---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/4992/
---
(Updated 2012-05-07 14:34:06.921280)
Review request for qpid, Andrew Stitcher
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/4992/#review7639
---
Picky little comment follows!
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/4992/
---
(Updated 2012-05-07 17:00:08.238194)
Review request for qpid, Andrew Stitcher
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/4992/#review7647
---
Ship it!
- Andrew
On 2012-05-07 17:00:08, Alan Conway wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/4992/
---
Review request for qpid, Andrew Stitcher and Steve Huston.
Summary
---
On 2012-05-03 16:17:15, Andrew Stitcher wrote:
I'm concerned that using a simple IP address approach to avoiding
connecting to yourself also stops you testing (or deploying) using multiple
brokers on the same host.
Good point, I'll use host:port - no changed needed in isLocalHost
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/4992/
---
(Updated 2012-05-03 18:07:53.067617)
Review request for qpid, Andrew Stitcher
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/4992/#review7510
---
/trunk/qpid/cpp/src/qpid/sys/posix/SystemInfo.cpp
