xmlbeans works out.
If it's ok for the signature stuff - which is very picky when it comes to
namespaces and
My first release was also without being in the web of trust.
I don't mind if you release without.
Andi.
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-poi.1045710.n5.nabble.com/3-14-beta-2-3-14-final-tp5721829p5721890.html
Sent from the POI - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi Nick,
Final or beta works both for me.
I'm currently digging in the JAXB support for the document signing and this
will have an impact on the security schemas, size-wise for the security
stuff it will be something like 1.9mb (old version) vs. 100kb (new version)
So either we decide to have
Hi,
if no-one objects, I'll apply the new "powered by" logo [1] to the website
tonight,
as we are kinda invited to use the new template [2].
As I have already received a few informal "it's ok ..." responses from the
PMCs,
I resign of doing a full vote.
Andi
[1]
For my quick use cases, I usually read the Excel with POI and generate
a XML file to be processed by Apache FOP.
Andi
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-poi.1045710.n5.nabble.com/Excel-to-PDF-tp5721695p5721696.html
Sent from the POI - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Maybe its possible to split the compilation in smaller parts and reference
the already compiled schema,
i.e. something like in [1]
I guess this would lead to a faster compilation with a smaller memory
footprint.
... and of course this would fit with my plan to have separate
modules/schema jars :)
I think it's ok to add common collections, as this is probably used in a lot
of applications
and I prefer linking to jars to copy
Maybe you want to read [1] to make sure we don't add a serialization issue,
when user don't use a current version of commons collection.
I have to admit, that I haven't
Hi,
I've missed to remove some test code on last wmf check-in, which creates the
/remaining.dat.
feel free to remove it, I'll care about it tonight.
Andi
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-poi.1045710.n5.nabble.com/Left-over-from-wmf-tests-tp5721415.html
Sent from the POI - Dev
I'm ambivalent on this issue, as see our web sphere environment (at my
$DAYJOB at a big insurance company) languish around on IBM JDK 1.5 / 1.6 ...
and I guess that's a common problem.
On the other hand the projects usually still stick with POI 3.9, so it
doesn't matter.
It looks like Tika
Hi Tim,
please give us an update based on the latest fix.
If there are further exceptions, just send me the files/file-links and I'll
add a few more cookie-cutter *) test cases and try to fix them
Andi
*) "Schema F" you would say in German ...
--
View this message in context:
Dominik Stadler wrote
> I did some comparison to previous packages, the following directories
> were part of the poi-ooxml-schemas-jar, but are missing now. This is
> on purpose, right?
Yes, this was on purpose - see #58617 for details and justification
Andi
--
View this message in context:
Hi David,
> And the suggested actions are:
> * Do not merge ooxml-schemas and ooxml-security, but do add Maven
> profiles allowing a switch between lite/full
I'd like to give another reason for the first point.
The ooxml-schemas are based on the ECMA 376 1st Edition and are stable for a
I usually just run "ant clean test" and sometimes "ant forbbiden-apis-check".
When I've added new files, I usually execute "ant rat".
Of course, I also blush when my changes lead to failing builds, but
generally speaking, having a failing build is not a big issue for me -
either you can fix it
Hi,
the build times on jenkins increased dramatically from about 20 min. to now
1h 50min.
I haven't payed attention to as when the build times increased so much, but
I somehow
wonder if my Locale changes have something to do with it ...
Another reason could be, that after a successful build, we
Hi,
our gump build is still failing [1] and I've tried to work around the
missing woodstox
reference in TestPPTX2PNG and PresetGeometries.
I don't understand why the fallback value is pointing to WstxInputFactory -
this should be the internal jdk class. the gump build is running under jdk8,
Nick Burch-2 wrote
It certainly used to be the case that some users didn't want the X##F
family of documents, and didn't want larger extra dependencies that they
needed, so they liked us keeping the split. With the special way that
Android does things like javax.xml, I believe that this
Hi,
Dominik Stadler wrote
Andi will likely hate me for this, ...
Surely not hate ... it's more like fear (like in school: which failures
have a made this time in the test?)
I thought I do as Nick said - release from a fresh svn copy - and this
worked without problems, so the ant build from svn
Hi,
Sorry, I wasn't aware that my test output files will be included in the src
package.
Thank you for pointing this out, Dominik.
I'll provide another RC tonight - basically repacking/checking the bin/src
packages for this issue
and moving them to the rc2 dir.
And droping a note into the
Hi Nick,
Nick Burch-2 wrote
However, the great work on a common HSLF/XLSF stuff isn't
yet in trunk, so probably we don't want to do 3.12 final until that is
Actually, there are a lots of changes in HSLF and I would prefer to have a
stable version
with all the current fixes out, before I
Have you tried applying the pastebin to your local XSSFTestDataSamples class
and run the TestStylesTable test?
The original source reference is not used again in these tests and I've got
unrelated errors, which seem not to be connected to closed resources.
Last time when I've tried the ubuntu
It should be probably ping -c 4 www.google.com ... otherwise it's endless
on Linux.
Of course in Windows it's called ping -n 4 ...
--
View this message in context:
I hopefully have time tonight for a closer look. But google says, that it
might has to do with JDK itself [1] -
at least the line numbers are very close to the stack trace.
It's probably another issue for the to-be-written known issues list ...
[1]
Banerjee, Tapas wrote
1) From poi developer forum positing I see multiple bugs are reported in
POI 11- Beta 2, most of them fixed at POI 11- Beta 3. Also there is
upcoming POI 11 - Final release.
Which poi (e.g. 3.11 Final) jar version you recommend us to test and use?
I'd say: test with
Patrick Bakker wrote
The problem with that is the the poi-ooxml... jar is not strictly a
subset. It adds in a
bunch of com.microsoft.schemas.office.x2006... packages that don't exist
in
the full ooxml-schemas.1.1.jar. Would it it be possible to split this out
as its own jar OR include these
1 - 100 of 105 matches
Mail list logo
