On 28 September 2016 at 21:36, Alan Conway wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-09-28 at 13:26 -0700, Justin Ross wrote:
>> IMO, the overall picture is simpler, and easier to explain to third
>> parties, if we go the way Ken suggested. When a remote peer sends
>> you an
>> idle timeout
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-7433?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15530962#comment-15530962
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on QPID-7433:
---
Commit 1762717 from
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-7433?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15530942#comment-15530942
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on QPID-7433:
---
Commit 1762716 from
The spec unfortunately says what it says, and even if there were scope
to update it, I'm not sure there is a way to change it to address the
main issue (which regardless of any other clarity issues, is I think
just that it only says you SHOULD advertise half your 'actual
timeout') that wouldn't
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPIDJMS-207?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15530932#comment-15530932
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on QPIDJMS-207:
-
Commit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-1308?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Alan Conway resolved PROTON-1308.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 0.15.0
There is some ongoing debate about ambiguity in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-1308?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15530815#comment-15530815
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on PROTON-1308:
-
Commit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-1308?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15530816#comment-15530816
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on PROTON-1308:
-
Commit
In case it was unclear I'm fine with it doing what it does here given
the spec wording, pessimistic was just a word choice (though I'd say
it fits the situation as well as conservative). I was mainly just
noting that as every time this comes up (this is at least the third
time I'd say I've had
On Wed, 2016-09-28 at 13:26 -0700, Justin Ross wrote:
> IMO, the overall picture is simpler, and easier to explain to third
> parties, if we go the way Ken suggested. When a remote peer sends
> you an
> idle timeout value, it is an expression of an (actual, not simply
> "advertised") guarantee -
IMO, the overall picture is simpler, and easier to explain to third
parties, if we go the way Ken suggested. When a remote peer sends you an
idle timeout value, it is an expression of an (actual, not simply
"advertised") guarantee - "I will expire the connection after X time
without receiving a
Seems there's some dispute over the meaning of idle-time-out in the
AMQP spec, not just how proton treats it. Let me try to convince you.
Forget proton for a moment, here's the spec text with my comments.
Remember: the spec defines the AMQP *protocol*, the important text is
where it talks
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DISPATCH-160?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ted Ross resolved DISPATCH-160.
---
Resolution: Fixed
> Dispatch router does not propagate custom message annotations
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DISPATCH-160?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15530695#comment-15530695
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on DISPATCH-160:
-
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DISPATCH-160?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15530693#comment-15530693
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on DISPATCH-160:
--
Commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/qpid-dispatch/pull/101
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-6868?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15530678#comment-15530678
]
Gordon Sim commented on QPID-6868:
--
Fix proposed for QPID-7415 has now been committed to master and will
On Wed, 2016-09-28 at 10:13 -0400, Ken Giusti wrote:
> I've had a hand in the way Proton/C interprets the meaning of 'idle-
> timeout' and I've never liked the solution. I think Proton/C's
> behavior is not 'pessimistic' as much as it is 'conservative' for the
> sake of interoperability. This,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-7415?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gordon Sim resolved QPID-7415.
--
Resolution: Fixed
> [AMQP 1.0]: reject, release & modified ignored by qpid::messaging
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-6868?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gordon Sim closed QPID-6868.
Resolution: Duplicate
> [AMQP 1.0 C++ Client] No errors for rejected messages.
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-7415?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15530669#comment-15530669
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on QPID-7415:
---
Commit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DISPATCH-357?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ted Ross updated DISPATCH-357:
--
Fix Version/s: (was: 0.7.0)
0.8.0
> Address field is empty for link routed
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPIDJMS-211?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robbie Gemmell resolved QPIDJMS-211.
Resolution: Fixed
> make the JNDI connection factory property handling more flexible
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPIDJMS-211?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robbie Gemmell updated QPIDJMS-211:
---
Description: Currently the connection factory property handling in the JNDI
bits use
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPIDJMS-211?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15530224#comment-15530224
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on QPIDJMS-211:
-
Commit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPIDJMS-211?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robbie Gemmell updated QPIDJMS-211:
---
Description: Currently the connection factory property handling in the JNDI
bits uses
Robbie Gemmell created QPIDJMS-211:
--
Summary: make the JNDI connection factory property handling more
flexible
Key: QPIDJMS-211
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPIDJMS-211
Project: Qpid
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-7438?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15530012#comment-15530012
]
Lorenz Quack commented on QPID-7438:
The first commit adds the {{changesConfiguredObjectState}}
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-7438?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15529968#comment-15529968
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on QPID-7438:
---
Commit 1762682 from
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-7438?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15529967#comment-15529967
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on QPID-7438:
---
Commit 1762681 from
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-7379?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15529815#comment-15529815
]
Lorenz Quack commented on QPID-7379:
Looks good! I like the change of passing the serialiser into the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-7431?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15529429#comment-15529429
]
Robbie Gemmell edited comment on QPID-7431 at 9/28/16 12:17 PM:
[~gsim]
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-7431?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15529429#comment-15529429
]
Robbie Gemmell commented on QPID-7431:
--
@gsim thanks for clarifying, sorry for the premature close
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-7431?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gordon Sim reopened QPID-7431:
--
Assignee: Gordon Sim
> Support for message-annotations
> ---
>
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-7431?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15529411#comment-15529411
]
Gordon Sim edited comment on QPID-7431 at 9/28/16 12:14 PM:
Messages with
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-7431?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15529411#comment-15529411
]
Gordon Sim commented on QPID-7431:
--
Messages with annotations can be received through qpid::messaging (and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-7379?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15529203#comment-15529203
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on QPID-7379:
---
Commit 1762630 from
I agree that specifying that the communicated figure should be "half"
the "actual" timeout was a mistake.
What the spec should have tried to communicate is that the sender
should communicate a value somewhat less than the period it uses to
determine that the connection has actually timed-out to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-7366?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15529154#comment-15529154
]
Rob Godfrey commented on QPID-7366:
---
It seems a little strange to me to do checks on the headers in
On 27 September 2016 at 22:24, Alan Conway wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-09-27 at 15:37 -0400, Alan Conway wrote:
>> I want to clarify and document the meaning of these terms for our
>> APIs,
>> presently I can't find anywhere where they are documented clearly.
>>
>> The AMQP spec
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-7379?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15528975#comment-15528975
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on QPID-7379:
---
Commit 1762621 from
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-6803?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Keith Wall updated QPID-6803:
-
Fix Version/s: qpid-java-6.1
> ByteBuffer slices/duplicates contribute significantly to garbage overhead
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-6803?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Keith Wall reassigned QPID-6803:
Assignee: Keith Wall
> ByteBuffer slices/duplicates contribute significantly to garbage overhead in
43 matches
Mail list logo